Somatotopic relations between spinal motoneurones and muscle fibres of the cat's musculus peroneus longus

The differences in the structure of the motor nucleus of the medial gastrocnemius muscle in male and female rats

There are many reports describing sexual dissimilarities in the CNS, particularly in the brain and cortical regions. However, knowledge regarding sexual dissimilarities in the spinal cord and in particular in the hindlimb muscle-motoneuron connectivity controlling locomotion is limited. In order to recognise sex differences in the architecture of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) motor nucleus in rats of the same age, retrograde-labelled motoneurons were identified following a bath of the proximal stump of the transected MG nerve in horseradish peroxidase. The rostrocaudal distribution of motoneurons along the spinal cord and on transverse sections as well as the size and density of motoneurons in the motor nucleus were determined from serial microscopic images. It was shown that the MG pool extended throughout the L4-L6 segments, with a length that was 32% greater in males. The position of the moto pool within the ventral horn of the spinal cord transversal sections was also different in both sexes: the pool was located more dorsally and laterally in males. Three size categories of motoneurons with different soma diameters were distinguished: α₁ (27.5-40.0μm), α₂ (>40.0μm) and γ (<27.5μm). The density of α (α₁ and α₂) motoneurons as well as γ motoneurons was higher in females, by about 13% and 23%, respectively. The number of α₁ motoneurons was 8% higher in females, whereas there were 46% more α₂ motoneurons in males. The most significant differences in the distribution concerned α₂ motoneurons, which revealed a lower density in the rostral parts of the MG motor nucleus in females. It was therefore concluded that the length of the MG motor nucleus was shorter, whereas the mean density of α and γ motoneurons was higher in females.

Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives

Social dilemmas occur when the pursuit of self-interest by individuals in a group leads to less than optimal collective outcomes for everyone in the group. A critical assumption in the human sciences is that people's choices in such dilemmas are individualistic, selfish, and rational. Hence, cooperation in the support of group welfare will only occur if there are selfish incentives that convert the social dilemma into a nondilemma. In recent years, inclusive fitness theories have lent weight to such traditional views of rational selfishness on Darwinian grounds. To show that cooperation is based on selfish incentives, however, one must provide evidence that people do not cooperate without such incentives. In a series of experimental social dilemmas, subjects were instructed to make single, anonymous choices about whether or not to contribute money for a shared “bonus” that would be provided only if enough other people in the group also contributed their money. Noncontributors cited selfish reasons for their choices; contributors did not. If people are allowed to engage in discussion, they will contribute resources at high rates, frequently on irrational grounds, to promote group welfare. These findings are consistent with previous research on ingroup biasing effects that cannot be explained by “economic man” or “selfish gene” theories. An alternative explanation is that sociality was a primary factor shaping the evolution of Homo sapiens. The cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying such choices evolved under selection pressures on small groups for developing and maintaining group membership and for predicting and controlling the behavior of other group members. This sociality hypothesis organizes previously inexplicable and disparate phenomena in a Darwinian framework and makes novel predictions about human choice.

On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning

Studies have shown that in the mammalian neuromuscular system stretch reflexes are localized within individual muscles. Neuromuscular compartmentalization, the partitioning of sensory output from muscles, and the partitioning of segmental pathways to motor nuclei have also been demonstrated. This evidence indicates that individual motor nuclei and the muscles they innervate are not homogeneous functional units. An analysis of the functional significance of reflex localization and partitioning suggests that segmental control mechanisms are based on subdivisions of motor nuclei–muscle complexes. A partitioned organization of segmental control mechanisms could utilize (1) the potential functional diversity of muscle fiber types, (2) the variety of mechanical actions of individual muscles arising from their distributed origins and insertions, and (3) diverse architectural features such as intramuscular variations in pinnation and complex in-series and in-parallel arrangements of muscle fibers. The differentiated activity observed in some muscles during natural movements also calls for localized segmental control mechanisms. Partitioning may also play a role in mechanical interactions between contracting motor units and in increasing the stability of neuromuscular systems. The functional advantages of reflex localization and partitioning suggest they are probably common features of segmental systems, whose organization reflects the structure and function of their associated neuromuscular systems.