Shoulder function following the loss of the latissimus dorsi muscle

Choosing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy and subpectoral implant breast reconstruction: implications for pectoralis major function

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of women are choosing mastectomy and subpectoral implant (SI) breast reconstruction over breast-conserving therapy (BCT). It is unclear to what extent these procedures differ in their effect on the pectoralis major (PM). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of choosing BCT or SI breast reconstruction on PM function.

METHODS

Ultrasound shear wave elastography images were acquired from the PM fiber regions and surface electromyography obtained activity from six shoulder muscles, while 14 BCT participants, 14 SI participants, and 14 age-matched controls remained at rest or generated submaximal shoulder torques.

RESULTS

BCT and SI participants were significantly weaker in shoulder adduction, while BCT participants were also weaker in internal and external rotation (all p ≤ 0.003). PM function was altered following either BCT or SI. In all treatment groups, the clavicular fiber region contributed primarily to flexion, and the sternocostal primarily contributed to adduction. However, healthy participants utilized the clavicular region more during adduction and the sternocostal region more during flexion when compared to BCT or SI participants (all p ≤ 0.049). The still intact clavicular region increased its contributions to flexion torques in SI participants compared to controls (p = 0.016). Finally, BCT and SI participants compensated for changes in PM function using synergistic shoulder musculature.

CONCLUSION

Both BCT and SI breast reconstruction result in significant long-term upper extremity strength deficits. Our results suggest changes to the underlying function of the PM and the adoption of unique but inadequate neuromuscular compensation strategies drive these deficits.

Evaluation of Shoulder Muscle Improvement in Patients Following Free Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Pedicle Flap Transfer

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, shoulder muscle strength, and donor site morbidity following the free latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle pedicle flap transfer. Materials: Patients with free LD muscle pedicle flap reconstructions and with asymptomatic shoulders (affected and contralateral side) were included. The follow-up duration was 12 months. The combined shoulder range of motion (ROM), Constant-Murley shoulder (CMS), and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) scores were measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The ratio of the isokinetic muscle strength and total work was measured with an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex 350®) both preoperatively and at sixth month postoperatively. Results: Twenty patients with a mean age of 37.06 ± 9.74 years and a mean body mass index of 23.49 ± 8.6 kg/m2 were included. The difference in shoulder ROM and CMS and increase in QuickDASH were not significant at the first postoperative year. The peak torque and total work performed decreased by 13%-16% for the adductor and extensor functions at the six month postoperatively, and these differences were significant. Although the adductor peak torque was significantly lower in the postoperative test of the operated side, no significant difference was found between the operated and unaffected shoulder peak torque values. Moreover, no significant difference was noted between the operated and unaffected shoulders in all isokinetic tests pre- and postoperatively. Conclusion: The free LD muscle pedicle flap harvest did not decrease function and ROM at the first postoperative year. The muscle strength and total work of shoulders after the LD muscle transfer returned to the preoperative condition at the sixth month, except adductor and extensor muscle strengths. However, adductor and extensor muscle strengths of the operated shoulders were not significantly different postoperatively.

Less is more - retrospective comparison of shoulder strength and range of motion between conventional and muscle-sparing harvesting technique of a latissimus dorsi flap

BACKGROUND

The muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap poses an alternative to the conventional latissimus dorsi flap when a defect requires a smaller flap volume with a long vascular pedicle. The aim of the study was to analyze the functional outcome following muscle-sparing versus conventional harvest of a latissimus dorsi flap.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who received a muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi muscle flap transplantation (group 1) and patients with a complete latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest (group 2) for defect reconstruction at the University Hospital of Erlangen between 2007 and 2016 were examined. The evaluation included a physical examination with the measurement of strength and range of motion of the shoulder of both the donor side as well as the nonoperated side. Furthermore, the DASH score was evaluated. Additionally, patients in group 1 received a neurophysiological examination.

RESULTS

The DASH score did not show statistically significant differences between both groups. Both strength (p = 0.031) and range of motion (p<0.05) of the shoulder of the donor side were statistically significantly lower than the nonoperated side in group 2, while no difference was found in group 1. The neurophysiological examination in group 1 showed a reduced nerve conduction velocity of the donor side as compared to the nonoperated side in most patients (60% and n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Harvesting the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap leads to less functional impairments of the shoulder than harvesting the complete latissimus dorsi flap.

Revisiting pedicled latissimus dorsi flaps in head and neck reconstruction: contrasting shoulder morbidities across mysofascial flaps

Free tissue transfer has become the gold standard for reconstruction within the head and neck. However, there are still many instances where pedicled locoregional flaps are the optimal reconstructive option. When myofascial tissue is needed, several options have been described throughout the literature. Various trapezius flaps have been used, although these have variable vascular anatomy and significant donor site morbidity. The pectoralis major myofascial flap has become a mainstay in head and neck reconstruction for its ease of harvest and reliability but suffers from similar issues with donor site morbidity. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap (PLDF) is another reliable option that has been used for multiple different ablative sites within the head and neck. The thin, pliable structure of the latissimus dorsi makes it a viable option for many defects, and recent reports also support its feasibility for use in an interdisciplinary two-team approach. Furthermore, the donor site morbidity of the PLDF is minimal compared to other similar myofascial options. In this article, we describe the surgical considerations and operative techniques for PLDF transfer along with a review of its associated donor site morbidity.

Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Fat Grafted Latissimus versus Abdominal Free Tissue Transfer

Immediate fat grafting to the pedicled myocutaneous latissimus dorsi (LD) flap has recently gained in popularity as a means to supplement volume for breast reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of the immediately fat-grafted LD to free tissue transfer in the obese population.

Latissimus Dorsi Tear in an Olympics-Level Tennis Player: Case Report and Review of Literature

Latissimus dorsi tears are extremely rare and are encountered primarily in high-level athletes. Noted initially in baseball pitchers, cases have been described in other sports too, with one report of a latissimus dorsi tear at the muscle-tendon junction in a tennis player. Anecdotal outcomes have been comparative after both non-operative and operative treatments. Although no clear indications for operative intervention exist, there is a general consensus that partial non-retracted tears can be managed with non-operative treatment, whereas complete tears warrant surgical repair. This case report describes a complete rupture with retraction of the latissimus dorsi tendon that occurred during a competitive match in an international level tennis player. Due to compelling sports participation reasons, this tear was managed with non-operative treatment. The player returned to competitive tennis within 6 weeks and won the Asian Games men's doubles tennis gold medal 53 days following his injury. He has had no subsequent shoulder-related symptoms despite his continuous participation in international level tennis for the past 18 months. We analyse the role of the latissimus dorsi in tennis and also review the available literature on this uncommon sports injury.

Incidence of shoulder functional morbidity following ipsilateral mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of shoulder morbidity in our cohort of patients with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction after mastectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 72 patients using validate Oxford shoulder score for function and quickDASH score for disability. Scores were collected preoperatively and at time of final review or study. We also reviewed patient records for patients who had a formal diagnosis of shoulder pathology. Results were analysed with student t-test.

RESULTS

Analysis of scores showed a statistically significant worsening of both oxford shoulder score (p < 0.005) and quickDASH score (p < 0.005), when pre and post-operative scores were compared. Seven patients had a formal diagnosis of shoulder pathology, and all of them recovered well. There was no significant difference in oxford shoulder score or quickDASH scores between patients with or without shoulder pathology. About 40% patients had some functional loss or disability at 4 years after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a high incidence of significant shoulder functional morbidity following latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction but number of patients requiring specific treatment is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Functional recovery after bilateral extended autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The impact of unilateral extended autologous latissimus dorsi (EALD) flap harvest and axillary surgery on shoulder function has been well described, but the impact of bilateral EALD flap harvest has not been clearly defined nor is it clear whether reconstructions should be synchronous or staged.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, patients undergoing bilateral EALD breast reconstruction (February 2003-December 2009) completed the disability, arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire preoperatively and at five post-operative timepoints. Intensive shoulder physiotherapy was offered to those whose DASH score was >30 at 6 weeks or >20 at 12 weeks post-operatively.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent bilateral EALD flap breast reconstruction (51 synchronous, 9 metachronous). Patients with pre-existing shoulder pathology (n = 1) and those who failed to return any post-operative DASH questionnaire (n = 10) were excluded from initial DASH analysis. However, these eleven patients were included in a separate analysis as an intention-to-treat analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric, Friedman test and multiple comparison model. Forty-nine patients' DASH scores were analysed. DASH score initially increased after surgery and then returned to functionally normal within 3-6 months (median DASH: preoperative = 1 vs 6 weeks post-operation = 26, p = <0.001; vs 3 months = 19, p = <0.001; vs 6 months = 13, p = <0.001); thereafter, the scores remained less than 12 (p = <0.001). Median DASH score after synchronous reconstruction was not higher than that after metachronous reconstructions, although the metachronous sample size was small.

CONCLUSION

With appropriate patient selection and intensive physiotherapy, bilateral EALD breast reconstruction does not appear to cause significant long-term impairment of shoulder function, and patients can now be counselled about the likely timecourse of shoulder recovery. There seems no reason to stage bilateral reconstruction to reduce shoulder morbidity.

The influence of reconstruction choice and inclusion of radiation therapy on functional shoulder biomechanics in women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

The functional implications of reconstructing the breast mound with a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap or placing an implant under the pectoralis major (PM) muscle is complicated by potential comorbidities from disinserting these muscles and adjuvant radiotherapy. We utilized novel robot-assisted measures of shoulder stiffness and strength to dissociate how breast reconstruction choice and inclusion of radiation therapy impact shoulder morbidity in post-mastectomy reconstruction patients.

METHODS

Shoulder strength and stiffness were collected from 10 irradiated LD flap breast reconstruction patients, 14 two-stage subpectoral implant reconstruction patients (subpectoral), and 10 irradiated deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap patients an average of 659 days post-reconstruction. Univariate ANOVAs examined surgical group differences in strength and stiffness.

