Austin PE, Dunn KA, Eily-Cofield K, Brown CK, Wooden WA, Bradfield JF. Subcuticular sutures and the rate of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds.
Ann Emerg Med 1995;
25:328-30. [PMID:
7864471 DOI:
10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70289-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To determine whether buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures increase the degree of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds.
DESIGN
Randomized, blinded, prospective trial.
SETTING
Laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS
Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300 to 325 g.
INTERVENTIONS
Four wounds were made on each rat. Two wounds on each were closed with three interrupted buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures 6-0 polyglactin 910 and running 5-0 nylon skin sutures. The other two wounds were closed with running 5-0 nylon skin sutures alone.
RESULTS
Fourteen days after the sutures were placed, the animals were killed, and histologic preparations were made from each wound. Each sample was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 for the presence of inflammatory infiltrates, fibroplasia and capillary proliferation, necrosis, exudates, giant cells, and edema. We determined a total wound score by adding the scores from each category. The mean total wound score was 4.46 +/- 2.92 for those closed with buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures and 4.91 +/- 2.56 for those closed without buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures. Using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, we found no statistically significant difference in mean total wound score of wounds closed with and without buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures (alpha = .01). The probability of detecting a twofold difference in total wound scores was 60% (beta = .40).
CONCLUSION
Buried, absorbable, subcuticular sutures do not significantly increase the degree of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds.
Collapse