Effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2a agonists on amphetamine-induced locomotion and c-Fos in striatum and nucleus accumbens

Adenosine Receptor mRNA Expression in Frontal Cortical Neurons in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a devastating neuropsychiatric disorder associated with the dysregulation of glutamate and dopamine neurotransmitter systems. The adenosine system is an important neuroregulatory system in the brain that modulates glutamate and dopamine signaling via the ubiquitously expressed adenosine receptors; however, adenosine A1 and A2A receptor (A1R and A2AR) mRNA expression is poorly understood in specific cell subtypes in the frontal cortical brain regions implicated in this disorder. In this study, we assayed A1R and A2AR mRNA expression via qPCR in enriched populations of pyramidal neurons, which were isolated from postmortem anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) tissue from schizophrenia (n = 20) and control (n = 20) subjects using laser microdissection (LMD). A1R expression was significantly increased in female schizophrenia subjects compared to female control subjects (t(13) = -4.008, p = 0.001). A1R expression was also significantly decreased in female control subjects compared to male control subjects, suggesting sex differences in basal A1R expression (t(17) = 2.137, p = 0.047). A significant, positive association was found between dementia severity (clinical dementia rating (CDR) scores) and A2AR mRNA expression (Spearman's r = 0.424, p = 0.009). A2AR mRNA expression was significantly increased in unmedicated schizophrenia subjects, suggesting that A2AR expression may be normalized by chronic antipsychotic treatment (F(1,14) = 9.259, p = 0.009). Together, these results provide novel insights into the neuronal expression of adenosine receptors in the ACC in schizophrenia and suggest that receptor expression changes may be sex-dependent and associated with cognitive decline in these subjects.

Selective Manipulation of G-Protein γ7 Subunit in Mice Provides New Insights into Striatal Control of Motor Behavior

Stimulatory coupling of dopamine D₁ (D₁R) and adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2AR) to adenylyl cyclase within the striatum is mediated through a specific Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer to ultimately modulate motor behaviors. To dissect the individual roles of the Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer in different populations of medium spiny neurons (MSNs), we produced and characterized conditional mouse models, in which the Gng7 gene was deleted in either the D₁R- or A_2AR/D₂R-expressing MSNs. We show that conditional loss of γ₇ disrupts the cell type-specific assembly of the Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer, thereby identifying its circumscribed roles acting downstream of either the D₁Rs or A_2ARs in coordinating motor behaviors, including in vivo responses to psychostimulants. We reveal that Gα_olfβ₂γ₇/cAMP signal in D₁R-MSNs does not impact spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotor behaviors in male and female mice, while its loss in A_2AR/D₂R-MSNs results in a hyperlocomotor phenotype and enhanced locomotor response to amphetamine. Additionally, Gα_olfβ₂γ₇/cAMP signal in either D₁R- or A_2AR/D₂R-expressing MSNs is not required for the activation of PKA signaling by amphetamine. Finally, we show that Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ signaling acting downstream of D₁Rs is selectively implicated in the acute locomotor-enhancing effects of morphine. Collectively, these results support the general notion that receptors use specific Gαβγ proteins to direct the fidelity of downstream signaling pathways and to elicit a diverse repertoire of cellular functions. Specifically, these findings highlight the critical role for the γ₇ protein in determining the cellular level, and hence, the function of the Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer in several disease states associated with dysfunctional striatal signaling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Dysfunction or imbalance of cAMP signaling in the striatum has been linked to several neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, schizophrenia, and drug addiction. By genetically targeting the γ₇ subunit in distinct striatal neuronal subpopulations in mice, we demonstrate that the formation and function of the Gα_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer, which represents the rate-limiting step for cAMP production in the striatum, is selectively disrupted. Furthermore, we reveal cell type-specific roles for Gα_olfβ₂γ₇-mediated cAMP production in the control of spontaneous locomotion as well as behavioral and molecular responses to psychostimulants. Our findings identify the γ₇ protein as a novel therapeutic target for disease states associated with dysfunctional striatal cAMP signaling.

Adenosine A2AReceptors in Substance Use Disorders: A Focus on Cocaine

Several psychoactive drugs can evoke substance use disorders (SUD) in humans and animals, and these include psychostimulants, opioids, cannabinoids (CB), nicotine, and alcohol. The etiology, mechanistic processes, and the therapeutic options to deal with SUD are not well understood. The common feature of all abused drugs is that they increase dopamine (DA) neurotransmission within the mesocorticolimbic circuitry of the brain followed by the activation of DA receptors. D₂ receptors were proposed as important molecular targets for SUD. The findings showed that D₂ receptors formed heteromeric complexes with other GPCRs, which forced the addiction research area in new directions. In this review, we updated the view on the brain D₂ receptor complexes with adenosine (A)2A receptors (A_2AR) and discussed the role of A_2AR in different aspects of addiction phenotypes in laboratory animal procedures that permit the highly complex syndrome of human drug addiction. We presented the current knowledge on the neurochemical in vivo and ex vivo mechanisms related to cocaine use disorder (CUD) and discussed future research directions for A_2AR heteromeric complexes in SUD.

A New Look at an Old Drug: Cumulative Effects of Low Ribavirin Doses in Amphetamine-Sensitized Rats

Background

Psychotic states related to psychostimulant misuse in patients with hepatitis C virus infection may complicate acceptance and reaction to antiviral treatment. This observation equally applies to the widely used ribavirin therapy.

