Effects of digitalis on atrial vulnerability

Digoxin delays recovery from tachycardia-induced electrical remodeling of the atria

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) induces electrical remodeling, which is thought to be responsible for the low success rate of antiarrhythmic treatment in AF of longer duration. Electrical remodeling seems to be related to tachycardia-induced intracellular calcium overload. Due to its vagomimetic action, digoxin is widely used to control the ventricular rate during AF, but it also increases intracellular calcium. On the basis of these characteristics, we hypothesized that digoxin would aggravate tachycardia-induced electrical remodeling.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) at cycle lengths of 430, 300, and 200 ms during 24 hours of rapid atrio/ventricular (300/150 bpm) pacing in 7 chronically instrumented conscious goats treated with digoxin or saline. Digoxin decreased the spontaneous heart rate but had no other effects on baseline electrophysiological characteristics. In addition to a moderate increase in the rate of electrical remodeling during rapid pacing, digoxin significantly delayed the recovery from electrical remodeling after cessation of pacing (at 430, 300, and 200 ms: P=0. 001, P=0.0015, and P=0.007, respectively). This was paralleled by an increased inducibility and duration of AF during digoxin. Multivariate analysis revealed that both a short AERP and treatment with digoxin were independent predictors of inducibility (P=0.001 and P=0.03, respectively) and duration (P=0.001 for both) of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Dioxin aggravates tachycardia-induced atrial electrical remodeling and delays recovery from electrical remodeling in the goat, which increases the inducibility and duration of AF.

Atrial vulnerability in patients with paroxysmal "lone" atrial fibrillation

Little is known about the electrophysiological properties of the atrium predisposing to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients without structural heart disease. This study was conducted to analyze intraatrial conduction, atrial refractoriness, and arrhythmia inducibility in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. An electrophysiological study was performed in 24 patients with a documented history of lone paroxysmal AF but in sinus rhythm at the time of the electrophysiological study. Twelve patients without any history of atrial arrhythmias served as controls. The patients with lone paroxysmal AF showed a significant prolonged local conduction time S1A1 (70 +/- 21 ms vs 36 +/- 12 ms, P < 0.0001), a lack of rate adaptation of the functional refractory period (FRP changes/cycle length changes < 10% in 15 of 24 patients with lone paroxysmal AF vs 1/12 controls, P = 0.002) and a higher incidence of inducible AF with only one extrastimulus (13/24 vs 0/12, P = 0.0014). The total P wave duration in the surface ECG (89 +/- 14 ms vs 83 +/- 8 ms, P = 0.15), the intraatrial conduction time (36 +/- 14 ms vs 28 +/- 8 ms, P = 0.07), the presence of a fragmented atrial electrogram (16/24 vs 7/12, P = 0.62), the absolute value of the effective refractory period (204 +/- 28 ms vs 212 +/- 23 ms, P = 0.42), and the vulnerability index (3.0 +/- 1.5 vs 3.6 +/- 1.5, P = 0.26) were not statistically different between the two groups. The presence of a prolonged (> 50 ms) S1A1 and/or the presence of a lack of rate adaptation of the FRP and/or the presence of inducible AF identified patients with spontaneous lone paroxysmal AF with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 85%, and a negative predictive value of 89%. In patients with lone paroxysmal AF, the electrophysiological study using conventional techniques allows not only to detect AF inducibility using a nonaggressive protocol, but also to reveal several electrophysiological abnormalities related to the atrial substrate itself. This atrial vulnerability may explain the high incidence of recurrences in patients with lone paroxysmal AF.

Zones of atrial vulnerability. Relationships to basic cycle length

BACKGROUND

Bradycardia is commonly found in individuals at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, a clear relationship between lengthening of basic cyclic length (BCL) and AF has not been demonstrated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 20 open-chest dogs, atrial refractoriness, AF vulnerability, and atrial activation times (ACTs) were determined in sinus rhythm and at BCLs of 400, 300, and 200 ms, and the findings at the same coupling intervals and stimulus strengths were compared. As BCL increased, AFV zone lengthened, and its outer limit occurred later in diastole. The outer limit of the AF vulnerability zone for a BCL was its relative refractory period; the inner limit, however, was not its effective refractory period. A border zone, defined by the inner limit of the AF vulnerability zone and the effective refractory period for a BCL, decreased as BCL lengthened, offsetting the increase in the AF vulnerability zone. The border zone was characterized by paradoxical stimulus current strength propagation relations and features suggesting supernormal conduction. ACT also increased with BCL lengthening. When AF induced by rapid atrial burst pacing was contrasted with AF induced by an extrastimulus, it tended to have a more disorganized pattern and lasted longer.

