Aprotinin preserves hemostasis in aspirin-treated patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?

Background Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used to limit perioperative bleeding and reduce the need for donated blood transfusions during cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin evaluating its effect on the outcome of perioperative transfusion have been published since 1987, and systematic reviews were conducted in 1992 and 1997.

Methods A systematic search was conducted for all RCTs of aprotinin that used placebo controls or were open-label with no active control treatment. Data collected included the primary outcome, objective of each study, whether a systematic review was cited or conducted as part of the background and/or rationale for the study and the number of previously published RCTs cited. Cumulative meta-analyses were performed.

Results Sixty-four randomized, controlled trials of aprotinin were found, conducted between 1987 and 2002, reporting an endpoint of perioperative transfusion. Median trial size was 64 subjects, with a range of 20 to 1784. A cumulative meta-analysis indicated that aprotinin greatly decreased the need for perioperative transfusion, stabilizing at an odds ratio of 0.25 (p, 10 2 6) by the 12th study, published in June of 1992. The upper limit of the confidence interval never exceeded 0.65 and results were similar in all subgroups. Citation of previous RCTs was extremely low, with a median of 20% of prior trials cited. Only 7 of 44 (15%) of subsequent reports referenced the largest trial (N 1/4 1784), which was 28 times larger than the median trial size.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that investigators evaluating aprotinin were not adequately citing previous research, resulting in a large number of RCTs being conducted to address efficacy questions that prior trials had already definitively answered. Institutional review boards and journals could reduce the number of redundant trials by requiring investigators to conduct adequate searches for prior evidence and conducting systematic reviews.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion. Recently, questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs and the safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the internet. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 211 RCTs that recruited 20,781 participants. Data from placebo/inactive controlled trials, and from head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of operative blood loss, but the differences were small. Aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.71). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and it was 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared superior in reducing the need for RBC transfusion: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding: RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.68). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of just under 3% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 37 (95% CI 27 to 56). Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, but the data were sparse and the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias. Evidence of publication bias was not observed in trials reporting re-operation rates. Adjustment for these effects reduced the magnitude of estimated benefits but did not negate treatment effects. However, the apparent advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues was small and may be explained by publication bias and non-equivalent drug doses. Aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18), stroke (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.64) renal dysfunction (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70) or overall mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20). The analyses of myocardial infarction and death included data from the majority of subjects recruited into the clinical trials of aprotinin. However, under-reporting of renal events could explain the lack of effect seen with aprotinin. Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues but data were sparse. These results conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion. Based on the results of randomised trials their efficacy does not appear to be offset by serious adverse effects. In most circumstances the lysine analogues are probably as effective as aprotinin and are cheaper; the evidence is stronger for tranexamic acid than for aminocaproic acid. In high risk cardiac surgery, where there is a substantial probability of serious blood loss, aprotinin may be preferred over tranexamic acid. Aprotinin does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of vascular occlusion and death, but the data do not exclude an increased risk of renal failure. There is no need for further placebo-controlled trials of aprotinin or lysine analogues in cardiac surgery. The principal need is for large comparative trials to assess the relative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in different surgical procedures.

Aspirin and postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between aspirin ingestion and postoperative bleeding complications, and to test the hypothesis that there is a subset of patients who are aspirin hyperresponders with a proclivity toward platelet dysfunction.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Despite numerous retrospective and prospective analyses, it is still controversial as to whether aspirin ingestion before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with significant postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 1999, the records of 2,606 consecutive patients undergoing CABG were reviewed to identify patients with a history of aspirin ingestion up until the time of surgery. Aspirin ingestion was correlated with postoperative blood transfusion using multivariate analysis. In a subset of preoperative aspirin users (n = 40), bleeding times were measured before and after aspirin use. Flow cytometry was performed in another cohort of patients with known heart disease (n = 30) to determine the effect of aspirin on platelet surface receptors.

RESULTS

During the 5-year study period, 63% of the CABG patients were identified as aspirin users. Among these, 23.1% required blood transfusions compared with 19% for the nonusers. Non-red blood cell transfusions were more common in aspirin users, as was reexploration for bleeding. Stratification of these results according to the frequency of aspirin use showed that aspirin is an independent multivariate predictor of postoperative blood transfusion only in high-risk patients. In the prospective studies, aspirin treatment resulted in a significant increase in the template bleeding time, an increase in platelet PAR-1 thrombin receptor activity, and a decrease in the binding of platelets to monocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the hypothesis that aspirin is associated with a greater likelihood of postoperative bleeding. A platelet function testing algorithm that combines preoperative risk factor assessment, template bleeding times, and flow cytometry may allow the identification of aspirin hyperresponders who are at increased risk for bleeding.

Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is used in most, but not all, complex heart operations. CPB is associated with a systemic inflammatory response in adults and children. Many materials-dependent (exposure of blood to non- physiologic surfaces and conditions) and materials-in dependent (surgical trauma, ischemia-perfusion to the organs, changes in body temperature, and release of endotoxin) factors during CPB have been implicated in the etiology of this complex response. The mechanisms involved may include complement activation, release of cytokines, leukocyte activation with expression of ad hesion molecules, and production of various vasoactive and immunoactive substances. Postpump inflamma tion may lead to postoperative complications and may result in respiratory failure, renal dysfunction, bleeding disorders, neurologic dysfunction, altered liver func tion, and ultimately multiple organ failure. Significant efforts are being made to decrease the generation and effects of postpump inflammation. Interventions to this end have included avoiding CPB when possible, im proving the biocompatibility of the involved mechani cal devices, and administering medications that main tain cellular integrity. This article provides an overview of the etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of postpump inflammation. Perhaps with additional in sight into this syndrome, CPB can be made a safer and more efficacious modality of cardiorespiratory support. Copyright© 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) blood transfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon aminocaproic acid, on peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (to May 1998), EMBASE (to December 1997), web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 participants). Aprotinin reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 30% (RR=0.70: 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.76). The average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 20.4% (95%CI: 15.6% to 25.3%). On average, aprotinin use saved 1.1 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.69 to 1.47) in those requiring transfusion. Aprotinin also significantly reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding (RR=0.40: 95%CI: 0.25 to 0.66). We found 18 trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) (1,342 participants). TXA reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (RR=0.66: 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.81). This represented an ARR of 17.2% (95%CI: 8.7% to 25.7%). TXA use resulted in a saving of 1.03 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.67 to 1.39) in those requiring transfusion. We found four trials of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) (208 participants). EACA use resulted in a statistically non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion (RR=0.48: 95%CI: 0.19 to 1.19). Comparisons between agents Eight trials made 'head-to-head' comparisons between TXA and aprotinin. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the rate of RBC transfusion: RR=1.21 (95%CI: 0.83 to 1.76) for TXA compared to aprotinin. Adverse Effects Aprotinin did not seem to be associated with an excess risk of adverse effects, including thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis RR=0.64: 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.31) and renal failure (RR=1.19: 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.79). Fewer data were available for TXA and EACA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From this review it appears that aprotinin reduces the need for red cell transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to bleeding, without serious adverse effects. However, there was significant heterogeneity in trial outcomes, and some evidence of publication bias. Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, although the data were rather sparse. The poor evaluation of these latter drugs is unfortunate as results suggest they may be equally as effective as aprotinin, but are significantly cheaper. The evidence reviewed here supports the use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery. Further small trials of this drug are not warranted. Future trials should be large enough to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aprotinin with that of TXA and EACA.

Is epsilon-aminocaproic acid as effective as aprotinin in reducing bleeding with cardiac surgery?: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although aprotinin is known to be effective in reducing postoperative hemorrhage after cardiac surgery, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, an alternative antifibrinolytic, is considerably less expensive. Because the results of 3 small randomized clinical trials comparing these 2 agents directly were inconclusive, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness and adverse-effect profile of these 2 agents against placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 52 randomized clinical trials published between 1985 and 1998 involving the use of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (n=9) or aprotinin (n=46) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were abstracted. Our primary outcomes were total blood loss, red blood cell transfusion rates and amounts, reexploration, stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality. The meta-analysis revealed substantial reductions in total blood loss with epsilon-aminocaproic acid and low-dose aprotinin (each with a 35% reduction versus placebo, P<0.001) and high-dose aprotinin (53% reduction, P<0.001). There were identical reductions in total postoperative transfusions with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (61% reduction versus placebo, P<0. 010) and high-dose aprotinin (62% reduction, P<0.001). The proportion of patients transfused was similarly reduced with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.69) and high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.28; 0.22 to 0.37). Although both drugs reduced rates of reexploration to similar degrees, this effect was statistically significant only with high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.39; 0. 24 to 0.61). epsilon-Aminocaproic acid and aprotinin had no effect on risks of postoperative myocardial infarction or overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the 2 antifibrinolytic agents appear to have similar efficacies, the considerably less-expensive epsilon-aminocaproic acid may be preferred over aprotinin for reducing hemorrhage with cardiac surgery.