Objective

We examined psychomotor and body weight gain responses to low ribavirin doses after cessation of intermittent amphetamine treatment in adult rats to assess its role in neurobehavioral outcome during psychostimulant withdrawal.

Method

The model of amphetamine-induced (1.5 mg/kg/day, i.p., 7 consecutive days) motor sensitization and affected body weight gain was established in adult male Wistar rats. Then, additional cohort of amphetamine-sensitized rats was subjected to saline (0.9% NaCl; 1 mL/kg/day; i.p.) or ribavirin (10, 20 and 30 mg/kg/day, i.p.) treatment for 7 consecutive days. Animals’ motor activity in a novel environment was monitored after the 1^st and the 7^th saline/ribavirin injection. Body weight gain was calculated as appropriate. Determination and quantification of ribavirin in the brain tissue were performed also.

Results

The 1^st application of ribavirin to amphetamine-sensitized rats affected/decreased their novelty-induced motor activity only at a dose of 30 mg/kg. After the 7^th application, ribavirin 30 mg/kg/day still decreased, while 10 and 20 mg/kg/day increased novelty-induced motor activity. These behavioral effects coincided with the time required to reach maximum ribavirin concentration in the brain. Body weight gain during withdrawal was not influenced by any of the doses tested.

Conclusion

Ribavirin displays central effects that in repeated treatment, depending on the applied dose, could significantly influence psychomotor response but not body weight gain during psychostimulant/amphetamine withdrawal.

Critical View on the Usage of Ribavirin in Already Existing Psychostimulant-Use Disorder

Substance-use disorder represents a frequently hidden non-communicable chronic disease. Patients with intravenous drug addiction are at high risk of direct exposure to a variety of viral infections and are considered to be the largest subpopulation infected with the hepatitis C virus. Ribavirin is a synthetic nucleoside analog that has been used as an integral component of hepatitis C therapy. However, ribavirin medication is quite often associated with pronounced psychiatric adverse effects. It is not well understood to what extent ribavirin per se contributes to changes in drug-related neurobehavioral disturbances, especially in the case of psychostimulant drugs, such as amphetamine. It is now well-known that repeated amphetamine usage produces psychosis in humans and behavioral sensitization in animals. On the other hand, ribavirin has an affinity for adenosine A1 receptors that antagonistically modulate the activity of dopamine D1 receptors, which play a critical role in the development of behavioral sensitization. This review will focus on the current knowledge of neurochemical/ neurobiological changes that exist in the psychostimulant drug-addicted brain itself and the antipsychotic-like efficiency of adenosine agonists. Particular attention will be paid to the potential side effects of ribavirin therapy, and the opportunities and challenges related to its application in already existing psychostimulant-use disorder.

Behavioral Effects of a Potential Novel TAAR1 Antagonist

The trace amine associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) is a G-protein coupled receptor expressed in the monoaminergic regions of the brain, and represents a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of neurological disorders. While selective agonists for TAAR1 have been successfully identified, only one high affinity TAAR1 antagonist has been described thus far. We previously identified four potential low potency TAAR1 antagonists through an in silico screen on a TAAR1 homology model. One of the identified antagonists (compound 22) was predicted to have favorable physicochemical properties, which would allow the drug to cross the blood brain barrier. In vivo studies were therefore carried out and showed that compound 22 potentiates amphetamine- and cocaine-mediated locomotor activity. Furthermore, electrophysiology experiments demonstrated that compound 22 increased firing of dopamine neurons similar to EPPTB, the only known TAAR1 antagonist. In order to assess whether the effects of compound 22 were mediated through TAAR1, experiments were carried out on TAAR1-KO mice. The results showed that compound 22 is able to enhance amphetamine- and cocaine-mediated locomotor activity, even in TAAR1-KO mice, suggesting that the in vivo effects of this compound are not mediated by TAAR1. In collaboration with Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, we attempted to determine the targets for compound 22. Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) results suggested several potential targets for compound 22 including, the dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin transporters; as well as sigma 1 and 2 receptors. Our follow-up studies using heterologous cell systems showed that the dopamine transporter is not a target of compound 22. Therefore, the biological target of compound 22 mediating its psychoactive effects still remains unknown.

The Role of Adenosine Receptors in Psychostimulant Addiction

Adenosine receptors (AR) are a family of G-protein coupled receptors, comprised of four members, named A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors, found widely distributed in almost all human body tissues and organs. To date, they are known to participate in a large variety of physiopathological responses, which include vasodilation, pain, and inflammation. In particular, in the central nervous system (CNS), adenosine acts as a neuromodulator, exerting different functions depending on the type of AR and consequent cellular signaling involved. In terms of molecular pathways and second messengers involved, A1 and A3 receptors inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC), through Gi/o proteins, while A2A and A2B receptors stimulate it through Gs proteins. In the CNS, A1 receptors are widely distributed in the cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, A2A receptors are localized mainly in the striatum and olfactory bulb, while A2B and A3 receptors are found at low levels of expression. In addition, AR are able to form heteromers, both among themselves (e.g., A1/A2A), as well as with other subtypes (e.g., A2A/D2), opening a whole range of possibilities in the field of the pharmacology of AR. Nowadays, we know that adenosine, by acting on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, is known to antagonistically modulate dopaminergic neurotransmission and therefore reward systems, being A1 receptors colocalized in heteromeric complexes with D1 receptors, and A2A receptors with D2 receptors. This review documents the present state of knowledge of the contribution of AR, particularly A1 and A2A, to psychostimulants-mediated effects, including locomotor activity, discrimination, seeking and reward, and discuss their therapeutic relevance to psychostimulant addiction. Studies presented in this review reinforce the potential of A1 agonists as an effective strategy to counteract psychostimulant-induced effects. Furthermore, different experimental data support the hypothesis that A2A/D2 heterodimers are partly responsible for the psychomotor and reinforcing effects of psychostimulant drugs, such as cocaine and amphetamine, and the stimulation of A2A receptor is proposed as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of drug addiction. The overall analysis of presented data provide evidence that excitatory modulation of A1 and A2A receptors constitute promising tools to counteract psychostimulants addiction.

