Turing test-inspired method for analysis of biases prevalent in artificial intelligence-based medical imaging

Evaluating Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis for Primary Gross Tumor Delineation

PURPOSE

To investigate the potential of virtual contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (VCE-MRI) for gross-tumor-volume (GTV) delineation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using multi-institutional data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study retrospectively retrieved T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), and planning computed tomography (CT) of 348 biopsy-proven NPC patients from 3 oncology centers. A multimodality-guided synergistic neural network (MMgSN-Net) was trained using 288 patients to leverage complementary features in T1w and T2w MRI for VCE-MRI synthesis, which was independently evaluated using 60 patients. Three board-certified radiation oncologists and 2 medical physicists participated in clinical evaluations in 3 aspects: image quality assessment of the synthetic VCE-MRI, VCE-MRI in assisting target volume delineation, and effectiveness of VCE-MRI-based contours in treatment planning. The image quality assessment includes distinguishability between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI, clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface, and veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas. Primary tumor delineation and treatment planning were manually performed by radiation oncologists and medical physicists, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean accuracy to distinguish VCE-MRI from CE-MRI was 31.67%; no significant difference was observed in the clarity of tumor-to-normal tissue interface between VCE-MRI and CE-MRI; for the veracity of contrast enhancement in tumor invasion risk areas, an accuracy of 85.8% was obtained. The image quality assessment results suggest that the image quality of VCE-MRI is highly similar to real CE-MRI. The mean dosimetric difference of planning target volumes was less than 1 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The VCE-MRI is highly promising to replace the use of gadolinium-based CE-MRI in tumor delineation of NPC patients.

Automated Organ Segmentation for Radiation Therapy: A Comparative Analysis of AI-Based Tools Versus Manual Contouring in Korean Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Accurate delineation of tumors and organs at risk (OARs) is crucial for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of OncoStudio, an AI-based auto-segmentation tool developed for Korean patients, compared with Protégé AI, a globally developed tool that uses data from Korean cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1200 Korean cancer patients treated with radiotherapy was conducted. Auto-contours generated via OncoStudio and Protégé AI were compared with manual contours across the head and neck and thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic organs. Accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). Feedback was obtained from 10 participants, including radiation oncologists, residents, and radiation therapists, via an online survey with a Turing test component.

RESULTS

OncoStudio outperformed Protégé AI in 85% of the evaluated OARs (p < 0.001). For head and neck organs, OncoStudio achieved a similar DSC (0.70 vs. 0.70, p = 0.637) but significantly lower MSD and 95% HD values (p < 0.001). In thoracic organs, OncoStudio performed excellently in 90% of cases, with a significantly greater DSC (male: 0.87 vs. 0.82, p < 0.001; female: 0.95 vs. 0.87, p < 0.001). OncoStudio also demonstrated superior accuracy in abdominal (DSC 0.88 vs. 0.81, p < 0.001) and pelvic organs (male: DSC 0.95 vs. 0.85, p < 0.001; female: DSC 0.82 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001). Clinicians favored OncoStudio in 70% of cases, with 90% endorsing its clinical suitability for Korean patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OncoStudio, which is tailored for Korean patients, demonstrated superior segmentation accuracy across multiple anatomical regions, suggesting its suitability for radiotherapy planning in this population.

From Machine Learning to Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of AI in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and difficult-to-detect cancer with a poor prognosis. Late diagnosis is common due to a lack of early symptoms, specific markers, and the challenging location of the pancreas. Imaging technologies have improved diagnosis, but there is still room for improvement in standardizing guidelines. Biopsies and histopathological analysis are challenging due to tumor heterogeneity. Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolutionizes healthcare by improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. AI algorithms can analyze medical images with precision, aiding in early disease detection. AI also plays a role in personalized medicine by analyzing patient data to tailor treatment plans. It streamlines administrative tasks, such as medical coding and documentation, and provides patient assistance through AI chatbots. However, challenges include data privacy, security, and ethical considerations. This review article focuses on the potential of AI in transforming pancreatic cancer care, offering improved diagnostics, personalized treatments, and operational efficiency, leading to better patient outcomes.