Selective operative approach for variceal hemorrhage

Decision-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and surgical distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) are treatments for complications of portal hypertension. TIPS is widely used because it is relatively easy to place. Because TIPS may malfunction over time, it is unclear whether TIPS is superior to DSRS in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who enjoy a longer survival. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of TIPS to DSRS for portal hypertension in Child's class A cirrhosis. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the number of procedures, life expectancy, and costs over the first 2 years in patients with Child's class A cirrhosis who underwent a TIPS or DSRS. Patients who received TIPS survived 1.96 years, required 1.7 procedures, and incurred $41,685 in costs. Patients who underwent a DSRS survived 1.86 years, required 1.0 procedure, and incurred $26,951 in costs. The cost-effectiveness of TIPS compared with DSRS was $147,340 per life-year saved. Adjusting the rate of TIPS dysfunction, 1-year survival, or the number of ultrasounds to detect TIPS dysfunction did not change the results. In patients with Child's class A cirrhosis, DSRS is a more cost-effective treatment than TIPS. Until the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing TIPS with DSRS are available, TIPS should be regarded as experimental and prohibitively expensive in Child's class A cirrhosis.

The changing spectrum of treatment for variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on patient selection and outcome of surgical treatment for this complication of portal hypertension, as reflected in a single surgeon's 18-year experience with operations for variceal hemorrhage.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Definitive treatment of patients who bleed from portal hypertension has been progressively altered during the past 2 decades during which endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and TIPS have successively become available as alternative treatment options to operative portosystemic shunts and devascularization procedures.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-three consecutive patients who were surgically treated for portal hypertensive bleeding between 1978 and 1996 were reviewed retrospectively. Four Eras separated by the dates when endoscopic therapy (January 1981), liver transplantation (July 1985), and TIPS (January 1993) became available in our institution were analyzed. Throughout all four Eras, a selective operative approach, using the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS), nonselective shunts, and esophagogastric devascularization, was taken. The most common indications for nonselective shunts and esophagogastric devascularization were medically intractable ascites and splanchnic venous thrombosis, respectively. Most other patients received a DSRS.

RESULTS

The risk status (Child's class) of patients undergoing surgery progressively improved (p = 0.001) throughout the 4 Eras, whereas the need for emergency surgery declined (p = 0.002). The percentage of nonselective shunts performed decreased because better options to manage acute bleeding episodes (sclerotherapy, TIPS) and advanced liver disease complicated by ascites (liver transplantation, TIPS) became available (p = 0.009). In all Eras, the operative mortality rate was directly related to Child's class (A, 2.7%; B, 7.5%; and C, 26.1 %) (p = 0.001). As more good-risk patients underwent operations for variceal bleeding, the incidence of postoperative encephalopathy decreased (p = 0.015), and long-term survival improved (p = 0.012), especially since liver transplantation became available to salvage patients who developed hepatic failure after a prior surgical procedure. There were no differences between Eras with respect to rebleeding or shunt occlusion. Distal splenorenal shunts (p = 0.004) and nonselective shunts (p = 0.001) were more protective against rebleeding than was esophagogastric devascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential introduction of endoscopic therapy, liver transplantation, and TIPS has resulted in better selection and improved results with respect to quality and length of survival for patients treated surgically for variceal bleeding. Despite these innovations, portosystemic shunts and esophagogastric devascularization remain important and effective options for selected patients with bleeding secondary to portal hypertension.