Differential effects of the adenosine A₂A agonist CGS-21680 and haloperidol on food-reinforced fixed ratio responding in the rat

RATIONALE

Previous studies have shown that adenosine A(2A) receptors are colocalized with dopamine D(2) receptors on striatal neurons. Activation of these two receptors has antagonistic effects under a number of conditions suggesting that stimulation of adenosine A(2A) receptors may have behavioral effects resembling those produced by blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors, but this possibility has been investigated in a limited number of situations.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of the adenosine A(2A) agonist CGS-21680 and the preferential D(2) dopamine antagonist haloperidol in a situation in which dopamine blockade produces a distinctive pattern of behavioral effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six rats were trained to lever press for food reward on a fixed ratio 15 schedule of reinforcement and then tested after being injected with various doses of CGS-21680 (0.064, 0.128, and 0.25 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.25 and 0.1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Haloperidol produced a dose-dependent suppression of lever pressing with mean response rates declining across the duration of the test session. CGS-21680 also produced a dose-dependent suppression of responding, but this effect was not temporally graded, and responding was equivalently suppressed across the duration of the session. Additionally, CGS-21680 increased post-reinforcement pause duration to a much greater extent than did haloperidol.

CONCLUSIONS

On this task, the behavioral effects of CGS-21680 do not resemble those produced by haloperidol. Several explanations of this discrepancy are possible, the most likely being that the observed behavioral effects of CGS-21680 result from an action at a site other than D(2) receptor-expressing striatal neurons.

Association analysis of the adenosine A1 receptor gene polymorphisms in patients with methamphetamine dependence/psychosis

Several lines of evidence suggest that the dopaminergic nervous system contributes to methamphetamine (METH) dependence, and there is increasing evidence of antagonistic interactions between dopamine and adenosine receptors in METH abusers. We therefore hypothesized that variations in the A1 adenosine receptor (ADORA1) gene modify genetic susceptibility to METH dependence/psychosis. In this study, we identified 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exons and exon-intron boundaries of the ADORA1 gene in a Japanese population. A total of 171 patients and 229 controls were used for an association analysis between these SNPs and METH dependence/psychosis. No significant differences were observed in either the genotypic or allelic frequencies between METH dependent/psychotic patients and controls. A global test of differentiation among samples based on haplotype frequencies showed no significant association. In the clinical feature analyses, no significant associations were observed among latency of psychosis, prognosis of psychosis, and spontaneous relapse. These results suggest that the ADORA1 gene variants may make little or no contribution to vulnerability to METH dependence/psychosis.

Adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia--opportunities for pharmacotherapy

Pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia based on the dopamine hypothesis remains unsatisfactory for the negative and cognitive symptoms of the disease. Enhancing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) function is expected to alleviate such persistent symptoms, but successful development of novel clinically effective compounds remains challenging. Adenosine is a homeostatic bioenergetic network modulator that is able to affect complex networks synergistically at different levels (receptor-dependent pathways, biochemistry, bioenergetics, and epigenetics). By affecting brain dopamine and glutamate activities, it represents a promising candidate for reversing the functional imbalance in these neurotransmitter systems believed to underlie the genesis of schizophrenia symptoms, as well as restoring homeostasis of bioenergetics. Suggestion of an adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia further posits that adenosinergic dysfunction might contribute to the emergence of multiple neurotransmitter dysfunctions characteristic of schizophrenia via diverse mechanisms. Given the importance of adenosine in early brain development and regulation of brain immune response, it also bears direct relevance to the aetiology of schizophrenia. Here, we provide an overview of the rationale and evidence in support of the therapeutic potential of multiple adenosinergic targets, including the high-affinity adenosine receptors (A(1)R and A(2A)R), and the regulatory enzyme adenosine kinase (ADK). Key preliminary clinical data and preclinical findings are reviewed.

An open-label, positron emission tomography study to assess adenosine A2A brain receptor occupancy of vipadenant (BIIB014) at steady-state levels in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists are potential new treatments for Parkinson disease. We used positron emission tomography (PET) of the A2A receptor radiotracer, [C]SCH442416, to assess binding of the novel A2A antagonist, vipadenant (previously known as BIIB014), to human brain A2A receptors and to investigate the relationship among dose, steady-state plasma levels, and receptor occupancy.

