Intravenous quinidine by intermittent bolus for electrophysiologic studies in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Electropharmacologic effect of a standard dose of intravenous procainamide in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) sometimes receive intravenous procainamide during electrophysiologic testing. Unfortunately, the responses to intravenous and subsequent oral drug therapy are variable and may be discordant.

HYPOTHESIS

It was the aim of this study to determine whether this variability might be explained by heterogeneity in the electropharmacologic response, even in a homogeneous population.

METHODS

We studied 42 patients who had spontaneous malignant ventricular arrhythmia and were inducible to sustained monomorphous VT during electrophysiologic testing. Each received 15 mg/kg of intravenous procainamide followed by a 2 mg/min infusion. Serum levels were drawn immediately following programmed stimulation. The mean procainamide level was 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml with an N-acetyl procainamide level of 1.0 +/- 0.5 mcg/ml. The 14 procainamide responders (5 of whom were noninducible and 9 whose VT cycle length increased > 100 ms) and the 28 nonresponders had similar procainamide and NAPA levels (6.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline clinical parameters, His to ventricular electrogram (HV) interval, effective refractory period, or VT cycle length. Prolongation of the effective refractory period and infra His conduction time occurred to a similar extent in responders and nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that procainamide has a consistent dose-response relationship with respect to refractoriness and conduction in patients with malignant arrhythmias. However, acute antiarrhythmic efficacy of procainamide cannot be predicted by clinical factors, drug levels, or drug-induced changes in common electrophysiologic parameters.

Prospective comparison of intravenous quinidine and intravenous procainamide in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing

BACKGROUND

Intravenous procainamide hydrochloride is frequently used in the acute care setting and during electrophysiologic testing, but intravenous quinidine gluconate is rarely used because of concerns about its safety. This study prospectively compares the hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of these agents in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-five consecutive patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias were prospectively treated with either intravenous quinidine gluconate or intravenous procainamide hydrochloride in an alternating unblinded fashion. The hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of these two drugs were compared. Seven (22%) patients assigned to intravenous quinidine gluconate and eight (24%) patients assigned to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride were rendered noninducible for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Four (13%) patients assigned to intravenous quinidine gluconate were unable to complete the infusion compared with none (p = 0.05) assigned to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride. Otherwise, the overall hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of the two drugs were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous quinidine gluconate is a reasonable alternative to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride in patients requiring a parenteral type IA antiarrhythmic agent.

Parenteral antiarrhythmics for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

The acute management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias often includes the use of parenteral antiarrhythmics. There are a number of agents currently available for this purpose. They are used to suppress inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation, they terminate spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia, and prevent ventricular fibrillation in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction. Serious adverse reactions include proarrhythmia, hypotension, severe bradyarrhythmias, and precipitation of congestive heart failure. A comparative evaluation of intravenous antiarrhythmics is difficult due to inherent differences in the choice of agents for study, protocol design, patient population, defined endpoint, and serum drug levels. Likewise, the reported adverse reaction rates vary from 0.4% to 75%. To understand the difficulties in clinical decision-making in this problem area, particularly drug selection, we present here a review of pertinent clinical trials evaluating parenteral drug efficacy and adverse effects.

Comparison of disposition values obtained by two assay methods for quinidine gluconate in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Eight patients with previously untreated ventricular tachycardia, age 48.54 +/- 28.02 years (mean +/- SD), were enrolled in a protocol evaluating the disposition of quinidine gluconate as determined by two assay methods. Patients received two infusions of 5 mg/kg over 30 minutes separated by 20-30 (24.9 +/- 4.0) minutes of electrophysiologic testing. Blood samples were obtained at 0.17 hours and just prior to the second infusion, and then at 0.17, 0.25, 0.33, 1.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 24.0 hours after the second infusion. Paired serum samples were assayed for quinidine concentrations by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography. The two assays compared well, with a linear regression equation of Y = 0.927X + 0.247 with a correlation coefficient of 0.985. With the exception of the beta elimination rate constant and beta distribution volume, t test comparison of disposition values demonstrated no significant difference. Differences in the estimates of the beta elimination rate constant reflected differences in the two methods and indicated that even though both assays were comparable, subtle differences in specificity could be reflected in significant differences in this variable.

Diarrhoea and constipation

Drug-induced constipation is mostly caused by changes in gut motility, whilst diarrhoea is more frequently caused by an increase in intestinal fluid secretion. In both instances the drug has to reach the enteric nervous system or the enterocyte, either via the blood or from the lumen, in sufficient concentrations to affect the mediators that regulate motility and fluid transport. Diarrhoea and constipation are frequently mentioned as side-effects of drugs, and therapeutic agents for almost all organ systems have been implicated. However, both these side-effects are usually mild or moderate, and rarely necessitate interruption of drug treatment. An exception to this rule is the antibiotic-associated colitis seen in patients treated with antibiotics such as lincomycin or clindamycin; in principle almost all antibiotics may cause this severe and potentially life-threatening complication. Other rare forms of severe, drug-induced colitis and diarrhoea result from toxic or anaphylactic reactions against gold preparations, cytostatic agents and sulphonamides. Ischaemic colitis due to vascular complications has been described in some women taking oral contraceptives, and in patients treated with vasopressin or digitalis.

Chronic flecainide therapy selected by electrophysiology testing of intravenous flecainide

The utility of flecainide acetate was evaluated in 93 patients by means of electrophysiologic studies before and after intravenous flecainide administration to determine long-term efficacy. Twenty patients had a prior history of at least one cardiac arrest and 73 patients had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). The mean radionuclear ejection fraction was 32 +/- 5%. Flecainide was evaluated in 93 patients, with 44 patients no longer having VT following flecainide (47% efficacy). Procainamide was evaluated in 69 patients; 24 patients had an adverse reaction to reaction to procainamide and 28 of the 69 patients were protected on procainamide (40% efficacy). The mean serum concentration of flecainide achieved in the protected group was 298 +/- 36 ng/ml and 4.3 micrograms/ml for procainamide. Both flecainide and procainamide significantly prolonged refractoriness, lengthened QRS duration, while only procainamide increased the QT interval. All 93 patients were discharged on antiarrhythmic therapy, 42 on flecainide, 27 on other antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing, and 24 on amiodarone (when all other agents failed). Six of the 42 patients on flecainide complained of adverse side effects, but none were severe enough to warrant stopping therapy. Of the 42 patients on flecainide, four (9%) died suddenly over 18 +/- 4 months. Twenty-seven patients were on other therapy; eight of these have died, three suddenly (11%), four with myocardial infarctions, and one due to congestive heart failure. Twenty-four patients started amiodarone; 11 have died, five (21%) suddenly, four of congestive heart failure, one of pulmonary fibrosis, and one with myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)