RESULTS

There were main effects of surgical group on vertical adduction, vertical abduction, and internal rotation strength. The LD flap group was significantly weaker than the subpectoral group in all measures and significantly weaker than the DIEP group during vertical adduction. There was also a main effect of surgical group on vertical adduction stiffness, where the LD group exhibited significantly reduced stiffness while producing vertical adduction torque. No significant differences between the subpectoral and DIEP groups existed for any measure of shoulder strength or stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Disinsertion of the LD, not the disinsertion of the PM or radiotherapy, contributes to strength deficits following LD flap breast reconstructions. The combined disinsertion of the PM and LD compromises shoulder stability in the vertical plane. Shoulder function should be a focal point of the surgical decision-making process and postsurgical care.

Patient Reported Quality of Life and Aesthetic Satisfaction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Immediate Partial and Delayed Total Breast Reconstruction

Objectives:

Latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap can be used as an alternative to abdominal flaps for autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of the present study was to present the results of the quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction of breast reconstruction surgeries with LD flap and implants.

Methods:

Sixteen patients who had undergone LD flap breast reconstruction were included in the study. Patients were surveyed on the quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction 12 months following breast reconstruction.

Results:

There were no major complications observed following surgeries. All of the patients included in the study were highly satisfied with the final aesthetic results. There was no difference in satisfaction rate between partial versus total reconstructions and between reconstruction with or without implant.

Conclusion:

LD flaps can be a good alternative to abdominal flaps for autologous breast reconstruction for both partial and total breast reconstruction and can achieve similar aesthetic results.

The Functional Impact of Breast Reconstruction: An Overview and Update

As rates of bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction rise, the aesthetic and psychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction are increasingly well understood. However, an understanding of functional outcome and its optimization is still lacking. This endpoint is critical to maximizing postoperative quality of life. All reconstructive modalities have possible functional consequences. Studies demonstrate that implant-based reconstruction impacts subjective movement, but patients’ day-to-day function may not be objectively hindered despite self-reported disability. For latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction, patients also report some dysfunction at the donor site, but this does not seem to result in significant, long-lasting limitation of daily activity. Athletic and other vigorous activities are most affected. For abdominal free flaps, patient perception of postoperative disability is generally not significant, despite the varying degrees of objective disadvantage that have been identified depending on the extent of rectus muscle sacrifice. With these functional repercussions in mind, a broader perspective on the attempt to ensure minimal functional decline after breast surgery should focus not only on surgical technique but also on postoperative rehabilitation. Early directed physical therapy may be an instrumental element in facilitating return to baseline function. With the patient’s optimal quality of life as an overarching objective, a multifaceted approach to functional preservation may be the answer to this continued challenge. This review will examine these issues in depth in an effort to better understand postoperative functional outcomes with a focus on the younger, active breast reconstruction patient.

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the distal third of the arm using a muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap

Use of a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap has been widely described for upper limb reconstruction. However, donor site sequelae have led to the development of muscle-sparing techniques for the LD flap. We present the technical principles of a muscle-sparing LD flap and its use as a pedicled flap to reconstruct the distal third of the arm.

Sports Injuries to the Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major

Injuries to the latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, while rare, are debilitating. They are seen in a variety of sports, although disproportionately in the throwing shoulder of baseball pitchers. There have been 25 case reports and 2 case series published on the nonoperative and operative management of these injuries. Latissimus dorsi and teres major muscle anatomy, function, and common injury patterns are well described in these case reports. Also well detailed are the typical patient presentation, physical examination, and imaging findings. Latissimus dorsi tendon injuries are sometimes treated operatively, whereas latissimus dorsi muscle belly or isolated teres major injuries are treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative treatment includes oral anti-inflammatories and shoulder physical therapy. A number of surgical patient positions, approaches, and fixation constructs have been described, although 2 techniques of positioning and surgical approach are used most commonly. Fixation is most often performed with suture anchors. Return-to-play timing, shoulder strength, and healing on magnetic resonance imaging are variable. No standard of care currently exists for the treatment of latissimus dorsi or teres major injuries. If treating a patient with an injury to either muscle, the clinician should be familiar with accumulated experience as reported in the published literature.

Long-term prospective assessment of shoulder function after breast reconstruction involving a latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer and postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Several investigators have evaluated the impaired function of the shoulder after removal of the latissimus dorsi muscle for breast reconstruction. However, a few investigators have studied whether including radiotherapy has a negative effect on functional recovery of the shoulder by a long-term follow-up after surgery. In this study, we compared objective measurements of shoulder function preoperatively and postoperatively for 3 years after latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flap transfer and postoperative radiotherapy (PRT).

METHODS

Eighteen patients who underwent unilateral transfer of a pedicled LDM flap and PRT within 2 months of breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in this study. Range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength in exhaustive shoulder movements were measured before surgery, and at 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 3 years.

