Lipopolysaccharide stimulation of hyaluronate synthesis by human gingival fibroblasts in vitro

Combination of enamel matrix derivative and hyaluronic acid inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response on human epithelial and bone cells

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and hyaluronic acid (HA) and their synergistic combination on lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced inflammation in human keratinocytes and osteoblasts.

Material and methods

Cells were challenged with LPS (1 μg/ml) and cultured in the following treatment groups with EMD (30 mg/ml) and HA (30 mg/ml): LPS, EMD, HA, EMD + HA, EMD + LPS, HA + LPS, and EMD + HA + LPS. Cell viability, inflammatory cytokine expression, and cell migration were determined using colorimetric assay, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and scratch wound healing assay, respectively.

Results

Cell viability was decreased when exposed to LPS compared to the controls. Overall, LPS treatment expressed upregulation on inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). EMD and HA reduced up to 3.0-fold the cytokine expression caused by LPS (p < 0.05). EMD and HA statistically induced higher migration in osteoblasts and keratinocytes, respectively. Migration was impaired by LPS, whereas it significantly increased after addition of EMD and HA.

Conclusions

EMD and HA are advantageous biomaterials that individually generate strong directional migratory keratinocyte and osteoblast response. Their combination also enhances cell viability, and anti-inflammatory and migratory abilities to promote healing specially under LPS inflammatory stimulus. Future in vivo and animal research is necessary to further characterize the effect of EMD and HA on periodontal regeneration.

Clinical relevance

The use of EMD in conjunction with HA resulted in a reduction of inflammation and improvement of tissue healing at wound sites. Both biomaterials combined may potentially improve the effectiveness of bone regeneration in periodontal bone defects, pointing to the potential clinical relevance of both materials in regenerative periodontal surgery.

Hyaluronan-mediated mononuclear leukocyte binding to gingival fibroblasts

OBJECTIVES

Binding of mononuclear leukocytes to hyaluronan cable structures is a well-known pathomechanism in several chronic inflammatory diseases, but has not yet described for chronic oral inflammations. The aim of this study was to evaluate if and how binding of mononuclear leukocytes to pathologic hyaluronan cable structures can be induced in human gingival fibroblasts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experiments were performed with human gingival fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from three healthy blood donors. Gingival fibroblasts were stimulated with (1) tunicamycin, (2) polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid (Poly:IC), and (3) lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to simulate (1) ER stress and (2) viral and (3) bacterial infections, respectively. Fibroblasts were then co-incubated with PBMCs, and the number of bound and fluorescently labeled PBMCs was assessed using a fluorescence reader and microscopy. For data analysis, a linear mixed model was used.

RESULTS

Hyaluronan-mediated binding of PBMCs to gingival fibroblasts was increased by tunicamycin and Poly(I:C) but not by LPS. Hyaluronidase treatment and co-incubation with hyaluronan transport inhibitors reduced this binding.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that hyaluronan-mediated binding of blood cells might play a role in oral inflammations. A potential superior role of viruses needs to be confirmed in further clinical studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The linkage between pathological hyaluronan matrices and oral infections opens up potential applications of hyaluronan transport inhibitors in the treatment of chronic oral inflammations.

Multiple functions of gingival and mucoperiosteal fibroblasts in oral wound healing and repair

Fibroblasts are cells of mesenchymal origin. They are responsible for the production of most extracellular matrix in connective tissues and are essential for wound healing and repair. In recent years, it has become clear that fibroblasts from different tissues have various distinct traits. Moreover, wounds in the oral cavity heal under very special environmental conditions compared with skin wounds. Here, we reviewed the current literature on the various interconnected functions of gingival and mucoperiosteal fibroblasts during the repair of oral wounds. The MEDLINE database was searched with the following terms: (gingival OR mucoperiosteal) AND fibroblast AND (wound healing OR repair). The data gathered were used to compare oral fibroblasts with fibroblasts from other tissues in terms of their regulation and function during wound healing. Specifically, we sought answers to the following questions: (i) what is the role of oral fibroblasts in the inflammatory response in acute wounds; (ii) how do growth factors control the function of oral fibroblasts during wound healing; (iii) how do oral fibroblasts produce, remodel and interact with extracellular matrix in healing wounds; (iv) how do oral fibroblasts respond to mechanical stress; and (v) how does aging affect the fetal-like responses and functions of oral fibroblasts? The current state of research indicates that oral fibroblasts possess unique characteristics and tightly controlled specific functions in wound healing and repair. This information is essential for developing new strategies to control the intraoral wound-healing processes of the individual patient.

Cytokine responses of human gingival fibroblasts to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans cytolethal distending toxin

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans is implicated in the pathogenesis of localized aggressive periodontitis, and has the capacity to express a cytolethal distending toxin (Cdt). Gingival fibroblasts (GF) are resident cells of the periodontium, which can express several osteolytic cytokines. The aims of this study were a) to investigate the role of Cdt in A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced expression of osteolytic cytokines and their cognate receptors in GF and b) to determine if the previously demonstrated induction of receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand (RANKL) by A. actinomycetemcomitans is mediated by these pro-inflammatory cytokines or by prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)). A. actinomycetemcomitans clearly induced interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1beta, and to a minimal extent, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha mRNA expression. At the protein level, IL-6 but not IL-1beta or TNF-alpha expression was stimulated. The mRNA expression of the different receptor subtypes recognizing IL-6, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha was not affected. A cdt-knockout strain of A. actinomycetemcomitans had similar effects on cytokine and cytokine receptor mRNA expression, compared to its parental wild-type strain. Purified Cdt stimulated IL-6, but not IL-1beta or TNF-alpha protein biosynthesis. Antibodies neutralizing IL-6, IL-1 or TNF-alpha, and the PGE(2) synthesis inhibitor indomethacin, did not affect A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced RANKL expression. In conclusion, a) A. actinomycetemcomitans induces IL-6 production in GF by a mechanism largely independent of its Cdt and b) A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced RANKL expression in GF occurs independently of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha, or PGE(2).