Intrathecal coadministration of clonidine with serotonin receptor agonists produces supra-additive visceral antinociception in the rat

Oral clonidine inhibits visceral pain-related viscerosomatic and cardiovascular responses to colorectal distension in rats

The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, modulates colorectal sensorimotor functions in humans and, given intrathecally, has analgesic effects in the colorectal distension (CRD) model in rats. We tested the effects of systemic clonidine on the visceral pain-related viscerosomatic and autonomic cardiovascular responses to CRD and colonic compliance in rats using clinically relevant CRD protocols. The activity of the abdominal musculature (viscerosomatic response), monitored by electromyography and intracolonic manometry, and changes in arterial blood pressure and heart rate, monitored by telemetry, were assessed simultaneously in conscious rats during CRD. Pressure-volume relationships during CRD served as a measure of colonic compliance. Clonidine (50-200 nmol/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently inhibited the viscerosomatic response to phasic, noxious CRD (12 distension at 80 mm Hg). At 200 nmol/kg clonidine also attenuated the increase in blood pressure (70+/-7% inhibition, P<0.05) and heart rate (67+/-16% inhibition, P<0.05) associated to noxious CRD. Similar effects were observed after i.v. administration. Likewise, clonidine (200 nmol/kg, p.o.) reduced the response to ascending phasic CRD (10-80 mm Hg) and significantly increased the threshold pressure for pain-related responses. Clonidine (50 or 150 nmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect the pressure-volume relationship during phasic CRD (2-20 mm Hg). These results show that systemic clonidine, at doses devoid of visible side effects, has analgesic effects in the CRD model of visceral pain in rats without affecting colonic compliance. These observations confirm the analgesic activity of systemic clonidine on visceral pain, support the translational value of the rat CRD model to humans and show that manometry is more sensitive than electromyography detecting pain-related responses.

Characterization of the antinociceptive actions of bicifadine in models of acute, persistent, and chronic pain

Bicifadine (1-p-tolyl-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane) inhibits monoamine neurotransmitter uptake by recombinant human transporters in vitro with a relative potency of norepinephrine > serotonin > dopamine (approximately 1:2:17). This in vitro profile is supported by microdialysis studies in freely moving rats, where bicifadine (20 mg/kg i.p.) increased extrasynaptic norepinephrine and serotonin levels in the prefrontal cortex, norepinephrine levels in the locus coeruleus, and dopamine levels in the striatum. Orally administered bicifadine is an effective antinociceptive in several models of acute, persistent, and chronic pain. Bicifadine potently suppressed pain responses in both the Randall-Selitto and kaolin models of acute inflammatory pain and in the phenyl-p-quinone-induced and colonic distension models of persistent visceral pain. Unlike many transport inhibitors, bicifadine was potent and completely efficacious in both phases of the formalin test in both rats and mice. Bicifadine also normalized the nociceptive threshold in the complete Freund's adjuvant model of persistent inflammatory pain and suppressed mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in the spinal nerve ligation model of chronic neuropathic pain. Mechanical hyperalgesia was also reduced by bicifadine in the streptozotocin model of neuropathic pain. Administration of the D(2) receptor antagonist (-)-sulpiride reduced the effects of bicifadine in the mechanical hyperalgesia assessment in rats with spinal nerve ligations. These results indicate that bicifadine is a functional triple reuptake inhibitor with antinociceptive and antiallodynic activity in acute, persistent, and chronic pain models, with activation of dopaminergic pathways contributing to its antihyperalgesic actions.

Noradrenergic pain modulation

Norepinephrine is involved in intrinsic control of pain. Main sources of norepinephrine are sympathetic nerves peripherally and noradrenergic brainstem nuclei A1-A7 centrally. Peripheral norepinephrine has little influence on pain in healthy tissues, whereas in injured tissues it has variable effects, including aggravation of pain. Its peripheral pronociceptive effect has been associated with injury-induced expression of novel noradrenergic receptors, sprouting of sympathetic nerve fibers, and pronociceptive changes in the ionic channel properties of primary afferent nociceptors, while an interaction with the immune system may contribute in part to peripheral antinociception induced by norepinephrine. In the spinal cord, norepinephrine released from descending pathways suppresses pain by inhibitory action on alpha-2A-adrenoceptors on central terminals of primary afferent nociceptors (presynaptic inhibition), by direct alpha-2-adrenergic action on pain-relay neurons (postsynaptic inhibition), and by alpha-1-adrenoceptor-mediated activation of inhibitory interneurons. Additionally, alpha-2C-adrenoceptors on axon terminals of excitatory interneurons of the spinal dorsal horn possibly contribute to spinal control of pain. At supraspinal levels, the pain modulatory effect by norepinephrine and noradrenergic receptors has varied depending on many factors such as the supraspinal site, the type of the adrenoceptor, the duration of the pain and pathophysiological condition. While in baseline conditions the noradrenergic system may have little effect, sustained pain induces noradrenergic feedback inhibition of pain. Noradrenergic systems may also contribute to top-down control of pain, such as induced by a change in the behavioral state. Following injury or inflammation, the central as well as peripheral noradrenergic system is subject to various plastic changes that influence its antinociceptive efficacy.