RESULTS

The results of ROM measurements at 3months postsurgery showed significant decreases in both flexion and abduction by 7.1 and 9.2 % and at 3 years postsurgery by 4.7 and 5.7 %. The muscle strength measurements at 3 months postsurgery showed statistically significant decreases both in adduction and in the 2nd medial rotation by 30.7 and 25.9 % and at 3 years postsurgery by 36.4 and 20.4 %. A significant improvement in these impairments was not observed for 3 years after surgery compared with that at 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

A combination of the LDM flap procedure and PRT could be associated with a higher incidence of tissue adhesions in both flexion and abduction and muscle deficit both in adduction and in the 2nd medial rotation.

A Prospective Analysis on Functional Outcomes Following Extended Latissimus Dorsi Flap Breast Reconstruction

Background:

To prospectively assess the functional effect of using the extended latissimus dorsi flap in immediate breast reconstructions.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 15 consecutive patients undergoing breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flap participated. Shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, lateral flexion of the torso, and position of scapula were measured pre-operatively and 1, 6, and 12 months post-operatively, in addition to donor-site post-operative complications.

Results:

At 12 months post-operatively, patients had achieved full range of shoulder movement, when compared to pre-operative values. Lateral flexion of the torso was, however, significantly reduced bilaterally at 1 and 6 months post-operatively (p = 0.001, p = 0.01) and to the not operated side at 12 months (p = 0.01). Muscle strength in flexion–extension–internal rotation was significantly (p = 0.01) reduced on the operated side 12 months post-operatively. All but one patient had numbness around the donor-site scar 12 months post-operatively, 33% had slight adhesions but all were pain free.

Conclusion:

Although invariably, patients having extended latissimus dorsi flap may expect to achieve full range of shoulder movement, they should be informed of possible functional consequences and the time and effort it takes to recover. Further research is needed to investigate the potential long-term functional implications that extended latissimus dorsi flap may have as a result of changes in the lateral flexion of the torso and scapula position.

Effect of latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction on the strength profile of the upper extremity

OBJECTIVE

Dissection of the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap may have a distinct impact on upper extremity function and strength. To date, insufficient differentiation has been made between loss of muscular strength and shoulder function by dissection of the LD muscle per se and loss of function resulting from all excisional surgery, radiation therapy, and reconstructive procedures at the donor site and the recipient site that may have been combined near the shoulder region.

METHODS

This study determines the long-term effect of the LD breast reconstruction on the strength profiles of the upper extremity by measuring the isometric torque strength both in seven synergistic- and two contra-movement directions. The Biodex System 3 Pro (Biodex Medical Systems, New York, NY) was used in 12 patients at a mean of 3.5 years after surgery, and in 20 matched controls. Because loss of LD muscle may not result in significant impairment of activities of daily live (ADL) even in cases where objective measurements are decreased, this study simultaneously assessed the subjective function by use of the standardised Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

This study observed a significant long-term loss of 8.8 Nm or 19% LD torque strength in synergistic movement directions after transplantation of the LD muscle. This loss correlated significantly with an increase of the mean DASH score among the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Because no significant loss of contra-movement torque strength was observed, it was concluded that the loss of synergistic torque strength appears to result from the loss of LD function per se.

Shoulder function after breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap: A prospective cohort study - Combining DASH score and objective evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is well-known in breast reconstruction especially in previously-irradiated patients, in order to have a low capsular contraction rate whenever an implant is associated. The aim of this study is to closely evaluate the effect of LD flap harvesting on shoulder function as well as specific movements related to the LD, both objectively and subjectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 86 patients who underwent pedicled LD muscle flap for breast reconstruction at the European Institute of Oncology between September 1995 until March 2011.

RESULTS

The majority of patients showed a joint recovery superior to 80% in all joint movements examined. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire revealed minimal disability similar to normal range and furthermore it appears to decrease in all sports and in particular in those who practice with LD involvement.

CONCLUSION

Focusing this data, a growing, "disability-free" percentage changes depending on whether or not the patients have practiced sport could be appreciate.

Change of paradigm in thoracic radionecrosis management

Classically, muscular or omental flaps are the gold standard in the management of thoracic defects following radionecrosis debridement. Their vascular supply and antibacterial property was supposed to enhance healing compared with cutaneous flaps. The evolution of reconstructive surgery allowed us to challenge this dogma. Therefore, we present five consecutive cases of thoracic radionecrosis reconstructed with cutaneous perforator flaps. In four patients, we performed a free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and one patient had a thoracodorsal perforator (TDAP) flap. Median time healing was 22.6 days with satisfactory cutaneous covering and good aesthetic results. There were no flap necrosis, no donor site complications. We believe that perforator flaps are a new alternative, reliable and elegant option that questions the dogma of muscular flaps in the management of thoracic radionecrosis.

Post-operative pulmonary and shoulder function after sternal reconstruction for patients with chest wall sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Sternal resection is occasionally required for patients with malignant tumors, particularly sarcomas, in the sternal region. Few reports have described post-operative respiratory and shoulder function after sternal resection for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Eight consecutive patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas requiring sternal resection were the focus of this study. Chest wall was reconstructed with a non-rigid or semi-rigid prosthesis combined, in most cases, with soft tissue flap reconstruction. Clinical outcomes investigated included complications, shoulder function, evaluated with Musculoskeletal Tumor Society-International Symposium of Limb Salvage system, and respiratory function, evaluated by use of spirometry.

