Subpectoral implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator combined with a nonepicardial lead system: preliminary experience with a novel approach

Late complications in patients with pectoral defibrillator implants with transvenous defibrillator lead systems: high incidence of insulation breakdown

As the majority of ICDs with transvenous leads are now implanted in the pectoral region, complications associated with the technique are being identified. To determine the incidence of lead complications in patients with transvenous defibrillator leads and ICDs implanted in the pectoral region, 132 unselected consecutive patients with transvenous defibrillator leads had ICDs implanted in the pectoral region. Three lead systems were used: (1) lead system 1 (45 patients) consisted of a transvenous pacing sensing lead and a superior vena cava coil with a submuscular patch used for defibrillation; (2) lead system 2 (36 patients) utilized a CPI Endotak lead system; and (3) lead system 3 (51 patients) utilized a Medtronic Transvene lead system. Patients were followed for 3-54 months (cumulative 2,269, mean 18 months). The average duration of follow-up with the three systems was 32, 12 and 11 months, respectively. At 30 months follow-up, all three lead systems had a low incidence of complications. However, there was a 13% overall incidence (45% actuarial incidence) of erosion of the insulation of the pacing sensing lead of system 1 at 50 months of follow-up. All lead complications were seen in patients with ICDs whose weights were > 195 g and volumes > 115 cc. The erosion was probably a consequence of the pressure by the large ICD against the lead in the pectoral pocket. Follow-up with lead systems 2 and 3 is relatively short (average 12 months) but no lead erosions were seen. Pectoral implantation of ICDs with long transvenous leads and large generators is associated with a moderate risk of late complications in the form of insulation breaks caused by pressure of the generator against the leads. The use of less redundant leads coupled with smaller ICDs will probably eliminate this complication.

Initial clinical experience with a new small sized third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results of a multicenter study. European Ventak Mini Investigator Group

This study reports the acute clinical experience with the new CPI VENTAK MINI: a small sized (68 cc), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with 33 J stored energy. Implantation of the device was attempted in 113 patients (90 men, mean age 57 +/- 16 years, 64 with coronary artery disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 41%) with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VF). All 113 patients (100%) were ultimately implanted, 12% of them for ICD replacement. Transvenous lead implantation was accomplished in all 104 patients (100%) receiving new leads, 95% of them with a single lead configuration. The safety criteria for implantation (2 consecutive VF conversions at 15 J or 3 at 20 J, in both cases without failures to convert) were demonstrated in all but 7 patients (6%). In 6 of these, safety criteria were not fully assessed while in the last patient defibrillation efficacy was not determined. Of the 104 patients with new leads, 90% underwent pectoral implantation. Of the 9 patients (9%) abdominally implanted, only 4 (4%) (3 children) were judged small sized for pectoral implant. At predischarge testing, reliable VF detection and conversion were noted in 96 of 97 patients tested. There was no perioperative mortality. At a 3.6 +/- 1.3 months follow-up, 34% of the patients had a spontaneous arrhythmic event, and 24% of the patients received shocks. Clinically inappropriate therapies occurred in 8% of the episodes in which any kind of therapy was delivered. This study demonstrates the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of the new device, and that pectoral implantation can be performed in the large majority of patients.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: another device to cover

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a mechanical device developed to manage patients with life-threatening arrhythmias when pharmacologic control has failed or produced unacceptable side effects. It is a significant amount of foreign material with a generator pack (volume 113 to 145 cc, weight 197 to 235 gm) and two or three leads and patches that are inserted into or placed on the heart. Although it has worked very well in preventing premature death, there have been complications associated with the device itself. The most significant of these has been exposure and/or infection. We present three patients who have experienced this problem. Improved coverage has been accomplished by burying the implant beneath the rectus abdominis muscle in situations where skin and subcutaneous tissue alone have proved inadequate. By dividing one or two tendinous inscriptions and the anterior limb of the internal oblique fascia, a musculofascial pocket is created to contain the generator and lead wires. This provided satisfactory coverage in two of our three patients. The single failure resulted from external trauma to the abdominal wall.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting

Displacement of an ICD electrode is a possible complication after changes in heart size after CABG and simultaneous implantation of an epicardial lead ICD. To prevent potentially life-threatening ICD dysfunction in patients who are candidates for CABG and ICD implantation, we suggest the use of transvenous ICD systems or a staged procedure (CABG followed by ICD implantation) rather than a simultaneous operation.

