Inhibitory effect of the nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan and its active metabolite, E-3174, on cAMP phosphodiesterase: additional action of the antagonists

Neuroprotection with angiotensin receptor antagonists: a review of the evidence and potential mechanisms

The peptide hormone angiotensin (A)-II, the major effector peptide of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is well established to play a pivotal role in the systemic regulation of blood pressure, fluid, and electrolyte homeostasis. Recent biochemical and neurophysiologic studies have documented local intrinsic angiotensin-generating systems in organs and tissues such as the brain, retina, bone marrow, liver, and pancreas. The locally generated angiotensin peptides have multiple and novel actions including stimulating cell growth and anti-proliferative and/or antiapoptotic actions. In the mammalian brain, all components of the RAS are present including angiotensin receptor subtypes 1 (AT(1)) and 2 (AT(2)). A-II exerts most of its well defined physiologic and pathophysiologic actions, including those on the central and peripheral nervous system, through its AT(1) receptor subtype. While the AT(1) receptor is responsible for the classical effects of A-II, it has been found that the AT(2) receptor is linked to totally different signalling mechanisms and this has revealed hitherto unknown functions of A-II. AT(2) receptors are expressed at low density in many healthy adult tissues, but are upregulated in a variety of human diseases. This receptor not only contributes to stroke-related pathologic mechanisms (e.g. hypertension, atherothrombosis, and cardiac hypertrophy) but may also be involved in post-ischemic damage to the brain. It has been reported that the AT(2) receptor regulates several functions of nerve cells, e.g. ionic fluxes, cell differentiation, and neuronal tissue regeneration, and also modulates programmed cell death. In this article, we review the experimental evidence supporting the notion that blockade of brain AT(1) receptors can be beneficial with respect to stroke incidence and outcome. We further delineate how AT(2) receptors could be involved in neuronal regeneration following brain injury such as stroke or CNS trauma. The current review is focussed on some of the new functions arising from the locally formed A-II with particular attention to its emerging neuroprotective role in the brain.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitory properties of losartan. Design and synthesis of new lead compounds

A 4-centre PDE4 pharmacophore search has been carried out in several 3D-databases containing compounds belonging to different therapeutic areas. Losartan, an angiotensin-II antagonist, has been identified as a new lead compound for developing PDE4 inhibitors. New families of compounds derived from losartan has been synthesized and their PDE inhibition has been measured.

Interactions of nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists at imidazoline/guanidinium receptor sites in rat forebrain

Imidazoline/guanidinium receptive sites (IGRS) are shown to be present in the subfornical organ and hypothalamic arcuate nucleus by a derivative of cirazoline, 2-(3-amino-4-[125I]iodophenoxy)methylimidazoline ([125I]AMIPI). Because many of the nonpeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonists contain imidazole ring structures, they may interact with IGRS. Therefore, we studied competitive activity of Ang II and several nonpeptide Ang II receptor antagonists [DuP 753 (losartan), EXP 3174, CV11974, and PD123319] at IGRS in rat forebrain. The results showed specific binding of 944 +/- 169 fmol/mg protein in the subfornical organ (n = 11) and of 367 +/- 27 fmol/mg protein in the arcuate nucleus (n = 6) at 0.4 nM [125I]AMIPI, as defined by competition with 10 microM cirazoline. Specific [125I]AMIPI binding was competed for completely by 10 microM idazoxan or clonidine as further characterization of IGRS. Ang II and the nonpeptide AT1 and AT2 antagonists did not significantly compete for specific [125I]AMIPI binding in either brain region at concentrations of 10 microM (< 20% competition with each compound), which is 10- to 100-fold higher than the concentration necessary to compete completely for their respective Ang II receptor subtypes. Only at the highest concentration (100 microM) did losartan compete significantly for binding (56 +/- 8%). Therefore, Ang II receptor antagonists interact with IGRS in rat forebrain cardiovascular areas only at high concentrations.

Binding of valsartan to mammalian angiotensin AT1 receptors

The binding characteristics of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist valsartan were investigated in different animal species and tissues. Using [125I](Sar1,Ile8) angiotensin II as radioligand, affinity constants were determined in liver and adrenal rat and marmoset, human adrenal and in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. In all tissues tested, valsartan had a greater affinity for the AT1 receptor than losartan (on average 5-fold). The affinities of both antagonists were up to 30 times weaker in the dog tissues [3H]Valsartan bound with high affinity (Kd 1.44 nmol/l) to the rat aortic smooth muscle cell AT1 receptor. Binding was saturable and reversible. Non-specific binding was low (10%). Reports that [3H]losartan binds to a non-angiotensin II binding site in rat liver and in other tissues could be confirmed. [3H]Valsartan on the other hand bound only to the AT1 receptor. Using a competition binding assay with [3H]losartan on rat liver membranes it could be shown that valsartan can bind to the 'losartan binding site', but at a 10,000-fold less affinity than for the AT1 receptor. Valsartan is therefore a highly specific and selective antagonist of the AT1 receptor. Due to its high affinity and low non-specific binding it is a suitable radioactive antagonist for the study of the distribution and function of the angiotensin AT1 receptor.

Functional interaction between losartan and central tachykinin NK3 receptors in the conscious rat

1. The cardiovascular and behavioural effects elicted by the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA), [MePhe7]neurokinin B ([MePhe7]NKB) or angiotensin II (AII) in the conscious rat were assessed before and 5 min after i.c.v. pretreatment with antagonists selective for angiotensin AT1 (losartan and its active metabolite EXP 3174), angiotensin AT2 (PD 123,319) or tachykinin NK3 (R 486) receptors. 2. I.c.v. administration of 25 pmol AII evoked an increase in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and water intake behaviour, accompanied by a transient bradycardia, whereas 25 pmol [MePhe7]NKB caused a transient increase in MAP and heart rate (HR) concurrently with marked wet dog shake behaviour. At the same dose, SP and NKA were more potent than [MePhe7]NKB in increasing MAP and HR, but did not produce water intake or wet dog shake behaviours. 3. Losartan (650 pmol, i.c.v.) reduced significantly the cardiovascular and behavioural responses to AII or [MePhe7]NKB, but not to SP or NKA. While 65 pmol losartan was inactive, 260 pmol inhibited selectively the central effects of AII. Whereas EXP 3174 (6.5 nmol) blocked both AII and [MePhe7]NKB-mediated responses, the dose of 650 pmol blocked only the responses to AII. 4. The central responses to AII and [MePhe7]NKB were not affected by PD 123,319 (650 pmol). On the other hand, the [MePhe7]NKB-induced central effects were significantly reduced by R 486 (650 pmol). The NK3-selective antagonist had no effect against AII. 5. This study provides functional evidence, to support earlier binding data, that losartan (and to some extent its active metabolite EXP 3174) interact with the tachykinin NK3 receptor in rat brain. However,the cardiovascular and behavioural responses induced by central tachykinin agonists (SP, NKA and[MePhe7]NKB) and All are mediated by unrelated mechanisms.