Objective benefit of nifedipine in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. Double-blind controlled study

Calcium channel blockers for primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon

BACKGROUND

Raynaud's phenomenon is a vasospastic disease characterized by digital pallor, cyanosis, and extremity pain. Primary Raynaud's phenomenon is not associated with underlying disease, but secondary Raynaud's phenomenon is associated with connective tissue disorders such as systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and mixed connective tissue disease. Calcium channel blockers promote vasodilation and are commonly used when drug treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon is required.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) versus placebo for treatment of individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon with respect to Raynaud's type (primary vs secondary) and type and dose of CCBs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (May 19, 2017), MEDLINE (1946 to May 19, 2017), Embase (1947 to May 19, 2017), clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Portal. We applied no language restrictions. We also searched bibliographies of retrieved articles and contacted key experts for additional and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing calcium channel blockers versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed search results and risk of bias and extracted trial data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

This review contains 38 RCTs (33 cross-over RCTs) with an average duration of 7.4 weeks and 982 participants; however, not all trials reported all outcomes of interest. Nine of the identified trials studied patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (N = 365), five studied patients with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (N = 63), and the rest examined a mixture of patients with primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (N = 554). The most frequently encountered risk of bias types were incomplete outcome data and poor reporting of randomization and allocation methods.When researchers considered both primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon, evidence of moderate quality (downgraded for inconsistency) from 23 trials with 528 participants indicates that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of attacks. CCBs reduced the average number of attacks per week by six ( weighted mean difference (WMD) -6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.60 to - 5.67; I² = 98%) compared with 13.7 attacks per week with placebo. When review authors excluded Kahan 1985C, a trial showing a very large reduction in the frequency of attacks, data showed that CCBs reduced attack frequency by 2.93 per week (95% CI -3.44 to -2.43; I² = 77%).Low-quality evidence (downgraded for imprecision and inconsistency) from six trials with 69 participants suggests that the average duration of attacks did not differ in a statistically significant or clinically meaningful way between CCBs and placebo (WMD -1.67 minutes, 95% CI -3.29 to 0); this is equivalent to a -9% difference (95% CI -18% to 0%).Moderate-quality evidence (downgraded for inconsistency) based on 16 trials and 415 participants showed that CCBs reduced attack severity by 0.62 cm (95% CI -0.72 to - 0.51) on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (lower scores indicate less severity); this was equivalent to absolute and relative percent reductions of 6% (95% CI -11% to -8%) and 9% (95% CI -11% to -8%), respectively, which may not be clinically meaningful.Improvement in Raynaud's pain (low-quality evidence; downgraded for imprecision and inconsistency) and in disability as measured by a patient global assessment (moderate-quality evidence; downgraded for imprecision) favored CCBs (pain: WMD -1.47 cm, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.74; patient global: WMD -0.37 cm, 95% CI -0.73 to 0, when assessed on a 0 to 10 cm visual analogue scale, with lower scores indicating less pain and less disability). However, these effect estimates were likely underpowered, as they were based on limited numbers of participants, respectively, 62 and 92. For pain assessment, absolute and relative percent improvements were 15% (95% -22% to -7%) and 47% (95% CI -71% to -24%), respectively. For patient global assessment, absolute and relative percent improvements were 4% (95% CI -7% to 0%) and 9% (95% CI -19% to 0%), respectively.Subgroup analyses by Raynaud's type, CCB class, and CCB dose suggest that dihydropyridine CCBs in higher doses may be more effective for primary Raynaud's than for secondary Raynaud's, and CCBs likely have a greater effect in primary than in secondary Raynaud's. However, differences were small and were not found for all outcomes. Dihydropyridine CCBs were studied as they are the subgroup of CCBs that are not cardioselective and are traditionally used in RP treatment whereas other CCBs such as verapamil are not routinely used and diltiazem is not used as first line subtype of CCBs. Most trial data pertained to nifedipine.Withdrawals from studies due to adverse effects were inconclusive owing to a wide CI (risk ratio [RR] 1.30, 95% CI 0.51 to 3.33) from two parallel studies with 63 participants (low-quality evidence downgraded owing to imprecision and a high attrition rate); absolute and relative percent differences in withdrawals were 6% (95% CI -14% to 26%) and 30% (95% CI -49% to 233%), respectively. In cross-over trials, although a meta-analysis was not performed, withdrawals were more common with CCBs than with placebo. The most common side effects were headache, dizziness, nausea, palpitations, and ankle edema. However, in all trials, no serious adverse events (death or hospitalization) were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials with evidence of low to moderate quality showed that CCBs (especially the dihydropyridine class) may be useful in reducing the frequency, duration, severity of attacks, pain and disability associated with Raynaud's phenomenon. Higher doses may be more effective than lower doses and these CCBs may be more effective in primary RP. Although there were more withdrawals due to adverse events in the treatment groups, no serious adverse events were reported.

Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers are the most commonly prescribed drugs for people with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Primary Raynaud's phenomenon is a common condition characterised by an exaggerated vasospastic response to cold or emotion: classically the digits (fingers and toes) turn white, then blue, then red. This is an update of the review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon as determined by attack rates, severity scores, participant-preference scores and physiological measurements.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Vascular Trial Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2016) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 12). In addition the TSC searched clinical trials databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of oral calcium channel blockers for the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and their quality, and extracted the data. Data extraction included adverse events. We contacted trial authors for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven randomised trials with 296 participants. Four trials examined nifedipine and the remainder nicardipine. Comparisons were with placebo in six trials and with both dazoxiben and placebo in one trial (only the nifedipine versus placebo data were used within this review). Treatment with oral calcium channel blockers was minimally effective in primary Raynaud's phenomenon at decreasing the frequency of attacks (standardised mean difference of 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.38, P = 0.003). This translates to 1.72 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.84) fewer attacks per week on calcium channel blockers compared to placebo. One trial provided details on duration of attacks reporting no statistically significant difference between the nicardipine and placebo groups (no P value reported). Only two trials provided any detail of statistical comparisons of (unvalidated) severity scores between treatment groups: one of these trials (60 participants) reported a mean severity score of 1.55 on placebo and 1.36 on nicardipine, difference 0.2 (95% CI of difference 0 to 0.4, no P value reported) and the other trial (three participants only with primary Raynaud's phenomenon) reported a median severity score of 2 on both nicardipine and placebo treatment (P > 0.999) suggesting little effect on severity. Participant-preference scores were included in four trials, but in only two were results specific to participants with primary Raynaud's phenomenon, and scoring systems differed between trials: scores differed between treatments in only one trial, in which 33% of participants on placebo and 73% on nifedipine reported improvement in symptoms (P < 0.001). Physiological measurements were included as outcome measures in five trials (different methodologies were used in each): none of these trials found any statistically significant between-treatment group differences. Treatment with calcium channel blockers appeared to be associated with a number of adverse reactions, including headaches, flushing and oedema (swelling). Overall, the trials were classed as being at low or unclear risk of bias; and the quality of the evidence presented was moderate for number of attacks, very low for duration of attacks, high for severity scores and low for patient preference scores.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The randomised controlled trials included in this review provide moderate quality evidence that oral calcium channel blockers are minimally effective in the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon as measured by the frequency of attacks and high-quality evidence that they have little effect on severity. We are unable to comment on duration of attacks or on patient preference due to the very low and low quality of evidence as a result of small sample sizes in the included studies and the variable data quality of outcome measures.

Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers are the most commonly prescribed drugs for people with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Primary Raynaud's phenomenon is a common condition characterised by an exaggerated vasospastic response to cold or emotion: classically the digits (fingers and toes) turn white, then blue, then red.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon as determined by attack rates, severity scores, participant-preference scores and physiological measurements.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Specialised Register (last searched February 2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 1). In addition the TSC searched clinical trials databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects of oral calcium channel blockers for the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and their quality, and extracted the data. Data extraction included adverse events. We contacted trial authors for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven randomised trials with 296 participants. Although overall all the trials were classed as being at low or unclear risk of bias, the sample size of the included trials was small and there was unclear reporting of outcomes. Four trials examined nifedipine and the remainder nicardipine. Comparisons were with placebo in six trials and with both dazoxiben and placebo in one trial (only the nifedipine versus placebo data were used within this review). Treatment with oral calcium channel blockers was minimally effective in primary Raynaud's phenomenon at decreasing the frequency of attacks (standardised mean difference of 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.38, P = 0.003). This translates to 1.72 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.84) fewer attacks per week on calcium channel blockers compared to placebo. One trial provided details on duration of attacks reporting no statistically significant difference between the nicardipine and placebo groups (no P value reported). Only two trials provided any detail of statistical comparisons of (unvalidated) severity scores between treatment groups: one of these trials (60 participants) reported a mean severity score of 1.55 on placebo and 1.36 on nicardipine, difference 0.2 (95% CI of difference 0 to 0.4, no P value reported) and the other trial (three participants only with primary Raynaud's phenomenon) reported a median severity score of 2 on both nicardipine and placebo treatment (P > 0.999). Participant-preference scores were included in four trials, but in only two were results specific to participants with primary Raynaud's phenomenon, and scoring systems differed between trials: scores differed between treatments in only one trial, in which 33% of participants on placebo and 73% on nifedipine reported improvement in symptoms (P < 0.001). Physiological measurements were included as outcome measures in five trials (different methodologies were used in each): in none of these trials were any statistically significant between-treatment group differences found. Treatment with calcium channel blockers appeared to be associated with a number of adverse reactions, including headaches, flushing and oedema (swelling).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The randomised controlled trials included in this review provide moderate-quality evidence that oral calcium channel blockers are minimally effective in the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon as measured by the frequency of attacks. However, the results of this review were limited by small sample sizes in the included studies and by variable data quality, particularly with regard to outcome measures.

Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine the efficacy of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for primary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). Primary outcomes were frequency and severity of RP attacks.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted using primary data sources: Medline, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of >2 days' duration with <35% dropouts. Eighteen of 31 trials were eligible for inclusion [13 nifedipine vs placebo; five other CCBs vs placebo (n = 361)]. The main reasons for trial exclusion were: subset data (primary RP) not provided (n = 10); data published more than once (n = 1); lack of control group (n = 1); and lack of randomization (n = 1). Data were abstracted independently and a weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for the outcomes.

RESULTS

The WMD (95% confidence interval) of all CCBs vs placebo for reduction in the frequency of attacks (n = 17) over 1 week was -5.00 (-9.02, -0.99) (P = 0.01) or -2.80 (-3.90, -1.70) when heterogeneity was considered, and -6.05 (-11.19,-0.19) (P = 0.04) for nifedipine alone (n = 10). The WMD of all CCBs vs placebo (n = 8) for reduction in severity of attacks (assessed with a 10-cm visual analogue scale) was -1.39 (-2.20, -0.58) (P = 0.0007) and -1.81 (-3.08, -0.54) (P = 0.005) for nifedipine alone (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Several small RCTs of CCBs for primary RP have been conducted and have yielded clinical improvement in the frequency and severity of ischaemic attacks. Most trials were crossover trials in which order effect was not studied; this may have introduced bias. The effect size may have been small because of low dosing in studies. The efficacy of CCBs for reducing severity and frequency of ischaemic attacks in primary RP is small (average of 2.8 to 5.0 fewer attacks per week and a 33% reduction in severity).

Evaluation and treatment of hypertension

Hypertension is a significant and prevalent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease and target organ damage. The urgency of treatment of high blood pressure depends on the level of blood pressure elevation and the presence of coexistent risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Likewise, the level to which blood pressure is reduced is not restricted to the definition of high blood pressure but instead depends on the underlying disease. Diabetes and renal insufficiency, for example, require blood pressure goals below those that are traditionally defined. In the absence of contraindications, beta-blockers and diuretics are still recommended as first-line agents for treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. Calcium channel antagonists also may reduce mortality. In patients with diabetes, ACE inhibitors are effective first-line agents in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients who are hypertensive or have microalbuminuria. ACE inhibitors may be beneficial in patients with nondiabetic renal insufficiency as well. Calcium channel antagonists may have some effect in retarding progression of diabetic nephropathy although a recent trial found a higher incidence of death as a secondary endpoint in hypertensive diabetic patients who were treated with calcium channel antagonists. Beta-blockers seem to be safe and well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate intermittent claudication, although patients with rest pain or limb ischemia have not been studied. Beta-blockers should not be used in patients with asthma. Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists are the preferred treatment of hypertension in patients with Raynaud's but should be avoided in patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease. NSAIDs, particularly piroxicam and indomethacin, raise mean blood pressure by approximately 5 mm Hg, enough to consider a change of either NSAID or antihypertensive to one that is not as affected by NSAIDs. Cyclosporine A can induce hypertension by its vasoconstrictive effects, particularly on the kidney. Calcium channel antagonists may antagonize this vasoconstriction while allowing the clinician to reduce the dose of cyclosporine A required to achieve its immunosuppressive effect.

Pharmacologic management of childhood hypertension

Antihypertensive drug therapy is used in children primarily to treat secondary forms of hypertension, because the prevalence of essential hypertension in the first decade of life is considerably less than 1% of the childhood population. This prevalence increases during the second decade of life, but the percentage of teenagers with essential hypertension continues to be low. Pharmaceutical companies have been able to target drug development to specific physiologic and biochemical systems. The converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers have greatly improved the success of therapy concomitant with a reduction in the incidence of adverse effects. The result has been a major change during the past decade in the recommendations for antihypertensive drug therapy.

