Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with acute myocardial infarction and one-vessel coronary artery disease

Lipid-lowering therapy after coronary revascularization

Atherosclerosis is often asymptomatic, unrecognized, and undertreated. Lumen irregularities are important angiographic findings that should be addressed aggressively through risk factor modification, medical therapy, and coronary revascularization. Both angiographic and clinical benefits have been demonstrated with lipid reduction therapy in randomized clinical trials. Coronary revascularization is indicated for symptom relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndromes at "intermediate" and "high" risk of subsequent death or myocardial infarction. In patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), future cardiac events may be related to lumen renarrowing or to progression of atherosclerotic disease at sites remote from the site of coronary revascularization. The time course of restenosis is relatively self-limiting, generally occurring within 6-12 months after the procedure. Clinical events occurring > 1 year after PCI generally relate to new lesions or progression of existing atherosclerotic disease. Patients with diabetes mellitus may be at higher risk for late coronary events than nondiabetic patients. In post-coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients, the majority of late events relate to degeneration of saphenous vein grafts. Lipid lowering therapy after coronary revascularization has been shown to prevent clinical events related to plaque instability and inhibit progression of saphenous vein graft disease. Thus, there are 2 goals in management of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease: (1) to relieve the flow-limiting stenosis, and (2) to prevent future clinical events with aggressive lipid lowering and modification of other risk factors. Patients, specialists, and primary care physicians each need to take accountability for this risk-factor modification.

Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era

Historically, risk stratification for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has centered on 3 principles: assessment of left ventricular function, detection of residual myocardial ischemia, and estimation of the risk for sudden cardiac death. Although these factors still have important prognostic implications for these patients, our ability to predict adverse cardiac events has significantly improved over the last several years. Recent studies have identified powerful predictors of adverse cardiac events available from the patient history, physical examination, initial electrocardiogram, and blood testing early in the evaluation of patients with AMI. Numerous studies performed in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy with either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty have emphasized the importance of a patent infarct related artery for long-term survival. The predictive value of a variety of noninvasive and invasive tests to predict myocardial electrical instability have been under active investigation in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy. The current understanding of the clinically important predictors of clinical outcomes in survivors of AMI is reviewed in this article.

Lipid-lowering therapy after coronary revascularization: the interventional cardiologist's perspective

Despite the success of coronary interventions in the treatment of stenosis due to coronary atherosclerosis, it behooves cardiologists to treat the underlying disease by decreasing patients' cholesterol levels. Intravascular ultrasound has made it possible to detect plaque accumulation not visible on angiography. Although advanced lesions that are fibrous and calcific can be treated with atherectomy and lasers, it is the soft, lipid-laden plaque that is particularly vulnerable to rupture and leads to coronary events. Therefore, attention must also focus on decreasing atherosclerotic progression in patients who have undergone coronary interventions. Studies have clearly shown the value of cholesterol reduction in decreasing coronary events. However, a review of cardiologists' practices shows that more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is needed. One way to achieve this goal is to treat and monitor patients who have undergone revascularization procedures and to encourage patients to become more involved in their own care.

Pravastatin limitation of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries (PLAC I): reduction in atherosclerosis progression and clinical events. PLAC I investigation

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of pravastatin on progression of coronary atherosclerosis and ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND

Few clinical trial data support the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate elevations in cholesterol levels.

METHODS

Four hundred eight patients (mean age 57 years) with coronary artery disease and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or = 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/liter) but < 190 mg/dl ([4.91 mmol/liter]) despite diet were randomized in a 3-year study to receive pravastatin or placebo. Atherosclerosis progression was evaluated by quantitative coronary arteriography.

RESULTS

Baseline mean LDL cholesterol was 164 mg/dl (4.24 mmol/liter). Pravastatin decreased total and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels by 19%, 28% and 8%, respectively, and increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol by 7% (p < or = 0.001 vs. placebo for all lipid variables). Progression of atherosclerosis was reduced by 40% for minimal vessel diameter (p = 0.04), particularly in lesions < 50% stenosis at baseline. There was a consistent although not statistically significant effect on mean diameter and percent diameter stenosis. There were also fewer new lesions in those assigned pravastatin (p < or = 0.03). Myocardial infarction was reduced during active treatment (8 in the pravastatin group, 17 in the placebo group; log-rank test, p < or = 0.05; 60% risk reduction), with the benefit beginning to emerge after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate cholesterol elevations, pravastatin reduces progression of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. The time course of event reduction increases the potential for a relatively rapid decrease in the clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease with lipid lowering.