Patient costs in the prevention and treatment of post-cesarean section infection

Antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery: a national survey and literature review

Although much has been written regarding the use of antibiotics in surgery, no clear guidelines exist in the literature regarding the use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To determine the pattern of antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery, a comprehensive survey was mailed to 6000 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members and candidates. A total of 1767 completed responses were returned, which represents a response rate of 30 percent. The type, route, and duration of antibiotic administration are reported for 10 common cosmetic surgical procedures. The results of the survey confirmed that there is widespread use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To provide guidelines for proper antibiotic use, the current literature was extensively reviewed. The authors found little or no correlation between reported clinical practice and the literature. It is hoped that this study will stimulate further investigation into this area of aesthetic surgery.

Medication use during the perinatal period

OBJECTIVE

To briefly describe the drug therapy administered during the perinatal period of pregnancy for common maternal and fetal complications, and to identify those agents that should not be used for these conditions.

DATA SOURCES

References were obtained from an ongoing literature search of peer-reviewed obstetric and gynecologic journals and other selected medical and pharmacy journals available in the English language. Primary search vehicle was a weekly review of the tables of contents of nearly 1,300 medical journals provided by Reference Update (Institute of Scientific Information, Philadelphia). MEDLINE searches were also conducted using key terms for each subtopic.

STUDY SELECTION

Specific references were selected for each topic based on the adequacy of their study design, patient population, and a recent publication date. Reviews were used if a large number of primary references would have been required to adequately describe the topic.

DATA EXTRACTION

Most references reflected the current opinions expressed in the Educational (Technical) Bulletin and Committee Opinion series published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Recent, well-conducted studies that arrived at different conclusions were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data obtained from each reference reflected the conclusions of the authors based on their research or an analysis of the research on others on the appropriate use of the drug(s) for the specific condition being treated.

CONCLUSION

Drug therapy during the perinatal period is frequently required and can be beneficial for the mother, fetus, and newborn. Many complications previously associated with severe morbidity and mortality, such as infections, premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, hypertension, maternal pain during labor, and postpartum hemorrhage, are now controlled with appropriate pharmacologic therapy. All health professionals who provide services to pregnant women should be knowledgeable in this drug therapy.

Single or triple dose piperacillin prophylaxis in elective cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piperacillin in the prevention of perioperative febrile morbidity in elective cesarean sections, a combination of cephradine plus metronidazole vs. a control group which did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis.

METHOD

198 women undergoing elective cesarean section were included in a randomized control study to compare the prophylactic efficacy and safety of a single dose (4 g) or three doses (2 g) of piperacillin, three doses of cephradine plus metronidazole combination, when administered peri-operatively and a control group which did not receive prophylactic antibiotics.

RESULT

198 women were randomized to the study, but 14 had to be excluded leaving 184 for analysis. Statistically significant difference was reached when comparing the piperacillin groups (group A and group C) with control (group D) in the prevention of postoperative febrile morbidity inclusive of wound infection and endomyometritis (single-dose piperacillin group A: Relative Risk = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.58). Multi-dose piperacillin therapy group C: R.R. = 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.77). The combination of cephradine and metronidazole (group B) when compared with the control group did not show any statistical significant difference in prevention of postoperative febrile morbidity (R.R.= 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-1.10). Single-dose piperacillin when compared to multi-dose piperacillin regimen appears to be more effective at reducing postoperative infective morbidity but this is not statistically significant (R.R. = 0.51, 95% CI 0.10-2.65). When febrile morbidity is separated into wound infection and myometritis, the reduction rates in either of them in each antibiotic study group A, B and C compared to the control group D are not significant except when study groups A and C are combined and compared to control group D (R.R. = 0.21, 95% CI 0.76-0.06).

CONCLUSION

Piperacillin single agent therapy, either as a single dose of 4 g or a triple dose of 2 g, is effective and safe in the prevention of postoperative infection when given as prophylaxis in elective cesarean cases.

[On the hypothesis of cesarean birth rate stabilization in southeastern, Brazil]

Births in S. Paulo State (Brazil) between 1987 and 1993 were studied to test the association between cesarean section rates and the social and economic development. The study used both Health Regions and hospitals as units of analysis. The cross-sectional study of secondary data adopted as variables: cesarean section rates in 1987, 1992 and 1993 by hospital and region; kind of provider; link of hospital with medical school; post-neonatal infant mortality rate; number of banks per inhabitant; and consumption potential of the regional central town per inhabitant. The C-section rates in the period studied were around 48% for the State; between 21.3 and 85.5% for the regions; between zero and 100% for the hospitals; as for kind of provider, the higher rates were found in private hospitals (56% in 1993). Medical school hospitals held stable rates throughout the period, around 39%. The multiple linear regression showed that banks per inhabitant and consumption potential by inhabitants explained 48% of the variation of the regional C-section rates. The stabilization of the State C-section rates is questioned, since the data shows a shift in the mode of hospital rates to higher values. A re-structure of the care delivered to births is imperative in S. Paulo State, since cesarean sections, besides being medical procedures, have become a consumer good, a symptom of the perverse logic that pervades the current organization of the health system.

