Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH

The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction

Growth-restricted fetuses are at risk of hypoxemia, acidemia, and stillbirth because of progressive placental dysfunction. Current fetal well-being, neonatal risks following delivery, and the anticipated rate of fetal deterioration are the major management considerations in fetal growth restriction. Surveillance has to quantify the fetal risks accurately to determine the delivery threshold and identify the testing frequency most likely to capture future deterioration and prevent stillbirth. From the second trimester onward, the biophysical profile score correlates over 90% with the current fetal pH, and a normal score predicts a pH >7.25 with a 100% positive predictive value; an abnormal score on the other hand predicts current fetal acidemia with similar certainty. Between 30% and 70% of growth-restricted fetuses with a nonreactive heart rate require biophysical profile scoring to verify fetal well-being, and an abnormal score in 8% to 27% identifies the need for delivery, which is not suspected by Doppler findings. Future fetal well-being is not predicted by the biophysical profile score, which emphasizes the importance of umbilical artery Doppler and amniotic fluid volume to determine surveillance frequency. Studies with integrated surveillance strategies that combine frequent heart rate monitoring with biophysical profile scoring and Doppler report better outcomes and stillbirth rates of between 0% and 4%, compared with those between 8% and 11% with empirically determined surveillance frequency. The variations in clinical behavior and management challenges across gestational age are better addressed when biophysical profile scoring is integrated into the surveillance of fetal growth restriction. This review aims to provide guidance on biophysical profile scoring in the in- and outpatient management of fetal growth restriction.

Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach

This study reviewed the literature about the diagnosis, antepartum surveillance, and time of delivery of fetuses suspected to be small for gestational age or growth restricted. Several guidelines have been issued by major professional organizations, including the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The differences in recommendations, in particular about Doppler velocimetry of the ductus venosus and middle cerebral artery, have created confusion among clinicians, and this review has intended to clarify and highlight the available evidence that is pertinent to clinical management. A fetus who is small for gestational age is frequently defined as one with an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile. This condition has been considered syndromic and has been frequently attributed to fetal growth restriction, a constitutionally small fetus, congenital infections, chromosomal abnormalities, or genetic conditions. Small for gestational age is not synonymous with fetal growth restriction, which is defined by deceleration of fetal growth determined by a change in fetal growth velocity. An abnormal umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index reflects an increased impedance to flow in the umbilical circulation and is considered to be an indicator of placental disease. The combined finding of an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry has been widely accepted as indicative of fetal growth restriction. Clinical studies have shown that the gestational age at diagnosis can be used to subclassify suspected fetal growth restriction into early and late, depending on whether the condition is diagnosed before or after 32 weeks of gestation. The early type is associated with umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities, whereas the late type is often associated with a low pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery. A large randomized clinical trial indicated that in the context of early suspected fetal growth restriction, the combination of computerized cardiotocography and fetal ductus venosus Doppler improves outcomes, such that 95% of surviving infants have a normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age. A low middle cerebral artery pulsatility index is associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction; however, there is no evidence supporting its use to determine the time of delivery. Nonetheless, an abnormality in middle cerebral artery Doppler could be valuable to increase the surveillance of the fetus at risk. We propose that fetal size, growth rate, uteroplacental Doppler indices, cardiotocography, and maternal conditions (ie, hypertension) according to gestational age are important factors in optimizing the outcome of suspected fetal growth restriction.

Antepartum Fetal Surveillance: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 229

The goal of antepartum fetal surveillance is to reduce the risk of stillbirth. Antepartum fetal surveillance techniques based on assessment of fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns have been in clinical use for almost four decades and are used along with real-time ultrasonography and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry to evaluate fetal well-being. Antepartum fetal surveillance techniques are routinely used to assess the risk of fetal death in pregnancies complicated by preexisting maternal conditions (eg, diabetes mellitus) as well as those in which complications have developed (eg, fetal growth restriction). The purpose of this document is to provide a review of the current indications for and techniques of antepartum fetal surveillance and outline management guidelines for antepartum fetal surveillance that are consistent with the best scientific evidence.

FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as the failure of the fetus to meet its growth potential due to a pathological factor, most commonly placental dysfunction. Worldwide, FGR is a leading cause of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and short- and long-term morbidity. Ongoing advances in clinical care, especially in definitions, diagnosis, and management of FGR, require efforts to effectively translate these changes to the wide range of obstetric care providers. This article highlights agreements based on current research in the diagnosis and management of FGR, and the areas that need more research to provide further clarification of recommendations. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence along with practical recommendations concerning the care of pregnancies at risk of or complicated by FGR, with the overall goal to decrease the risk of stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with this condition. To achieve these goals, FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) brought together international experts to review and summarize current knowledge of FGR. This summary is directed at multiple stakeholders, including healthcare providers, healthcare delivery organizations and providers, FIGO member societies, and professional organizations. Recognizing the variation in the resources and expertise available for the management of FGR in different countries or regions, this article attempts to take into consideration the unique aspects of antenatal care in low-resource settings (labelled “LRS” in the recommendations). This was achieved by collaboration with authors and FIGO member societies from low-resource settings such as India, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.

