Assessment of the mitral valve splitability score by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography

Impact of tissue harmonic imaging on the assessment of rheumatic mitral stenosis

We examined the effect of tissue harmonic imaging on the echocardiographic splitability score and valve area measurement of 40 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Planimetered valve areas were unaffected by the use of harmonic imaging, but valve scores were increased, particularly in patients with scores <10.

Echocardiography in Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty

Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty (BV) has been used successfully in recent years for the relief of mitral stenosis, and in many instances, as an alternative to cardiac surgery. This procedure requires precise evaluation of both valve morphology and function for preprocedure decision making and follow-up of patients. Two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography is a unique, noninvasive tool for evaluating morphologic characteristics of valve, subvalvular apparatus, and valve annular size. Doppler echocardiography provides functional information on transvalvular flow velocity, which can be used to derive pressure gradient across valve and regurgitant flow. Mitral valve area can be either obtained from 2-D echocardiography or derived from Doppler pressure half time. Echocardiography is currently the most widely used technique for assessing results of percutaneous BV. More recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used for the evaluation of patients undergoing percutaneous mitral BV in whom left atrial thrombus is suspected and for the intraoperative monitoring of the valvuloplasty procedure. In this article we discuss the advantages and limitations of both transthoracic echocardiography and TEE, its recent developments in monitoring the procedure, evaluation of immediate results and long term follow-up after the valvuloplasty procedure, and its clinical utility in the selection of patients for percutaneous BV.

Colour doppler valvar and subvalvar flow diameter imaging versus echo score in mitral stenosis: comparison with type of surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the value of echo score with that of Doppler subvalvar flow broadening in deciding the type of mitral stenosis surgery.

PATIENTS

30 patients, mean age 47 years, with severe stenosis undergoing surgery were divided into two groups according to type of surgery: open heart commissurotomy (group 1, n = 12), or prosthesis (group 2, n = 18). A control group of 10 patients with prosthesis served as reference, representing mild stenosis without subvalvar connection.

METHODS

For echo, the score proposed by Wilkins for cross sectional imaging was used. For Doppler, the flow diameters were measured in cm by an independent examiner from the long axis view in early diastole at two levels: (1) at the level of the stenosis (origin flow diameter), and (2) 1.5 cm downstream from the stenosis in the left ventricle (subvalvar flow diameter) with calculation of a Doppler ratio relating these two measurements, expressed as a percentage of broadening. Diagnostic value was compared for both procedures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, mitral valve areas, or haemodynamics for the two groups. Mean values (SD) were: echo score: group 1, 9.83 (1.26) v group 2, 10.8 (8.1), NS; Doppler ratio %: group 1, 44 (24) v group 2, 12 (21) (P < 0.001); control group: 69 (15). The per cent diagnostic value for an open heart commissurotomy of respective cut off points was: Doppler ratio > 25% (range 71% to 87%); echo score < 10 (range 50% to 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

The new Doppler ratio diagnostic value agreed better with surgical management, repair or prosthesis, in this study. Thus, it appears to better reflect the subvalvar involvement and changes in kinetics than the echo score alone. This easy Doppler method might become a routine examination for follow up of patients with open heart commissurotomy, to avoid performing repeated transoesophageal echocardiography.

The value of transesophageal echocardiography in predicting immediate and long-term outcome of balloon mitral valvuloplasty: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of transesophageal echocardiography in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome of balloon mitral valvuloplasty, and compare the results to transthoracic echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography accurately detects left atrial thrombi and allows better visualization of mitral valve morphology; however, its value in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome of balloon mitral valvuloplasty had not been assessed as adequately as for transthoracic echocardiography.

METHODS

In 56 patients referred for balloon mitral valvuloplasty, both transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were performed (Group A). An echo score for both techniques was used to reflect mitral valve morphology, and its predictive value for immediate and long-term outcome of the valvuloplasty was assessed. The impact of transesophageal echocardiography in preventing procedural embolic events in those 56 patients was assessed by comparison to another group of 41 patients, who were examined only by transthoracic echocardiography prior to balloon mitral valvuloplasty (Group B).

RESULTS

In Group A, transesophageal echocardiography detected left atrial thrombus in seven, while transthoracic echocardiography detected left atrial thrombus in two patients. After 2 months of warfarin therapy, a repeat transesophageal echo examination in four patients showed resolution of thrombus in three who went on to have balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Among the 52 patients who eventually had the procedure after thrombus was excluded by transesophageal echocardiography, there were no embolic events, compared to three embolic events among the 41 patients in Group B (P = 0.08). The transthoracic echocardiography scores, while slightly higher, correlated well with transesophageal echocardiography scores (r = 0.51, P < 0.001). The increase in mitral valve area did not correlate well to total transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography scores, while it correlated negatively to valve calcification by transthoracic (r = -0.29, P < 0.05) and mobility by transesophageal echocardiography (r = -0.59, P < 0.02). At follow-up (7 +/- 4 months) nonsurvivors (7/56) had higher total scores by either transthoracic (P < 0.01) or transesophageal echocardiography (P < 0.05) compared to survivors. The percent reduction in mitral valve area was greater with age (r = 0.5, P < 0.02), time to follow-up (r = 0.67, P < 0.002), valve mobility by transthoracic echocardiography (r = 0.59, P < 0.01), and valve calcification by transthoracic echocardiography (r = 0.37, P = 0.09) and transesophageal echocardiography (r = 0.4, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Transesophageal echocardiography is superior to transthoracic echocardiography in detecting left atrial thrombi, and it may reduce the risk of embolic events following balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Assessment of mitral valve morphology by transesophageal echocardiography is complementary and not superior to assessment by transthoracic echocardiography. Mitral valve calcification and mobility appear to be the best morphological predictors of immediate and long-term outcome following balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of severe rheumatic submitral valve stenosis

The submitral apparatus may play a predominant role in rheumatic mitral stenosis and should be evaluated aggressively with Doppler echocardiography, especially in patients in whom percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy is being considered. The following case presents a patient with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis in whom some noninvasive clues alerted us to the presence of predominant submitral stenosis.