Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue

3D bioprinting: Advancing the future of food production layer by layer

3D bioprinting is an advanced manufacturing technique that involves the precise layer-by-layer deposition of biomaterials, such as cells, growth factors, and biomimetic scaffolds, to create three-dimensional living structures. It essentially combines the complexity of biology with the principles of 3D printing, making it possible to fabricate complex biological structures with extreme control and accuracy. This review discusses how 3D bioprinting is developing as an essential step in the creation of alternative food such as cultured meat and seafood. In light of the growing global issues associated with food sustainability and the ethical challenges raised by conventional animal agriculture, 3D bioprinting is emerging as a key technology that will transform food production in the years to come. This paper also addresses in detail each of the components that make up bioprinting systems, such as the bioinks and scaffolds used, the various types of bioprinter models, and the software systems that control the production process. It offers a thorough examination of the processes involved in printing diverse food items using bioprinting. Beyond the scope of this conversation, 3D bioprinting, which provides superior precision and scalability in tissue engineering, is a crucial node in the broader system of cultured meat and seafood production. But like any emerging technology, 3D bioprinting has its limitations. In light of this, this study emphasizes the necessity of ongoing research and development to advance bioprinting towards widespread use and, ultimately, promote a more resilient, ethical, and sustainable food supply system.

From lab to life: advances inin-situbioprinting and bioink technology

Bioprinting has the potential to revolutionize tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, offering innovative solutions for complex medical challenges and addressing unmet clinical needs. However, traditionalin vitrobioprinting techniques face significant limitations, including difficulties in fabricating and implanting scaffolds with irregular shapes, as well as limited accessibility for rapid clinical application. To overcome these challenges,in-situbioprinting has emerged as a groundbreaking approach that enables the direct deposition of cells, biomaterials, and bioactive factors onto damaged organs or tissues, eliminating the need for pre-fabricated 3D constructs. This method promises a personalized, patient-specific approach to treatment, aligning well with the principles of precision medicine. The success ofin-situbioprinting largely depends on the advancement of bioinks, which are essential for maintaining cell viability and supporting tissue development. Recent innovations in hand-held bioprinting devices and robotic arms have further enhanced the flexibility ofin-situbioprinting, making it applicable to various tissue types, such as skin, hair, muscle, bone, cartilage, and composite tissues. This review examinesin-situbioprinting techniques, the development of smart, multifunctional bioinks, and their essential properties for promoting cell viability and tissue growth. It highlights the versatility and recent advancements inin-situbioprinting methods and their applications in regenerating a wide range of tissues and organs. Furthermore, it addresses the key challenges that must be overcome for broader clinical adoption and propose strategies to advance these technologies toward mainstream medical practice.

Evaluating cells metabolic activity of bioinks for bioprinting: the role of cell-laden hydrogels and 3D printing on cell survival

Introduction

Tissue engineering has advanced significantly in recent years, owing primarily to additive manufacturing technology and the combination of biomaterials and cells known as 3D cell printing or Bioprinting. Nonetheless, various obstacles remain developing adequate 3D printed structures for biomedical applications, including bioinks optimization to meet biocompatibility and printability standards. Hydrogels are among the most intriguing bioinks because they mimic the natural extracellular matrix found in connective tissues and can create a highly hydrated environment that promotes cell attachment and proliferation; however, their mechanical properties are weak and difficult to control, making it difficult to print a proper 3D structure.

Methods

In this research, hydrogels based on Alginate and Gelatin are tested to evaluate the metabolic activity, going beyond the qualitative evaluation of cell viability. The easy-to-make hydrogel has been chosen due to the osmotic requirements of the cells for their metabolism, and the possibility to combine temperature and chemical crosslinking. Different compositions (%w/v) are tested (8% gel-7% alg, 4% gel-4% alg, 4% gel-2% alg), in order to obtain a 3D structure up to 10.3 ± 1.4 mm.

Results

The goal of this paper is to validate the obtained cell-laden 3D structures in terms of cell metabolic activity up to 7 days, further highlighting the difference between printed and not printed cell-laden hydrogels. To this end, MS5 cells viability is determined by implementing the live/dead staining with the analysis of the cellular metabolic activity through ATP assay, enhancing the evaluation of the actual cells activity over cells number.

Discussion

The results of the two tests are not always comparable, indicating that they are not interchangeable but provide complementary pieces of information.