Inpatient Biophysical Profiles and the Effect on Clinical Decision Making

Objective  Our primary objective was to determine whether biophysical profiles (BPP) performed on the antepartum unit result in changes in clinical decision making. Study Design  A retrospective cohort chart review was performed among women who had a BPP during hospital admission. BPP status was categorized as normal (8/8 points) and abnormal (6/8 or less points). The primary outcome, clinical decision making, was the need for prolonged external fetal monitoring (defined as > 2 hours) or decision to proceed with delivery. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, indicated preterm delivery, birth weight, 5-minute Apgar's score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results  Among our cohort ( n  = 186), 85.5% ( n  = 159) had a normal BPP. Delivery management was altered in one case (0.54%) by the BPP findings, and there were no BPPs that resulted in need for prolonged monitoring. Compared with women with normal BPP, women with abnormal BPPs were more likely to deliver at <37 weeks, to be admitted to the NICU, or have a 5-minute Apgar's score <7. Conclusion  In-hospital BPPs alter clinical decision making in less than 1% of cases.

No. 197a-Fetal Health Surveillance: Antepartum Consensus Guideline

OBJECTIVE

This guideline provides new recommendations pertaining to the application and documentation of fetal surveillance in the antepartum period that will decrease the incidence of birth asphyxia while maintaining the lowest possible rate of obstetrical intervention. Pregnancies with and without risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes are considered. This guideline presents an alternative classification system for antenatal fetal non-stress testing to what has been used previously. This guideline is intended for use by all health professionals who provide antepartum care in Canada.

OPTIONS

Consideration has been given to all methods of fetal surveillance currently available in Canada.

OUTCOMES

Short- and long-term outcomes that may indicate the presence of birth asphyxia were considered. The associated rates of operative and other labour interventions were also considered.

EVIDENCE

A comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials published between January 1996 and March 2007 was undertaken, and MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database were used to search the literature for all new studies on fetal surveillance antepartum. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria and classifications of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

SPONSOR

This consensus guideline was jointly developed by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and the British Columbia Perinatal Health Program (formerly the British Columbia Reproductive Care Program or BCRCP) and was partly supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. RECOMMENDATION 1: FETAL MOVEMENT COUNTING: RECOMMENDATION 2: NON-STRESS TEST: RECOMMENDATION 3: CONTRACTION STRESS TEST: RECOMMENDATION 4: BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE: RECOMMENDATION 5: UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER: RECOMMENDATION 6: UMBILICAL ARTERY DOPPLER.

Predictive factors of preterm delivery in French Guiana for singleton pregnancies: definition and validation of a predictive score

Objective: Given the high rate of premature birth in French Guiana (13.5%), and its stability in time, the aim of the present study was to define a predictive score for preterm birth in women with a unique pregnancy in order to help prioritize health resources in the local context.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all deliveries of unique pregnancies in French Guiana collected between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014 in the Registre d'Issue de Grossesse Informatisé (RIGI), a registry that collects data on live births over 22 weeks of amenorrhea on the territory. Statistically significant predictors (p < .05) of preterm delivery were included in a logistic regression model. The selected variables were chosen to be available during the first trimester. Coefficients were used to establish a score which was categorized and prospectively validated using data from 2015.Results: Seven explanatory variables, all measurable during the first trimester of pregnancy, were significantly associated with preterm birth. The predictive score divided in deciles allowed to establish sensitivity and specificity thresholds. Overall, depending on the chosen threshold the score sensitivity was low and the specificity was high. Lowering the threshold identified half of women as "at risk" for preterm birth.Conclusion: This first trimester score was insufficiently sensitive to identify individual women at risk for preterm delivery.

Managing fetal growth restriction: surveillance tests and their interpretation

The main challenges in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction consist in identifying signs of disease progression and determining the appropriate timing of delivery. The risk of continuing the pregnancy must be balanced with the risk of prematurity, which depends on gestational age. To allow appropriate monitoring of the growth-restricted fetus, several surveillance tests are available. These include ultrasound Doppler velocimetry of feto-placental vessels, cardiotocography, and amniotic fluid evaluation. It is well known that the combination of tests performs better than each test alone to predict fetal deterioration. The interpretation of test results depends on the gestational age and on the nature of the growth disorder (early- vs. late-onset disease). Appropriate knowledge on the surveillance tests interpretation and the frequency at which they need to be performed is crucial in managing fetal growth restriction, in order to produce better outcome and prevent stillbirth, and at the same time to avoid unnecessary interventions.

Impact of maternal prenatal smoking on fetal to infant neurobehavioral development

Despite recent emphasis on the profound importance of the fetal environment in "programming" postnatal development, measurement of offspring development typically begins after birth. Using a novel coding strategy combining direct fetal observation via ultrasound and actocardiography, we investigated the impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) on fetal neurobehavior; we also investigated links between fetal and infant neurobehavior. Participants were 90 pregnant mothers and their infants (52 MSDP-exposed; 51% minorities; ages 18-40). Fetal neurobehavior at baseline and in response to vibro-acoustic stimulus was assessed via ultrasound and actocardiography at M = 35 weeks gestation and coded via the Fetal Neurobehavioral Assessment System (FENS). After delivery, the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale was administered up to seven times over the first postnatal month. MSDP was associated with increased fetal activity and fetal limb movements. Fetal activity, complex body movements, and cardiac-somatic coupling were associated with infants' ability to attend to stimuli and to self-regulate over the first postnatal month. Furthermore, differential associations emerged by MSDP group between fetal activity, complex body movements, quality of movement, and coupling, and infant attention and self-regulation. The present study adds to a growing literature establishing the validity of fetal neurobehavioral measures in elucidating fetal programming pathways.

