Monitoring of anticoagulation in aprotinin-treated patients during heart operation

Evidence Based Coagulation Monitors: Heparin Monitoring, Thromboelastography, and Platelet Function

The hemostatic management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is a unique challenge. Since its inception, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has required meticulous attention to maintaining adequate anticoagulation. New anticoagulants and alternative monitoring techniques present an opportunity to investigate potential advances in the area of anticoagulation for CPB. Hemostasis after CPB is still a vexing problem, and the addition of antiplatelet medication to the platelet defect already incurred during CPB has led to hemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery. The two opposing processes of anticoagulation and hemostasis must be managed carefully and modified with respect to the patient's hematologic status and desired hemostatic outcome. Cardiac surgical patients consume a much larger fraction of perioperative blood transfusions than the percentage of the surgical population they represent. Thus, during CPB, careful attention must be paid to optimal anticoagulation, platelet quiescence, biocompatible circuitry and interventions, and to monitoring hemostasis. The multifactorial etiology of the CPB-induced hemostatic defect requires a multimodal approach to blood conservation and hemostasis monitoring, including heparin maintenance and sophisticated point-of-care hemostasis monitoring. Each technology has its own attributes and each may be suitable for different populations based upon the expected defects being measured. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of point-of-care monitors in coagulation and hemostasis management in cardiac surgical patients.

Coagulation Monitoring

Monitoring hemostasis is now possible by different modalities, of which the point of care devices seem most helpful to the clinician in the operating room. Most of these monitors are being used in the cardiac population, and their significance in other fields remains to be assessed.

Antithrombotic controversies in off-pump coronary bypass

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the use of perioperative antithrombotics in patients undergoing surgical revascularization of the coronary vessels. Although there is a general agreement about the use of anticoagulation during off-pump coronary revascularization (OPCAB), the degree of the required anticoagulation varies from one center to another. The review is divided into four major sections. The first section describes the pathophysiology of the coagulation system in cardiac surgery with and without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. In this section, we also discuss the interactions between the coagulation system and the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery. The second section examines the role of prophylactic antithrombosis in patients referred to surgical revascularization, and their role in bleeding complications associated with surgery. Heparinization and neutralizing its anticoagulative effects during coronary surgery are discussed in the third section. The fourth section examines the evidence that the inflammatory response contributes to adverse peri-operative events, in particular organ dysfunction, and potential therapeutic strategies to control this response. The review concludes with a summary of potential future research directions and key deficiencies in our knowledge regarding the use of anticoagulants in cardiac surgery.

Monitoring anticoagulation and hemostasis in cardiac surgery

The need to monitor anticoagulation and hemostasis during and after cardiac surgery has led to recognition of the importance of evaluation and use of hemostasis monitors in this setting. Consequently, rapid and accurate identification of abnormal hemostasis has been the major impetus for the development of point-of-care tests and their use in transfusion algorithms for cardiac surgical and other critically ill patients.

Monitoring the Hematologic Complications of Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures have a variety of hemostatic defects that lead to bleeding and the frequent need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Dilution of the patient's blood volume by the extracorporeal circuit priming so lution causes depletion of platelets and coagulation factor levels. Contact of blood with the extracorporeal circuit induces a hemorrhagic diathesis through a vari ety of mechanisms. Contact activation causes the for mation of kallikrein, bradykinin, and complement acti vation, leading to a whole-body inflammatory reaction. Intrinsic coagulation is stimulated, leading to subse quent activation of the fibrinolytic system. Platelet dys function caused by the effects of the extracorporeal circuit on platelet membrane integrity and the effects of circulating platelet inhibitors have also been described. The use of high-dose heparin for CPB mitigates these effects but does not completely eliminate them. Prota mine, administered to antagonize heparin's effects, has antiplatelet properties and anticoagulant effects when given in excess. Because of the numerous hemostatic insults incurred during and after CPB, complex moni toring techniques are necessary to ensure adequate anticoagulation, adequate heparin neutralization, and normal platelet function. Coagulation monitoring has allowed more specific identification of particular distur bances of hemostasis and has been linked with a reduc tion in hemorrhagic complications after CPB. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

High-dose epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus aprotinin: antifibrinolytic efficacy in first-time coronary operations

BACKGROUND

The antifibrinolytic efficacy of a high-dose regimen of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (epsilon-ACA) was compared with aprotinin in first-time coronary operations.

METHODS

In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 20 patients received high-dose epsilon-ACA (10 g both as a loading and cardiopulmonary bypass priming dose, 2.5 g/h until 4 hours after protamine), and another 20 patients received aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU [280 mg] for loading and priming, 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h [70 mg/h]). Ten untreated patients served as controls.