METHODS

We used PET to compare [C]SCH442416 uptake before and after blockade with daily oral vipadenant (2.5-100 mg/d for 10 or 11 days) in healthy volunteers (n = 15). We estimated receptor occupancy in brain regions of interest, particularly the putamen, by kinetic modeling of PET data. We estimated the dose, minimal plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin), and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC0-tau) at the steady state required for saturation (> or =90% receptor occupancy) using Bayesian Emax and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The estimated receptor occupancy of vipadenant in the brain regions of interest varied from 74% to 94% at the lowest daily dose (2.5 mg) and reached saturation in all regions at 100 mg. In the putamen, the estimated minimal daily dose, steady-state Cmin, and steady-state AUC0-tau required for receptor saturation were 10.2 mg (interquartile range, 28%), 0.097 microg/mL (27%), and 6 microg h/mL (21%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first evidence that vipadenant occupies A2A receptors in the human brain. Receptor occupancy was related to both dose and plasma levels of vipadenant. These results, coupled with previous efficacy results in animals, justify continued development of vipadenant as a potential treatment for Parkinson disease.

Adenosine A2A receptors and their role in drug addiction

The specific events between initial presumably manageable drug intake and the development of a drug- addicted state are not yet known. Drugs of abuse have varying mechanisms of action that create a complex pattern of behaviour related to drug consumption, drug-seeking, withdrawal and relapse. The neuromodulator adenosine has been shown to play a role in reward-related behaviour, both as an independent mediator and via interactions of adenosine receptors with other receptors. Adenosine levels are elevated upon exposure to drugs of abuse and adenosine A2A receptors are enriched in brain nuclei known for their involvement in the processing of drug-related reinforcement processing. A2A receptors are found in receptor clusters with dopamine and glutamate receptors. A2A receptors are thus ideally situated to influence the signalling of neurotransmitters relevant in the neuronal responses and plasticity that underlie the development of drug taking and drug-seeking behaviour. In this review, we present evidence for the role of adenosine and A2A receptors in drug addiction, thereby providing support for current efforts aimed at developing drug therapies to combat substance abuse that target adenosine signalling via A2A receptors.

Additive effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors and amphetamine on histone H4 acetylation, cAMP responsive element binding protein phosphorylation and DeltaFosB expression in the striatum and locomotor sensitization in mice

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) plays an important role in chromatin remodeling in response to a variety of neurochemical signalings and behavioral manipulations, and may be a therapeutic target for modulation of psychostimulant behavioral sensitization. In this study, we investigated the molecular interaction between histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) and psychostimulant in vivo of mice after repeated treatment with the HDACi, butyric acid (BA) and valproic acid (VPA), alone or in combination with amphetamine. Repeated treatment with amphetamine produced HDACi-like effects: enhanced global histone H4 acetylation level by Western blot as well as specific histone H4 acetylation associated with fosB promoter by chromatin immunoprecipitation in the striatum. Conversely, repeated treatment with BA or VPA produced amphetamine-like effects: enhanced cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation at Ser(133) position and increased DeltaFosB protein levels in the striatum. Furthermore, co-administration of BA or VPA with amphetamine produced additive effects on histone H4 acetylation as well as CREB phosphorylation in the striatum. The interplay of HDAC and CREB was also supported by co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrating that repeated treatment with VPA reduced the association of CREB and HDAC1 in the striatum. Finally, the additive effect of VPA/BA and amphetamine on histone H4 acetylation, phosphorylated CREB, and DeltaFosB was associated with potentiated amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. Thus, HDACi may interact additively with psychostimulants at both histone acetylation and CREB phosphorylation through the CREB:HDAC protein complex in the striatum to modulate DeltaFosB protein levels and psychomotor behavioral sensitization.

The adenosine A2A receptor agonist, CGS-21680, blocks excessive rearing, acquisition of wheel running, and increases nucleus accumbens CREB phosphorylation in chronically food-restricted rats

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are preferentially expressed in rat striatum, where they are concentrated in dendritic spines of striatopallidal medium spiny neurons and exist in a heteromeric complex with D(2) dopamine (DA) receptors. Behavioral and biochemical studies indicate an antagonistic relationship between A(2A) and D(2) receptors. Previous studies have demonstrated that food-restricted (FR) rats display behavioral and striatal cellular hypersensitivity to D(1) and D(2) DA receptor stimulation. These alterations may underlie adaptive, as well as maladaptive, behaviors characteristic of the FR rat. The present study examined whether FR rats are hypersensitive to the A(2A) receptor agonist, CGS-21680. In Experiment 1, spontaneous horizontal motor activity did not differ between FR and ad libitum fed (AL) rats, while vertical activity was greater in the former. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of CGS-21680 (0.25 and 1.0 nmol) decreased both types of motor activity in FR rats, and returned vertical activity levels to those observed in AL rats. In Experiment 2, FR rats given access to a running wheel for a brief period outside of the home cage rapidly acquired wheel running while AL rats did not. Pretreatment with CGS-21680 (1.0 nmol) blocked the acquisition of wheel running. When administered to FR subjects that had previously acquired wheel running, CGS-21680 suppressed the behavior. In Experiment 3, CGS-21680 (1.0 nmol) activated both ERK 1/2 and CREB in caudate-putamen with no difference between feeding groups. However, in nucleus accumbens (NAc), CGS-21680 failed to activate ERK 1/2 and selectively activated CREB in FR rats. These results indicate that FR subjects are hypersensitive to several effects of an adenosine A(2A) agonist, and suggest the involvement of an upregulated A(2A) receptor-linked signaling pathway in NAc. Medications targeting the A(2A) receptor may have utility in the treatment of maladaptive behaviors associated with FR, including substance abuse and compulsive exercise.

