Single-dose preoperative prophylaxis in transurethral surgery. Ciprofloxacin versus cefotaxime

Do antimicrobials have a role in preventing septicaemia following instrumentation of the urinary tract?

Urinary tract instrumentation is a significant cause of septicaemia. Review of the literature suggests that selective use of antimicrobials would reduce the risk of septicaemia as this varies between patients and with procedures. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is indicated for patients at high risk of endocarditis, or who are neutropenic. For patients without these risk factors, it is indicated for open, transurethral, or certain forms of laser prostatectomy or trans-rectal prostate biopsy. For cystoscopy, antimicrobials are indicated for patients with preoperative bacteriuria or a preoperative indwelling catheter. Single dose aminoglycosides or oral fluoroquinolones are the agents of choice with the exception of the prevention of endocarditis, where combinations active against streptococci are recommended. For other instrumentations, the risk of antimicrobial toxicity probably outweighs the benefits and a risk-reduction strategy is recommended. Further studies are required to provide definitive answers in many of these areas.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a prospective randomized study using a quinolone antibiotic (fleroxacin) to compare the efficacy of: (1) a single oral dose, (2) a single intravenous (IV) dose, and (3) an extended regimen consisting of an initial IV dose followed by oral therapy until removal of the urinary catheter, but for less than 6 days.

METHODS

We excluded from study patients who received antimicrobial agents within 48 hours of surgery. Single-dose prophylaxis consisted of 400 mg of fleroxacin given either orally or intravenously. The extended regimen consisted of an initial 400 mg IV dose followed by 400 mg oral each day (patients older than 75 years, or with a creatinine clearance less than 40 mL/min, received 200 mg/day). UTI was defined as clinical evidence of infection plus the presence of more than 10 white blood cells (WBC)/mm3 in any urine specimen plus the presence of more than 10(4) cfu/mL in midstream urine specimens or more than 10(2) cfu/mL in catheter specimens.

RESULTS

Prior to TURP, 30% (25/84) of the patients had a urethral catheter in situ and 12% (3/25) of these patients had bacteriuria. Only 1 patient developed a UTI and that was 22 days after a TURP (intergroup comparisons, Fisher's exact test greater than 0.05). There were no instances of urosepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

A single oral dose of a fluoroquinolone agent provided optimum prophylaxis for patients undergoing TURP.

Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability

Ciprofloxacin is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. Since its introduction in the 1980s, most Gram-negative bacteria have remained highly susceptible to this agent in vitro; Gram-positive bacteria are generally susceptible or moderately susceptible. Ciprofloxacin attains therapeutic concentrations in most tissues and body fluids. The results of clinical trials with ciprofloxacin have confirmed its clinical efficacy and low potential for adverse effects. Ciprofloxacin is effective in the treatment of a wide variety of infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative pathogens. These include complicated urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases (gonorrhoea and chancroid), skin and bone infections, gastrointestinal infections caused by multiresistant organisms, lower respiratory tract infections (including those in patients with cystic fibrosis), febrile neutropenia (combined with an agent which possesses good activity against Gram-positive bacteria), intra-abdominal infections (combined with an antianaerobic agent) and malignant external otitis. Ciprofloxacin should not be considered a first-line empirical therapy for respiratory tract infections if penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen; however, it is an appropriate treatment option in patients with mixed infections (where S. pneumoniae may or may not be present) or in patients with predisposing factors for Gram-negative infections. Clinically important drug interactions involving ciprofloxacin are well documented and avoidable with conscientious prescribing. Recommended dosage adjustments in patients with impaired renal function vary between countries; major adjustments are not required until the estimated creatinine clearance is < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 (or when the serum creatinine level is > or = 2 mg/dl). Ciprofloxacin is one of the few broad spectrum antibacterials available in both intravenous and oral formulations. In this respect, it offers the potential for cost savings with sequential intravenous and oral therapy in appropriately selected patients and may allow early discharge from hospital in some instances. In conclusion, ciprofloxacin has retained its excellent activity against most Gram-negative bacteria, and fulfilled its potential as an important antibacterial drug in the treatment of a wide range of infections. Rational prescribing will help to ensure the continued clinical usefulness of this valuable antimicrobial drug.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Surgical and endoscopic surgery. Lithotripsy. Transplantation]

The opening of the urinary tract switches surgical and endoscopic urology to the clean contaminated category and therefore for each of them antibiotic prophylaxis has to be considered. Prophylactic antibiotics are only recommended before surgery in patients with sterile urine. Those with infected urine should have curative antibiotics. Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly recommended for transurethral resection of the prostate, transrectal biopsy of the prostate, renal transplant and radical cystectomy with ileal or colonic pouch for urinary diversion. It is worthless in diagnostic cystoscopy. ESWL and scrotal surgery. For other procedures more data are required to conclude.

