Terbutaline and diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

Clinical management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with muscle dysfunction

Muscle dysfunction is frequently observed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, contributing to their exercise limitation and a worsening prognosis. The main factor leading to limb muscle dysfunction is deconditioning, whereas respiratory muscle dysfunction is mostly the result of pulmonary hyperinflation. However, both limb and respiratory muscles are also influenced by other negative factors, including smoking, systemic inflammation, nutritional abnormalities, exacerbations and some drugs. Limb muscle weakness is generally diagnosed through voluntary isometric maneuvers such as handgrip or quadriceps muscle contraction (dynamometry); while respiratory muscle loss of strength is usually recognized through a decrease in maximal static pressures measured at the mouth. Both types of measurements have validated reference values. Respiratory muscle strength can also be evaluated determining esophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic maximal pressures although there is a lack of widely accepted reference equations. Non-volitional maneuvers, obtained through electrical or magnetic stimulation, can be employed in patients unable to cooperate. Muscle endurance can also be assessed, generally using repeated submaximal maneuvers until exhaustion, but no validated reference values are available yet. The treatment of muscle dysfunction is multidimensional and includes improvement in lifestyle habits (smoking abstinence, healthy diet and a good level of physical activity, preferably outside), nutritional measures (diet supplements and occasionally, anabolic drugs), and different modalities of general and muscle training.

Muscle metabolism and exercise tolerance in COPD

This article explores the hypothesis that dyspnea in patients with COPD arises from an imbalance between the load placed on the respiratory muscle pump and its capacity. Evidence to support this concept is presented, and possible therapeutic approaches are discussed.

Does inhaled albuterol improve diaphragmatic contractility in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

We tested the hypothesis that the decrease in dyspnea in patients with COPD with inhaled albuterol is in part due to increased diaphragmatic contractility. Eleven patients with COPD inhaled albuterol or placebo in a double-blind randomized manner. Subsequently, dyspnea was measured while patients breathed through inspiratory resistors, and diaphragmatic contractility was quantified during maximal inspiratory efforts and after twitch stimulation of the phrenic nerves. Albuterol produced a decrease in dyspnea (5 +/- 2 to 4 +/- 2 [SD] Borg units, p < 0.01), and increases in maximal transdiaphragmatic pressure (92.4 +/- 37.2 to 102.8 +/- 37.2 cm H(2)O, p < 0.03) and potentiated twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures (21.6 +/- 7.1 to 25.2 +/- 7.6 cm H(2)O, p < 0.02). The decrease in dyspnea correlated with the increases in maximal and twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures: r = -0.64 (p = 0. 04) and r = -0.65 (p = 0.04), respectively. Compared with placebo, albuterol produced an increase in inspiratory capacity (1.87 +/- 0. 71 to 2.26 +/- 0.74 L, p = 0.002), which accounted for the increases in maximal and twitch transdiaphragmatic pressures. The decrease in dyspnea correlated with the increase in inspiratory capacity (r = -0. 62, p = 0.04), but not with the increase in FEV(1) (r = -0.13, p = 0. 72). In conclusion, albuterol relieves dyspnea and enhances respiratory muscle output in patients with COPD primarily by improving the length-tension relationship of the diaphragm rather than by improving its contractility.

Short-term effects of inhaled beta-adrenergic agonist on breathlessness and central inspiratory drive in patients with nonreversible COPD

In patients with COPD, a relationship between breathlessness and respiratory effort, assessed in terms of mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1), has been described. To evaluate the short-term effects of inhaled terbutaline on breathlessness, breathing pattern, and P0.1 in patients with nonreversible COPD, we designed a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. Twenty-five patients with stable nonreversible COPD, mean age 64 +/- 11 years, were enrolled in the study. Patients received 500 micrograms inhaled terbutaline or placebo. Breathlessness, using the Borg scale, breathing pattern, and P0.1 were measured at baseline and 30 min after inhalation. Terbutaline resulted in a significant decrease in Borg scale, while no differences were observed after placebo. No significant changes in breathing pattern were found. Nevertheless, a decrease in P0.1 (0.31 +/- 0.07 vs 0.21 +/- 0.05 kPa; p < 0.001) after terbutaline inhalation was observed. Borg score was correlated with P0.1 in all patients. Moreover, changes in Borg score after medication were directly proportional to P0.1 changes (r = 0.85; p < 0.01). We conclude that terbutaline decreases central inspiratory drive and improves breathlessness in patients with nonreversible COPD.

Effect of a beta 2-agonist (broxaterol) on respiratory muscle strength and endurance in patients with COPD with irreversible airway obstruction

The effect of broxaterol, a new beta 2-agonist, on respiratory muscle endurance and strength was studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover clinical trial in 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with irreversible airway obstruction (FEV1 = 57.1 percent of predicted). One patient withdrew from the study because of acute respiratory exacerbation. Inspiratory muscle strength was assessed by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and endurance time was determined as the length of time a subject could breathe against inspiratory resistance (target mouth pressure = 70 percent of MIP, Ti/Ttot = 0.4). Broxaterol (B) or placebo (P) was given orally for seven days at the dose of 0.5 mg three times a day with a washout period of 72 h between study treatments. Measurements were performed before administration of B or P and 2 h (six patients) or 8 h (nine patients) after the end of each treatment. No significant changes in FEV1 or FRC were observed after B or P suggesting that diaphragmatic length was maintained constant with each treatment. The MIP did not significantly change, while endurance time increased after B in the patients tested at 2 h (from 234.8 +/- 48.1 s to 284.0 +/- 48.0 s, p less than 0.05) and at 8 h (from 187.2 +/- 31.1 s to 258.2 +/- 40.4 s, p less than 0.005). No changes were observed after P. Minute ventilation, airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), integrated electromyographic activities of the diaphragm (Edi), and intercostal parasternals (Eic) (normalized to the value obtained during MIP) showed no change during the endurance run with different treatments. We conclude that in a group of COPD patients with irreversible airway obstruction, B significantly improves respiratory muscle endurance, and that this does not arise as a result of an effect on neuromuscular drive or pulmonary mechanics, but may be mediated by peripheral factors.