Long-term lorcainide therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Comparative efficacy of pirmenol and procainamide in a drug-resistant population with ventricular tachycardia

The acute antiarrhythmic properties of pirmenol were studied in 12 patients who failed clinical oral drug therapy with a history of a cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in ten men and two women with a mean age of 63 +/- 2 years. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation when they were off all antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested on procainamide, 1000 mg, administered intravenously, and ventricular tachycardia could be provoked in nine of twelve patients. Pirmenol was given intravenously, 1.1 mg/kg bolus followed by 40 micrograms/kg/min over 40 minutes prior to drug testing. Pirmenol did not significantly change the baseline heart rate, blood pressure, or measured electrocardiographic values from control values. Ten of 12 patients were still inducible to ventricular tachycardia on pirmenol. Procainamide protected one of nine patients against VT induction. In patients still inducible on drug therapy, the VT rate was significantly slowed from 221 beats/min to 166 beats/min on pirmenol and to 200 beats/min on procainamide. The effects of this new antiarrhythmic agent were similar to procainamide in this drug-resistant study population.

Chronic flecainide therapy selected by electrophysiology testing of intravenous flecainide

The utility of flecainide acetate was evaluated in 93 patients by means of electrophysiologic studies before and after intravenous flecainide administration to determine long-term efficacy. Twenty patients had a prior history of at least one cardiac arrest and 73 patients had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). The mean radionuclear ejection fraction was 32 +/- 5%. Flecainide was evaluated in 93 patients, with 44 patients no longer having VT following flecainide (47% efficacy). Procainamide was evaluated in 69 patients; 24 patients had an adverse reaction to reaction to procainamide and 28 of the 69 patients were protected on procainamide (40% efficacy). The mean serum concentration of flecainide achieved in the protected group was 298 +/- 36 ng/ml and 4.3 micrograms/ml for procainamide. Both flecainide and procainamide significantly prolonged refractoriness, lengthened QRS duration, while only procainamide increased the QT interval. All 93 patients were discharged on antiarrhythmic therapy, 42 on flecainide, 27 on other antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing, and 24 on amiodarone (when all other agents failed). Six of the 42 patients on flecainide complained of adverse side effects, but none were severe enough to warrant stopping therapy. Of the 42 patients on flecainide, four (9%) died suddenly over 18 +/- 4 months. Twenty-seven patients were on other therapy; eight of these have died, three suddenly (11%), four with myocardial infarctions, and one due to congestive heart failure. Twenty-four patients started amiodarone; 11 have died, five (21%) suddenly, four of congestive heart failure, one of pulmonary fibrosis, and one with myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lorcainide for the treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia: clinical and electrophysiologic results

The electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic efficacy of lorcainide were evaluated using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) in 14 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to conventional drug therapy. Lorcainide was administered orally (200-400 mg/d, eight patients), intravenously (150 mg/d, one patient), or by both routes (250-380 mg/d, five patients) prior to PES. In 13 patients undergoing both control and lorcainide PES, lorcainide increased the QRS duration (102 +/- 28 to 125 +/- 28 ms, P less than .001) and the QTc interval (430 +/- 39 to 471 +/- 32 ms, P less than .01) but had no effect on the RR interval (786 +/- 156 to 780 +/- 172 ms, P greater than .2). The right ventricular effective refractory period increased from 258 +/- 8 to 285 +/- 22 ms (P less than .001). Lorcainide prevented VT induction or resulted in induction of only well-tolerated, nonsustained VT in six of 14 patients (43%). The cycle length of induced VT increased from 264 +/- 32 to 306 +/- 34 ms (P less than .01). Of six patients started on chronic therapy, four still receive lorcainide after 18 +/- 7 months. Adverse effects have consisted mainly of sleep disturbances. Thus, it can be stated that lorcainide is effective in certain patients with VT refractory to conventional therapy.

Antiarrhythmic effects of indecainide in a drug-resistant population with ventricular tachycardia at programmed electrical stimulation

The antiarrhythmic properties of indecainide were studied in 15 patients with a history of a cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia. Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in nine men and six women with a mean age of 68 +/- 2 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 41 +/- 4%. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation while off all antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested on procainamide, 1000 mg, administered intravenously, and ventricular tachycardia could be provoked in 10 of 15 patients. Indecainide was given intravenously, 1 mg/kg. Indecainide did not significantly change the baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and QTc interval from control values. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly prolonged. Twelve of 15 patients were still inducible for ventricular tachycardia on indecainide. Procainamide protected 5 of 15 patients against ventricular tachycardia induction. In patients still inducible on indecainide therapy, the ventricular tachycardia rate was significantly slowed, from 281 bpm to 224 bpm on indecainide and to 215 bpm on procainamide. The effects of this new class IC antiarrhythmic agent appears similar to procainamide in patients with serious life-threatening tachyarrhythmias.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy of ethmozine in patients with ventricular tachycardia as determined by programmed electrical stimulation

The antiarrhythmic properties of ethmozine were studied in 27 patients with a history of a cardiac arrest or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Programmed electrical stimulation studies were performed in 20 men and seven women with a mean age of 62 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 43%. All patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation while off all antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients were then tested on procainamide if their treatment with this drug orally had not previously failed. Procainamide, 1000 and 1500 mg, was administered intravenously, and ventricular tachycardia could be provoked in 14 of 18 patients. Ethmozine was given in an oral loading regimen starting 24 to 36 hours later. After 500 mg oral ethmozine, patients were given 15 mg/kg ethmozine every 8 hours for seven to nine doses prior to drug testing. Ethmozine did not significantly change the baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and QTc interval from the initial drug-free values. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly prolonged. Seven patients were protected on oral ethmozine; 14 patients still had ventricular tachycardia inducible at programmed electrical stimulation testing, and six patients developed ventricular tachycardia spontaneously on ethmozine and were not tested in the programmed electrical stimulation laboratory. One patient had gastrointestinal complaints and was not discharged on the drug. The five patients who tolerated the oral protocol without side effects and who were protected against programmed stimulation induction of ventricular tachycardia were discharged on oral therapy. One patient on long-term therapy appeared to develop an allergic reaction to the agent with unexplained fevers and was switched to amiodarone therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lorcainide therapy in a cardiac arrest population

Thirty-eight patients with prior history of cardiac arrest underwent programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies and serial drug testing. Lorcainide was tested acutely in all 38 patients and prevented ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction in 14 patients and failed in 24 (efficacy rate 37%). Procainamide had failed clinically (cardiac arrest or breakthrough VT) in 16 patients, seven patients had previously severe adverse side effects, and thus only 15 were tested on procainamide at PES testing with seven protected. Following initial studies, 14 patients were started on lorcainide oral therapy and 24 on other therapy determined effective at PES testing (N-acetylprocainamide-two, flecainide-nine, bethanidine-three, slow-release procainamide hydrochloride-three, quinidine-two, cibenzoline-one, amiodarone-four). After 29 +/- 7 months follow-up, three are alive on lorcainide therapy, five discontinued therapy due to side effects; six died--three sudden deaths (33%) and two cardiac deaths (both myocardial infarctions). Twenty out of 24 patients are alive who were started on PES predicted effective therapy other than lorcainide; four died--three sudden deaths (13%) and one cardiac nonsudden death. Antiarrhythmic therapy guided by PES studies gives overall encouraging results in a cardiac arrest group of patients. Lorcainide, however, is not tolerated well and affords less protection against a sudden death recurrence than is noted in a population on other antiarrhythmic therapy predicted effective at PES testing.