CONCLUSIONS

Lengthening of BCL increases the AF vulnerability zone, extending its outer limit later in diastole and comprising an increasing component of the total duration of the relative refractory period. Very short BCLs create conditions that also favor AF vulnerability.

Effect of intraatrial reentry on initiation of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia

We studied the effect of intraatrial reentry (IAR) on initiation of orthodromic reentrant tachycardia (ORT) in 150 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome using His-bundle recording and the atrial extrastimulus technique. IAR was initiated by premature atrial stimulation in 44 patients (29%), and it was followed by ORT in 16 patients (11%). In 8 patients (5%), IAR promoted the initiation of ORT, whereas in 5 patients (3%), IAR inhibited the initiation of ORT. These findings suggest that ORT is frequently induced following IAR. IAR, which was frequently observed during electrophysiological studies, seems to play an important role in the initiation of ORT.

Repetitive atrial firing and fragmented atrial activity elicited by extrastimuli in the sick sinus syndrome with and without abnormal atrial electrograms

Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm and programmed atrial stimulation were performed in 50 patients with sick sinus syndrome to investigate the relationship between abnormal atrial electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm and some determinants of the atrial vulnerability such as repetitive atrial firing and fragmented atrial activity elicited by single extrastimulus. The patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the presence (Group I) or absence (Group II) of abnormal atrial electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm. In Group I (N = 32), repetitive atrial firing was induced in 23 (72%) patients, and in Group II (N = 18) in 6 (33%) patients; p less than 0.01. The repetitive atrial firing zone was 41 +/- 37 ms in Group I and 12 +/- 18 ms in Group II; p less than 0.001. Fragmented atrial activity was induced in 30 (94%) patients from Group I, and in 8 (44%) patients from Group II; p less than 0.0001. The fragmented atrial activity zone was 47 +/- 42 ms in Group I and 14 +/- 19 ms in Group II; p less than 0.0001. The atrial electrogram width at the premature beat (A2; p < 0.02) and the maximum A2/A1 ratio (p < 0.002) were 178 +/- 53 ms and 196% +/- 40%, respectively in Group I, and 141 +/- 36 ms and 159% +/- 30%, respectively in Group II. Atrial fibrillation was induced in 13 (41%) patients from Group I, and in 1 (6%) patient from Group II (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Redefining the role of digoxin in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) encompasses a variety of discrete clinical syndromes, including paroxysmal, chronic, acute, and postoperative. Digoxin, long considered the mainstay of therapy for rate control in all types of AF, appears to have only modest electrophysiologic effects, which are mediated primarily by the autonomic nervous system. Digoxin has less potency than the calcium antagonists or beta-blocking drugs with respect to atrioventricular nodal blockade. Although less potent than calcium antagonists or beta-blocking drugs on the atrioventricular node, digoxin provides positive inotropic support, whereas the other 2 agents can suppress left ventricular function. Thus, digoxin is the agent of choice in patients with AF in the setting of significant left ventricular dysfunction. However, in the absence of left ventricular dysfunction, digoxin should be considered second-line therapy for the treatment of all AF syndromes.

Pharmacologic suppression of atrial flutter induced by atrial stimulation

To examine the electrophysiologic properties of human atrial flutter and its response to various classes of antiarrhythmic drugs, 39 patients were identified as having inducible sustained atrial flutter with atrial extra-stimulation techniques. Measurement of intra-atrial, interatrial, atrioventricular node and His-Purkinje-conduction intervals, atrial refractory periods, and atrial flutter-cycle length were made before and after intravenous administration of verapamil, ouabain, or cedilanid, propranolol, and procainamide in these 39 patients, as well as in seven control patients. Verapamil significantly shortened flutter-cycle length but suppressed atrial-flutter induction in only one of seven patients. Two of nine patients who received propranolol proved resistant to flutter provocation; the seven patients who remained nonsuppressible exhibited greater prolongation of interatrial-conduction time. Ouabain and cedilanid suppressed flutter inducibility in four of seven patients, and flutter-cycle length increased in those patients remaining inducible. Procainamide suppressed flutter induction in nine of 11 patients. These results suggest that procainamide is the most effective agent of those agents tested in suppressing atrial flutter induced by atrial extra-stimulation. Verapamil and propranolol proved quite ineffective in suppressing inducible atrial flutter.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with an accessory pathway: importance of the conduction properties of the accessory pathway