Spinal 5-HT(2) and 5-HT(3) receptors mediate low, but not high, frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a form of non-pharmacological treatment for pain. Involvement of descending inhibitory systems is implicated in TENS-induced analgesia. In the present study, the roles of spinal 5-HT and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in TENS analgesia were investigated in rats. Hyperalgesia was induced by inflaming the knee joint with 3% kaolin-carrageenan mixture and assessed by measuring paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to heat before and 4 h after injection. The (1). alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine (30 microg), (2). 5-HT antagonist methysergide (5-HT(1). and 5-HT(2). 30 microg), one of the 5-HT receptor subtype antagonists, (3). NAN-190 (5-HT(1A), 15 microg), (4). ketanserin (5-HT(2A), 30 microg), (5). MDL-72222 (5-HT(3), 12 microg), or (6). vehicle was administered intrathecally prior to TENS treatment. Low (4 Hz) or high (100 Hz) frequency TENS at sensory intensity was then applied to the inflamed knee for 20 min and PWL was determined. Selectivity of the antagonists used was confirmed using respective agonists administered intrathecally. Yohimbine had no effect on the antihyperalgesia produced by low or high frequency TENS. Methysergide and MDL-72222 prevented the antihyperalgesia produced by low, but not high, frequency TENS. Ketanserin attenuated the antihyperalgesic effects of low frequency TENS whereas NAN-190 had no effect. The results from the present study show that spinal 5-HT receptors mediate low, but not high, frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia through activation of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(3) receptors in rats. Furthermore, spinal noradrenergic receptors are not involved in either low or high frequency TENS antihyperalgesia.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Effects of clonidine on a C-fibre reflex in the rat

A C-fibre reflex elicited by electrical stimulation within the territory of the sural nerve, was recorded from the ipsilateral biceps femoris muscle in anaesthetized rats. The temporal evolution of the response was studied using a constant stimulus intensity (3 x threshold) and recruitment curves were built by varying stimulus intensity from 0 to 7 x threshold. The intravenous administration of 0.02-0.2 mg/kg clonidine resulted in a dose-dependent depression of the C-fibre reflex. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan completely prevented this depressive effect of clonidine. The effects of clonidine on the C-fibre reflex elicited by a wide range of stimulus intensities were investigated using recruitment curves: following 0.16 mg/kg clonidine, a dramatic shift of the recruitment curve to the right was seen with both an increase in the threshold and a decrease in the slope. Clonidine also produced a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure, but this was not correlated with the depression of the nociceptive reflex.

Antinociceptive effects of oral clonidine and S12813-4 in acute colon inflammation in rats

Acute colonic inflammation was induced by perendoscopic injection of 50 microleters of dilute formalin (5%) in the depth of the colonic wall (c.w.) in rats. Compared to saline injection, the procedure was followed by nociceptive behaviors from which visceral nociception was quantified. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine 2-[2,6-dichlorophenylamine]-2-imidazole hydrochloride (75, 150 and 300 mg/kg), administered orally 15 min after c.w. injection of formalin significantly reduced the nociceptive responses at the high dose only. However, when administered 30 min prior to nociceptive stimulation, the compound exhibited an antinociceptive effect at the three doses. A novel analgesic, the compound "S12813-4' 3-[2-(4-phenylpiperazine-1-yl)-ethyl]-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-oxazolo[b] pyridine, chlorydrate (10, 30 and 90 mg/kg), given orally displayed antinociceptive effects whatever the administration schedule, before or after c.w. injection of formalin. The antinociceptive effect of S12813-4 (30 mg/kg given orally) was prevented by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of yohimbine or idazoxan (1 mg/kg). We conclude that visceral nociception elicited by formalin-induced colonic inflammation is attenuated by clonidine and S12813-4. The pharmacological profiles of the two compounds and the inhibition of the antinociceptive effect of S12813-4 by yohimbine and idazoxan suggest that noradrenergic mechanisms are involved in the transmission and/or modulation of the nociceptive influx arising from the inflamed colon.