Different effects of adenosine A1 agonist ribavirin on amphetamine-induced total locomotor and stereotypic activities in rats

Pretreatment with a single dose of ribavirin (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg b.w., i.p.) decreased amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg b.w., i.p.)-induced total locomotor activity (distance traveled) compared to amphetamine alone, but the most significant effect was observed with 30 mg/kg dose. In contrast, total stereotypic activities (such as sniffing, self-grooming, licking, and head weaving) of these animals were unchanged. These findings demonstrate the ability of ribavirin to modulate in a different way central regulation of locomotor and stereotypic activities that in the future could have a practical application in target therapy of some movement disorders.

The time-course of ribavirin-provoked changes of basal and AMPH-induced motor activities in rats

The time-course of changes of basal and amphetamine (AMPH)-induced locomotor and stereotypic activities in adult male Wistar rats after a single ribavirin injection was studied. In the first set of experiments, 10, 20 or 30 mg ribavirin/kg body weight (b.w.) were injected i.p. to rats and their basal motor activities were recorded every 10 min for 2 h and compared with those of saline-treated controls. In the second set of experiments, the animals were pretreated with ribavirin and 20 min later i.p. injected with AMPH (1.5 mg/kg b.w.). The controls received AMPH 20 min after the saline injection. Motor activity was recorded after the first injection and until 120 min after AMPH administration. Ribavirin did not significantly affect the time-course of either basal locomotor or stereotypic activities. Pretreatment with any of the applied ribavirin doses decreased the AMPH-induced hyperlocomotor response. However, the most pronounced effect was observed with ribavirin doses of 20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg when administered during the first 10 min and 30 min after the AMPH injection respectively. In contrast, the stereotypic activities of these animals were only slightly changed. These results indicate a different susceptibility of regions in the basal ganglia to ribavirin.

Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats

Recent experiments from our laboratory have demonstrated that drug states can signal when environmental cues will be followed by rewarding outcomes (ie Pavlovian conditioning). However, little is known about the generality of this approach and whether it can be used for studying the pharmacological properties of drug states. Accordingly, the present experiments tested the pharmacological specificity of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), amphetamine (1 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) in this Pavlovian drug discrimination procedure. Following drug administration, presentation of a conditional stimulus (CS) was followed by brief access to sucrose. When saline was administered, the same CS was presented but sucrose was withheld. In substitution tests, rats in each condition received varying doses of all training drugs and caffeine. Anticipatory food seeking developed during the CS on drug sessions but not on saline sessions for all drug features (ie drug state-specific conditional response (CR)). In generalization tests, this CR decreased as a function of decreases in the training dose. Median effective doses (ED50s) were calculated for nicotine (0.054 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.26 mg/kg), and CDP (2.48 mg/kg). No compound tested substituted for the CDP training drug. Partial substitution was evident between nicotine and amphetamine; CDP did not substitute for either of these drug features. Caffeine fully substituted for nicotine (ED50 = 15.45 mg/kg) and amphetamine (ED50 = 3.70 mg/kg), but not for CDP. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that drug states can occasion appetitive Pavlovian CRs in a pharmacologically specific manner.

Adenosine A2A receptors are involved in physical dependence and place conditioning induced by THC

A2A adenosine and CB1 cannabinoid receptors are highly expressed in the central nervous system, where they modulate numerous physiological processes including adaptive responses to drugs of abuse. Both purinergic and cannabinoid systems interact with dopamine neurotransmission (through A2A and CB1 receptors, respectively). Changes in dopamine neurotransmission play an important role in addictive-related behaviours. In this study, we investigated the contribution of A2A adenosine receptors in several behavioural responses of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) related to its addictive properties, including tolerance, physical dependence and motivational effects. For this purpose, we first investigated acute THC responses in mice lacking A2A adenosine receptors. Antinociception, hypolocomotion and hypothermia induced by acute THC administration remained unaffected in mutant mice. Chronic THC treatment developed similar tolerance to these acute effects in wild-type and A2A-knockout mice. However, differences in the body weight pattern were found between genotypes during such chronic treatment. Interestingly, the somatic manifestations of SR141716A-precipitated THC withdrawal were significantly attenuated in mutant mice. The motivational responses of THC were also evaluated by using the place-conditioning paradigm. A significant reduction of THC-induced rewarding and aversive effects was found in mice lacking A2A adenosine receptors in comparison with wild-type littermates. Binding studies revealed that these behavioural changes were not associated with any modification in the distribution and/or functional activity of CB1 receptors in knockout mice. Therefore, this study shows, for the first time, a specific involvement of A2A receptors in the addictive-related properties of cannabinoids.

Reverse microdialysis of a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist alters extracellular adenosine levels in the rat nucleus accumbens

Recent evidence suggests that modulation of dopaminergic transmission alters striatal levels of extracellular adenosine. The present study used reverse microdialysis of the selective dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist raclopride to investigate whether a blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors modifies extracellular adenosine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens. Results reveal that perfusion of raclopride produced an increase of dialysate adenosine which was significant with a high (10 mM) and intermediate (1 mM) drug concentration, but not with lower drug concentrations (10 and 100 microM). Thus, the present study demonstrates that a selective blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors in the nucleus accumbens produced a pronounced increase of extracellular adenosine. The cellular mechanisms underlying this effect are yet unknown. It is suggested that the increase of extracellular adenosine might be related to a homeostatic modulatory mechanism proposed to be a key function of adenosine in response to neuronal metabolic challenges.

