Behavior and binding: desensitization to alpha 1-adrenergic stimulation of acoustic startle is associated with a decrease in alpha 1-adrenoceptor binding sites

Corticotropin-releasing factor and noradrenergic signalling exert reciprocal control over startle reactivity

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and norepinephrine (NE) levels are altered in post-traumatic stress disorder and may be related to symptoms of hyperarousal, including exaggerated startle, in these patients. In animals, activation of both systems modulates anxiety behaviours including startle plasticity; however, it is unknown if they exert their actions orthogonally or dependently. We tested the hypothesis that NE receptor activation is required for CRF effects on startle and that CRF1 receptor activation is required for NE effects on startle. The study examined the effects of: (1) α2 agonist clonidine (0.18 mg/kg i.p.), α1 antagonist prazosin (0.8 mg/kg), and β1/2 antagonist propranolol (0.8, 8.0 mg/kg) pretreatment on ovine-CRF (oCRF)- (0.6 nmol) induced increases in startle reactivity and disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI); (2) α2 antagonist atipamezole (1-30 mg/kg) and α1 agonist cirazoline (0.025-1.0 mg/kg) treatment on startle; (3) CRF1 antagonist (antalarmin, 14 mg/kg) pretreatment on atipamezole- (10.0 mg/kg) induced increases in startle. oCRF robustly increased startle and reduced PPI. Pretreatment with clonidine or prazosin, but not propranolol, blocked oCRF-induced increases in startle but had no effect on oCRF-induced disruptions in PPI. Atipamezole treatment increased startle, which was partially attenuated by CRF1 antagonist pretreatment. Cirazoline treatment did not increase startle. These findings suggest that CRF modulation of startle, but not PPI, requires activation of α1 adrenergic receptors, while CRF1 activation also contributes to NE modulation of startle. These data support a bi-directional model of CRF-NE modulation of stress responses and suggest that both systems must be activated to induce stress effects on startle reactivity.

Neurochemistry of the afferents to the rat cochlear root nucleus: possible synaptic modulation of the acoustic startle

Afferents to the primary startle circuit are essential for the elicitation and modulation of the acoustic startle reflex (ASR). In the rat, cochlear root neurons (CRNs) comprise the first component of the acoustic startle circuit and play a crucial role in mediating the ASR. Nevertheless, the neurochemical pattern of their afferents remains unclear. To determine the distribution of excitatory and inhibitory inputs, we used confocal microscopy to analyze the immunostaining for vesicular glutamate and GABA transporter proteins (VGLUT1 and VGAT) on retrogradely labeled CRNs. We also used reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry to detect and localize specific neurotransmitter receptor subunits in the cochlear root. Our results show differential distributions of VGLUT1- and VGAT-immunoreactive endings around cell bodies and dendrites. The RT-PCR data showed a positive band for several ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits, M1-M5 muscarinic receptor subtypes, the glycine receptor alpha1 subunit (GlyRalpha1), GABAA, GABAB, and subunits of alpha2 and beta-noradrenergic receptors. By immunohistochemistry, we confirmed that CRN cell bodies exhibit positive immunoreaction for the glutamate receptor (GluR) 3 and NR1 GluR subunits. Cell bodies and dendrites were also positive for M2 and M4, and GlyRalpha1. Other subunits, such as GluR1 and GluR4 of the AMPA GluRs, were observed in glial cells neighboring unlabeled CRN cell bodies. We further confirmed the existence of noradrenergic afferents onto CRNs from the locus coeruleus by combining tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry and tract-tracing experiments. Our results provide valuable information toward understanding how CRNs might integrate excitatory and inhibitory inputs, and hence how they could elicit and modulate the ASR.

Emerging evidence for a central epinephrine-innervated alpha 1-adrenergic system that regulates behavioral activation and is impaired in depression

Currently, most basic and clinical research on depression is focused on either central serotonergic, noradrenergic, or dopaminergic neurotransmission as affected by various etiological and predisposing factors. Recent evidence suggests that there is another system that consists of a subset of brain alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors innervated primarily by brain epinephrine (EPI) that potentially modulates the above three monoamine systems in parallel and plays a critical role in depression. The present review covers the evidence for this system and includes findings that brain alpha(1)-adrenoceptors are instrumental in behavioral activation, are located near the major monoamine cell groups or target areas, receive EPI as their neurotransmitter, are impaired or inhibited in depressed patients or after stress in animal models, and are restored by a number of antidepressants. This "EPI-alpha(1) system" may therefore represent a new target system for this disorder.

