Constrictive pericardial disease caused by epicardial implantable cardiac defibrillator patches: treatment by pericardial stripping and nonthoracotomy lead system implantation

Symptomatic pericardial disease associated with patch electrodes of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: an underestimated complication?

Constrictive pericarditis can be associated with ICD patch electrodes. During a mean follow-up of 24 months, in a population of 35 patients who received ICDs with a patch electrodes configuration, we identified three patients with clinical and hemodynamic signs compatible with this event. Patient 1, a 35-year-old male, underwent implantation of an ICD because of a primary electrical disease complicated by cardiac arrest. Fourteen months later he complained of exertional dyspnea without any signs of heart failure. Right heart catheterization showed high filling pressures and diastolic dip and plateau in pressure curves. Thoracotomy and pericardial exploration were performed. Three months after removal of the patches and insertion of an endocardial lead system, the patient had normal respiration. Patients 2 and 3, who suffered from coronary heart disease without heart failure, exhibited a hemodynamic profile suggestive of constrictive pericarditis: in one patient, 10 months after ICD implantation, associated with right heart failure; and in the other, 18 months after ICD implantation with left heart failure. Patch electrodes were removed in these two patients and replaced by endocardial lead electrodes with subsequent clinical improvement. It is concluded that constrictive pericarditis related to epicardial patch is not an uncommon occurrence during ICD therapy and should be considered in patients who show clinical signs of cardiac decompensation.

Late diagnosis of pericardial constriction associated with defibrillator patches and deformation of the left ventricle

We report a case of pericardial constriction associated with defibrillator patches developing 4.5 years after implantation. This constriction was related to the presence of a large pericardial mass that had developed above the defibrillator patch. This mass, which had a calcified superior border, suggested former hematoma associated with pericardial fibrosis. It induced significant compression of the right ventricle and a dumb-bell deformity of the left ventricle. The hemodynamic picture was of elastic-form constrictive pericarditis. Because of previous cerebral stroke during cardiac surgery, the patient was discharged on pharmacologic treatment after improvement of his functional status. Since removal of epicardial patches is an effective treatment of constriction, constrictive pericarditis should be systematically considered in patients with epicardial patch electrodes and impairment of functional status.

Defibrillator patch electrode constriction: an underrecognized entity

Pericardial constriction associated with the placement of intrapericardial defibrillator patches is a rare occurrence that is reported only one tenth as often in defibrillator patients as in patients undergoing other types of cardiac operations. Although this discrepancy may be attributable to a lower incidence of constriction with the defibrillator patch electrode procedure, it may also indicate a failure to recognize that progressive right heart failure and signs of low cardiac output that could be due to pericardial constriction and not progressive systolic dysfunction. Because surgical removal of the patches and decortication of the epicardial surface is the only effective therapy, it is important to recognize this uncommon, but profoundly debilitating entity.