Management of fetal growth restriction using the contraction stress test: a case-control study

Purpose: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a concerning health issue. However, studies on FGR management are limited due to its rarity. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the contraction stress test (CST) for FGR management. Materials and methods: A case-control retrospective study design. Our institute innovated CST in FGR management in 2017. We included women in their 33rd-40th week of pregnancy with a diagnosis of FGR and retrospectively divided them into groups: the CST group (FGR management with CST) and no CST group (FGR management without CST) before and after CST development. Neonatal outcome, pH, and pO₂ of umbilical artery (UA) were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences in the rate of birth weight, Apgar score <7 (5 minutes), neonatal death, hospitalization to newborn childhood intensive care unit (NICU), and UA pH were found between groups. Average UA pH was 7.29 ± 0.05 and 7.29 ± 0.04 in the CST and no CST groups, respectively (p = .864). Average UA pO₂ values were 21.1 ± 8.6 and 15.7 ± 5.0 mmHg in the CST and no CST groups, respectively (p = .016), showing significant differences. Conclusions: Neonatal outcomes and UA pH were slightly different between the groups managed with and without CST. However, UA pO₂ values significantly differed between the groups. For FGR management, the use of a CST may allow for early intervention before fetal acidemia and acidosis. For establishing the effects of a CST for FGR management, analysis including several cases and investigation of long-term outcomes of newborn infants is necessary.

Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus

A uniform approach to management of fetal growth restriction (FGR) improves outcome, prevents stillbirth, and allows appropriately timed delivery. An estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile with coexisting abnormal umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), or cerebroplacental ratio Doppler index best identifies the small fetus requiring surveillance. Placental perfusion defects are more common earlier in gestation; accordingly, early-onset (≤32 weeks of gestation) and late-onset (>32 weeks) FGR differ in clinical phenotype. In early-onset FGR, progression of UA Doppler abnormality determines clinical acceleration, while abnormal ductus venosus (DV) Doppler precedes deterioration of biophysical variables and stillbirth. Accordingly, late DV Doppler changes, abnormal biophysical variables, or an abnormal cCTG require delivery. In late-onset FGR, MCA Doppler abnormalities precede deterioration and stillbirth. However, from 34 to 38 weeks, randomized evidence on optimal delivery timing is lacking. From 38 weeks onward, the balance of neonatal versus fetal risks favors delivery.

Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe

BACKGROUND

Early-onset fetal growth restriction represents a particular dilemma in clinical management balancing the risk of iatrogenic prematurity with waiting for the fetus to gain more maturity, while being exposed to the risk of intrauterine death or the sequelae of acidosis.

OBJECTIVE

The Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe was a European, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to determine according to which criteria delivery should be triggered in early fetal growth restriction. We present the key findings of the primary and secondary analyses.

STUDY DESIGN

Women with fetal abdominal circumference <10th percentile and umbilical pulsatility index >95th percentile between 26-32 weeks were randomized to 1 of 3 monitoring and delivery protocols. These were: fetal heart rate variability based on computerized cardiotocography; and early or late ductus venosus Doppler changes. A safety net based on fetal heart rate abnormalities or umbilical Doppler changes mandated delivery irrespective of randomized group. The primary outcome was normal neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years.

RESULTS

Among 511 women randomized, 362/503 (72%) had associated hypertensive conditions. In all, 463/503 (92%) of fetuses survived and cerebral palsy occurred in 6/443 (1%) with known outcome. Among all women there was no difference in outcome based on randomized group; however, of survivors, significantly more fetuses randomized to the late ductus venosus group had a normal outcome (133/144; 95%) than those randomized to computerized cardiotocography alone (111/131; 85%). In 118/310 (38%) of babies delivered <32 weeks, the indication was safety-net criteria: 55/106 (52%) in late ductus venosus, 37/99 (37%) in early ductus venosus, and 26/105 (25%) in computerized cardiotocography groups. Higher middle cerebral artery impedance adjusted for gestation was associated with neonatal survival without severe morbidity (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.52) and infant survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.72) although birthweight and gestational age were more important determinants.

CONCLUSION

Perinatal and 2-year outcome was better than expected in all randomized groups. Among survivors, 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome was best in those randomized to delivery based on late ductus venosus changes. Given a high rate of delivery based on the safety-net criteria, deciding delivery based on late ductus venosus changes and abnormal computerized fetal heart rate variability seems prudent. There is no rationale for delivery based on cerebral Doppler changes alone. Of note, most women with early-onset fetal growth restriction develop hypertension.

Maternal-Fetal Monitoring of Opioid-Exposed Pregnancies: Analysis of a Pilot Community-Based Protocol and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

To describe/analyse a novel, community-based prenatal monitoring protocol for opioid-exposed pregnancies developed by our centre in 2014 to optimize prenatal care for this population. A literature review of published monitoring protocols for this population is also presented.