Buffer effects on high affinity [3H]-prazosin binding in brain and spinal cord

[3H]-Prazosin binding was characterized in cortical and spinal membranes from Fischer 344N and Sprague-Dawley rats. Estimates of Bmax and Kd values were comparable with earlier studies of these regions in the central nervous system (CNS). However, the Kd obtained using Tris buffer system was greater than when HEPES or phosphate buffer was used. These data indicate that high affinity [3H]-prazosin binding in the homogenates of tissue from the CNS is affected critically by buffer selection.

Binding of [3H]prazosin and [3H]p-aminoclonidine to alpha-adrenoceptors in rat spinal cord

alpha-Adrenoceptors in spinal cord appear to play a role in a number of physiologic processes including the control of blood pressure, pain and motor function. In order to evaluate more clearly these potential roles, the characteristics of binding of [3H]prazosin ([3H]PRZ) to spinal alpha 1 adrenoceptors and [3H]p-aminoclonidine ([3H]PAC) to spinal alpha 2 adrenoceptors were determined. Binding of each ligand to their respective adrenoceptors was saturable and Scatchard analysis revealed binding of each to a single class of adrenoceptors with characteristics of [3H]PRZ binding of Bmax = 78 fmol/mg protein and Kd = 0.75 nM and [3H]PAC binding Bmax = 70 fmol/mg protein and Kd = 1.39 nM. Whereas [3H]PRZ specific binding (Bmax) was unaltered by guanine nucleotides. [3H]PAC binding was increased with addition of 10 microM guanosine triphosphate (GTP) (P less than 0.05) and decreased with either 50 microM GTP or guanyl-5'-yl-imidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p] (P less than 0.01). Competition for specific [3H]PRZ and [3H]PAC binding by various alpha 1 and alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists of known pharmacologic activity revealed that [3H]PRZ defines alpha 1 adrenoceptors (Ki = 2.1 nM for prazosin vs 4300 nM for yohimbine) and [3H]PAC defines alpha 2 adrenoceptors (Ki = 1.06 nM for yohimbine vs 15480 nM for prazosin). Regional spinal cord studies demonstrated that dorsal spinal cord in the lumbar region contains the highest density of both [3H]PRZ (Bmax = 93 +/- 14 fmol/mg protein) and [3H]PAC (Bmax = 101 +/- 6 fmol/mg protein) binding. In contrast, lowest binding was evident in thoracic cord with equal levels in both dorsal and ventral regions (Bmax = 44-48 fmol/mg protein). The regional distribution of both alpha 1 and alpha 2 adrenoceptors in spinal cord compares to the localization previously classified functionally utilizing various pharmacological agonists and antagonists at norepinephrine receptors.

Antagonism of apomorphine-enhanced startle by alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists

The present study investigated the possible involvement of central noradrenergic neurons in mediating the excitatory effect of the dopamine agonist apomorphine on the acoustic startle response in rats. Experiment 1 assessed the effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of adrenergic antagonists on apomorphine-enhanced startle. The excitation of startle produced by apomorphine (1.0-3.0 mg/kg i.p.) was blocked by the alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists prazosin (0.03-1.0 mg/kg) and WB-4101 (1.0 mg/kg). Prazosin was very potent in this regard, having an ED50 of 0.03 mg/kg. Blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors with propranolol (20 mg/kg) or blockade of peripheral alpha-adrenergic receptors with phentolamine (10 mg/kg) failed to alter the effect of apomorphine. Prazosin did not block the enhancement of startle produced by other drugs (5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine, strychnine), nor did it alter the entry of apomorphine into the brain. The alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists piperoxane (0.03 mg/kg), yohimbine (0.03 mg/kg) or RX781094 (0.07 mg/kg) markedly potentiated apomorphine excitation. These data indicated that specific blockade of central alpha 1-adrenergic receptors prevents apomorphine-enhanced startle. In contrast to the effects of alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists, Experiment 2 found that other drugs that produce an acute (clonidine, 0.040 mg/kg) or chronic (intraventricular 6-hydroxydopamine, 2 X 200 micrograms; DSP4, 50 mg/kg i.p.) disruption of noradrenergic transmission failed to affect apomorphine excitation. Thus, the ability of alpha 1-adrenergic antagonists to block apomorphine's excitation of startle cannot be explained by a simple dopamine-norepinephrine interaction. Alternative hypothesis are discussed.