NASPE/ACC/AHA/ESC medical/scientific statement special report--clinical investigation of antiarrhythmic devices: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Joint Task Force of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Working Groups on Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology

The goal of radiofrequency catheter ablation and the criterion for efficacy is the elimination of arrhythmogenic myocardium. The application of radiofrequency current in the heart clearly results in lower morbidity and mortality rates than thoracic and cardiac surgical procedures in general, and comparisons of therapy with radiofrequency catheter ablation and therapy with thoracic and cardiac surgical procedures in randomized clinical trials are unwarranted. Trials of radiofrequency catheter ablation versus medical or implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy may be indicated in certain conditions, such as ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease. Randomized trials are recommended for new and radical departures in technology that aim to accomplish the same goals as radiofrequency catheter ablation. Surveillance using registries and/or databases is necessary in the assessment of long-term safety and efficacy.

Clinical investigation of antiarrhythmic devices. A statement for healthcare professionals from a joint task force of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Working Groups on Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology

The goal of radiofrequency catheter ablation and the criterion for efficacy is the elimination of arrhythmogenic myocardium. The application of radiofrequency current in the heart clearly results in lower morbidity and mortality rates than thoracic and cardiac surgical procedures in general, and comparisons of therapy with radiofrequency catheter ablation and therapy with thoracic and cardiac surgical procedures in randomized clinical trials is unwarranted. Trials of radiofrequency catheter ablation versus medical or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy may be indicated in certain conditions, such as ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease. Randomized trials are recommended for new and radical departures in technology that aim to accomplish the same goals as radiofrequency catheter ablation. Surveillance using registries and/or databases is necessary in the assessment of long-term safety and efficacy.

Subpectoral implantation of ICD generators: long-term follow-up

A nonthoracotomy surgical approach using an endocardial electrode and combined implantation of a subcutaneous patch and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator in a subpectoral pocket has been described. We report the long-term follow-up results in patients undergoing implantation using this approach. The patient population consisted of 28 patients (22 men and 6 women) with a mean age of 59 +/- 12 years. The underlying heart disease consisted of coronary artery disease in 20 patients and dilated cardiomyopathy in 8 patients. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was the mode of presentation in 16 patients and sudden cardiac death in 12 patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31% +/- 6%. The lead system consisted of an 8 French bipolar passive fixation rate sensing lead positioned at the right ventricular apex, an 11 French spring coil electrode positioned at the superior vena cava-right atrial junction (surface area 700 mm2), and submuscular placement of a large patch (surface area 28 cm2) on the anterolateral chest wall near the cardiac apex via a submammary incision. A defibrillation threshold of < or = 15 joules (J) was required for implantation. This criterion was not satisfied in five patients; thus, a limited thoracotomy was performed via the submammary incision, and the large patch was placed epicardially. The mean R wave amplitude was 12 +/- 3 mV, the mean pacing threshold was 1.0 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 msec, and the mean defibrillation threshold was 12.6 +/- 3 J. ICD generators implanted were the Ventak-P in 17, PCD-7217 in 5, and the Cadence V-100 in 6 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator patch erosion presenting as hemoptysis

Although the internal cardioverter defibrillator has prevented many premature deaths from lethal ventricular arrhythmias, some complications have occurred with its use. We present a patient who developed a fistula between the left ventricle and a bronchus, caused by erosion of the ventricular patch. The patient's presenting symptom was hemoptysis. Physicians caring for patients with these devices should be aware of this potential problem.

Consistent subcutaneous prepectoral implantation of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) that can be placed in the prepectoral region rather than implanted in the abdominal wall.

DESIGN

We report the experience of placement of this new ICD in the prepectoral region in 13 patients from Sept. 28, 1993, through Jan. 10, 1994, at the Mayo Clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients offered this new ICD underwent placement of transvenous defibrillation leads, and the pulse generator was placed in a pocket formed in the subcutaneous, prepectoral space. Testing ensured a defibrillation threshold of 24 J or less.

RESULTS

In all 13 patients, the pulse generator could be placed in the subcutaneous, prepectoral space. In all except one patient, acceptable defibrillation thresholds were achieved by using lead systems placed totally transvenously. Only one patient required placement of a subcutaneous patch. All but two patients were dismissed from the hospital within 3 days after the ICD implantation.

CONCLUSION

Consistent subcutaneous, prepectoral placement of this new ICD pulse generator is possible. Because the entire procedure can be performed in the pacemaker implantation room, the potential exists for decreasing the duration of the hospitalization and associated costs.