METHODS

Retrospective comparison of pre-protocol (n = 215) and post-protocol (n = 251) cohorts. Medline and Embase were searched between 2000-2016 using MeSH terms: [fetal monitoring OR prenatal care] AND [opioid-related disorders OR substance-related disorders] in Medline and [fetal monitoring OR prenatal care] AND [opiate addiction OR substance abuse] in Embase, producing 518 results. Thirteen studies included protocols for monitoring opioid-exposed pregnancies. No comprehensive monitoring protocols with high-quality supporting evidence were found.

RESULTS

We evaluated 466 opioid-exposed pregnancies, 215 before and 251 after introduction of the protocol. Since implementation, there was a significant increase in the number of opioid-exposed patients who have underwent urine drug screening (72.6% to 89.2%, P < 0.0001); a significant reduction in the number of urine drug screenings positive for illicit opioids (50.2% to 29.1%, P < 0.0001); and a significant increase in the number of patients who discontinued illicit opioid use by the time of delivery (24.7% to 39.4%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the CS rate (27.4% vs. 26.3%, P > 0.05). There were no observed differences in the rate of preterm birth, birth weight <2500 g, or Apgar score <7 (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Care of women with increased opioid use during pregnancy is an important but under-studied health issue. A novel protocol for focused antenatal care provision for women with opioid-exposed pregnancies improves standard of care and maternal/fetal outcomes.

Does antenatal betamethasone have negative effects on fetal activities and hemodynamics in cases of preeclampsia without severe features? A prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized study

AIM

To evaluate whether antenatal betamethasone affects the fetal biophysical profile (BPP) and Doppler indices of umbilical and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) in cases of preeclampsia without severe features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty singleton preeclamptic pregnancies without severe features at gestational ages of 28-34 weeks were randomly divided into two groups of 20 patients: betamethasone and control groups. Patients in the betamethasone group were administered two consecutive doses of 12 mg betamethasone intramuscularly, 24 h apart, and patients in the control group were administered the same volume of saline as a placebo. All participants were evaluated before (0 h) and at hours 24, 48, and 72 of betamethasone/placebo administration using BPP scoring and umbilical and MCA Doppler examinations.

RESULTS

Total BPP scores were significantly lower in the betamethasone group across the three time points during the follow-up period (p < 0.001). None of the Doppler indices differed significantly between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Antenatal betamethasone negatively affects fetal BPP score parameters, including the non-stress test, fetal body and breathing movements, without affecting vascular indices of umbilical arteries and MCAs. Clinician awareness of this transient drug-induced effect might be valuable for preventing iatrogenic preterm delivery for fetuses in preeclamptic pregnancies without severe features.

Antenatal fetal surveillance "Assessment of the AFV"

The evaluation of amniotic fluid volume (AFV) is an established part of the antenatal surveillance of pregnancies at risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome. The two most commonly used ultrasound techniques to estimate AFV are the amniotic fluid index (AFI) and the single deepest pocket (SDP). Four studies have defined normal AFVs, and although their normal volumes have similarities, there are also differences primarily due to the statistical methodology used in each study. Dye-determined AFV correlates with ultrasound estimates for normal fluid volumes but correlates poorly for oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios. The addition of color Doppler in estimating AFV leads to the overdiagnosis of oligohydramnios. Neither the AFI nor the SDP is superior in identifying oligohydramnios, but the SDP is a better measurement choice as the use of AFI increases the diagnosis rate of oligohydramnios and labor inductions without an improvement in pregnancy outcomes.

A comparison of Doppler and biophysical findings between liveborn and stillborn growth-restricted fetuses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surveillance characteristics that precede stillbirth in growth-restricted fetuses that receive integrated Doppler and biophysical profile scoring (BPS).

STUDY DESIGN

Nine hundred eighty-seven singleton pregnancies that were complicated by fetal growth restriction had multivessel Doppler scans (umbilical and middle cerebral arteries [MCA], ductus venosus, and umbilical vein) and BPS. Surveillance findings were compared between live births and stillbirths.

RESULTS

Forty-seven stillbirths occurred in 2 clusters, 37 at <34 weeks of gestation and 10 thereafter. Before 34 weeks of gestation, stillbirths had parallel escalation of umbilical artery and ductus venosus Doppler findings followed by abnormal BPS. At ≥34 weeks of gestation, only a decline in MCA pulsatility index was observed, and 75% of stillbirths were unanticipated by the BPS.

CONCLUSION

Before 34 weeks of gestation, multivessel Doppler abnormality anticipates an abnormal BPS and subsequent stillbirth. After 34 weeks of gestation, stillbirths occur after MCA brain-sparing in a shorter interval than predicted by a normal BPS. Recognition of these differences in clinical behavior requires consideration for the planning of monitoring intervals in preterm and term fetal growth restriction.

Toward consistent terminology: assessment and reporting of amniotic fluid volume

Amniotic fluid is typically measured by ultrasound using the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the maximum vertical pocket (MVP). Although both parameters correlate poorly with the actual amniotic fluid volume measured with dye-dilution methods, cross-sectional studies have been used to establish gestational norms. The current acceptable definition of polyhydramnios in the late second and the third trimester in both singleton and multiple gestations is a MVP > 8 cm, while the definition of oligohydramnios is a MVP < 2 cm. The pocket to be measured should exclude the umbilical cord or fetal parts. Randomized clinical trials have indicated that defining oligohydramnios as a MVP < 2 cm will result in fewer obstetrical interventions and similar perinatal outcomes when compared to an AFI < 5 cm.