To investigate how the electrophysiologic properties of the accessory pathway affect the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, programmed stimulation data of 57 patients with overt pre-excitation and 33 patients with a concealed accessory pathway with documented circus movement tachycardia were reviewed. Atrial fibrillation had occurred spontaneously in 31 (54%) of the 57 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and in 1 (3%) of the 33 with a concealed accessory pathway (p less than 0.001). Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 23 of 31 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and spontaneous atrial fibrillation (Group A), in 7 of 26 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome without spontaneous atrial fibrillation (Group B) and in 5 of 33 patients with a concealed accessory pathway (Group C). The anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway was shorter in Group A than in Group B (252 versus 297 ms, p less than 0.001). There were no differences among groups in PA interval, right to left atrium conduction time, cycle length of tachycardia and atrial and retrograde accessory pathway effective refractory period. Atrial fibrillation is more frequent in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome than in those with a concealed accessory pathway. Patients with overt pre-excitation and atrial fibrillation have a shorter anterograde accessory pathway refractory period. It seems therefore that the anterograde rather than the retrograde conduction properties of the accessory pathway are the critical determinants of atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Clinical experience with a new software-based antitachycardia pacemaker for recurrent supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.

Electrophysiologic determinants of recurrent atrial flutter after successful termination by overdrive pacing

The potential ability of electrophysiologic abnormalities to predict recurrence of atrial flutter was evaluated. Twenty-five patients with chronic atrial flutter resistant to combined digitalis and quinidine therapy were studied electrophysiologically after restoration of sinus rhythm by overdrive pacing or by eventual direct current cardioversion. Recurrence of atrial flutter was observed in 12 patients during a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range 3 to 50). Electrophysiologic testing included programmed high right atrial stimulation at a paced drive cycle length of 600 ms and incremental pacing up to 200-ms paced intervals. When coupling intervals of 90% of the drive cycle length were compared to coupling intervals of 48% of the drive cycle length, the increase in S1A1 interval, defined as the interval between the stimulus artifact and the atrial activation near the atrioventricular junction, was greater in patients with subsequent recurrence of atrial flutter (47 +/- 11 vs 21 +/- 18 ms). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the S1A1 increase to be the sole independent predictor of recurrence (p = 0.0082) while previous episodes of atrial flutter or the presence of organic heart disease were identified as dependent variables. Reclassification showed a 91% sensitivity and a 92% specificity. Correct classification was achieved in 92% of patients. The initiation of atrial dysrhythmia had no predictive value. The assessment of the S1A1 interval by programmed atrial stimulation appears helpful in delineating the patient risk of recurrent atrial flutter after termination by overdrive pacing.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with and without primary atrial vulnerability. Clinical and electrophysiological differences

Primary atrial vulnerability defined as induction of repetitive atrial firing by a single atrial extrastimulus cannot always be demonstrated in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The authors studied the electrophysiological differences between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with and without primary atrial vulnerability. In 14 of 31 patients with documented history of atrial fibrillation, single extrastimulation at the high right atrium initiated repetitive atrial firing defined as rapid disorganized atrial activity continuing longer than 1 second. In the 14 patients with vulnerable atrium, the atrial effective and functional refractory were periods significantly shorter and the duration of the local atrial electrogram of the premature beat was longer and was fractionated. The % sinus node recovery time was longer in patients without vulnerability. Nine of the 17 patients without atrial vulnerability had sinus node dysfunction, and 4 of the remaining 8 patients had a repetitive type of atrial automatic tachycardia. In contrast, only 3 (21%) of the 14 patients with vulnerability had sinus node dysfunction, and none showed repetitive atrial tachycardia. The high prevalence of sinus node dysfunction or repetitive type of atrial automatic tachycardia in patients without primary atrial vulnerability suggests that these transient electrophysiological modifications which are not dealt with in the basic conditions may have a role in the enhancement of atrial vulnerability.

