The interaction of glutathione with 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard, studied by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Drug metabolising enzyme polymorphisms and chemotherapy-related ovarian failure in young breast cancer survivors

Cyclophosphamide is associated with chemotherapy-related ovarian failure (CROF) in breast cancer survivors, however little is known about predicting individual risks. We sought to identify genetic alleles as biomarkers for risk of CROF after cyclophosphamide treatment. One hundred fifteen premenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer were genotyped for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in cyclophosphamide activation (CYP3A4 and CYP2C19) and detoxification (GSTP1 and GSTA1). Patients prospectively completed menstrual diaries. With median follow up of 808 days, 28% experienced CROF. Survivors homozygous for the GSTA1 minor allele had lower hazards for developing CROF (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05-0.94], p=.04), while survivors homozygous for the CYP2C19 minor allele had higher hazards for developing CROF (HR 4.5 [95% CI 1.5-13.4], p=.007) compared to patients with at least one major allele. In separate multivariable models adjusting for age and tamoxifen use, the associations were no longer statistically significant (GSTA1 HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.06-1.0], p=.05; CYP2C19 HR 2.5 [0.8-7.6], p=.11). CYP3A4 and GSTP1 SNPs were not significantly related to CROF. In younger breast cancer survivors undergoing cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, genetic variation in CYP2C19 and GSTA1 merits further study to determine its relationship with CROF.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Young breast cancer survivors face important potential implications of chemotherapy-related ovarian failure (CROF). Little is known about individual risk for CROF. Cyclophosphamide, a particularly gonadotoxic drug commonly used in breast cancer treatment, is metabolised by various cytochrome p450 enzymes. Studies have shown genetic variation in p450 enzymes is associated with differential clinical outcomes after cyclophosphamide treatment: breast cancer patients homozygous for GSTA1 minor allele had improved overall survival; lupus patients homozygous for CYP2C19 minor allele had increased risk for CROF; and CYP3A4*1B I was associated with decreased risk for CROF.What do the results of this study add? We show a surprising opposite trend for the risk of CROF in breast cancer patients with GSTA1 and CYP2C19 variants, while we did not show a significant risk for genetic variation in CYP3A4 (which had previously been shown to have a protective effect) or GSTP1.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study shows the complexity of genetic variation in predicting outcomes to treatment. We advocate for future replicative studies to potentially validate GSTA1 and CYP2C19 and definitively negate CYP3A4 and GSTP1 as biomarkers for risk of CROF after cyclophosphamide treatment. Understanding genetic variation in chemotherapy metabolism has the potential to individualise treatment regimens to maximise efficacy and minimise toxicity.

Pharmacogenomics in Pediatric Oncology: Review of Gene-Drug Associations for Clinical Use

During the 3rd congress of the European Society of Pharmacogenomics and Personalised Therapy (ESPT) in Budapest in 2015, a preliminary meeting was held aimed at establishing a pediatric individualized treatment in oncology and hematology committees. The main purpose was to facilitate the transfer and harmonization of pharmacogenetic testing from research into clinics, to bring together basic and translational research and to educate health professionals throughout Europe. The objective of this review was to provide the attendees of the meeting as well as the larger scientific community an insight into the compiled evidence regarding current pharmacogenomics knowledge in pediatric oncology. This preliminary evaluation will help steer the committee’s work and should give the reader an idea at which stage researchers and clinicians are, in terms of personalizing medicine for children with cancer. From the evidence presented here, future recommendations to achieve this goal will also be suggested.

Ovarian xenobiotic biotransformation enzymes are altered during phosphoramide mustard-induced ovotoxicity

The anti-neoplastic prodrug, cyclophosphamide, requires biotransformation to phosphoramide mustard (PM), which partitions to volatile chloroethylaziridine (CEZ). PM and CEZ are ovotoxicants, however their ovarian biotransformation remains ill-defined. This study investigated PM and CEZ metabolism mechanisms through the utilization of cultured postnatal day 4 (PND4) Fisher 344 (F344) rat ovaries exposed to vehicle control (1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) or PM (60μM) for 2 or 4 days. Quantification of mRNA levels via an RT(2) profiler PCR array and target-specific RT-PCR along with Western blotting found increased mRNA and protein levels of xenobiotic metabolism genes including microsomal epoxide hydrolase (Ephx1) and glutathione S-transferase isoform pi (Gstp). PND4 ovaries were treated with 1% DMSO, PM (60μM), cyclohexene oxide to inhibit EPHX1 (CHO; 2mM), or PM + CHO for 4 days. Lack of functional EPHX1 increased PM-induced ovotoxicity, suggesting a detoxification role for EPHX1. PND4 ovaries were also treated with 1% DMSO, PM (60μM), BSO (Glutathione (GSH) depletion; 100μM), GEE (GSH supplementation; 2.5mM), PM ± BSO, or PM ± GEE for 4 days. GSH supplementation prevented PM-induced follicle loss, whereas no impact of GSH depletion was observed. Lastly, the effect of ovarian GSH on CEZ liberation and ovotoxicity was evaluated. Both untreated and GEE-treated PND4 ovaries were plated adjacent to ovaries receiving PM + GEE or PM + BSO treatments. Less CEZ-induced ovotoxicity was observed with both GEE and BSO treatments indicating reduced CEZ liberation from PM. Collectively, this study supports ovarian biotransformation of PM, thereby influencing the ovotoxicity that ensues.