Transabdominal esophagogastric devascularization as treatment for variceal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

During the past 18 years we have used a selective operative approach for variceal bleeders in whom endoscopic sclerotherapy failed or sclerotherapy was not indicated. Esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy has been reserved for unshuntable patients and for those in whom a shunt was deemed inadvisable. The purposes of this study are to describe the surgical procedure technique and indications for esophagogastric devascularization and to report its long-term results.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who underwent either a limited (n = 9) or extensive (n = 23) esophagogastric devascularization procedure without esophageal transection for variceal bleeding were retrospectively reviewed. Common indications were thrombosis of all splanchnic veins (n = 12), distal splenorenal shunt thrombosis (n = 7), generalized portal hypertension with isolated splenic vein thrombosis (n = 5), and symptomatic splenomegaly or severe hypersplenism (n = 6). Eighteen patients (56%) had cirrhosis, eleven (34%) received an emergency operation, and eighteen (56%) bled from gastric varices.

RESULTS

Three patients with Child's class C disease undergoing emergency surgery died during the early postoperative interval. Rebleeding occurred in nine surviving patients (31%) and was the cause of death in three. Rebleeding rates for the limited and extensive devascularization procedures were 50% and 24%, respectively. Only one of 11 patients with diffuse splanchnic venous thrombosis without liver disease has died. The 5-year survival rate of patients with liver disease was 51%. Only two patients experienced postoperative encephalopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in selected patients, esophagogastric devascularization without esophageal transection is a reasonably effective alternative to shunt surgery.

Role of distal splenorenal shunt for long-term management of variceal bleeding

Distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) has been studied extensively over the past 25 years to define its role in management of variceal bleeding. The operative technique of the shunt has not changed, but more aggressive attempts at portal-azygos disconnection have been studied for their effect on maintenance of portal perfusion. Control of variceal bleeding is achieved in about 90% of patients. Portal flow to the liver is maintained in > 90% of patients with nonalcoholic etiology of portal hypertension and in 50% to 84% of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis depending on the degree of portal-azygos disconnection. Encephalopathy and liver failure do not seem to be accelerated by DSRS but depend on the severity of the underlying liver disease. Reported survival likewise depends on the etiology of portal hypertension and the severity of liver disease: > 90% survival can be achieved in portal vein thrombosis and patients with cirrhosis and normal liver function, but 50% to 60% 3- to 5-year survivals are reported for patients with more advanced disease. DSRS offers one treatment modality for management of variceal bleeding that must fit into an overall strategy for these patients. Full evaluation is the key to allow selection of patients for pharmacotherapy, sclerotherapy, variceal decompression, or liver transplantation.

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Transjugular placement of an intrahepatic stent is a new technique to establish a portosystemic shunt for treatment of portal hypertension. A puncture needle is advanced in a catheter through the inferior vena cava into a hepatic vein; then an intrahepatic branch of the portal vein is punctured and an expandable stent of metallic mesh is implanted to establish the shunt.

METHODS

We attempted the stent-shunt procedure in 100 of 112 consecutive patients with variceal bleeding due to cirrhosis, who were then followed for a mean (+/- SD) of 12 +/- 6 months. Of the 100 patients, 22 had Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis, 10 were treated on an emergency basis, and 68 had alcoholic cirrhosis. The shunt was established with use of Palmaz stents expanded to 8 to 12 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 93 percent of the patients. The mean (+/- SD) time for the procedure was 1.2 +/- 0.3 hours. The shunt reduced the portal venous pressure gradient by 57 percent. Major complications were hemorrhage (intraabdominal bleeding in six patients, biliary bleeding in four, and bleeding in the liver capsule in three) and migration of the stent into the pulmonary artery (in two patients). At follow-up, stenosis of the shunt was evident in 21 patients and occlusion in 10 patients; 10 of these 31 patients had variceal rebleeding. Stenoses and occlusions of the shunt were all treated successfully by redilation, thrombolysis, or implantation of an additional stent. Hepatic encephalopathy (stages I to III) developed in 25 percent of the patients. The proportion of patients with shunts who remained free of variceal rebleeding was 92 percent at six months and 82 percent at one year. The 30-day mortality was 3 percent. The cumulative one-year survival was 85 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the transjugular placement of an intrahepatic portosystemic stent is an effective and safe treatment for variceal hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis.