Identification, assessment and management of fetal compromise

The main goals of fetal surveillance are to avoid fetal death and to recognize the fetus that will benefit from early intervention with resuscitation or delivery. Surveillance can occur in the antepartum or intrapartum period. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring is the most common form of surveillance in the intrapartum period. Several techniques are used in the antepartum period, including nonstress test, biophysical profile, and contraction stress test. Multiple techniques are used once distress is noted in the fetus, with the ultimate resuscitation effort being delivery.

Fetal assessment before and after dosing with buprenorphine or methadone

AIM

To determine pre- and post-dosing effects of prenatal methadone compared to buprenorphine on fetal wellbeing.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of data derived from the Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research (MOTHER) study, a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Six United States sites and one European site that provided comprehensive opioid-dependence treatment to pregnant women.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-one of the 131 opioid-dependent pregnant women completing the MOTHER clinical trial, assessed between 31 and 33 weeks of gestation.

MEASUREMENTS

Two fetal assessments were conducted, once before and once after study medication dosing. Measures included mean fetal heart rate (FHR), number of FHR accelerations, FHR reactivity in the fetal non-stress test (NST) and biophysical profile (BPP) score.

FINDINGS

Significant group differences were found for number of FHR accelerations, non-reactive NST and BPP scores (all Ps < 0.05). There were no significant group differences before time of dosing. Significant decreases (all Ps < 0.05) occurred from pre- to post-dose assessment for mean FHR, FHR accelerations, reactive NST and fetal movement. The decrease in accelerations and reactive NST were significant only for fetuses in the methadone group, and this resulted in a significantly lower likelihood of a reactive NST compared to fetuses in the buprenorphine group.

CONCLUSION

Buprenorphine compared with methadone appears to result in less suppression of mean fetal heart rate, fetal heart rate reactivity and the biophysical profile score after medication dosing and these findings provide support for the relative safety of buprenorphine when fetal indices are considered as part of the complete risk-benefit ratio.

Timing delivery of the growth-restricted fetus

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is commonly defined as an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile. While 70% of these are small for normal reasons and not at risk, 30% are pathologically small at risk for numerous complications including fetal death. In the late preterm IUGR fetus (>34 weeks), prematurity risks less and the risk of fetal demise becomes the primary concern. Pulsed-wave Doppler interrogation of the umbilical and middle cerebral artery is useful in reducing perinatal mortality, however, Doppler changes in these vessels of the IUGR fetus may not occur after 34 weeks gestation. There are no randomized trials addressing the timing of delivery of the IUGR fetus in the late preterm or early-term period. However, retrospective reports show an increase risk of fetal demise. While timing the delivery of the late preterm/early-term IUGR fetus requires consideration of multiple factors (e.g. degree of growth restriction, etiology, amniotic fluid volume, and biophysical and Doppler testing), available data suggests that delivery should occur by 37 to 38 weeks for singleton IUGR fetuses. In twin pregnancies with a co-twin IUGR fetus, chorionicity also impacts timing of delivery, but delivery should occur by 34-36 weeks.

Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

To study if the duration of individual Doppler abnormalities is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in fetal growth restriction (FGR) caused by placental dysfunction.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of patients with FGR (abdominal circumference < 5(th) percentile and umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) elevation) who had at least three examinations before delivery. Days of duration of absent/reversed UA end-diastolic velocity (UA-AREDV), low middle cerebral artery PI (brain sparing), ductus venosus (DV) and umbilical vein Doppler abnormalities were related to stillbirth, major neonatal morbidity and intact survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-seven study participants underwent a total of 1069 examinations. The duration of an absent/reversed a-wave in the DV (DV-RAV) was significantly higher in stillbirths (median, 6 days) compared with intact survivors and those with major morbidity (median, 0 days for both; P = 0.006 and P = 0.001, respectively). Duration of brain sparing was also longer in stillbirth cases compared with intact survivors (median, 19 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.02). Stepwise multinomial logistic regression showed that gestational age at delivery was a significant codeterminant of outcome for all arterial Doppler abnormalities when the DV a-wave was antegrade. However, when present, the duration of DV-RAV was the only contributor to stillbirth (probability of stillbirth = 1/(1 + exp - (interval to delivery × 1.03 - 2.28)), r2 = 0.73). Receiver-operating characteristics curve statistics showed that a DV-RAV for > 7 days predicted stillbirth (100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, likelihood ratio = 5.0, P < 0.0001). In contrast, neither neonatal death nor neonatal morbidity was predicted by the days of persistent DV-RAV.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of absent or reversed flow during atrial systole in the DV is a strong predictor of stillbirth that is independent of gestational age. While prematurity remains the strongest predictor of neonatal risks it is unlikely that pregnancy can be prolonged by more than 1 week in this setting.

Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) remains one of the main challenges in maternity care. Improvements have to start from a better definition of IUGR, applying the concept of the fetal growth potential. Customized standards for fetal growth and birthweight improve the detection of IUGR by better distinction between physiological and pathological smallness and have led to internationally applicable norms. Such developments have resulted in new insights in the assessment of risk and surveillance during pregnancy. Serial fundal height measurement plotted on customized charts is a useful screening tool, whereas fetal biometry and Doppler flow are the mainstay for investigation and diagnosis of IUGR. Appropriate protocols based on available evidence as well as individualized clinical assessment are essential to ensure good management and timely delivery.