The effects of tiazofurin on basal and amphetamine-induced motor activity in rats

The effects of tiazofurin (TR; 2-beta-d-ribofuranosylthiazole-4-carboxamide), a purine nucleoside analogue on basal and amphetamine (AMPH)-induced locomotor and stereotypic activity of adult Wistar rat males were studied. The animals were injected with low (3.75, 7.5, and 15 mg/kg ip) and high (62.5, 125, and 250 mg/kg ip) TR doses. Neither low nor high TR doses influenced basal locomotor and stereotypic activity in comparison with the corresponding controls treated with saline only. However, pretreatment with TR at any dose applied, except for the lowest one, significantly decreased AMPH-induced (1.5 mg/kg ip) locomotor activity, while AMPH-induced stereotypic activity was inhibited with the two highest TR doses. In addition, TR was detected in the brain by HPLC already 15 min after the injection (125 mg/kg ip) to reach a maximum 2 h after the administration and was detectable in this tissue during the next 4 h. Our results indicate that TR modifies central regulation of the motor activity, possibly by influencing dopaminergic (DA-ergic) transmission.

Effects of an adenosine A2A receptor blockade in the nucleus accumbens on locomotion, feeding, and prepulse inhibition in rats

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) subserves behaviors governed by natural rewards, i.e., feeding or exploration, and has been implicated in control of prepulse inhibition (PPI), a measure of sensorimotor gating. The present study sought to determine whether a tonic stimulation of adenosine A(2A) receptors in the rat NAc is involved in control of spontaneous locomotor activity, feeding behavior, and PPI. To this end, bilateral microinfusions of a prodrug (MSX-3) (3 microg and 5 microg in 1 microl per side) of the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist MSX-2 or vehicle (1 microl per side) were administered into the NAc. Results show that blockade of intra-NAc adenosine A(2A) receptors by a high (5 microg), but not by a low (3 microg), dose of MSX-3 increased locomotor activity in an open field, reduced food intake, and delayed intake onset in food-deprived rats examined in a test cage with standard laboratory chow. Furthermore, PPI was significantly disrupted after intra-NAc infusion of 5 microg, but not 3 microg, MSX-3. These findings suggest that locomotor activity as well as intact PPI and feeding behavior rely on tonic activation of intra-NAc A(2A) receptors. The data add further support to the view that adenosine is a tonically active modulator of striatal function through actions on A(2A) receptors.

Inactivation of adenosine A2A receptors selectively attenuates amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization

Repeated treatment with the psychostimulant amphetamine produces behavioral sensitization that may represent the neural adaptations underlying some features of psychosis and addiction in humans. In the present study we investigated the role of adenosine A(2A) receptors in psychostimulant-induced locomotor sensitization using an A(2A) receptor knockout (A(2A) KO) model. Daily treatment with amphetamine for 1 week resulted in an enhanced motor response on day 8 (by two-fold compared to that on day 1), and remained enhanced at day 24 upon rechallenge with amphetamine. By contrast, locomotor sensitization to daily amphetamine did not develop in A(2A) KO mice on day 8 or 24, and this absence was not the result of a nonspecific threshold effect. The absence of behavioral sensitization was selective for amphetamine since daily treatment with the D(1) agonist SKF81297 (2.5 mg/kg) or the D(2) agonist quinpirole (1.0 mg/kg) produced similar behavioral sensitization in both WT and A(2A) KO mice. Furthermore, coinjection of SKF81297 and quinpirole also resulted in indistinguishable locomotor sensitization in A(2A) KO and WT mice, suggesting normal D(1) and D(2) receptor responsiveness. Finally, at the cellular level A(2A) receptor inactivation abolished the increase in striatal dynorphin mRNA induced by repeated amphetamine administration. The selective absence of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in A(2A) KO mice suggests a critical role of the A(2A) receptor in the development of psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization, and supports the pharmacological potential of A(2A) adenosinergic agents to modulate adaptive responses to repeated psychostimulant exposure.

Dopamine D1 receptors and adenosine A1 receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens regulate motor activity but not prepulse inhibition

Locomotor activity and sensorimotor gating (measured as prepulse inhibition of startle) are regulated by mesoaccumbal dopamine. Recent evidence indicated antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors and dopamine D(1) receptors, as well as between adenosine A(2) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, it is conceivable that accumbal dopamine and adenosine are both involved in the regulation of prepulse inhibition and locomotion. We tested whether accumbal adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors control locomotor activity and prepulse inhibition using the following four treatments. (1) Injections of the selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentanyladenosine (CPA 1.5 and 3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (2) Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area by local infusion of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin (25-100 ng/0.5 microl bilaterally). (3) Picrotoxin injections into the ventral tegmental area (100 ng/0.5 microl) and simultaneous bilateral injections of CPA (3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (4) Injections of the selective dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (3 microg/0.5 microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area stimulation by picrotoxin. Intra-accumbal CPA infusion reduced locomotor activity but had no effect on prepulse inhibition. Picrotoxin stimulation of the ventral tegmental area increased locomotor activity which was antagonized by co-administration of CPA or SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. An enhancement of prepulse inhibition was observed after stimulation of the ventral tegmental area and co-administration of SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. These findings demonstrate that adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors are involved in the regulation of locomotor activity mediated by the mesoaccumbal dopamine system. The finding that locomotor effects induced by stimulation of the mesoaccumbal dopamine system were not accompanied by a prepulse inhibition-deficit suggests a dissociation of the neuronal substrates involved in the control of locomotion and the regulation of sensorimotor gating.