Selective shunt versus nonshunt surgery for management of both schistosomal and nonschistosomal variceal bleeders

This clinical study included 219 (Child A/B) consecutive variceal bleeders. Electively 123 had distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) and 96 had splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization (S&GD). Liver pathology was documented in 73% of patients, with schistosomal fibrosis in 41% and nonalcoholic cirrhosis or mixed pattern (fibrosis and cirrhosis) in 59%. The surgical groups were similar before operation, with a mean follow-up of 82 +/- 13 and 78 +/- 18 months, respectively (range, 60 to 120 months). The two pathologic populations were also similar before each and both procedures. The operative mortality rates were low, with incidences of 3.3% (DSRS) and 3.1% (S&GD). Rebleeding occurred significantly (p less than 0.05) more frequently after S&GD (27%) compared to DSRS (5.7%). Sclerotherapy salvaged 65% of S&GD rebleeders. Encephalopathy developed significantly (p less than 0.05) more after DSRS (18.7%) compared to S&GD (7.3%), with no significant difference among the current survivors. The difference in overall rebleeding and encephalopathy rates between both procedures was statistically related to patients with cirrhosis and mixed lesions (p less than 0.05). Distal splenorenal shunt significantly reduced the endoscopic variceal size more than S&GD (p less than 0.05). Prograde portal perfusion was documented in 94% of patients in each group, with a variable distinct pattern of portaprival collaterals in 91% (DSRS) and 65% (S&GD). The total population cumulative survival was similar with 80% for DSRS and 79% for S&GD (plus sclerosis in 23%), with hepatic cell failure the cause of death in 46% and 50%, respectively. However, in the schistosomal patients, survival was better improved after DSRS (90%) compared to S&GD (75%), with no difference among the cirrhotic and mixed group (DSRS 73%, S&GD 72%). In conclusion (1) both DSRS and S&GD have low operative mortality rates, (2) DSRS is superior to S&GD in the schistosomal patients, and (3) S&GD backed by endosclerosis for rebleeding is a good surgical alternative to selective shunt in the nonalcoholic cirrhotic and mixed population.

Surgical rescue for failures of cirrhotic sclerotherapy

Bleeding from gastroesophageal varices remains the most devastating complication of the portal hypertensive syndrome. Endoscopic sclerotherapy has emerged as the best initial treatment for bleeding varices because surgery is obviated and survival may be improved. However, sclerotherapy will fail and surgical rescue will be required in at least a third of patients. There are two viable surgical rescue procedures: shunt surgery and liver transplantation. This paper summarizes the available data and concludes that there is a role for both procedures.

Definitive therapy for variceal bleeding: a personal view

Definitive therapy for variceal hemorrhage has evolved during the past half century. Only completely decompressing shunts (nonselective shunts) were available before 1967. Additional options now include selective shunts, devascularization procedures, endoscopic sclerotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and hepatic transplantation. Although drug treatment is experimental at the present time, the remaining therapeutic options are applicable to various subgroups of patients and in certain clinical settings. At the University of Nebraska, patients with variceal bleeding are first grouped based on their candidacy for transplantation. Transplantation candidates with advanced (Child's class C) or symptomatic liver disease undergo transplantation as soon as possible. Future transplantation candidates with stable, asymptomatic liver disease undergo either long-term sclerotherapy or a distal splenorenal shunt if sclerotherapy fails or if they have poor access to tertiary medical care. These patients are carefully monitored so that they can undergo transplantation before they become high-operative risks. Patients who are not candidates for transplantation receive chronic variceal sclerotherapy as initial therapy so long as shunt surgery is readily available if sclerotherapy fails. When surgery is indicated, the distal splenorenal shunt is preferred to nonselective shunts because several controlled and uncontrolled series have demonstrated a lower frequency of encephalopathy after selective variceal decompression.