Platelets and cardiopulmonary bypass

Exposure of blood to an extracorporeal circulation, such as CPB, causes a variety of physiological responses. Haematological derangements are just one of many potential dangers to the patient who undergoes CPB. The paradox of CPB-related problems with the haematological system is that there are some factors tipping the balance towards a bleeding tendency, and others that favour a prothrombotic state. Both of these issues must be dealt with independently to create the safest environment for surgery. It has been demonstrated that platelets play a key role in both haemostatic dysfunction and thrombotic complications of CPB. Much has been achieved, both clinically and in the laboratory, in the understanding of the precise role platelets play in these events, but the exact mechanisms involved have yet to be completely identified. As research progresses, our understanding will increase, but until then clinical practice must be dictated by the current evidence available.

Aprotinin counterbalances an increased risk of peri-operative hemorrhage in CABG patients pre-treated with Aspirin

OBJECTIVE

As Aspirin (ASA) has proven efficacy in preventing patients with CAD from complications related to cardiovascular diseases, most patients scheduled for CABG are treated with ASA therapy. Consequently, impaired hemostasis is a problem in the management of CABG patients. Clinical studies have shown that Aprotinin can reduce bleeding and the use of blood products by 50% in patients both with and without pre-operative ASA therapy. Concerning the combined effect of peri-operative low-dose ASA therapy and intra-operative high-dose Aprotinin therapy, the gathering of additional and prospective data seemed to be necessary.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind two-centre randomised three-arm study in patients with elective primary CABG surgery. Three groups have been tested, comprising 119 patients in total (group A: ASA + Aprotinin, group B: placebo + Aprotinin, group C: placebo + placebo) to investigate a possible reduction of bleeding in Aprotinin treated patients. For all patients, thromboxane levels were used to identify ASA or placebo treatment.

RESULTS

The post-operative blood loss is significantly reduced by 21% after Trasylol administration (B vs. C; P = 0.009). The unexpected result of this study has been that the pre-treatment with ASA led to a further reduction of 18% (A vs. C; P < 0.0001). The difference between the two Aprotinin groups (A and B) is significant (P = 0. 01) in favour of ASA pre-treatment. Myocardial infarction (MI) had been diagnosed at levels of 1.8% in total (2/113), 2.6% (1/38) in group B and 3.2% (1/31 ) in group C. An additional blinded evaluation of ECG, enzyme levels and clinical status revealed 'definite, probable and possible' MIs of 5% in group A, compared to 16% in group B and 13% in group C, thus providing no evidence for a higher risk of infarction by Aprotinin treatment. When comparing the ASA group to non-ASA pre-treatment, a strong trend towards a reduction in MI rate becomes obvious, from 15% to 5% in favour of the ASA pre-treatment (P = 0.08). Concerning other peri-operative complications, no statistical difference between the groups could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in post-operative blood loss in primary elective CABG surgery with intra-operative Aprotinin treatment could be confirmed. A low-dose ASA treatment combined with a high-dose aprotinin administration during surgery not only neutralized a potentially higher risk of bleeding, but did in fact reduce the post-operative blood loss. The protective effect of ASA on peri-operative MI has been evident through a reduction of MI rate in ASA treated patients.

Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators

Concern about the side effects of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion has increased interest in methods of minimizing perioperative transfusion. We performed meta-analyses of randomized trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid in cardiac surgery. All identified randomized trials in cardiac surgery were included in the meta-analyses. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received at least one perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion. Sixty studies were included in the meta-analyses. The largest number of patients (5808) was available for the meta-analysis of aprotinin, which significantly decreased exposure to allogeneic blood (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.39; P < 0.0001). The efficacy of aprotinin was not significantly different regardless of the type of surgery (primary or reoperation), aspirin use, or reported transfusion threshold. The use of aprotinin was associated with a significant decrease in the need for reoperation because of bleeding (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73; P = 0.001). Desmopressin was not effective, with an OR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.64-1.50; P = 0.92). Tranexamic acid significantly decreased the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.76; P = 0.0009). Epsilon-aminocaproic acid did not have a statistically significant effect on the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-1.12; P = 0.07). There were not enough patients to exclude a small but clinically important increase in myocardial infarction or other side effects for any of the medications. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the number of patients exposed to perioperative allogeneic transfusions in association with cardiac surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are used in cardiac surgery in an attempt to decrease the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion. This meta-analysis of all published randomized trials provides a good estimate of the efficacy of these medications and is useful in guiding clinical practice. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the exposure of patients to allogeneic blood transfusion perioperatively in relationship to cardiac surgery.

Aprotinin inhibits plasmin-induced platelet activation during cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

In the past few years, aprotinin has been used in cardiac surgery with impressive results of reducing blood loss, but several adverse effects of aprotinin also have been reported. One of the most likely mechanisms is the inhibition of plasmin by aprotinin, although this indirect effect has not been reproduced in all experimental studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the platelet function and fibrinolytic activity during human cardiac surgery, with or without aprotinin. During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in humans without aprotinin (n=16), decrease of platelet aggregation induced by thrombin, increase of alpha-granule secretion of platelet and microparticle formation, and increase of plasmin/alpha2-antiplasmin complex (PIC) were observed. In contrast, low-dose aprotinin (1.0 x 10(6) KIU), which was administered only into the priming fluid of extracorporeal circuits (n=10), maintained platelet aggregation induced by thrombin and reduced alpha-granule secretion and microparticle formation of platelets during CPB. In vitro, plasmin (0.8 CU/mL) released alpha-granules of washed platelets, and this activation was completely inhibited by aprotinin (10 KIU/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin has indirect effects to inhibit platelet activation, and this may partly explain the reduction of blood loss during cardiac surgery. To prevent the adverse effects, a single and minimal use of aprotinin is important. The results of in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that platelet preservation was demonstrated by the lower concentration of aprotinin (1.0 x 10(6) KIU per patient or 10 KIU/mL) compared with the concentration that inhibits plasma fibrinolysis.

Pharmacological prophylaxis of bleeding in surgical patients treated with aspirin

A Medline search and subsequent meta-analysis shows that pre-operative aspirin increases blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Both aprotinin and desmopressin are effective in counteracting this. There are almost no data on the effects of bleeding of aspirin, aprotinin and desmopressin in other procedures.

Heparin coating with aprotinin reduces blood activation during coronary artery operations

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate whether the combination of heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits (ECC) and aprotinin treatment reduce blood activation during coronary artery operations.

METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively divided into two groups (heparin-coated ECC and uncoated ECC groups), which were comparable in terms of age, sex, left ventricular function, preoperative aspirin use and consequent intraoperative aprotinin use, number of grafts, duration of aortic cross-clamping, and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood activation was assessed at different times during cardiopulmonary bypass by determination of complement activation (C3 and C4 activation products C3b/c and C4b/c and terminal complement complex), leukocyte activation (elastase), coagulation (scission peptide fibrinopeptide 1 + 2), and fibrinolysis (D-dimers).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that heparin-coated ECC, under conditions of standard heparinization, did not reduce perioperative blood loss and need for transfusion. Heparin coating, however, reduced maximum values of C3b/c (446 +/- 212 nmol/L versus 632 +/- 264 nmol/L with uncoated ECC; p = 0.0037) and maximum C4b/c values (92 +/- 48 nmol/L versus 172 +/- 148 nmol/L with uncoated ECC; p = 0.0069). Levels of terminal complement complex, elastase, fibrinopeptide 1 + 2, and D-dimers were not significantly modified by the use of heparin-coated ECC. Multivariate analysis showed that the intergroup differences in maximum C3b/c and C4b/c values were more pronounced in women in part with high baseline values of C3b/c. We also found that aprotinin contributed to the reduction of maximum values of fibrinopeptide 1 + 2 and D-dimers, whereas heparin coating had no significant influence on these parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of combined properties of heparin-coated ECC and aprotinin in reducing complement activation, coagulation, and fibrinolysis. We therefore recommend use of both together to achieve maximal reduction of blood activation during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery operations.

