A pocket calculator program to fit first order kinetic curves

Methotrexate and gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate transport in CEM and CEM/MTX human leukemic lymphoblasts

In a continuing investigation of determinants of their 200-fold methotrexate resistance and their collateral sensitivity to gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate, the ability of CEM/MTX cells to transport the two drugs was analyzed and compared with that of CEM cells. The Km and Vmax values for the influx of methotrexate into CEM cells did not differ significantly from those of CEM/MTX cells, and this was the case for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate as well. Surface binding and influx rates were proportional to cell surface area, but differences in efflux rates and methotrexate uptake were too large to be explained on this basis. Neither methotrexate nor trimetrexate competed with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate influx in CEM cells. However, both drugs perturbed the gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate steady state in CEM cells, resulting in slightly less uptake than with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate alone. However, the major difference between the two cell types was in the methotrexate uptake plateau, which was much greater in the case of the parental cell line. A related observation was the more rapid efflux of methotrexate from CEM/MTX cells than from CEM cells. The poor uptake, the associated meager capacity to polyglutamylate methotrexate and the enhanced methotrexate efflux appear to be responsible for its decreased activity against CEM/MTX cells. Half-lives for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate efflux were the same in both cell lines, allowing the drug to accumulate to cytotoxic levels despite its inability to form polyglutamates.

Kinetic persistence of cruciform structures in reconstituted minichromosomes

Cruciforms persist in reconstituted minichromosomes, as revealed by cleavage with specific nucleases and hybridization with synthetic oligonucleotides. Relaxation by topoisomerase I suggests that cruciforms are located mainly on internucleosomal DNA and that their persistence on minichromosomes may be due to kinetic effects. The analysis of the kinetic behaviour of cruciforms in minichromosomes shows a definite velocity of reabsorption with respect to stable cruciforms in supercoiled naked DNA. An explanation based on suppression of the untwisting of linker DNA due to adjacent nucleosomes is proposed.