[The role of new molecules in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis]

The preoperative administration of a new antibiotic for antimicrobial prophylaxis is questionable because of the methodological difficulties to demonstrate its efficiency and benefits in decreasing the postoperative infectious complications. As their rate is very low, especially in clean surgery, the number of patients to be included in a comparative trial is very high. Most studies assessed only small groups and therefore any extrapolation for clinical practice is of limited value. Because of their therapeutic efficiency the fluoroquinolones are often recommended for antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, the rapid occurrence of resistances, directly related to their prescription should invite the prescribers to be cautions. They should be contra-indicated as long as an alternative of similar efficiency is existing, in case of bacteraemia, when an administration of more than 48 hours in required or when the intra-hospital resistance rate exceeds 10 p. 100.

Intravenous ciprofloxacin: a position statement by the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Intravenous ciprofloxacin is approved for the treatment of urinary tract, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue, and lower respiratory tract infections. Few large, randomized studies comparing its effectiveness with that of other available agents exist; most of these have been published in non-peer-reviewed journal supplements. Intravenous ciprofloxacin is nearly ten times more expensive than the "equivalent" oral dose. Based on the limitations of currently available clinical data, iv ciprofloxacin does not appear to be superior, and is at best comparable in efficacy to other currently available antibiotics. Bacterial resistance, especially in serious infections secondary to P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, is becoming more prevalent. Intravenous ciprofloxacin should be considered an alternative for the treatment of infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tracts only when the following conditions exist: (1) documented bacterial resistance to less-costly regimens with proven efficacy for these indications (e.g., beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and known susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, (2) documented hypersensitivity to first-line agents, or (3) inability to ingest or absorb oral ciprofloxacin. Further clinical trials using higher doses are required before iv ciprofloxacin can be recommended routinely for treatment of serious systemic infections. Because of its poor activity against streptococci, marginal activity against some strains of P. aeruginosa, and the rapidly developing resistance of staphylococci, iv ciprofloxacin should not be used empirically for infections in settings (such as the intensive care unit) where these organisms are likely to be pathogenic.

Cefotaxime is extensively used for surgical prophylaxis

Cefotaxime, a broad-spectrum third-generation cephalosporin, has been extensively used worldwide for chemotherapy of serious infections. Based on the characteristics of its antimicrobial spectrum, low incidence of allergy, and lack of adverse effects, cefotaxime has been used successfully for prophylaxis of a number of different surgical procedures. Extensive data have been accumulated for single-dose or short-course cefotaxime prophylaxis regimens. These cefotaxime regimens have been demonstrated to be very effective and inexpensive. For this article, over 11,500 published cefotaxime prophylaxis cases are reviewed (10,500 control cases) and 98 references are cited. Single-dose cefotaxime was clearly indicated for hysterectomies, cesarean sections, upper gastrointestinal cases, bone and joint operations, biliary tract procedures, transurethral resections, open urologic surgeries, and some vascular procedures. Short-course (3-4 doses) may be required for colorectal resections, cardiac surgeries, head and neck surgeries, organ transplants, specific pediatric surgical cases, and for some patients with compromised immune function, regardless of origin. Cefotaxime has reduced wound morbidity of contaminated abdominal operations to < 10%. This change from multiple-dose regimens to the single-dose or short-course regimens, enabled by cefotaxime use, decreases the risk of inducing or selecting bacterial resistance; the change would generate a significant reduction in hospital costs. Surgeons should not hesitate to employ cefotaxime and other third-generation cephalosporins with proven limited-dose indications to greatly benefit their patients and the hospital environment.

A prostatectomy audit: phase I--insights and questions

A local prostatectomy audit is being undertaken to gain some insight into the pre- and peri-operative factors that influence post-operative outcome and length of post-operative stay. The aims of the first phase of the audit, involving 150 prostatectomy patients, have been to attempt to define the minimum data set required to meet the study's objectives, and to devise a data-collecting tool that can be completed by the medical and nursing staff as part of the routine work. A tentative model has been devised to forecast post-operative stay. The audit has raised a number of questions which will form the basis of further studies.

Role of quinolones in surgical prophylaxis

The general principles involved in the use of chemoprophylaxis in surgery, the selection of patients at risk, and the choice of antibiotic agents are reasonably well established. While a good deal of data exist regarding commonly used prophylactic regimens, very little data are available on the role of quinolones in surgical prophylaxis. The literature dealing with this area is reviewed, and studies on the use of quinolones in biliary, colorectal, urologic, orthopedic and vascular surgery are discussed. The data suggest that generally the quinolones are as efficacious as the other antibiotics with which they were compared, and in the case of urologic surgery the results using quinolones were better than those in non-treated controls. Single-dose prophylaxis was regularly shown to be as effective as multiple dose regimens. Further clinical trial data are necessary before any firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the role of quinolones in surgical prophylaxis.