Impact of genetic polymorphisms on chemotherapy toxicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The efficacy of chemotherapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients has significantly increased in the last 20 years; as a result, the focus of research is slowly shifting from trying to increase survival rates to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity. At the present time, the cornerstone of therapy for ALL is still formed by a reduced number of drugs with a highly toxic profile. In recent years, a number of genetic polymorphisms have been identified that can play a significant role in modifying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs. The best example is that of the TPMT gene, whose genotyping is being incorporated to clinical practice in order to individualize doses of mercaptopurine. However, there are additional genes that are relevant for the metabolism, activity, and/or transport of other chemotherapy drugs that are widely use in ALL, such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, L-asparaginase, etoposide, cytarabine, or cytotoxic antibiotics. These genes can also be affected by genetic alterations that could therefore have clinical consequences. In this review we will discuss recent data on this field, with special focus on those polymorphisms that could be used in clinical practice to tailor chemotherapy for ALL in order to reduce the occurrence of serious adverse effects.

Oxazaphosphorine bioactivation and detoxification The role of xenobiotic receptors

Oxazaphosphorines, with the most representative members including cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and trofosfamide, constitute a class of alkylating agents that have a broad spectrum of anticancer activity against many malignant ailments including both solid tumors such as breast cancer and hematological malignancies such as leukemia and lymphoma. Most oxazaphosphorines are prodrugs that require hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes to generate active alkylating moieties before manifesting their chemotherapeutic effects. Meanwhile, oxazaphosphorines can also be transformed into non-therapeutic byproducts by various drug-metabolizing enzymes. Clinically, oxazaphosphorines are often administered in combination with other chemotherapeutics in adjuvant treatments. As such, the therapeutic efficacy, off-target toxicity, and unintentional drug-drug interactions of oxazaphosphorines have been long-lasting clinical concerns and heightened focuses of scientific literatures. Recent evidence suggests that xenobiotic receptors may play important roles in regulating the metabolism and clearance of oxazaphosphorines. Drugs as modulators of xenobiotic receptors can affect the therapeutic efficacy, cytotoxicity, and pharmacokinetics of coadministered oxazaphosphorines, providing a new molecular mechanism of drug-drug interactions. Here, we review current advances regarding the influence of xenobiotic receptors, particularly, the constitutive androstane receptor, the pregnane X receptor and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, on the bioactivation and detoxification of oxazaphosphorines, with a focus on cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide.

Drug focus: Pharmacogenetic studies related to cyclophosphamide-based therapy

Cyclophosphamide is a cornerstone in the treatment of many pediatric and adult malignancies, as well as in the treatment of refractory autoimmune conditions. Genetic factors are thought to play a role in the interindividual variation in both response and toxicities associated with cyclophosphamide-based therapies. This drug focus reviews the most compelling studies conducted on the pharmacogenetics of cyclophosphamide-based therapies. Broader pharmacogenomic studies are needed and may reveal additional factors important in susceptibility to toxicity and/or response to therapy.

Relationship of glutathione S-transferase genotypes with side-effects of pulsed cyclophosphamide therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

AIMS

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an established treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Cytotoxic CTX metabolites are mainly detoxified by multiple glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). However, data are lacking on the relationship between the short-term side-effects of CTX therapy and GST genotypes. In the present study, the effects of common GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genetic mutations on the severity of myelosuppression, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and infection incidences induced by pulsed CTX therapy were evaluated in patients SLE.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from peripheral leucocytes in patients with confirmed SLE diagnosis (n = 102). GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutations were analyzed by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-multiplex procedure, whereas the GSTP1 codon 105 polymorphism (Ile-->Val) was analyzed by a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrated that SLE patients carrying the genotypes with GSTP1 codon 105 mutation [GSTP1*-105I/V (heterozygote) and GSTP1*-105 V/V (homozygote)] had an increased risk of myelotoxicity when treated with pulsed high-dose CTX therapy (Odds ratio (OR) 5.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96, 12.76); especially in patients younger than 30 years (OR 7.50, 95% CI 2.14, 26.24), or in patients treated with a total CTX dose greater than 1.0 g (OR 12.88, 95% CI 3.16, 52.57). Similarly, patients with these genotypes (GSTP1*I/V and GSTP1*V/V) also had an increased risk of GI toxicity when treated with an initial pulsed high-dose CTX regimen (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.03, 10.79). However, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutations did not significantly alter the risks of these short-term side-effects of pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The GSTP1 codon 105 polymorphism, but not GSTM1 or GSTT1 null mutations, significantly increased the risks of short-term side-effects of pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients. Because of the lack of selective substrates for a GST enzyme phenotyping study, timely detection of this mutation on codon 105 may assist in optimizing pulsed high-dose CTX therapy in SLE patients.

Metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and epsilon. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.

ABCC2-Mediated Biliary Transport of 4-Glutathionylcyclophosphamide and Its Contribution to Elimination of 4-Hydroxycyclophosphamide in Rat

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients conditioned with cyclophosphamide (CY) and total body irradiation have substantially greater risk of nonrelapse mortality when plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of O-carboxyethylcyclophosphoramide mustard (CEPM) is high. The discovery was paradoxical because CEPM is a nontoxic elimination route of the protoxic CY metabolite hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCY). CY was administered to Wistar and TR- rats (a Wistar strain lacking functional ABCC2) at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg CY, respectively. After either dose, Wistar rats excreted 4-glutathionylcyclophosphamide (GSCY) abundantly in bile; GSCY was absent from bile of TR- rats. Liver AUC(GSCY) was 2- to 2.5-fold greater in TR- than Wistar rats after 100 and 200 mg/kg CY, respectively. Liver AUC(HCY) was 24-46% greater in TR- rats than in Wistar rats after the respective CY doses. Plasma AUC(CEPM) of TR- rats was approximately twice that of Wistar rats after 100 mg/kg, but did not differ between the two strains after 200 mg/kg. Conversely, plasma AUC(HCY) was not different after 100 mg/kg CY, but was 40% greater in TR- rats after 200 mg/kg. The dose dependence of plasma AUC(CEPM) and AUC(HCY) was explained by the concentrations of HCY attained and the in vitro K(m) of aldehyde dehydrogenase and inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogense in TR- rats. We conclude that GSCY is a substrate of ABCC2, and plasma AUC(CEPM) functions as a reporter of liver exposure to HCY and toxins formed from it when HCY concentration is below the K(m) of aldehyde dehydrogenase and the activity is not compromised.

Covalent binding to glutathione of the DNA-alkylating antitumor agent, S23906-1

The benzoacronycine derivative, S23906-1, was characterized recently as a novel potent antitumor agent through alkylation of the N2 position of guanines in DNA. We show here that its reactivity towards DNA can be modulated by glutathione (GSH). The formation of covalent adducts between GSH and S23906-1 was evidenced by EI-MS, and the use of different GSH derivatives, amino acids and dipeptides revealed that the cysteine thiol group is absolutely required for complex formation because glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and other S-blocked derivatives failed to react covalently with S23906-1. Gel shift assays and fluorescence measurements indicated that the binding of S23906-1 to DNA and to GSH are mutually exclusive. Binding of S23906-1 to an excess of GSH prevents DNA alkylation. Additional EI-MS measurements performed with the mixed diester, S28053-1, showed that the acetate leaving group at the C1 position is the main reactive site in the drug: a reaction scheme common to GSH and guanines is presented. At the cellular level, the presence of GSH slightly reduces the cytotoxic potential of S23906-1 towards KB-3-1 epidermoid carcinoma cells. The GSH-induced threefold reduction of the cytotoxicity of S23906-1 is attributed to the reduced formation of lethal drug-DNA covalent complexes in cells. Treatment of the cells with buthionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GSH biosynthesis, facilitates the formation of drug-DNA adducts and promotes the cytotoxic activity. This study identifies GSH as a reactant for the antitumor drug, S23906-1, and illustrates a pathway by which GSH may modulate the cellular sensitivity to this DNA alkylating agent. The results presented here, using GSH as a biological nucleophile, fully support our initial hypothesis that DNA alkylation is the major mechanism of action of the promising anticancer drug S23906-1.

Identification of new aqueous chemical degradation products of isophosphoramide mustard

NMR (31P, 1H and 13C) spectroscopy was used to study the products of the degradation of isophosphoramide mustard (IPM) in buffered solutions at pH ranging from 1 to 13. At pH < or = 1, the only degradation compounds detected were phosphate ion (Pi) and chloroethylammonium chloride (CEA-HCl), resulting from the breakdown of the two P-N bonds (pathway Ia). At pH 9.3 and 13, only the products of 1,3-cyclization of the N-chloroethyl group (monoaziridinylIPM (monoAzIPM) and a very low level of bisaziridinylIPM (bisAzIPM)) were found after approximately 15 h of reaction (pathway II). At intermediate pH, the two pathways coexist. At pH 3.5 and 5.0, the P-N bond hydrolysis is the major pathway, but two final phosphorylated products were detected, Pi which represented 67% (pH 3.5) and 17% (pH 5.0) of all the IPM phosphorylated degradation products after approximately 15 h of reaction, and phosphorylethanolamine (PEA) which represented 16% (pH 3.5) and 46% (pH 5.0) of the same sum. PEA formation can be explained by the 1,5-cyclization of a transient compound giving a 1,3,2-oxazaphospholidine intermediate whose P-N bond is exclusively cleaved in acidic medium. The presence of monohydroxyIPM (monoOHIPM) (whose percentage increases with pH from 5% (pH 3.5) to approximately 28% (pH 5.0) of all the IPM phosphorylated degradation compounds), probably coming from the alkylation by water of an aziridine/aziridinium intermediate, demonstrates the occurrence of pathway II. At pH 7.0 and 7.4, the pathway II is initiated first, leading to 1,3-cyclization(s), followed by water alkylation of the aziridines formed. The sequences are IPM 1-->monoAzIPM 5-->bisAzIPM 9; IPM 1-->monoAzIPM 5-->monoOHIPM 6-->monoAzIPM with a N-hydroxyethylchain (presumed structure) 7-->dihydroxyIPM 8. Nevertheless, PEA and Pi are the final products observed, which implies the P-N bond hydrolysis of products 5-9 as demonstrated by the presence in the medium of CEA, aziridine and ethanolamine.

Combined expression of multidrug resistance protein (MRP) and glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1) in MCF7 cells and high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of ethacrynic acid but not oxazaphosphorines or cisplatin

We tested the hypothesis that combined increased expression of human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1), an enzyme that catalyzes the conjugation with glutathione of several toxic electrophiles, and the glutathione-conjugate efflux pump, multidrug resistance protein (MRP), confers high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of anticancer and other drugs. To accomplish this, we developed MCF7 breast carcinoma cell derivatives that express high levels of GSTP1-1 and MRP, alone and in combination. Parental MCF7 cells, which express no GSTP1-1 and negligible MRP, served as control cells. We found that either MRP or GSTP1-1 alone conferred significant resistance to ethacrynic acid cytotoxicity. Moreover, combined expression of GSTP1-1 and MRP conferred a high level of resistance to ethacrynic acid that was greater than resistance conferred by either protein alone. Increased MRP was also associated with modest resistance to the oxazaphosphorine compounds mafosfamide, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. However, coordinated expression of GSTP1-1 with MRP failed to augment this modest resistance. Similarly, GSTP1-1 had no effect on the sensitivities to cisplatin of MCF7 cells regardless of MRP expression. These results establish that coordinated expression of MRP and GSTP1-1 can confer high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of some drugs, including ethacrynic acid, but that such resistance is variable and does not apply to all toxic drugs that can potentially form glutathione conjugates in either spontaneous or GSTP1-1-catalyzed reactions.

Biochemical toxicology of chemical teratogenesis

Although exposure during pregnancy to many drugs and environmental chemicals is known to cause in utero death of the embryo of fetus, or initiate birth defects (teratogenesis) in the surviving offspring, surprisingly, little is known about the underlying biochemical and molecular mechanisms, or the determinants of teratological susceptibility, particularly in humans. In vitro and in vivo studies based primarily on rodent models suggest that many potential embryotoxic xenobiotics are actually proteratogens that must be bioactivated by enzymes such as the cytochromes P450 and peroxidases such as prostaglandin H synthase to teratogenic reactive intermediary metabolites. These reactive intermediates generally are electrophiles or free radicals that bind covalently (irreversibly) to, or directly of indirectly oxidize, embryonic cellular macromolecules such as DNA, protein, and lipid, irreversibly altering cellular function. Target oxidation, known as oxidase stress, often appears to be mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radicals. The precise nature of the teratologically relevant molecular targets remains to be established, as do the relative conditions of the various types of macromolecular lesions. Teratological suseptibility appears to be determined in part by a balance among pathways of maternal xenobiotic elimination, embryonic xenobiotic bioactivation and detoxification of the xenobiotic reactive intermediate, direct and indirect pathways for the detoxification of ROS (cytoprotection), and repair of macromolecular lesions. Due largely to immature or otherwise compromised embryonic pathways for detoxification, Cytoprotection, and repair, the embryo is relatively susceptible to reactive intermediates, and teratogenesis via this mechanism can occur from exposure to therapeutic concentrations of drugs, or supposedly safe concentrations of environmental chemicals. Greater insight into the mechanisms involved in human reactive intermediate-mediated teratogenicity, and the determinants of individual teratological susceptibility, will be necessary to reduce the unwarranted embryonic attrition from xenobiotic exposure.