Hemorrhage and the use of blood products after adult cardiac operations: myths and realities

BACKGROUND

Several patient-, procedure-, and prescriber-related factors are thought to influence the decision to administer allogeneic blood products. We reexamine a number of assertions applied commonly to the practice of transfusion in cardiac operations.

METHODS

More than 50 original articles including a total of more than 10,000 patients from 70 centers were reviewed. Data from 5,426 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 at the Montreal Heart Institute are presented.

RESULTS

From our review of the literature, we conclude that postoperative mediastinal fluid drainage averages 917 mL and that aspirin therapy increases drainage by less than 300 mL in most studies, which should not increase use of blood products, insofar as a strict transfusional protocol is adhered to. Across centers, transfusions can vary eightfold for the same postoperative drainage. Data from our institution show that postoperative mediastinal drainage per se is not influenced by reoperation or by the type of operation. However, total blood losses and transfusion requirements remain increased in reoperative and complex procedures. Excessive mediastinal drainage resulting in increased transfusions occurs in 29% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to allogeneic transfusions remains institution dependent. Constant reevaluation of local practice is essential to implement efficient blood conservation strategies.

Heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin prime for coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

The biocompatibility of an extracorporeal circuit is improved by heparin bonding onto its inner surface. To determine the effect of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass with aprotinin prime on postoperative recovery and resource utilization, a prospective study was done in 102 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with full systemic heparinization.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to be treated with either a heparin-coated circuit (n = 51) or an uncoated circuit (n = 51). Differences in blood loss, need for blood transfusion, morbidity, and intensive care stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

No differences in blood loss and need for blood transfusion were found between the groups. The relative risk for adverse events in the heparin-coated group was 0.29 (95% confidence interval ranging from 0.10 to 0.80). Adverse events included myocardial infarction (2 patients in the uncoated group versus 0 in the heparin-coated group), rethoracotomy for excessive bleeding (1 versus 2), rhythm disturbance (7 versus 2), respiratory insufficiency (4 versus 0), and neurologic dysfunction (2 versus 0). The lower incidence of adverse events in the heparin-coated group was associated with a shorter intensive care stay (median, 2 days; range, 2 to 5 days) compared with the uncoated group (median, 3 days; range, 2 to 19 days, p = 0.03). The cost savings of 1 day of intensive care stay counterbalanced the additional costs of heparin-coated circuits.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass with aprotinin prime resulted in a significant reduction in mobidity in the early postoperative phase and a concomitant decrease in intensive care stay, resulting in important cost savings.

Aprotinin

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical pharmacology of aprotinin in patients undergoing surgical procedures involving major blood loss, namely, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was used to identify French- and English-language publications on aprotinin using the indexing terms aprotinin, cardiothoracic surgery, and hemorrhage. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by review of article bibliographies. Data also were obtained from the approved Canadian and US product labels.

STUDY SELECTIONS

All abstracts and uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study design, population, results, and safety information were retained. Efficacy conclusions were drawn from controlled trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung tissue, decreases bleeding after cardiac surgery by mechanisms including antifibrinolytic activity and preservation of platelet function. Several trials have shown that aprotinin reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG. Its use in other surgical procedures involving major blood loss has been reported. Aprotinin is well tolerated, with minor allergic reactions being the most frequently reported adverse effect. Although unsubstantiated, the possibility that aprotinin could create a prothrombic state leading to early graft occlusion and formation of microthrombi in renal and coronary vasculatures is of concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin is an effective hemostatic agent in CABG. Clear definitions of indications, dosing, safety, and repeated use remain to be investigated thoroughly.

Hemostatic efficacy of dipyridamole, tranexamic acid, and aprotinin in coronary bypass grafting

Sixty patients (four groups of 15 patients) were entered in a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with dipyridamole, tranexamic acid, and aprotinin to reduce bleeding after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Only patients with a preoperative platelet count of less than 246 x 10(9)/L were selected because a previous study showed that these individuals are at risk for increased postoperative bleeding. Compared to control subjects, postoperative blood loss 6 hours after operation was significantly reduced by tranexamic acid (674 +/- 411 versus 352 +/- 150 mL; p < 0.05) and by aprotinin (270 +/- 174 mL; p < 0.01). Dipyridamole did not reduce postoperative blood loss and was associated with complications in 3 patients. We conclude that hemostasis after cardiac operations can be improved with tranexamic acid and aprotinin. Dipyridamole appeared to be ineffective.