Adenosine A2A, 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptor in neonatally pregnenolone-treated rats

Steroid hormones synthesized in the brain, called 'neurosteroids', modulate neuronal activity. We treated neonatal rats with a main precursor of the neurosteroidogenesis, pregnenolone, and examined adenosine A2A receptor, 5- hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A and 5-HT7 receptor densities in the front-parietal cortex in juvenile and adult rats. In receptor binding assay using [3H]CGS21680 and [3H]8-OH-DPAT, it was shown that neonatal pregnenolone-treatment induced a significant decrease in the adenosine A2A receptor density with no significant effects on the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptor densities.

The purinergic P2 receptor antagonist pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2'4'-disulphonic acid prevents both the acute locomotor effects of amphetamine and the behavioural sensitization caused by repeated amphetamine injections in rats

Repeated administration of amphetamine-like psychostimulants produce a progressive and long-lasting hypersensitivity to their behavioural effects known as behavioural sensitization. Previous studies have shown that administration of the purinergic P2 receptor agonist 2-methylthio ATP into the nucleus accumbens of rats raises the extracellular level of dopamine accompanied with enhanced locomotion in a similar manner. Furthermore, the quantitative EEG after application of 2-methylthio ATP or amphetamine was characterized by an elevation of the alpha1-power. However, purinergic P2 receptor antagonists decreased the basal level of dopamine in the NAc and in addition prevented the effects of 2-methylthio ATP. The purpose of the present study was to investigate, whether endogenous ATP acting via purinergic P2 receptors is involved in the process of amphetamine-induced sensitization. Rats were treated systemically for five successive days with d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) and tested in an open field with respect to their locomotor response. The enhanced locomotor activity after the first injection of amphetamine was diminished by the previous intracerebroventricular application of the purinergic P2 receptor antagonist pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2'4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS; 0.6 nmol) (P<0.05). The challenge with a lower dose of amphetamine (0.75 mg/kg) produced an increased locomotion in comparison to the response after the first amphetamine application indicating the expression of a behavioural sensitization. Pretreatment with PPADS prior to each amphetamine administration prevented the increase of locomotor activity after the challenge with amphetamine (P<0.05). In summary, the present study demonstrates that PPADS blocks both the acute locomotor effects of amphetamine and the development of behavioural sensitization to the psychostimulant. We suggest that the activation of purinergic P2 receptors by endogenous ATP is necessary for the expression of these effects.

Selective attenuation of psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses in mice lacking A(2A) adenosine receptors

A(2A) adenosine receptors are highly expressed in the striatum where they modulate dopaminergic activity. The role of A(2A) receptors in psychostimulant action is less well understood because of the lack of A(2A)-selective compounds with access to the central nervous system. To investigate the A(2A) adenosinergic regulation of psychostimulant responses, we examined the consequences of genetic deletion of A(2A) receptors on psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses. The extent of dopaminergic innervation and expression of dopamine receptors in the striatum were indistinguishable between A(2A) receptor knockout and wild-type mice. However, locomotor responses to amphetamine and cocaine were attenuated in A(2A) knockout mice. In contrast, D(1)-like receptor agonists SKF81297 and SKF38393 produced identical locomotor stimulation and grooming, respectively, in wild-type and A(2A) knockout mice. Similarly, the D(2)-like agonist quinpirole produced motor-depression and stereotypy that were indistinguishable between A(2A) knockout and wild-type mice. Furthermore, attenuated amphetamine- (but not SKF81297-) induced locomotion was observed in pure 129-Steel as well as hybrid 129-SteelxC57BL/6 mice, confirming A(2A) receptor deficiency (and not genetic background) as the cause of the blunted psychostimulant responses in A(2A) knockout mice. These results demonstrate that A(2A) receptor deficiency selectively attenuates psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses and support an important role for the A(2A) receptor in modulating psychostimulant effects.

GABAergic involvement in motor effects of an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist in mice

Adenosine A(2A) agonists are known to induce catalepsy and inhibit dopamine mediated motor hyperactivity. An antagonistic interaction between adenosine A(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors is known to regulate GABA-mediated neurotransmission in striatopallidal neurons. Stimulation of adenosine A(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors has been shown to increase and inhibit GABA release respectively in pallidal GABAergic neurons. However, the role of GABAergic neurotransmission in the motor effects of adenosine A(2A) receptors is not yet known. Therefore in the present study the effect of GABAergic agents on adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist (NECA- or CGS 21680) induced catalepsy and inhibition of amphetamine elicited motor hyperactivity was examined. Pretreatment with GABA, the GABA(A) agonist muscimol or the GABA(B) agonist baclofen potentiated whereas the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline attenuated NECA- or CGS 21680-induced catalepsy. However, the GABA(B) antagonists phaclophen and delta-aminovaleric acid had no effect. Administration of NECA or CGS 21680 not only reduced spontaneous locomotor activity but also antagonized amphetamine elicited motor hyperactivity. These effects of NECA and CGS 21680 were potentiated by GABA or muscimol and antagonized by bicuculline. These findings provide behavioral evidence for the role of GABA in the motor effects of adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists. Activation of adenosine A(2A) receptors increases GABA release which could reduce dopaminergic tone and induce catalepsy or inhibit amphetamine mediated motor hyperactivity.