The Emory perspective of the distal splenorenal shunt in 1990

The distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) has been extensively studied at Emory University over the past 18 years to define its role in the management of variceal bleeding. DSRS has been applied broadly in many different patient groups and has been evaluated in prospective randomized trials; thus, a considerable amount of data has accrued on the metabolic and hemodynamic consequences of selective variceal decompression. Its current role is defined as primary therapy for variceal bleeding in patients with portal vein thrombosis and good-risk patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis. As a therapy for patients whose bleeding is not controlled by sclerotherapy, it should be used as the shunt procedure of choice, but patient evaluation must focus on the choice between DSRS and liver transplantation.

The distal splenorenal shunt

Distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) provides selective decompression of gastroesophageal varices, with maintenance of portal hypertension and prograde portal flow to the cirrhotic liver. Accurate patient evaluation is essential to select appropriate patients for DSRS. Variceal bleeding control is greater than 85% and is as effective as total portosystemic shunts. Maintenance of prograde portal flow is greater than 90% in nonalcoholic disease, but only 50% in alcoholic cirrhosis; the latter is improved by total splenopancreatic disconnection. Hepatic function is better maintained when portal flow is maintained. Encephalopathy is lower after DSRS than after total shunts. Survival is not significantly improved after DSRS in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis compared to outcome after total shunts. The survival in patients with nonalcoholic disease is significantly improved over that of alcoholics.

Distal splenorenal shunt with splenopancreatic disconnection. A 4-year assessment

The aims of distal splenorenal shunt with splenopancreatic disconnection (DSRS-SPD) were to improve maintenance of portal flow and prevent siphoning of hepatotrophic factors from the pancreas, as occurs after standard DSRS. The main patient population targeted for improvement were alcoholic cirrhotics, who have poorer survival than nonalcoholic cirrhotics and greater loss of portal flow (60%) after standard DSRS. Seventy-eight patients had DSRS-SPD during the study period 1983 to 1987: thirty-two patients were Child's A, 25 were Child's B, and 21 were Child's C. The 35 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were a significantly poorer risk group by Child's class and galactose elimination capacity (GEC) than the 39 patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis. Four patients had portal vein thrombosis. At 4-year follow-up, portal perfusion is maintained in 84% alcoholic and 90% nonalcoholic patients, with hepatic and systemic hemodynamics showing identical patterns for both groups. Hepatic function measured by GEC was maintained in alcoholic patients (290 +/- 68 mg/min to 303 +/- 74 mg/min) and nonalcoholics patients (342 +/- 92 to 320 +/- 118 mg/min). Gastric variceal rebleeding occurred in 10 patients--4 early (less than 2 months) and 6 late (18 to 54 months), leading to operation in 4 and transhepatic embolization in 4 patients: 2 of these patients died from this complication. Survival data show an operative mortality rate of 6.4% and overall mortality rate of 30%, with no significant difference between alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhotics. DSRS-SPD has significantly improved maintenance of portal perfusion and survival in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis requiring selective shunt for variceal bleeding when compared to standard DSRS. In this population DSRS-SPD is the operation of choice. In patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis, the current data have not shown DSRS-SPD to have advantage over standard DSRS.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy for esophago-gastric varices: a critical reappraisal

Amongst the many non-surgical techniques for the treatment of variceal bleeding, endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) has shown great promise. EST can successfully obliterate esophageal varices and prevent variceal rebleeding. It is also very effective in the control of active bleeding from esophageal varices. The technique of EST is simple and can be carried out with a conventional, forward viewing, flexible endoscope and a teflon injector. Weekly intravariceal injections of an aqueous sclerosant are preferable. Though complications of EST in experienced hands are low, prophylactic EST at present should be advocated only to patients at high risk of bleeding. While controversy exists, most reports indicate that EST improves survival of patients with portal hypertension who have bled from esophageal varices. With regular follow-up endoscopies, recurrence of varices and bleeding from them can be substantially reduced. Sclerotherapy may successfully obliterate gastric varices in some patients either following EST for esophageal varices or by direct gastric variceal injections. For the long-term management of portal hypertension, combination of pharmacotherapy before as well as after eradication of esophageal varices, needs proper evaluation.

