Reversible inhibition of RNA phage replication and macromolecular synthesis by levorphanol

Turnover as a control of ribonucleic acid accumulation in bacteria undergoing stepdown

The synthesis of ribosomes was compared in rel+ and rel- strains of Escherichia coli undergoing "stepdown" in growth from glucose medium to one with lactate as principal carbon source. Two strains (CP78 and CP79), isogenic except for rel, showed similar behaviour with respect to (1) the kinetics of labelling total RNA and ribosomes with exogenous uracil, (2) the proportion of newly formed protein that could be bound with nascent rRNA in mature ribosomes, and (3) the rate of induction of enzymically active beta-galactosidase (relative to the rate of ribosome synthesis). It was concluded that, as there was no net accumulation of RNA during stepdown in either strain, rRNA turnover must be occurring at a high rate. The general features of ribosome maturation in rel+ and rel- cells were almost identical with those found in auxotrophic rel+ organisms starved of required amino acids. In both cases, there was a considerable delay in the maturation of new ribosomal particles, owing to a relative shortfall in the rate of synthesis of ribosome-associated proteins. Only about 4-5% of the total protein labelled during stepdown was capable of binding with newly formed rRNA. This compared with 3.5% for rel+ and 0.5% for rel- auxotrophs during amino acid starvation. The turnover rate for newly formed mRNA and rRNA was virtually the same in "stepped-down" rel+ and rel- strains and was similar to that of the same fraction in amino acid-starved rel+ cells. The functional lifetime of mRNA was also identical. It seems that in the rel- strain many of the characteristics typical of the isogenic rel+ strain are displayed under these conditions, at least as regards the speed of ribosome maturation and the induction of beta-galactosidase. Studies on the thermolability of the latter enzyme induced during stepdown indicate that inaccurate translation, which occurs in rel- strains starved for only a few amino acids, is less evident in this situation than in straightforward amino acid deprivation.

Inhibition by levorphanol and related drugs of amino acid transport by isolated membrane vesicles from Escherichia coli

Levorphanol inhibits the transport of the amino acids proline and lysine by cytoplasmic membrane vesicles derived from Escherichia coli. The degree of inhibition increases with increasing levorphanol concentration and ranges from 26% at 10(-6) M levorphanol to 92% at 10(-3) M levorphanol. The effect is independent of the energy source, since levorphanol inhibits proline uptake to the same extent in the presence of 20 mM d-lactate or 20 mM succinate and in the absence of an exogenous energy source. Levorphanol does not irreversibly alter the ability of membrane vesicles to transport proline, since incubation of membrane vesicles for 15 min in the presence of 0.25 mM levorphanol, a concentration which inhibits proline transport by more than 75%, has no effect on the rate of proline transport by these vesicles once the drug is removed. Both the maximum velocity and the K(m) of proline transport are modified by levorphanol, hence, the type of inhibition produced by levorphanol is mixed. The inhibitor constant (K(i)) for levorphanol inhibition of proline transport is approximately 3 x 10(-4) M. Membrane vesicles incubated in the presence of levorphanol accumulate much less proline at the steady state than do control vesicles. Furthermore, the addition of levorphanol to membrane vesicles preloaded to the steady state with proline produces a marked net efflux of proline. Levorphanol does not block either temperature-induced efflux or exchange of external proline with [(14)C]proline present in the intravesicular pool. Dextrorphan, the enantiomorph of levorphanol, and levallorphan, the N-allyl analogue of levorphanol, inhibit proline and lysine transport in a similar manner. Possible mechanisms of the effects of these drugs on cell membranes are discussed.