RESULTS

Both agents reduced postoperative levels of thrombin/antithrombin III complexes, D-dimers, fibrin degradation products, free plasma hemoglobin (epsilon-ACA versus aprotinin, p = not significant; p < 0.05 versus controls), and amount of retransfused autologous blood (p < 0.001). Epsilon-ACA increased, aprotinin suppressed antiplasmin-plasmin complex generation (epsilon-ACA versus controls, p < 0.02; epsilon-ACA versus AP, p < 0.0001). For 4 hours after discontinuation, more chest drainage occurred with epsilon-ACA than aprotinin (137 +/- 90 mL versus 62 +/- 29 mL; means +/- standard deviation; p < 0.02). Cumulative 12-hour drainage was similar for aprotinin (391 +/- 220 mL) and epsilon-ACA (582 +/- 274 mL), but higher without inhibitor (1,091 +/- 541 mL; p < 0.001 versus drugs). Postoperatively, aprotinin was associated with the lowest autologous retransfusion incidence and highest hematocrits (p < 0.01 versus epsilon-ACA). Homologous transfusion exposures did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

In first-time coronary operations, higher postoperative hematocrit and less shed blood retransfusion constitute only subtle advantages of aprotinin over high-dose epsilon-ACA.

Aprotinin

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical pharmacology of aprotinin in patients undergoing surgical procedures involving major blood loss, namely, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was used to identify French- and English-language publications on aprotinin using the indexing terms aprotinin, cardiothoracic surgery, and hemorrhage. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by review of article bibliographies. Data also were obtained from the approved Canadian and US product labels.

STUDY SELECTIONS

All abstracts and uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study design, population, results, and safety information were retained. Efficacy conclusions were drawn from controlled trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung tissue, decreases bleeding after cardiac surgery by mechanisms including antifibrinolytic activity and preservation of platelet function. Several trials have shown that aprotinin reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG. Its use in other surgical procedures involving major blood loss has been reported. Aprotinin is well tolerated, with minor allergic reactions being the most frequently reported adverse effect. Although unsubstantiated, the possibility that aprotinin could create a prothrombic state leading to early graft occlusion and formation of microthrombi in renal and coronary vasculatures is of concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin is an effective hemostatic agent in CABG. Clear definitions of indications, dosing, safety, and repeated use remain to be investigated thoroughly.

Enhanced blood conservation in primary coronary artery bypass surgery using heparin-bonded circuits with lower anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Despite many advances in blood conservation techniques, a significant proportion of patients undergoing primary coronary revascularization still require homologous transfusions. A comprehensive strategy to diminish perioperative blood loss was developed by integrating many individual components to create an improved blood conservation environment and was prospectively applied to 557 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed in our medical center over a 14-month period.

METHODS

The first 455 patients were treated with conventional, nonheparinbonded circuits (NHBCs) and full anticoagulation (activated clotting time [ACT] > 480 sec). We wanted to test the hypothesis of whether "tip-to-tip" heparin-bonded circuits (HBCs) used in conjunction with lower anticoagulation (ACT > 280 sec) when added to our current blood conservation environment can further enhance clinical outcomes. We prospectively applied this technique to a consecutive group of patients (n = 102).

RESULTS

Compared to patients treated with NHBCs, patients treated with HBCs had a significantly lower mediastinal and pleural chest tube output in the first 24 hours (683 +/- 561 mL vs 984 +/- 616 mL, p < 0.00001) were less likely to be transfused (52% vs 68.1%, p < 0.01) and had a lower exposure to different blood donor units (4.1 +/- 8.4 vs 9.3 +/- 10.3, p < 0.000003). There were no complications directly related to HBCs used in conjunction with lower anticoagulation. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

In summary, HBCs in conjunction with lower anticoagulation were safely applied in patients undergoing primary CABG with marked improvement in blood conservation, and should be considered for broader clinical use.

Effective use of heparin-bonded circuits and lower anticoagulation for coronary artery bypass grafting in Jehovah's Witnesses

Despite many advances in blood conservation techniques, a significant proportion of patients undergoing primary coronary revascularization still require homologous transfusions. Based on a large clinical experience with high-risk patients during coronary artery bypass, a comprehensive strategy to diminish perioperative blood loss was developed by integrating many individual components. An integral component in this strategy is the use of lower heparinization (activated clotting time [ACT] > 280 sec) in conjunction with "tip-to-tip" heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits (HBC). This technique was prospectively applied to a group of Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) patients who refuse blood transfusion on religious grounds (n = 9). Outcome was compared to a matched group of patients treated with full heparinization (ACT > 480 sec) used with conventional, nonheparin-bonded CPB circuits (NHBC) performed within the same academic year (n = 455). There were no complications in JW patients who had a significantly lower mediastinal and pleural tube output in the first 24 hours (323 67 mL vs 984 616 mL, p < 0.01). In comparison to JW patients who received no transfusions, 68.1% of patients treated with NHBC were transfused (p 0.0001). In summary, HBC in conjunction with lower anticoagulation was effectively and safely applied to JW patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. This technique should be considered for broader clinical use.