Effect of delayed operation for bleeding esophageal varices on Child's class and indices of liver function

The charts of 38 patients managed with a period of intensive medical treatment (mean 7 days) prior to portosystemic shunting were examined. We found that the operative delay did not improve the Child's class or the indices of liver function. The operative mortality rates in these patients were 0 in Child's A patients, 13 percent in Child's B patients, and 50 percent in Child's C patients. Based on these findings, we began to operate on patients with bleeding esophageal varices as soon as they stabilized. The charts of 10 consecutive Child's C patients operated on without a period of intensive medical management (mean 3 days) were reviewed and compared with the charts of 8 Child's C patients with delayed operation. The two groups of patients were similar. We recommend that patients who need a shunt should be operated on as soon as possible after bleeding has ceased.

Retroperitoneal approach to the Warren shunt

The Warren shunt, despite its recognized attributes, has several major obstacles to gaining widespread acceptance in the surgical community. These include its technical difficulty and the increased incidence of postoperative ascites. We have begun using a retroperitoneal approach for the performance of this procedure, which we believe is technically easier and may lessen postoperative ascites. In addition, blood loss, the need for ventilatory support and intensive care, and the occurrence of postoperative ileus have all been reduced in our experience. Herein, we have reported the details of this approach and discussed its major advantages over the classic transperitoneal approach to the distal splenorenal shunt.

Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for long-term treatment of variceal bleeding. Early results of a randomized trial

In September 1982, a prospective randomized trial comparing shunt surgery and endoscopic sclerotherapy for the elective management of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis was initiated. Twenty-seven patients have received shunts (distal splenorenal = 23, nonselective = 4) and 30 patients have had chronic sclerotherapy. Eighty-six per cent of patients had alcoholic cirrhosis and 33% were Child's class C. After a mean follow-up of 25 months, 19% of shunt and 57% of sclerotherapy patients have had rebleeding (p = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis reveals similar 2-year survival rates for shunt (65%) and sclerotherapy (61%) groups. Only two of 10 sclerotherapy failures have been salvaged by surgery. Posttherapy quantitative hepatic function, frequency of encephalopathy, and cumulative medical costs were similar for both groups. Hepatic portal perfusion and portal pressure at 1 year were better maintained by sclerotherapy than by distal splenorenal shunt. In conclusion, endoscopic sclerotherapy and shunt surgery provide similar results with respect to survival, hepatic function, frequency of encephalopathy, and costs. Sclerotherapy is an acceptable, but not superior, alternative to shunt surgery for treatment of variceal hemorrhage.

Bleeding esophageal varices

No single treatment for bleeding esophageal varices is appropriate for all patients and situations. An algorithm for management of the patient with acute bleeding is presented in this article. The options for long-term, definitive therapy and the criteria for selection of each are discussed.

Prognostic factors in survival after portasystemic shunts. Multivariate analysis

Multivariate analyses correlated short-term survival and long-term survival with clinical data from 141 patients with portasystemic shunts for bleeding esophageal varices over the 8 years from 1974 through 1981. By logistic regression analysis, the elements with independent prognostic significance for operative death were an emergency operation, serum albumin and bilirubin levels, age, and sex. A cutpoint probability value of 0.75 marked the single level above which 84% of patients could be expected to survive, but below which 77% are likely to die. By a Cox regression model, elements with independent prognostic significance were identical. Male sex (p = 0.02) and prolonged partial thromboplastin time (p = 0.04) indicated a poor prognosis after an emergency operation; after an elective operation only the serum albumin level was prognostic (p = 0.02). Normal blood clotting is the major determinant of survival after an emergency shunt, and the serum albumin level chiefly determines survival after elective portasystemic decompression.