Electrophysiology, hemodynamic and arrhythmia efficacy model studies on encainide

Effect of encainide, ODE, MODE, and flecainide on ADP/5-HT induced platelet aggregation and in the anesthetized dog coronary artery stenosis-occlusion model of intravascular thrombosis

Encainide is a class 1C antiarrhythmic agent that is indicated for the treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias, such as sustained ventricular tachycardia. Furthermore, encainide possesses a moderate degree of antiserotonin activity, which was quantitated in this present study by determining displacement of [3H]spiperone binding from rat cortical 5-HT2 binding sites. The Ki for encainide in this model was 66.1 nM, compared to 2.6 nM for ketanserin. Two encainide metabolites, ODE and MODE, were also active, but were weaker than encainide. Additionally, these agents were found to inhibit platelet aggregation induced in vitro in human platelet-rich plasma by the combination of ADP and serotonin. In view of the fact that serotonin is one of a variety of humoral factors capable of activating blood platelets and has been recently implicated as playing a role in certain thrombotic syndromes, encainide, along with its two principal human metabolites, ODE and MODE, and another class 1C antiarrhythmic, flecainide, were evaluated in an in vivo model of intravascular thrombosis. Intraduodenal doses of 1 mg/kg of either encainide, ODE, or MODE significantly inhibited thrombosis in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis-occlusion.

Comparative hemodynamic effects of procainamide, tocainide, and encainide in severe chronic heart failure

Many of the newer antiarrhythmic agents are said to cause minimal myocardial depression, but their hemodynamic effects have not been invasively evaluated and compared in patients with severe chronic heart failure. In a randomized, crossover study, the hemodynamic responses to single oral doses of procainamide (750 mg), tocainide (600 mg), and encainide (50 mg) given to 21 patients with severe chronic heart failure were compared. Cardiac performance decreased with all three drugs, but the magnitude of deterioration differed among the three agents. Stroke volume index decreased with procainamide (-5 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), tocainide (-7 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), and encainide (-8 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), but the decline was significantly greater with encainide than with procainamide (p less than 0.05). Similarly, left ventricular filling pressure increased with tocainide and encainide (+4 +/- 1 and +5 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively; both p less than 0.05), but not with procainamide; the increase was significantly greater with tocainide and encainide than with procainamide (p less than 0.001). These deleterious hemodynamic effects were accompanied by worsening symptoms of heart failure in six patients with encainide and seven patients with tocainide but in only two patients with procainamide. Serum levels for all drugs were in the therapeutic range. In conclusion, although the three type I antiarrhythmic agents tested may all adversely affect left ventricular function in patients with heart failure, encainide and tocainide are more likely than procainamide to cause hemodynamic and clinical deterioration.

Encainide

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent having little or no effect on action-potential duration or maximum diastolic potential but decreasing the maximum rate of phase O depolarization as well as increasing atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In intact animals or humans, encainide increases the AH, PR, QRS, and H-V intervals while not affecting the sinus node cycle length or JT interval. QT interval increases only by the concomitant increase in the QRS interval. Encainide is metabolized to O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), both of which are also antiarrhythmics with similar pharmacology to encainide. Encainide and its metabolites have little negative inotropic activity and ancillary pharmacology. Consequently, encainide has little or no effect on hemodynamic variables in patients with either normal or compromised cardiac function. The drug is well tolerated, with side effects being mainly those associated with its local anesthetic activity such as blurred vision and dizziness. Encainide is particularly effective in patients with excessive premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and less so in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Like all antiarrhythmics, encainide may aggravate or precipitate new arrhythmias (proarrhythmia). The overall incidence of proarrhythmia is about 10%, with less occurring in patients with PVCs and more in those with sustained VT; also, the incidence of proarrhythmia is higher in patients with underlying heart disease. Encainide is also effective for the treatment of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, PSVT (both PAF as well as reentry of the nodal or W-P-W type), and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Its dosage and role in antiarrhythmic therapy are discussed.

New antiarrhythmic drugs: tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, encainide, and amiodarone

Tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, encainide, and amiodarone are antiarrhythmic agents that have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for general use in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. All five agents are effective in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, whereas encainide, flecainide, and amiodarone are also useful in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias and the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (although not yet approved for these indications). Tocainide and mexiletine are similar to lidocaine and are as effective as quinidine in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Encainide and flecainide are superior to quinidine for the control of ventricular ectopic beats and as effective as quinidine for patients with ventricular tachycardia. Amiodarone is the most effective agent available for treating patients with ventricular tachycardia, but it is also the most toxic antiarrhythmic agent and should be used only when other antiarrhythmic drugs have not been effective or tolerated.

Electrophysiologic study in the management of cardiac arrest survivors: a critical review

This review discusses the value and limitations of EPS in the management of cardiac arrest survivors. Uncertainties associated with EPS include a lack of consensus with respect to stimulation protocol, end points for VT suppression during drug testing, significance of induced polymorphic VT or VF, and timing of EPS after myocardial infarction. Despite methodologic shortcomings in most clinical studies, a useful body of knowledge has emerged. In cardiac arrest survivors, incidence of inducible sustained VT ranged from 35% to 75%. Where induced VT (sustained or nonsustained) was successfully suppressed, recurrent arrhythmic events occurred in 0% to 33% of patients over a 1- to 5-year follow-up period. Failed regimens correlated with a high risk of arrhythmic recurrence. EPS also helps to select patients for the implantable defibrillator or electrocardiac surgery. In conclusion, EPS appears empirically useful in the management of cardiac arrest survivors with coronary artery disease; its value in other disease entities is uncertain.