Roles of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in the expression and development of methamphetamine-induced sensitization

We studied the effects of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor agonists on the expression and development of methamphetamine-induced sensitization in rats. When animals were treated with the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist, N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), along with methamphetamine every 3 days with a total of five administrations, the augmentation of hyperlocomotion by methamphetamine re-administration after 7-day withdrawal (methamphetamine challenge administration) was not inhibited. However, when the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist, 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethyl-amino-5'-N-ethylcarboxy-amide adenosine (CGS21680), was administered according to the same schedule, the augmentation was significantly inhibited. On the other hand, when CHA or CGS21680 was administered 30 min before methamphetamine challenge, both drugs dose-dependently inhibited the augmentation of hyperlocomotion. These results suggested that both adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors play important roles in the expression of methamphetamine-induced sensitization, and that adenosine A(2A) receptors do so in the development of this sensitization.

An integrative neuroanatomical perspective on some subcortical substrates of adaptive responding with emphasis on the nucleus accumbens

Neuroanatomical substrates associated in the literature with adaptive responding are discussed, with a focus on the nucleus accumbens. While it is emphasized that the accumbens exhibits multiple levels of complex organization, a fairly complete list of brief descriptions of recent studies devoted specifically to the accumbens shell and core subterritories is presented in tabular format. The distinct patterns of connectivity of the accumbens core and shell and structures related to them by connections are described. Multiple inputs, outputs and abundant reciprocity of connections within the ventral parts of the basal ganglia are emphasized and the implications for "through-put" of impulses is considered. It is noted, at least on neuroanatomical grounds, that there is ample reason to expect feed forward processing from shell and structures with which it is associated to core and structures with which it is associated. Furthermore, the potential for additional feed forward processing involving several forebrain functional anatomical systems, inlcuding the ventral striatopallidum, extended amygdala and magnocellular basal forebrain complex is considered. It is intended that from the considerations recorded here a conceptual framework will begin to emerge that is amenable to further experimental substantiation as regards how multiple basal forebrain systems and the cortices to which they are related by connections work together to fashion a unitary object--the adaptive response.

Central adenosine A(2A) receptors: an overview

Recent advances in molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology and behavioral pharmacology together with the development of more selective ligands to the various adenosine receptors have increased our understanding of the functioning of central adenosine A(2A) receptors. The A(2A) receptor is one of four adenosine receptors found in the brain. Its expression is highest in striatum, nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercles, although it also occurs in neurons and microglia in most other brain regions. The receptor has seven transmembrane domains and couples via Gs to adenyl cyclase stimulation. Antagonistic interactions between A(2A) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors have been described, as stimulation of the A(2A) receptor leads to a reduction in the affinity of D(2) receptors for D(2) receptor agonists. The A(2A) receptor is thought to play a role in a number of physiological responses and pathological conditions. Indeed, A(2A) receptor antagonists may be useful for the treatment of acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as cerebral ischemia or Parkinson's disease. A(2A) receptor agonists may treat certain types of seizures or sleep disorders. This review discusses the characteristics, distribution, pharmacochemical properties and regulation of central A(2A) receptors, as well as A(2A) receptor-mediated behavioural responses and their potential role in various neuropsychiatric disorders.

Drugs of abuse and immediate-early genes in the forebrain

A diverse array of chemical agents have been self administered by humans to alter the psychological state. Such drugs of abuse include both stimulants and depressants of the central nervous system. However, some commonalties must underlie the neurobiological actions of these drugs, since the desire to take the drugs often crosses from one drug to another. Studies have emphasized a role of the ventral striatum, especially the nucleus accumbens, in the actions of all drugs of abuse, although more recent studies have implicated larger regions of the forebrain. Induction of immediate-early genes has been studied extensively as a marker for activation of neurons in the central nervous system. In this review, we survey the literature reporting activation of immediate-early gene expression in the forebrain, in response to administration of drugs of abuse. All drugs of abuse activate immediate-early gene expression in the striatum, although each drug induces a particular neuroanatomical signature of activation. Most drugs of abuse activate immediate-early gene expression in several additional forebrain regions, including portions of the extended amygdala, cerebral cortex, lateral septum, and midline/intralaminar thalamic nuclei, although regional variations are found depending on the particular drug administered. Common neuropharmacological mechanisms responsible for activation of immediate-early gene expression in the forebrain involve dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. Speculations on the biological significance and clinical relevance of immediate-early gene expression in response to drugs of abuse are presented.

Synergistic interaction between an adenosine antagonist and a D1 dopamine agonist on rotational behavior and striatal c-Fos induction in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats

The interaction between adenosine and D1 dopamine systems in regulating motor behavior and striatal c-Fos expression was examined in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions. These results were compared to the synergistic interaction between D1 and D2 dopamine systems in 6-OHDA rats. Coadministration of the adenosine antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX: 10 mg/kg) and the D1 dopamine agonist SKF38393 (0.5 mg/kg) to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats produced significant contralateral rotation and c-Fos expression in the ipsilateral striatum compared to 6-OHDA rats treated with either drug alone. However, the regional pattern of striatal c-Fos activation following treatment of 6-OHDA rats with SKF38393 and DMPX was different from the dorsolateral pattern of striatal c-Fos induction observed after coadministration of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists (SKF38393: 0.5 mg/kg + quinpirole: 0.05 mg/kg). These data are consistent with a functional interaction between D1 dopamine and adenosine systems in the striatum, but suggest that activation of different subsets of striatal neurons underlie the behavioral synergy observed following combined adenosine antagonist-D1 dopamine agonist and combined D1 dopamine agonist-D2 dopamine agonist treatment.