RESULTS

The anterior chest wall was reconstructed with non-rigid strings for 3 patients and with polypropylene mesh for 5. There were no severe post-operative complications, for example surgical site infection or pneumonia. All 3 patients with non-rigid reconstruction experienced paradoxical breathing, whereas none with polypropylene mesh did so. Post-operatively, FEV(1)% was unchanged but %VC was significantly reduced (p = 0.01), irrespective of the reconstruction method used (strings or polypropylene mesh). Shoulder function was not impaired.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing sternal resection, post-operative shoulder function was excellent. Pulmonary function was slightly restricted, but not sufficiently so to interfere with the activities of daily living (ADL). Paradoxical breathing is a slight concern for non-rigid reconstruction.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer for a deficit of both active elevation and external rotation. Results of 15 cases with a minimum of 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of reverse shoulder replacements performed in association with a latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer in cases of irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears including the teres minor tendon. Our hypothesis was that the tendon transfers would improve the clinical results of arthroplasty by restoring active external rotation.

METHODS

Fifteen procedures in 14 patients were performed through a single deltopectoral approach. Both tendons were fixed to the proximal anterolateral aspect of the humeral metaphysis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 67.5 years (range 53 to 82 years). All had severe cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada stage 3 or 4) and severe atrophy or fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and teres minor on preoperative MRI or CT-scan (Goutallier stage 3 or 4). Preoperative and postoperative functions were assessed by Constant score. Satisfaction was assessed by the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). At follow up, radiographs were examined for radiolucent lines, osteolysis and scapular notching.

RESULTS

The average follow-up after surgery was 33.2 months (range 24 to 60 months). The mean absolute Constant score improved significantly (P=10(-5)) from 23.7±11.5 preoperatively to 61.1±11.9 postoperatively. Forward flexion and external rotation with the arm at the side improved significantly, respectively from 64.7±35.6° preoperatively to 126±34.4° postoperatively (P<10(-5)) and from -8.7±21.3° to 27.3±12.2° (P<0.0005). Internal rotation was not affected. The mean SST improved from 1.9±1.6 points preoperatively to 7.6±1.8 points postoperatively (P<0.0005). Twelve patients were very satisfied or satisfied (including one with a bilateral procedure) and 2 were unsatisfied with the final result. At final follow-up, radiographs showed no radiolucent lines around the implants nor scapular notching.

CONCLUSION

The combined procedure helped restoration of active elevation and external rotation in cases of massive cuff tear including the teres minor tendon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Complications, pitfalls, and outcomes after chest wall reconstruction

Chest wall and mediastinal wounds may be life-threatening. Although modern reconstruction methods with various muscle flaps have reduced morbidity and mortality, chest wall reconstruction presents unique challenges. Major categories of adverse outcomes include (1) persistent infection; (2) interference with respiratory mechanics; (3) functional deficits of the shoulder; and (4) hernias. Persistent infection may be resolved by providing coverage via muscle or omental flap, performing thorough debridement, filling the "dead space" with adequate volume, buttressing repair of visceral fistulae, and covering exposed prosthetic material with vascularized flaps. Potential deficits in respiratory mechanics and shoulder function may be avoided by stabilizing the chest wall skeleton and decreasing donor muscle functional loss. Hernias may be minimized by maintaining visceral "right of domain" to the chest and abdominal cavities. Complex reconstructive cases represent an intricate interplay of physiology, structural protection, and aesthetic considerations and require integration of several management principles.

Functional neuro-vascularized muscle transfer for oncological reconstruction of extremity sarcoma

The strategy of limb salvage following surgical resection of skeletal tumor has led to an increased demand for more complex reconstructive options in order to achieve better functional outcomes. Functional neuro-vascularized muscle transfer (FMT) is a beneficial tool for restoring joint movement involving the reconstruction of "movement" in the affected extremity. Until now, however, the clinical application of FMT was mainly limited to trauma cases and to date, very few studies have focused on musculoskeletal oncology. In this study, we reviewed patients who underwent wide resection for extremity sarcoma and functional reconstruction using FMT and discussed the advantages, indications and complications of the procedure.