Cesarean section rates in teaching hospitals: a national survey

This survey investigated the cesarean section rate in teaching hospitals in the United States and the factors that may influence it. A national survey was performed by mailing a questionnaire to 277 accredited residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology. The estimated cesarean rate in all hospitals with residencies in obstetrics and gynecology in the United States in 1990 was 20.3 percent, compared with an overall national rate of 23.5 percent. Women delivering in teaching hospitals were less likely to have a cesarean section than those delivering in hospitals without residency programs (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.77-0.78, p = 0.0001). As centers for training and research, teaching hospitals represent an appropriate setting to begin the process of lowering the United States cesarean section rate.

[Economic aspects of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis]

The cost of an antibiotic is easily evaluated in the case of antimicrobial prophylaxis. The other expenses, either direct or indirect costs, are much more difficult to assess. Studies evaluating the economical impact of the prophylactic antibiotics are rather rare. Antibiotic prescription for prophylaxis is evaluated to represent about 20 to 30% of the total antibiotic administration in French hospitals. The most significant studies evaluate the cost/benefit ratio and demonstrate the advantage of prophylaxis in orthopaedic, vascular and gynaecologic surgery.

Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital

A department-wide effort to reduce the cesarean section rate at the University Medical Center of Jacksonville (Florida) began in 1987. University Medical Center, a teaching hospital with approximately 4500 annual deliveries, serves an almost exclusively indigent obstetric population. Overall, the cesarean section rate declined from 28 per 100 deliveries in 1986 to 11 per 100 in 1989. Decreasing the number of repeat cesarean sections played an important role in reducing total cesarean deliveries. In 1986 32% of women with prior cesarean sections underwent a trial of labor. By 1989 this proportion had increased to 84%. In 1986 65% of women undergoing a trial of labor were delivered vaginally. By 1989 this proportion had increased to 83%. For these reasons the proportion of patients who had repeat cesarean sections dropped from 8% in 1986 to 3% in 1989. Changing approaches to the evaluation and management of dystocia and fetal distress also helped to lower the overall cesarean section rate. In 1986 cesarean sections for at least one of these two indications accounted for 14% of all deliveries. By 1989 this percentage had dropped to 4%. Because selective criteria for vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation were maintained, incremental increased rates of vaginal breech delivery had only a minimal impact on lower overall cesarean section rates. The reduction in the number of cesarean sections was accomplished without compromising neonatal outcomes. In fact, during this 4-year period neonatal mortality rates actually decreased; neonatal morbidity rates remained stable. Our experience suggests that cesarean section rates can be substantially reduced without compromising the newborn.

Maternal mortality from infection at a university hospital in Nigeria

This study analyzed 89 cases of maternal death following infections. The overall maternal mortality rate in infection was 5.9%. The maternal death rate is significantly related to parity but higher age group mothers survived better. Septicaemic shock and cardiopulmonary arrest were the major terminal causes of maternal death. The risk factors for the high maternal death following infections were examined and preventive measures recommended.

Prevention of postoperative infection in cesarean section after rupture of the membranes

Patients having a cesarean section more than 6 h after rupture of the membranes constitute a high risk group for postoperative infections. Two such groups were studied. Patients were given either cefuroxime 1.5 g every 8th hour for 24 h followed by cefadroxil 0.5 g twice daily for 6 days or received no medication. The infection rate was significantly reduced in the treatment group as compared to the control group (15% vs. 48%). Non-infected patients had a significantly shorter stay in hospital (8 days vs. 12 days). Combined use of these drugs for prevention of post-cesarean infection has not previously been reported. No side effects of the antibiotic prophylaxis were reported.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea follows perioperative prophylaxis with cefoxitin

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea during prolonged therapy of obstetric and gynecologic infections is known to occur with use of all classes of antibiotics except vancomycin and the aminoglycosides. We present 11 cases of C. difficile-associated diarrhea which followed a short course of perioperative prophylaxis with cefoxitin during a 1-year period. Nine of the cases of C. difficile-associated diarrhea were among 162 women who received cefoxitin perioperative prophylaxis for cesarean section or hysterectomy, but none occurred in 85 women who received one of four other antibiotics for perioperative prophylaxis (p = 0.024, Fisher's exact test). The two other occurrences of C. difficile-associated diarrhea following perioperative prophylaxis with cefoxitin were in women who underwent exploratory laparotomy. We conclude that C. difficile-associated diarrhea is related to perioperative prophylaxis with cefoxitin.