Effects of acetyl strophanthidin on duration of atrial fibrillation in the neurally-intact and blockaded dog

Although the inotropic and dromotropic effects of cardiac glycosides in atrial fibrillation (AF) are well recognized, their action on AF itself is not clear. Accordingly, to determine whether cardiac glycosides prolong AF, the duration of electrically induced AF, atrioventricular conduction, and left ventricular function were assessed for 30 minutes before and for 30 minutes following intravenous administration of acetyl strophanthidin (AS), 20 micrograms/kg, in neurally intact, beta-blocked, and beta-blocked and vagotomized dogs. In the intact dog, AS, 20 micrograms/kg, increased peak dp/dt by 132 +/- 35 mmHg.sec-1, p less than 0.05, and slowed ventricular response by 16 +/- 7 min-1, p less than 0.05, but had a variable effect on AF duration. While the increased left ventricular peak dp/dt persisted for 15 minutes after AS, an increased duration of AF was evident only at 20 minutes, when the effects of AS on left ventricular (LV) inotropy were no longer apparent. Moreover, the subset of dogs that did not demonstrate prolongation of average duration of AF after AS had a greater increment of peak dp/dt than those that showed prolongation, 237 +/- 52 versus 53 +/- 31 mmHg.sec-1, p less than 0.05. An additional 20 micrograms/kg, which produced ventricular extrasystoles, prolonged AF duration when compared to both control and 30-minute measurements. Acetyl strophanthidin, 20 micrograms/kg, had a variable effect on duration of AF with beta-blockade but prolonged duration by 114 +/- 34%, p less than 0.05, with both vagotomy and beta-blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Length of excitation wave and susceptibility to reentrant atrial arrhythmias in normal conscious dogs

We calculated the wavelength of the atrial impulse in chronically instrumented conscious dogs by measuring both conduction velocity and refractory period: wavelength = refractory period X conduction velocity. Implantation of multiple stimulating and recording electrodes allowed wavelength determination at four different areas: the right and left parts of Bachmann's bundle and the free walls of the right and left atria. During programmed electrical stimulation, three types of arrhythmias were observed: rapid repetitive responses, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation. During normal rhythm, the wavelength of the atrial impulse varied between 14 and 18 cm. Premature beats had a shorter wavelength, depending on the degree of prematurity. Premature beats that evoked rapid repetitive responses showed a critical shortening of the wavelength below 12.3 cm. Episodes of atrial flutter were induced at a wavelength below 9.7 cm, while fibrillation occurred at wavelengths shorter than 7.8 cm. We correlated the induction of these arrhythmias with the values of refractory period, conduction velocity, and wavelength during control and during administration of several drugs. Intravenous administration of acetylcholine shortened the wavelength by 30-40%, mainly because of refractory period shortening. Both propafenone and lidocaine had strong but opposite effects on refractoriness and conduction and, consequently, little effect on the wavelength. Quinidine markedly prolonged the refractory period, but prolongation of wavelength was less because of a simultaneous decrease in conduction velocity. d-Sotalol also increased refractory period, but because it had no appreciable effect on conduction velocity, this drug was the most effective in prolongation of wavelength. Linear discriminant analysis of the data showed that the refractory period and the conduction velocity each were poor parameters to predict the occurrence of the different arrhythmias (predictive value 48% and 38%, respectively). The combination of both properties, however, as expressed in the wavelength, was a more reliable index that predicted the induction of the different arrhythmias correctly in 75% of the cases. We conclude that the wavelength is a useful parameter for evaluating antiarrhythmic drugs.

Digitalis: its place in therapy

Since the initial introduction of digitalis 200 years ago by Withering, its low therapeutic ratio has limited the use of this agent. The utility of digitalis in patients with congestive heart failure and a recent myocardial infarction has been questioned recently. Findings of rigorously controlled clinical studies suggest a small but definite hemodynamic and clinical improvement in patients administered digitalis. Congestive heart failure can be effectively treated without cardiac glycosides. However, when used judiciously, digitalis provides an additional agent in our therapeutic armamentarium. The inotropic, dormotropic, and vagomimetic properties are uniquely suited for the patient with supraventricular arrhythmias and compromised left ventricular function.