Fasciocutaneous flaps of the subscapular artery axis to reconstruct large extremity defects

INTRODUCTION

The scapular, parascapular and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps represent fasciocutaneous flaps derived from the subscapular artery axis. These flaps can be harvested individually or combined as conjoint flaps, tailored to reconstruct a wide variety of defects in the extremities. ANALYSIS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction at North Bristol trust with a fasciocutaneous flap of the subscapular axis from April 2006 until April 2010 were included. This cohort of 45 patients was retrospectively analysed. The Enneking score for return of limb function was used as an outcome measure after reconstruction. Donor-site morbidity analysis was carried out prospectively using Oxford Medical Research Council (MRC) score, Vancouver Scar Scale and disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients had extremity reconstruction using flaps of the subscapular artery axis following severe limb trauma, often comprising open tibial fractures. A total of 42 patients had lower limb injuries and three had upper limb injuries. All flaps survived. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9.3, the mean Enneking score was 27 at 12 months mean follow-up. In the nine conjoint flaps, the mean area of tissue resurfaced was 257 cm2.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case series of fasciocutaneous flaps of the subscapular artery axis, we establish that these flaps are robust and versatile. They replace 'like-with-like' and have good patient satisfaction. The donor site can be closed primarily, is discrete and has minimal donor morbidity. The conjoint flaps can be used for reconstruction of very large defects without the need to sacrifice functionally important muscle.

[Functional impairment and its impact on sporting activities after latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction]

AIM OF THE STUDY

The latissimus dorsi flap is commonly used for breast reconstruction. Donor site morbidity is the major side effect of this surgery. However, if the impact of the latissimus dorsi muscle removal on daily living activities has already been studied, few data are available about its consequences on sporting activities.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Our retrospective monocentric study reviewed 75 consecutive female patients who underwent latissimus dorsi muscle transfer for breast reconstruction with a mean follow-up of 32.4 months. Patients had to answer a questionnaire per phone about their sporting, daily living and working activities before and after surgery. If they felt any changes after surgery, the type of limitation was detailed (pain, strength, endurance).

RESULTS

We showed a reduction in sporting activities for 43% patients practising a sport using the upper limb compared to 19% for them using the lower limb (P<0.05%). Eighty-three percent of the patients felt restricted for at less one activity of daily living. 5.2% had to adapt their working conditions after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in sporting activities using the upper limb after surgery suggests a negative impact of the surgery. However, other factors than the latissimus dorsi muscle removal might contribute to this reduction.

Current indications for and comparative analysis of three different types of latissimus dorsi flaps

BACKGROUND

Free tissue transfer with lower abdominal flaps for autologous breast reconstruction is not suitable for all patients. The latissimus dorsi (LD) musculocutaneous flap is an alternative, effective method for both immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

The authors assess their experience with LD flaps for breast reconstruction, including indications for patient selection, donor site choice, aesthetic outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Charts for all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with one of three types of LD myocutaneous flaps during a three-year period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients (n = 82) were divided into three groups: (1) 35 patients received a standard LD myocutaneous flap with implant, (2) 18 patients underwent a muscle sparing LD flap procedure with implant, and (3) 29 patients had an autologous LD flap. A questionnaire was administered to assess flap and donor site complications, aesthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and shoulder function.

RESULTS

Flap complications occurred in 13 patients (15%). Donor site complications occurred in 24 patients (28%), mostly consisting of back seroma with the autologous LD flap. There was no significant difference in shoulder range of motion or muscle strength between the operated and unoperated sides. Patient satisfaction was high in all three study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LD is a safe, versatile, and reproducible technique for breast reconstruction. The procedure benefits from ease of flap harvesting and setting and may provide satisfactory results in diverse patients, including those for whom an abdominal flap is neither indicated nor feasible. .

Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap Harvesting May Affect the Shoulder Joint in Long Run

Background:

The latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle or myocutaneous flap is one of the most commonly used flaps and is believed to result in minimal donor-side morbidity. The impact on shoulder function from LD removal is important due to the common nature of this procedure. Previous studies have been performed after relatively short follow-up time and mostly after breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate shoulder function years after latissimus dorsi muscle free flap operation.

Methods:

Between 1998 and 2004, eight patients who underwent LD-free flap for lower limb (7) or head and neck (1) soft tissue reconstruction were enrolled in this study. Scar, shoulder pain, function, mobility, stability and strength were evaluated and measured by using the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ), the Scar Evaluation Scale (SES) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) form, goniometer and isokinetic tests. Measurements of the operated sides were compared to the non-operated sides.

Results:

Mean age was 54 ± 21 years and mean follow-up was 92.5 ± 36 months after surgery. Mean PSAQ was 73 (65%), mean SES score was 2 ± 1. When comparing the operated sides to the unoperated sides, ASES score was significantly lower in the operated side (76 versus 93, p = 0.008); The range of motion in active and passive endorotation, active extrarotation and active forward elevation were significantly reduced after surgery. Operated side revealed a significant joint instability (3.6 versus 1.2, p = 0.007) using the ASES form. Isokinetic tests revealed that only intra-rotation strength was significantly reduced (35.74 Newton-metre versus 42.7 Newton-metre, p = 0.03) in the operated side.

Conclusion:

LD harvesting can affect the function of the shoulder joint in the long run. Reduced mobility, instability and weakness could be obtained with objective measurements. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size, internal controls and retrospective nature of this study.

Shoulder and upper arm muscle architecture

PURPOSE

To examine the architecture of the shoulder and upper arm muscles and generate data that could serve as a guide for comparison, compatibility, and relative performance among these muscles for use in transfer.

METHOD

Eleven shoulder and arm muscles were dissected bilaterally in 5 fresh cadavers. Of these 110 potentially available muscles, 107 were suitable for evaluation and were grouped according to similarities in architecture. Resting muscle length, required excursion, muscle fiber length, pennation angle, and mass were determined. Physiologic cross-sectional area (PCSA) was then calculated from these parameters using a standard formula.

RESULTS

Based on the gross appearance of muscle fiber orientation, the 11 muscles were subdivided into 3 groups. Required excursion was found to be less than fiber length in all muscles except for the teres major and middle deltoid with abduction. The middle deltoid muscle was found to have a short fiber length, complex multipennate structure, and high PCSA. Comparison showed the biceps and posterior deltoid to have fiber lengths greater than any portion of the triceps; however, neither demonstrated architectural features that would generate the force (represented by PCSA) determined for the combined triceps.

CONCLUSIONS

Data presented in this study offer the opportunity for direct comparison of architectural features of select shoulder and arm musculature.

Transfer of latissimus dorsi muscle for the functional reconstruction of quadriceps femoris muscle following oncological resection of sarcoma in the thigh

Wide resection of tumours in the anterior compartment of the thigh frequently requires en bloc removal of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Such resection can result in significantly decreased muscle power of knee extension. Functional muscle transfer is a beneficial tool for the reconstruction process. Until now, however, there have been few reports on the outcome of quadriceps muscle reconstruction using free innervated muscle transfer. We reviewed 14 patients (seven women and seven men, mean age 53 years). The extent of tumour invasion required resection of the entire quadriceps in four cases, of three heads in six cases and of two heads in the remaining four cases. Local recurrence occurred in one patient only, and there were no major complications. In the four patients with entire resection of the quadriceps, the postoperative muscle manual test (MMT) result was 0-1 (mean, 0.5), but this recovered to between 2 and 3 (mean 2.3) after a mean follow-up of 70 months. In the six cases with resection of three heads, the MMT test result was 2 and active knee extension recovered almost fully. Transfer of free, functional latissimus dorsi muscle is best indicated for cases in which the entire quadriceps or three heads are resected. Active knee extension can be expected to improve to an MMT score of 2 after reinnervation of the transferred muscle. Microsurgical reconstruction following resection of soft-tissue sarcoma provides adequate functional and coverage reconstruction, together with better local control by allowing wider surgical margins.

Shoulder function after latissimus dorsi transfer in breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer in the case of breast reconstruction remains frequently used because this muscle provides a good size source of tissue in reconstructive surgery. Given that, the consequences of the LD removal on shoulder function and the actual loss of maximal strength developed must be investigated.

METHODS

Twenty women (50 ± 7.5 years old) were evaluated before surgery, 3 and 6 months after an unilateral transfer of a pedicle flap of LD muscle used for breast reconstruction. Women performed a bilateral shoulder isokinetic assessment [for the internal rotators (IRs) and external rotators and for the abductor and adductor (ADD) muscles] allowing the establishment of bilateral muscular deficit status and the study of agonist/antagonist muscle ratios. The algofunctional and clinical status of the shoulders was analysed by the means of Constant score and specific shoulder clinical tests. The women did not perform any specific strengthening of muscle shoulder after surgery.

RESULTS

The isokinetic assessment showed a muscle weakness 3 and 6 months after LD transfer, mainly on the ADDs (33 ± 9% at 6 months) and on the IRs (16 ± 11% at 6 months). The Constant score significantly decreased after surgery on the operated shoulder. Women with a Constant score impairment showed pain during specific shoulder clinical tests. We also found a correlation between Constant score impairment and internal rotators weakness or rotator muscle imbalance.

CONCLUSION

Given those results, we could advocate a specific shoulder strengthening after LD transfer, focused mainly on the IRs and ADDs.

Chest reconstruction: I. Anterior and anterolateral chest wall and wounds affecting respiratory function

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the indications for chest wall reconstruction. 2. Understand the function of the chest wall and implications for both reconstruction and the chest wall itself when components are missing or used for reconstruction. 3. List the reconstructive requirements of chest wall wounds. 4. Identify flaps for regional reconstruction of the chest wall. 5. Describe the role of microvascular surgery in chest wall reconstruction.

BACKGROUND

Chest wall and mediastinum wounds may be life-threatening. They interfere with respiratory mechanics and may also be contaminated with exposed vital structures. Consideration is given to flap choice to restore function, resolve infection, and maintain suitable aesthetics.

METHODS

Literature search as well as the authors' personal experience enabled preparation of this article.

RESULTS

Where necessary, skeletal integrity must be restored, generally with prosthetic material, and then covered with well-vascularized soft tissue. "Living tissue" is required to help combat infection, buttress visceral repairs, and fill dead space. Soft-tissue deficiency must occasionally be augmented with large distant microvascular flaps.

CONCLUSION

Flap reconstruction has reduced morbidity and mortality of these complex problems without undue donor-site impairment of respiratory and upper extremity function.

Quadriceps muscle reconstruction with free functioning latissimus dorsi muscle flap after oncological resection

INTRODUCTION

The concept of limb salvage led to increased demand for more complex and sophisticated reconstructive options to achieve better functional and cosmetic outcome. Reconstruction of the total or partial loss of quadriceps muscle after soft tissue sarcomas excision with free functioning latissimus dorsi muscle transfer had become more popular in the last years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 1993 and October 2004, 11 patients with average age 45.5 years underwent excision of quadriceps muscle followed by simultaneous reconstruction with free functioning latissimus dorsi muscle. There were six men and five women. The tumors were high grade in 90.9% of patients and were >10 cm in 81.8% of patients. The tumor extension required the resection of the entire quadriceps in four cases, of three heads in six cases, of only two heads in one case.

RESULTS

The average follow up was 69 months. The average time of recovery of the contractile activity of the muscle was 8.3 months after operation. The musculoskeletal tumor society rating score (MTSRS) scored excellent or good in 73% of patients. Three patients (27.3%) died of metastatic disease. Local recurrence occurred in one patient (9.1%). Limb salvage was achieved in all the patients (100%).

CONCLUSION

This method of reconstruction is a reliable technique not only to fill the defect resulting from oncological resection but also to provide better function. Microsurgical reconstruction of soft tissue sarcoma helps to expand the indications of limb salvage by allowing better local control and achieving adequate function and coverage.

The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap with a transversely oriented skin paddle presents distinct advantages in breast reconstruction, including reduced donor-site morbidity and greater freedom of orientation of the skin paddle. This study reports the anatomical basis, surgical technique, complications, and aesthetic and functional outcomes following use of this flap for breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a pedicled muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap was conducted. Indications for surgery included breast reconstruction following mastectomy, lumpectomy, and irradiation, and for correction of implant-related complications. Case-note review was performed, as was a functional evaluation consisting of a patient questionnaire, a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand form, postoperative range-of-motion analysis, and instrumented strength testing comparing the operated and nonoperated sides. Aesthetic evaluation of the donor site was conducted by all patients. An anatomical study of 15 flaps harvested from fresh cadavers was performed to determine the location of the bifurcation of the thoracodorsal artery and the course of its descending branch.

RESULTS

Twenty-four descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flaps were harvested. All donor sites were closed primarily, with skin paddle sizes ranging up to 25 x 12 cm. There was one case of minor flap tip necrosis and no instances of seroma. There was no statistically significant difference in strength or range of motion of the shoulder joint when comparing the operated to the nonoperated side. Two patients reported minor functional impact following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicled descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap with a transversely orientated skin paddle results in minimal functional deficit of the donor site, absence of seroma, large freedom of orientation of the skin paddle, low rate of flap complications, and a cosmetically acceptable scar.

A prospective assessment of shoulder morbidity and recovery time scales following latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The impact on shoulder function from removal of the latissimus dorsi muscle in breast reconstruction is important because of the common nature of this operation. Informed consent requires us to discuss the impact of surgery and likely recovery times. The literature already supports the absence of long-term effects from this procedure. However, all studies and subsequent reviews are based on retrospective studies, thus making it impossible to assess recovery time scales compared with preoperative values. In this prospective study, the authors set out to define the impact on shoulder function and, importantly, to assess recovery time scales compared with preoperative values.

METHODS

Shoulder range of motion, strength, function, and pain were assessed prospectively in 22 subjects who had latissimus dorsi muscle flap breast reconstruction. Assessments were carried out preoperatively and then at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using standardized objective assessments.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate no significant loss of range of motion, strength, function, or pain at 1 year. However, strength, disability scores, neural glide, and discomfort were still abnormal at 6 months and then normalized at 1 year. It was noted that the extended latissimus dorsi flap tended to have poorer scores and recovery compared with a latissimus dorsi flap and implant.

CONCLUSION

The authors believe this information to be important to the patient, therapist, and surgeon in the assessment of postoperative recovery from this procedure.

Shoulder function after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap

BACKGROUND

Converting the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap has been reported for breast reconstruction. The goal of this article is to evaluate the donor site after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in patients who underwent breast surgery and to show the advantages of sparing the latissimus dorsi muscle on the function of the shoulder.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2004, 22 patients who had a partial breast reconstruction using a pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flap were enrolled in a functional study to evaluate shoulder function postoperatively. Latissimus dorsi muscle strength, shoulder mobility, and latissimus dorsi thickness were measured by using the MicroFet2, a goniometer, and ultrasound examination, respectively. The measurements of the operated and contralateral (unoperated) sides were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

When comparing the operated sides to the unoperated sides, latissimus dorsi strength seemed to be maintained after surgery. Shoulder mobility was also similar in all movements, but both active and passive forward elevation and passive abduction were reduced significantly after surgery, and latissimus dorsi thickness was not affected by harvesting the thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps. No seroma formation was found in any of the donor sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-site morbidity after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap was reduced to a minimum. Therefore, perforator flaps should be considered in reconstruction whenever adequate perforators can be identified and safely dissected.