Measurement of cold challenge responses in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis

Using computed thermography continuous temperature recordings were made before and after cold challenge of the fingers of control subjects and patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis. Basal skin temperature measurements (Tpre) were significantly lower in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis than in the controls. Temperatures immediately after cold challenge (T0) were significantly lower in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis than in controls. The lag phase before the start of temperature recovery (Tlag) was significantly greater in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis than in control subjects. The maximum recovery index (R%) was significantly less in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis than in controls. The maximum rate of change of temperature during the rapid phase of rewarming (Gmax) was significantly greater in controls than in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis. Discriminant analysis showed that the dynamic parameters of rewarming (Tlag, Gmax, and R%) showed greater variation between the patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon and those with Raynaud's phenomenon associated with systemic sclerosis than did Tpre or T0. This method of analysis of cold challenge will be used in studies of the effects of treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Quality of life as outcome measures in randomized clinical trials. An overview of three general medical journals

A survey of 75 randomized trials published in 1986 in the Annals of Internal Medicine, American Journal of Medicine, and New England Journal of Medicine was carried out by two observers using predetermined criteria about the importance of health status as an outcome measurement and the quality-of-health status measurement that was used. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement among the two observers. Although a number of investigators used well-established quality-of-life measurements, in only 10 of 55 trials in which health status was judged crucial or important were measures with established validity and responsiveness used. Despite the fact that reliable measurement of quality of life is now feasible, it is underutilized in randomized clinical trials.

Nifedipine and alpha-adrenoceptor function in human finger skin vessels

Experiments were designed to study the effect of the calcium entry blocker nifedipine on contractions evoked by alpha-adrenoceptor activation in human finger skin vessels and to show whether nifedipine could prevent the vasoconstriction induced by local cooling. Vasoconstriction of finger skin vessels was evoked with phenylephrine (a preferential alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist), B-HT933 (a preferential alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist) and by local cooling. The alpha-adrenoceptor agonists were administered into the skin by iotophoresis and local cooling was produced with a Peltier element. Nifedipine significantly attenuated the vasoconstrictor responses both to alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptor stimulation, the effect on alpha 2-mediated responses being more pronounced. It had no effect on the vasoconstriction induced by local cooling of finger skin.

Lower extremity vasospasm associated with ischemic neuropathy, dermal fibrosis, and digital gangrene in a patient with carcinoid syndrome

Bilateral lower extremity vasospasm associated with severe pain and hyperesthesias in the legs, and digital gangrene in both feet developed in a 50-year-old man with carcinoid syndrome. Nifedipine and chemical lumbar sympathectomy were partially effective in relieving the vasospasm. Electromyographic findings were consistent with ischemic neuropathy. A skin biopsy specimen showed striking dermal fibrosis. Serotonin and other vasoconstrictor substances released from the tumor may be responsible for the vasospasm, the dermal sclerosis, and the ischemic neuropathy. The early use of lumbar sympathectomy in patients with lower extremity vasospasm may prevent these irreversible ischemic complications.

Thrombolytic treatment and new calcium antagonists

Images

Recent issues in antihypertensive drug therapy

Results of recent large scale treatment trials have demonstrated that aggressive management of high blood pressure prevents progression of mild hypertension to the accelerated or malignant phase and reduces incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular hypertrophy. These trials mostly have utilized a diuretic-based, stepped-care approach to drug therapy, however, and have not shown a consistent beneficial effect of treatment on coronary heart mortality. In addition, the results of studies such as MRFIT have raised questions about serious risks of diuretic treatment in selected patients. These concerns have led to increased use of nonpharmacologic approaches to lowering blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension, but most patients ultimately require drug therapy. Alternative agents to diuretics now being employed as monotherapy in mild hypertension include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, alpha-blockers, alpha- and beta-blockers, and, to a lesser extent, centrally-acting sympatholytics and peripheral adrenergic antagonists. Rational use of these agents primarily is based on a careful evaluation of concomitant medical conditions (see Table 3), as well as their mode of action, relative side effects, ease of administration, and cost. Age and race recently have been found to be important determinants of antihypertensive response to agents such as diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors (see Table 3) and appreciation of these relative differences may affect drug selection. When these factors are taken into account, an effective and well tolerated regimen can be tailored to the individual patient. It is hoped that aggressive treatment of hypertension in the future will cause a further decline in cardiovascular mortality in the United States.

Dermatologic therapy: December 1985 to December 1986

I have reviewed the significant therapeutic changes reported in the English literature between December 1985 and December 1986. Readers should review the original articles in toto before attempting any new experimental or controversial therapy summarized.