Independent and interactive effects of digoxin and quinidine on the atrial fibrillation threshold in dogs

To assess the effects of digoxin as single therapy and in combination with quinidine in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, the atrial fibrillation threshold was determined from the right atrial appendage and Bachmann's bundle in 11 open chest dogs. In group 1 (six dogs), the atrial fibrillation threshold was determined at baseline, post-quinidine (10 mg/kg intravenously) and then post-digoxin (50 micrograms/kg intravenously). In group 2 (five dogs), the order of drug administration was reversed. The results of this study were: 1) Digoxin had no significant effect on the atrial fibrillation threshold when given alone. 2) Quinidine significantly increased the atrial fibrillation threshold (p less than 0.002) and the addition of digoxin resulted in a further increase in threshold (p less than 0.002). 3) Quinidine produced greater suppression of atrial fibrillation induction at the right atrial site than at the Bachmann's bundle site, suggesting differential effects of quinidine on atrial fibers.

Atrial vulnerability in the immature canine heart

The induction of repetitive atrial responses during atrial extrastimulation (atrial vulnerability) was studied in 3 groups of dogs. Group I consisted of 19 neonatal puppies (age 3 to 15 days), group II of 10 older puppies (age 5 to 11 weeks) and group III of 10 adult dogs. In all dogs, atrial extrastimulation was performed coupled to a constant paced rhythm that was 85 +/- 7% of the sinus cycle length at rest in group I, 86 +/- 6% in group II and 83 +/- 10% in group III. In all groups, atrial repetitive responses were observed as the atrial functional refractory periods were approached during extrastimulation; however, the number of repetitive atrial responses was greater and the duration of repetitive firing longer in the neonates. In the neonatal group as many as 28 repetitive atrial responses were induced (9.4 +/- 8.2 beats) and the duration of repetitive atrial firing averaged 838 ms (range 120 to 2,425). In contrast, in only 1 of 20 older puppies and adult dogs were more than 2 repetitive atrial beats observed (number of repetitive atrial beats in group II, 1.7 +/- 1; in group III, 1.2 +/- 0.5). Thus, the normal neonatal atrium is more susceptible to intraatrial reentry in response to premature extrastimulation than the more mature canine atrium. This enhanced atrial vulnerability may be related to the shorter atrial refractory periods of the neonate and may be of importance in understanding the genesis of certain dysrhythmias in the human neonate.

The electrophysiological substrate of atrial fibrillation

The electrophysiological substrate that predisposes the human atrium to sustain atrial fibrillation is incompletely understood. However, abnormalities of atrial size, refractory period and conduction are important precursors to this arrhythmia. The propensity of various disease states, cardioactive drugs and the autonomic nervous system to potentiate atrial fibrillation may be explained by changes in these electrophysiological properties.

Effect of intravenous flecainide on atrial vulnerability in man

Sixteen patients were investigated by means of programmed atrial stimulation at two different driving rates: 100 and 120/min. All patients had an increased atrial vulnerability at both driving rates. After intravenous flecainide application (1 mg/kg body weight as a bolus followed by the same amount given by infusion over a period of 20 min) the increased vulnerability was abolished in 11 and 9 patients respectively. In the remaining patients the rate of induced atrial tachyarrhythmia decreased. These findings correlate with a significant prolongation of the effective refractory period of the right atrium and a significant shortening of the relative refractory period of the right atrium. It is concluded that flecainide may be effective in the treatment of atrial arrhythmias in man.

Effect of whiskey on atrial vulnerability and "holiday heart"

Vulnerability to atrial fibrillation and flutter was examined in 11 alcohol abusers who did not have cardiomyopathy or manifest heart failure. Atrial extrastimulation was done with rapid pacing (drive cycle length 500 ms) to facilitate induction of atrial vulnerability, seen in four alcohol abusers. The remaining seven were retested 30 minutes after drinking 60 to 120 ml of 86 proof whiskey (ethanol blood levels were 49 to 101 mg/100 ml but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained normal in all) and atrial fibrillation or flutter was induced in three of the drinkers. Three nondrinkers, symptomatic with sinus bradycardia but not in heart failure, were found not to be vulnerable to atrial fibrillation or flutter, but flutter was induced in two of the three after drinking whiskey. Whiskey did not alter atrial functional refractory periods (mean +/- standard error of the mean 297 +/- 14 to 290 +/- 12 ms) or widen the dispersion among three disparate right atrial sites (57 +/- 13 to 47 +/- 12 ms). Thus, whiskey enhanced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation and flutter in patients without heart failure or cardiomyopathy, substantiating the "holiday heart" syndrome.