Venous Doppler evaluation of the growth-restricted fetus

Evaluation of venous Doppler parameters has significantly contributed to the understanding of the vascular mechanisms that lead to fetal growth restriction (FGR) and subsequent fetal deterioration in the setting of progressive placental dysfunction. Venous redistribution of umbilical venous blood flow away from the fetal liver precedes fetal growth delay. Venous Doppler examination allows adjustment of monitoring intervals in recognition of accelerating fetal deterioration. The timing of delivery in early-onset FGR remains challenging because gestational age has an overriding effect on the neonatal outcome until the late second trimester and randomized trials of specific delivery triggers are lacking.

Fetal growth restriction - from observation to intervention

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental dysfunction has important short- and long-term impacts that may reach into adulthood. Early-onset FGR before 34 weeks' gestation shows a characteristic sequence of responses to placental dysfunction that evolves from the arterial circulation to the venous system and finally to biophysical abnormalities. In this form of FGR safe prolongation of pregnancy is a primary management goal, as gestational age at delivery, birth weight and iatrogenic premature delivery have an important impact on short-term outcome and neurodevelopment. Surveillance intervals should be adjusted based on umbilical artery and venous Doppler studies. Intervention thresholds need to be based on the balance of fetal vs. neonatal risks and therefore critically depend on gestational age. Late-onset FGR presents with subtle Doppler and biophysical abnormalities and therefore poses a diagnostic dilemma. Often unrecognized, term FGR contributes to a large proportion of adverse perinatal outcome. Monitoring intervals should be adjusted based on middle cerebral artery Doppler and fetal heart rate parameters. Delivery timing thresholds can be low. In both forms of FGR neurodevelopmental impacts of placental disease occur before clinical decisions regarding delivery timing arise. This places special emphasis on future preventative studies.

Antepartum fetal testing: a critical appraisal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recognition of the fetus at risk for death or damage in utero, quantifying the risk, balancing fetal risk against the risk of neonatal complications from immaturity and determining optimal time and mode of intervention, is a cornerstone of modern perinatal medicine. Antepartum fetal testing is essential in making these crucial decisions. The art and science of fetal assessment is fluid. In this treatise, the evolution of testing is reviewed, test accuracy results examined and suggestions for future applications are considered.

RECENT FINDINGS

Composite testing of a range of fetal biophysical variables is an excellent predictor of fetal acidemia and risk of death or damage. Confusion regarding the optimal means of measuring one of these variables, amniotic fluid volume, has been addressed in the literature and contemporary studies from several independent sources indicate that the amniotic fluid index method should be abandoned in favor of the maximal vertical pocket method. It is becoming increasingly more evident that a spectrum of fetal testing modalities based on interrogation of different aspects of fetal adaptive responses to adversity is preferable in fetal testing. Further it is evident that in some fetal diseases, such as intrauterine growth restriction, fetal condition may change acutely and accordingly best outcome is achieved by much more frequent testing. The question of whether intervention for fetal compromise can prevent subsequent neurological sequelae remains open.

SUMMARY

There has been remarkable advancement in identifying the fetus at risk. The concept of multispectral combined fetal testing including acute biophysical variables, amniotic fluid volume and arterial and venous Doppler flow velocity waveforms is established.

The effect of intermittent maternal fasting on human fetal breathing movements

In order to determine the effect of maternal fasting on human fetal breathing movements (FBM), 63 healthy pregnant women with singleton uncomplicated pregnancies of 30 weeks' gestation or more, and who were fasting during Ramadan, were recruited. Maternal blood glucose level and fetal movements were recorded during and after fasting. Statistical comparison of samples before and after a meal was made using Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test. Maternal glucose level during fasting (5.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/l) was significantly (P = 0.01) lower than after breakfast (5.3 +/- 1.0 mmol/l). There was a significant association between maternal glucose levels and numbers of days faster (P = 0.01). The time needed to detect breathing movements was significantly longer (P = 0.005) during fasting than postprandial. The continuous variety of fetal breathing movement was significantly (P = 0.02) less during fasting compared to postprandial. It is concluded that intermittent maternal fasting is associated with a significant alteration in the frequency and pattern of human FBM.

Fetal assessment during pregnancy

Fetal monitoring during pregnancy is used to prevent fetal death. This article addresses the goals of fetal monitoring during pregnancy. Methods of fetal surveillance are reviewed, as well as the meaning of abnormal fetal testing and how these results relate to fetal and neonatal outcome. Overall, pediatricians who understand the goals, methods, and interpretation of fetal testing can communicate more effectively with the delivering obstetric team in anticipation of optimizing obstetric and pediatric outcomes.

Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop

In August 2007, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institutes of Health Office of Rare Diseases, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Academy of Pediatrics cosponsored a 2-day workshop to reassess the body of evidence supporting antepartum assessment of fetal well-being, identify key gaps in the evidence, and formulate recommendations for further research. Participants included experts in obstetrics and fetal physiology and representatives from relevant stakeholder groups and organizations. This article is a summary of the discussions at the workshop, including synopses of oral presentations on the epidemiology of stillbirth and fetal neurological injury, fetal physiology, techniques for antenatal monitoring, and maternal and fetal indications for monitoring. Finally, a synthesis of recommendations for further research compiled from three breakout workgroups is presented.