The role of serotonergic receptors in the effects of mu opioids in squirrel monkeys responding under a titration procedure

This experiment was conducted to determine whether drugs acting on brain serotonin modulate the effects of the mu opioid, morphine, as measured by the squirrel monkey shock titration procedure and, if so, whether serotonergic modulation is mediated via specific 5HT receptor subtypes. Under this procedure, electric shock was delivered to the monkey's tail and scheduled to increase once every 15 s from 0.01 to 2.0 mA in 30 steps. Five responses on a lever during the 15-s shock period terminated the shock for 15 s, after which the shock resumed at the next lower intensity. The intensity below which monkeys maintained shock 50% of the time (median shock level or MSL) and rate of responding (RR) in the presence of shock were determined under control conditions and after administration of morphine alone and in combination with various serotonergic compounds. Morphine increased median shock level and decreased rate of responding in a dose-dependent manner. These effects of morphine was attenuated by the 5HT1A receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT [(+)-8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino tetralin HBr] and ipsapirone. The effects of morphine were not altered by the 5HT1A receptor antagonist, NAN-190 [1-(2-methoxyphenyl-4-[4-(2-phthalimido) butyl] piperazine HBr], and 5HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserin, the 5HT3 receptor antagonist, MDL 72222 [3-tropanyl-3,5-dichlorobenzoate], the alpha 2 adrenergic antagonist, yohimbine, or the alpha2 adrenergic agonist, clonidine. These results suggest that 5HT1A receptors may be involved in the effects of morphine in the shock titration procedure, whereas 5HT2, 5HT3 and alpha 2 adrenergic receptors do not appear to play a role in morphine's effects in this procedure.

[Antinociceptive effects of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists ("analgesic" actions in animal experiments)agonists ("analgesic" actions in animal experiments).]

alpha(2)-Adrenoceptor agonists like clonidine, dexmedetomidine, and ST-91, inhibit nociceptive reflex activity predominantly by a spinal mode of action. They mimic the action of the inhibitory transmitter noradrenaline, which is released from the terminals of bulbospinal monoaminergic pathways. The inhibition by noradrenaline is due partly to hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic neuronal membrane; however, the selective antinociceptive effect of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists results from reduction of the release of the excitatory transmitters such as glutamate and substance P, blockade of the binding of substance P to spinal neurones, and enhancement of the action of the inhibitory transmitter, 5-hydroxytryptamine. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine stimulate adrenoceptors of the alpha(2A) subtype, while ST-91 stimulates alpha(2B) adrenoceptors. Antinociception is manifested not only by depression of nociceptive reflexes and behaviour, but also by inhibition of the expression of immediate early genes in dorsal horn neurones following noxious stimulation. The inhibitory control from the brain stem of spinal nociceptive activity can be triggered by alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists. Moreover, impulse conduction in C fibres of peripheral nerves is far more reduced by these compounds than that in A fibres. Antinociceptive effects are reported to occur in various models of clinical pain, e.g. the formalin test, adjuvans-induced arthritis, autotomy following deafferentation, and "hyperalgesia" after nerve ligation. Therefore, the mechanisms involved in antinociception may also be responsible for the analgesia produced by alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists.

Effects of dorsal rhizotomy and selective lesion of serotonergic and noradrenergic systems on 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT3 receptors in the rat spinal cord

