Matching to guide the design and predict the outcome of randomized atherectomy trials

Association between proximal stent edge positioning on atherosclerotic plaques containing lipid pools and postprocedural myocardial infarction (from the CLI-POOL Study)

Postprocedural myocardial infarction is an ominous complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite several patient, lesion, and procedural factors that may affect its occurrence and severity, it is unclear if implanting a stent edge on a coronary lipid pool, as appraised by optical coherence tomography (OCT), adversely affects outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the association between postprocedural myocardial infarction and the implantation of a stent edge on a lipid pool, as assessed by OCT. A database was screened for patients without ongoing myocardial infarctions; who underwent PCI with stenting for single, native, de novo lesions; without periprocedural side-branch occlusion or compromise; who underwent post-PCI OCT; and had postprocedural myocardial infarctions. These subjects were matched 1:1 with patients with similar features but without postprocedural myocardial infarctions. Plaque characterization with OCT was performed using established criteria. Specifically, lipid pools within stent edges were quantified by computing the number of involved quadrants and the degree of lipid arc on cross-sectional images. A total of 30 patients were included (15 with postprocedural myocardial infarctions and 15 controls without infarctions). Whereas no patient or control subject had lipid pools in correspondence to distal stent edges, landing of proximal stent edges on lipid pools was significantly more frequent in patients than in controls (10 [66%] vs 2 [13%], p = 0.009), Moreover, patients with postprocedural myocardial infarctions had more extensive lipid pools at proximal stent edges than those without postprocedural myocardial infarctions. Accordingly, lipid pool arc at proximal stent edge was significantly associated with peak post-PCI creatine kinase-MB/upper limit of normal ratio (Spearman's ρ = 0.49, p = 0.006). In conclusion, incomplete stent coverage of coronary lipid pools appears to be associated with an increased risk for postprocedural myocardial infarction in patients who undergo PCI.

Clinical and angiographic outcome of directional atherectomy followed by stent implantation in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery

BACKGROUND

Lesions located at the ostium of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are considered an ideal target for directional atherectomy (DCA), but few data are available about the value of using this strategy before stenting in comparison with stenting alone.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the immediate and mid term clinical and angiographic results of DCA followed by stent implantation for ostial LAD lesions.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of the immediate and mid term angiographic and clinical results of a series of 117 consecutive patients with de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD. Of these, 46 underwent DCA before stenting and 71 were treated with stenting alone.

RESULTS

Technical success in the two groups was similar at around 98%. DCA plus stenting provided a larger minimum lumen diameter at the end of the procedure than stenting alone (3.57 (0.59) mm v 3.33 (0.49) mm, p = 0.022). There were no differences for in-hospital major adverse events (MACE) (7.5% for atherectomy plus stenting, and 5.3% for stenting alone; p = 0.41). All patients had clinical follow up at a mean of 7.9 (2.7) months. Angiographic follow up was done in 89 patients (76%) at a mean of 5.9 (2.2) months. The atherectomy plus stenting group had a larger minimum lumen diameter than the stenting group (2.79 (0.64) mm v 2.26 (0.85) mm, p = 0.004) and a lower binary restenosis rate (13.8% v 33.3%, p = 0.031). Six month MACE were reduced in the atherectomy plus stenting group (8.7% v 23.9%, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Debulking before stenting in de novo lesions located at the ostium of the LAD is safe and is associated with a high rate of technical success. Follow up data show that DCA plus stenting results in a significantly larger minimum lumen diameter and a lower incidence of restenosis than stenting alone.

Effect of plaque debulking before stent implantation on in-stent neointimal proliferation: a serial 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study

BACKGROUND

Recent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have suggested that plaque burden has a role in promoting intimal hyperplasia after stenting. We report on volumetric assessments of in-stent neointimal formation with 3-dimensional IVUS analysis, comparing directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) plus stenting (DCA/stenting) to stenting without DCA.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (24 lesions) treated with DCA before stenting were matched to 24 patients (24 lesions) receiving stenting without DCA. All stents were a single Multilink stent. In both groups, serial IVUS was performed before and after intervention and during the 6-month follow-up period. The arterial segments that were analyzed with a computer-based contour detection program were the same as the stented segments analyzed on serial studies. These measurements were obtained: (1) lumen volume (LV), (2) stent volume (SV), (3) vessel volume (VV), (4) in-stent neointimal volume (ISV) calculated as SV-LV, and (5) percent in-stent neointimal volume (%ISV) calculated as ([SV-LV]/SV) x 100.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. After intervention, both groups achieved similar LV (140.0 mm(3) DCA/stenting vs 135.2 mm(3) stenting alone). However, the follow-up ISV and %ISV were significantly smaller in the DCA/stenting group (19.6 +/- 12.2 mm(3) DCA/stenting vs 44.6 +/- 29.5 mm(3) stenting alone; P =.00040; 15.3% +/- 10.6% DCA/stenting vs 31.5% +/- 17.7% stenting alone; P =.00040). Consequently, the DCA/stenting group showed a significantly greater follow-up LV (121.0 +/- 51.5 mm(3) DCA/stenting vs 91.5 +/- 26.7 mm(3) stenting alone; P =.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Plaque removal with DCA before stenting inhibits in-stent neointimal hyperplasia.

Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to determine whether cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) has advantages over other modalities in treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Controversies exist regarding optimal treatment for ISR. Recently, CBA emerged as a tool in management of ISR.

METHODS

A total of 648 lesions treated for ISR were divided into four groups according to the treatment strategy: CBA, rotational atherectomy (ROTA), additional stenting (STENT), and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Following the matching process, 258 lesions were entered into the analysis.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar among the groups (p = NS). Acute lumen gain was significantly higher in the STENT group (2.12 +/- 0.7 mm), whereas in the CBA group the gain was similar to one achieved following ROTA and following PTCA (1.70 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.79 +/- 0.5 mm and 1.56 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively; p = NS). The lumen loss at follow-up was lower for the CBA versus ROTA and versus STENT (0.63 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.30 +/- 0.8 mm and 1.36 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001), yielding a lower recurrent restenosis rate (20% vs. 35.9% and 41.4%, respectively; p < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, CBA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17; confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.51; p = 0.001) and diffuse restenosis type at baseline (OR = 2.07; CI, 1.15 to 3.71; p = 0.02) were identified as predictors of target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that CBA is a safe and efficient technique for treatment of ISR, with immediate results similar to atheroablation and better clinical and angiographic outcomes at follow-up. This approach might be implemented as a viable option in management of focal ISR and to prepare diffuse ISR for brachytherapy treatment.

Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions

BACKGROUND

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides more precise information than angiography about vascular dimensions. This information is used by some centers to optimize intracoronary stent implantation. There are no direct comparisons of the effects on restenosis of optimal IVUS-guided versus angiography-directed high-pressure stenting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Lesions of patients who had a 6-month angiographic follow-up study were eligible for matching. From 445 consecutive lesions treated by Palmaz-Schatz (P-S) stenting guided by IVUS (IVUS group) in Milan, 173 lesions were individually matched with 173 of 476 consecutive lesions treated by P-S stenting directed by angiography (Angio group) in Hamburg. Lesions were selected by a computerized program according to baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. Immediate and 6-month angiographic results were retrospectively compared, distinguishing an "early phase" from a "late phase." This distinction was based on the more aggressive dilation strategy with larger balloons and more demanding IVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion used in Milan in the early phase. In both phases, a larger minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after stenting and after 6 months was achieved in the IVUS group than in the Angio group. In the early phase, the dichotomous restenosis rate was lower in the IVUS group than in the Angio group (9.2% versus 22.3%; P=.04). In the late phase, there was no difference in restenosis between the groups (22.7% versus 23.7%; P=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In matched lesions treated with high-pressure stenting, IVUS guidance achieved a larger MLD than angiographic guidance. However, in the IVUS group, the restenosis rate was lower only in the early phase, when balloons larger than currently used were selected to maximize the stent lumen area.

Clinical and angiographic comparison of matched patients with successful directional coronary atherectomy or stent implantation for primary coronary artery lesions

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare the long-term clinical and angiographic effects of successful directional atherectomy and stent implantation and to examine whether restenosis is related to the mechanism of lumen improvement as well as the extent of lumen gain.

BACKGROUND

Directional atherectomy and coronary stent implantation have been shown to achieve a more optimal immediate result that may lead to a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and fewer target vessel revascularizations than does angioplasty. However, it remains to be determined whether one of the devices used in these interventions provides consistently better results than the other.

METHODS

To allow meaningful comparisons a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with atherectomy were individually matched with a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with stent implantation. Matching for baseline characteristics identified patients with identical lesion location and lesion severity, and immediate and late angiographic and clinical outcome were compared. To evaluate the possibility of a procedure effect on restenosis, patients were further matched for both immediate angiographic outcome and baseline characteristics, providing 150 matched patients for comparison. As confirmatory analysis, multivariate models were constructed to predict late lumen diameter.

RESULTS

Matching resulted in two comparable groups with equivalent baseline clinical and stenosis characteristics (n = 117 pairs). Atherectomy led to a smaller immediate gain than stenting and, because late loss was similar in both groups, stenting resulted in a larger late lumen (1.96 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.66 +/- 0.55 mm, p < 0.0001). When patients were matched for immediate gain and baseline characteristics (n = 75 pairs), lumen loss was more pronounced after atherectomy, and thus the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up differed significantly between the two groups (1.66 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.47 mm, p = 0.004). This beneficial angiographic effect of stenting was accompanied by a reduced need for repeat interventions. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent effect of the interventional device used, whereby less loss and greater lumen diameter at follow-up were predicted for stent implantation than for atherectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful stent implantation provided a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and lower rates of restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization than did atherectomy. This favorable effect of stenting not only is related to a larger, immediate gain, but also seems to attenuate late lumen loss.