Mechanism and clinical significance of atrial repetitive responses in man

We have studied the electrophysiological correlates of atrial repetitive responses, induced by single extrastimuli, in a group of 25 patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. The incidence of repetitive responses was not related to a previous history of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Repetitive responses were observed only when the extrastimulus elicited a significant intra-atrial conduction delay, as measured from the extrastimulus artifact, to two or three points in the atria. This condition was fulfilled only when the basic atrial rhythm was paced, and it was also facilitated by increasing atrial rate, which shortened the atrial effective refractory period. Atrial pacing thus seemed to facilitate the production of atrial repetitive responses by both promoting intra-atrial conduction delays during extrastimulation, and by shortening the atrial refractory period. Atrial repetitive responses are probably a nonspecific phenomenon, unrelated to a tendency towards atrial tachyarrhythmias; their mechanism is probably local re-entry, related to slow conduction of impulses during incomplete repolarization, and under favorable conditions they may precipitate atrial flutter or fibrillation in predisposed patients.

Electrophysiologic studies in atrial fibrillation. Slow conduction of premature impulses: a possible manifestation of the background for reentry

Extrastimulus-induced intraatrial conduction delays were measured in 12 patients with documented episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) by recording atrial electrograms at the high right atrium, His bundle region, and coronary sinus. Seventeen patients with and without heart disease, but without atrial arrhythmias served as the control group. During baseline-paced atrial rhythms, a conduction delay zone could be delineated, near the atrial effective refractory period, during which all extrastimuli produced conduction delays. When compared at the same paced cycle lengths (500 to 650 ms), the patients with AF had shorter atrial effective refractory periods (mean +/- standard deviation 206 +/- 24.1 versus 233 +/- 28.2 in control patients, p less than 0.02), wider conduction delay zones (79 +/- 21.7 ms versus 52 +/- 21 in control patients, p less than 0.01), and longer conduction delays both to the His bundle region (64 +/- 18.3 ms versus 35 +/- 21.7 in control patients, p less than 0.005) and the coronary sinus (76 +/- 18.9 ms versus 35 +/- 16.1 in control patients, p less than 0.001). Repetitive atrial responses were recorded in 6 patients with AF and in 9 control subjects. Sinus nodal function abnormalities were detected in 6 of the patients with fibrillation. Patients with AF had a higher tendency than control subjects to develop slow intraatrial conduction, as well as shorter effective refractory periods. Since both features would favor reentry, they may be the electrophysiologic manifestations of the abnormalities making these patients prone to atrial reentrant arrhythmias. Repetitive atrial responses were of no predictive value. Sinus nodal dysfunction was frequently found, but was not essential for the occurrence of AF.

The electropharmacology of acute drug testing using pacemakers

Acute drug testing in patients is useful to select prophylactic treatment for life-threatening or intractable tachycardias. This is generally done by induction of tachycardias with pacing. Acute studies that depend on temporary insertion of pacing electrodes do not determine efficacy in the same sense as longer term clinical drug trials because of the biased population referred for testing with pacemakers. However, the pharmacologic activity of compounds can be tested in terms of electrical functions such as conductivity and refractoriness not merely of the heart in general, but also of the arrhythmogenic focus. Such data can be directly applied to patients with similar arrhythmias, obviating the confusion often caused by interspecies and disease differences.

Electrophysiologic drug testing in prophylaxis of sporadic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: technique, application, and efficacy in severely symptomatic preexcitation patients

Electrophysiologic drug testing was performed in nine patients with severely symptomatic sporadic (2 to 13 [mean 4.2] attacks/24 months) paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). All patients had control inductions of sustained (greater than 30 seconds) AF by high right atrial stimulation, and attempted inductions following serial administration of drugs. Drugs tested were intravenous procainamide (1.0 to 1.5 gm) (five patients), intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) (three patients), oral quinidine (1.6 to 2.4 gm/day) six patients), oral disopyramide (1.2 to 1.6 gm/day) (four patients), and oral aprindine (100 to 250 mg/day) (four patients). In all patients, one or more drugs prevented induction of sustained AF: procainamide (one patient), quinidine (five patients), disopyramide (four patients), and aprindine (four patients). All patients were treated with drugs which prevented induction of sustained AF and followed for 8 to 40 (mean 24) months. Seven patients tolerated their drugs: six had no AF and one had several short nonsustained attacks. Two patients did not tolerate their drugs: one had paroxysmal palpitation (on decreased aprindine dosage), and one had AF (while off of aprindine). In conclusion, electrophysiologic drug testing is feasible in patients with sporadic PAF. Inability to induce sustained AF following drug administration suggests successful prophylaxis of spontaneous PAF with the same drug.