Autoradiographic studies were performed in combination with dorsal rhizotomy or selective lesion of descending serotonergic or noradrenergic systems in an attempt to identify the neuronal cell types endowed with the serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT3 receptors in the rat spinal cord. Unilateral sectioning of seven dorsal roots (C4-T2) at the cervical level produced a marked decrease (approximately-75%, 10 days after the surgery) in the binding of [125I]iodozacopride to 5-HT3 receptors in the superficial layers of the ipsilateral dorsal horn, further confirming the preferential location of these receptors on primary afferent fibres. In addition, a significant decrease (approximately 20%) in the binding of [3H]8-OH-DPAT to 5-HT1A receptors and of [125I]GTI to 5-HT1B receptors was also observed in the same spinal area in rhizotomized rats, suggesting that a small proportion of these receptors are also located on primary afferent fibres. The labelling of 5-HT1B receptors was significantly decreased (-12%) in the dorsal horn at the cervical (but not the lumbar) level, and that of 5-HT3 receptors was unchanged in the whole spinal cord in rats whose descending serotonergic projections had been destroyed by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine. Conversely, the labelling of 5-HT1A receptors was significantly increased in the cervical (+13%) and lumbar (+42%) dorsal horn in 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine-lesioned rats. Similarly, [3H]8-OH-DPAT binding to 5-HT1A receptors significantly increased (+26%) in the lumbar (but not the cervical) dorsal horn in rats whose noradrenergic systems had been lesioned by DSP-4. The labelling of 5-HT1B receptors was also increased (+31% at the cervical level; +17% at the lumbar level), whereas that of 5-HT3 receptors remained unchanged in these animals. These data indicate that complex adaptive changes in the expression of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors occurred in the rat spinal cord following the lesion of descending monoaminergic systems.

Spinal mu and delta, but not kappa, opioid-receptor agonists attenuate responses to noxious colorectal distension in the rat

The antinociceptive efficacy of different opioid-receptor agonists following their intrathecal (i.t.) administration was examined in awake, unanesthetized rats in a model of visceral pain. Cumulative i.t. doses of the mu-preferring opioid-receptor agonist morphine produced dose-dependent attenuation of the change (increase) in mean arterial pressure (delta MAP) and elevation of the visceromotor threshold to colorectal distension (CRD). Similar dose-dependent antinociceptive effects were produced after i.t. administration of the mu opioid-receptor-selective agonist DAMPGO. Morphine and DAMPGO were equipotent against the delta MAP to phasic CRD (80 mm Hg, 20 sec), but DAMPGO was more than 6 times more potent than morphine in elevating the visceromotor threshold to an incrementing CRD. Intrathecal administration of the delta opioid-receptor-selective agonist DPDPE produced, like morphine and DAMPGO, a dose-dependent attenuation of the delta MAP to CRD; DPDPE was one-tenth as potent as morphine or DAMPGO. DPDPE also dose-dependently elevated the visceromotor threshold to CRD, but its efficacy was only half that of morphine or DAMPGO. The kappa opioid-receptor-selective agonist U 50488H was without antinociceptive efficacy after i.t. administration, but did attenuate responses to CRD after systemic administration. The antinociceptive effects produced by morphine and DAMPGO were antagonized by i.t. pretreatment with naloxone and the effects produced by DPDPE were antagonized by i.t. pretreatment with the delta opioid-receptor-selective antagonist naltrindole. These data indicate that local mu and delta, but not kappa, opioid receptors can modulate visceral nociceptive transmission in the spinal cord.

Noradrenergic mediation of spinal antinociception by 5-hydroxytryptamine: characterization of receptor subtypes

The present study examined the involvement of spinal noradrenergic mechanisms in spinal antinociception by the 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT) receptor-selective agonists CGS 12066B (5-HT1B; 7-trifluoromethyl-4(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline), TFMPP (5-HT1C; M-trifluoromethylphenyl-piperazine) and DOI (5-HT2; 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane) using the rat hot plate test. Effects of alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists (phentolamine, yohimbine), the adrenergic neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine, and the selective noradrenergic uptake blocker desipramine were determined. CGS 12066B, TFMPP and DOI produced dose-related antinociception. The antinociceptive effect of each agent was reduced by pretreatment with both phentolamine and yohimbine (15-60 micrograms). Pretreatment with 6-hydroxydopamine (100 micrograms, intrathecal) for 7-10 days, which reduced spinal cord levels of noradrenaline by 87%, inhibited the action of TFMPP (and 5-HT), but not CGS 12066B or DOI. Pretreatment with desipramine (25 mg/kg, systemic) potentiated the action of TFMPP but not CGS 12066B or DOI (or 2-methyl-5-HT). These results suggest that antinociception by TFMPP is dependent on release of endogenous noradrenaline from the spinal cord, while that produced by CGS 12066B and DOI is not. As TFMPP exhibits a close similarity to 5-HT in these experiments, the 5-HT receptor subtype being activated to induce noradrenaline release may either be a 5-HT1C or a 5-HT1S subtype. Other mechanisms account for the observed blockade of the action of CGS 12066B and DOI by alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists.