Cholesterol and atherosclerosis: "the new is the old rediscovered"

Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy: part I

This is the first of a series of reviews of the controversy that swirled around the "lipid hypothesis" of atherosclerosis for so many years. Today, in the era of the statins, there is no longer any doubt about the value of decreasing blood cholesterol levels. In fact, "the lower the better" is the position of many clinicians. However, getting to this point has been a long uphill battle marked by heated debate and sometimes violent disagreement. The history of this controversy is worth telling for its own sake and because remembering it may help us avoid similar mistakes in the future. The history of this controversy is worth telling for its own sake and because remembering it may help us avoid similar mistakes in the future.

Lipoproteins and atherogenesis

Like many complex disease processes, atherogenesis represents the interaction of an array of genetic and environmental factors. From nonhuman animal models to the investigation of epidemiologic factors in man, no single, overriding cause for the development of this indolent vascular disease has been identified. However, the cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein particles are closely tied to the development of the disease. The genetic and environmental influences on the concentrations of specific lipoprotein subspecies provide a context for identifying patients at risk as well as for developing effective therapeutic strategies to influence and prevent the sequelae of atherogenesis.