Fetal growth restriction

Normal fetal growth is determined by the genetically predetermined growth potential and further modulated by maternal, fetal, placental, and external factors. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a failure to reach this potential and is clinically suspected if sonographic estimates of fetal weight, size, or symmetry are abnormal. Integration of fetal anatomy assessment, amniotic fluid dynamics, uterine, umbilical, and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler is the most effective approach to differentiate potentially manageable placenta-based FGR from aneuploidy, nonaneuploid syndromes, and viral infection. Although placental dysfunction results in a multisystem fetal syndrome with impacts on short- and long-term outcome, only cardiovascular and behavioral responses are helpful to guide surveillance and intervention. Early-onset FGR before 34 weeks gestation is readily recognized but challenging to manage as questions about optimal delivery timing remain unanswered. In contrast, near-term FGR provides less of a management challenge but is often missed as clinical findings are more subtle. Once placenta-based FGR is diagnosed, integrating multivessel Doppler and biophysical profile score provides information on longitudinal progression of placental dysfunction and degree of fetal acidemia, respectively. Choosing appropriate monitoring intervals based on anticipated disease acceleration and intervention when fetal risks exceed neonatal risks are the prevailing current management approaches.

Integrated testing and management in fetal growth restriction

Growth-restricted fetuses are at higher risk for poor perinatal and long-term outcome than those who are appropriately grown. Multiple antenatal testing modalities can help document the sequence of fetal deterioration. The full extent of this compromise is best identified by a combination of fetal biometry, biophysical profile scoring, and arterial and venous Doppler. In the preterm growth-restricted fetus, timing of delivery is critically determined by the balance of fetal versus neonatal risks. In the near-term fetus, accurate diagnosis continues to be a challenge as unrecognized growth restriction contributes to a significant proportion of unexplained stillbirths. In this review, we present an integrated diagnostic and surveillance approach that accounts for these factors.

The fetal response to chronic placental insufficiency

Fetal growth restriction is most commonly caused by failure of the placenta to meet the increasing demands for oxygen and substrate of the developing fetus, resulting in common fetal compensatory responses. Understanding these responses is helpful in developing a management strategy that will optimize pregnancy outcome.

Choice of antenatal testing significantly effects a patient's work obligations

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare two approaches to antenatal testing for their impact on the workforce.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective observational study of women who presented for antenatal testing. All women were given a survey upon presentation. As per hospital protocol, nonstress testing (NST) was performed semiweekly and biophysical profile (BPP) was performed weekly. The choice of testing was determined by the attending physician. chi2- and Student's t-tests were performed where appropriate. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULT

A total of 195 women were surveyed. Among them, 94 women had an NST and 101 had a BPP. Overall, 59.2% were multiparous, 33.1% had to arrange for child care and 97.2% felt reassured by the testing. There were no differences in demographic characteristics, education, type of insurance or employment status between the groups. Women who had NSTs were more likely to lose time from work than those who had BPPs (218.4 versus 68.9 min; P<0.001). Of the women who had semiweekly NSTs, 80.6% would have preferred weekly testing. If the 94 women who received semiweekly testing had weekly testing, a total of 534.4 h would have been available for the workforce.

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly NST results in a significant increase in time lost from the workforce compared with weekly BPP.

Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of non-stress test (NST), computerized fetal heart rate analysis (cCTG), biophysical profile scoring (BPS) and arterial and venous Doppler ultrasound investigation in the prediction of acid-base status in fetal growth restriction.

METHODS

Growth-restricted fetuses, defined by abdominal circumference < 5(th) percentile and umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index > 95(th) percentile, were tested by NST, cCTG, BPS, and UA, middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and umbilical vein (UV) Doppler investigation. The short-term variation (STV) of the fetal heart rate was calculated using the Oxford Sonicaid 8002 cCTG system. Relationships between antenatal test results and cord artery pH < 7.20 were investigated, using correlation, parametric and non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-six of 58 patients (96.6%) received complete assessment of all variables. All were delivered by pre-labor Cesarean section at a median gestational age of 30 + 6 weeks. The UA pulsatility index (PI) was negatively correlated with the cCTG STV (Pearson correlation - 0.29, P < 0.05). The DV PI was negatively correlated with the pH (Pearson correlation - 0.30, P < 0.02). The cCTG mean minute variation and pH were not significantly correlated (Pearson correlation 0.13, P = 0.34). UV pulsations identified the highest proportion of neonates with a low birth pH (9/17, 53%), the highest number of false positives among patients with an abnormal BPS, abnormal DV Doppler and a STV < 3.5 ms, and also stratified false negatives among patients with an equivocal or normal BPS. Abnormal DV Doppler correctly identified false positives among patients with an abnormal BPS. cCTG reduced the rate of an equivocal BPS from 16% to 7.1% when substituted for the traditional NST. Elevated DV Doppler index and umbilical venous pulsations predicted a low pH with 73% sensitivity and 90% specificity (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In fetal growth restriction with placental insufficiency, venous Doppler investigation provides the best prediction of acid-base status. The cCTG performs best when combined with venous Doppler or as a substitute for the traditional NST in the BPS.