Failure in the rate adaptation of the atrial refractory period: its relationship to vulnerability

We evaluated the relationship of rate-dependent changes in atrial refractoriness to atrial vulnerability in 39 patients. Vulnerability was considered present when sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias, lasting longer than 1 minute, could be provoked with one to three extra stimuli. Adaptation of atrial refractory period duration to rate was defined as: normal: steep rate reduction with a linear correlation slope value of 0.08 or more; non-adaptation: absence of rate reduction, the slope value being 0 to 0.01; poor adaptation: slight reduction with rate, the slope having values of 0.02 to 0.07. Increased vulnerability was demonstrable in 16 of 17 patients with non-adaptation of the effective refractory period (ERP), and in 10 of 10 with a similar defect of the functional refractory period (FRP); in the intermediate category (poor adaptation) the results for ERP and FRP were 7/11 and 5/6. By way of contrast when both measurements showed normal adaptation, vulnerability was elicited in 2/9 patients. The significance between these groups showed P less than 0.005. Of 17 patients with atrial arrhythmia by Holter, 14 showed poor or non-adaptation of the ERP. It is suggested that poor or absent rate adaptation of the atrial refractory period, and a propensity to atrial fibrillation or flutter, constitute a clinical entity not previously described.

Dispersion of atrial refractoriness in patients with sinus node dysfunction

Abnormal atrial refractoriness was examined as a cause of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AFF) in patients with bradycardia. Refractory periods at three disparate right atrial sites were compared in 17 patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and 16 controls. Atrial pacing shortened refractory periods, but failed to decrease dispersion of refractoriness significantly. During sinus rhythm, duration and dispersion of refractoriness were greater in SND patients than in controls. These differences persisted with atrial pacing. For example, at the paced rate, dispersion of effective refractory periods in SND patients was greater than in controls (62.9 +/- 34 vs 36.6 +/- 21 msec, p less than 0.01). Six SND patients had AFF, but they did not have greater dispersion than other SND patients, or unusually short or long refractory periods. Thus, prolonged and nonuniform refractoriness were features of SND. Abnormal refractoriness in SND reflected atrial disease and persisted with pacing. These abnormalities were not unique to patients with AFF.

Diagnostic implications of atrial vulnerability

Extrastimulation in the atrial vulnerable zone may result in atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF), especially with stimulation of multiple atrial sites. However, the clinical relevance of such vulnerability to AFF is unknown. Therefore, single twice-threshold extrastimuli were applied at three disparate right atrial sites in 45 consecutive unmedicated patients without overt heart failure. Group I consisted of 12 patients with documented spontaneous paroxysms of AFF. AFF was duplicated in 9 to 12 patients using extrastimulation in the vulnerable zone (5 in sinus rhythm, 4 requiring atrial pacing at 120 beats/min). Group II consisted of 33 patients without documented AFF dispite monitoring. Vulnerability to AFF was found in 12 of 33 patients (4 in sinus rhythm, 8 requiring atrial pacing). The duration of induced AFF did not discriminate between the two groups. Among the 12 Group II patients vulnerable to AFF, 3 had rapid palpitations, 2 had undiagnosed rapid tachycardias, 1 had atrial tachycardias and 1 junctional tachycardias. In vulnerable patients, the pause after AFF correlated with the pause after atrial pacing, but only 1 of 11 Group II patients with sick sinus syndrome was vulnerable. Thus, paroxysmal AFF may be duplicated with the extrastimulus technique if sufficient arial sites are stimulated, providing a model for evaluation of these arrhythmias. But atrial vulnerability, even to extrastimulation at normal heart rates, may be seen in patients suspected of atrial tachyarrhythmia in the absence of documented AFF, and does not contribute to the diagnosis of sinoatrial dysfunction.