Fetal growth restriction and postnatal development

The interaction between genetic constitution and in utero environment determines fetal growth and development and influences the susceptibility to certain disorders in adulthood. Data from both animal and human studies indicate that prenatal and early postnatal malnutrition can program the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis), altering neuroendocrine response to stressors throughout lifetime. Impaired uteroplacental perfusion results in fetal growth restriction (FGR). In FGR there is evidence of chronic hypoxemia and alterations in metabolic, endocrine, and hematological parameters, compatible with starvation. Furthermore, FGR is associated with increased perinatal mortality and in the survivors there is increased susceptibility to diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adulthood. There is evidence that early postnatal growth acceleration, which would normally be considered desirable, may exacerbate metabolic dysfunction in later life.

Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results

OBJECTIVE

Multi-vessel Doppler ultrasonography and biophysical profile scoring (BPS) are used in the surveillance of growth restricted fetuses (IUGR). The interpretation of both tests performed concurrently may be complex. This study examines the relationship between Doppler ultrasonography and biophysical test results in IUGR fetuses.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-eight IUGR fetuses (abdominal circumference < 5th percentile, elevated umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI)) had concurrent surveillance with UA, middle cerebral artery (MCA) and ductus venosus (DV) Doppler ultrasonography and BPS (fetal tone, movement, breathing, maximal amniotic fluid pocket and fetal heart rate). Patients were stratified into three groups according to their Doppler examination: (1) abnormal UA alone; (2) brain sparing (MCA-PI > 2 SD below mean for gestational age); and (3) abnormal DV (PI > 2 SD above the mean for gestational age) and BPS groups: (1) normal (> 6/10); (2) equivocal (6/10); and (3) abnormal (< 6/10). Predictions of short-term perinatal outcomes by both modalities were compared for stratification. The distribution and concordance of Doppler and BPS test results were examined for the whole patient group and based on delivery prior to 32 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

Abnormal UA Doppler results alone were observed in 109 fetuses (33.2%), brain sparing in 87 (26.5%) and an abnormal DV in 132 (40.2%). The BPS was normal in 158 (48.2%), equivocal in 68 (20.7%) and abnormal in 102 (31.1%). Both testing modalities stratified patients into groups with comparable acid-base disturbance and perinatal outcome. Of the nine possible test combinations the largest subgroups were: abnormal UA alone/normal BPS (n = 69; 21%) and abnormal DV Doppler/abnormal BPS (n = 62; 18.9%). Assessment of compromise by both testing modalities was concordant in 146 (44.5%) cases. In 182 fetuses with discordant results the BPS grade was better in 115 (63.2%, P < 0.0001). Marked disagreement of test abnormality was present in 57 (17.4%) fetuses. Of these, abnormal venous Doppler in the presence of a normal BPS constituted the largest group (Chi-square P < 0.002). Stratification was not significantly different in patients delivered prior to 32 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSION

Doppler ultrasonography and BPS effectively stratify IUGR fetuses into risk categories, but Doppler and BPS results do not show a consistent relationship with each other. Since fetal deterioration appears to be independently reflected in these two testing modalities further research is warranted to investigate how they are best combined.

Using fetal acoustic stimulation to shorten the biophysical profile

PURPOSE

To determine whether fetal acoustic stimulation can decrease the time required to achieve a reassuring biophysical profile.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for a biophysical profile were prospectively assigned to study and control groups. The study group received 3 seconds of acoustic stimulation if fetal breathing, tone, or movement were not present during the first 5 minutes of the study. The biophysical profile was completed in the standard fashion, for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 870 patients were enrolled (458 control, 412 with stimulation). The fetal acoustic stimulation group had decreased testing time (3 minutes) and fewer non-reassuring tests (5%). The fetal acoustic stimulation group had fewer studies without breathing, potentially reducing the need for further testing or intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal acoustic stimulation can be used to decrease the biophysical profile testing time and to reduce the number of non-reassuring tests.

Pathophysiology of Fetal Growth Restriction: Implications for Diagnosis and Surveillance

Normal fetal growth depends on the genetically predetermined growth potential and is modulated by fetal, placental, maternal, and external factors. Fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are at high risk for poor short- and long-term outcome. Although there are many underlying etiologies, IUGR resulting from placental insufficiency is most relevant clinically because outcome could be altered by appropriate diagnosis and timely delivery. A diagnostic approach that aims to separate IUGR resulting from placental disease from constitutionally small fetuses and those with other underlying etiologies (e.g., aneuploidy, viral infection, nonaneuploid syndromes) needs to integrate multiple imaging modalities. In placental-based IUGR, cardiovascular and behavioral responses are interrelated with the disease severity. Ultrasound assessment of fetal anatomy, amniotic fluid volume, and growth is complementary to the Doppler investigation of fetoplacental blood flow dynamics. A diagnostic approach to IUGR combining these modalities is presented in this review.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the development of the placental interface, to outline the mechanisms of placental insufficiency, and to list the manifestations of placental insufficiency and the tests that can be used to diagnose fetal growth restriction.

Pulmonary complications of pregnancy

Pregnancy induces significant physiologic stresses on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems that may precipitate respiratory compromise. In addition, certain disease states that are unique to the pregnant woman, such as amniotic fluid emboli syndrome, may be associated with respiratory failure. The physiologic changes that affect the pregnant woman are reviewed. Pregnancy-related conditions are discussed as well as how common diseases, such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome, asthma, pneumonia, and AIDS,have to be approached when balancing the needs of the fetus with maternal well-being.