Lea's Shield, a new barrier contraceptive preliminary clinical evaluations three-day tolerance study

Lea's Shield®: colposcopic and microbiological testing during 8 weeks of use

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess the effects of Lea's Shield(R) plus nonoxynol-9 spermicide on signs and symptoms of female genital irritation and cervical and vaginal microflora during 8 weeks of use with intercourse and to analyze problems associated with the use of the device.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm study, participants were evaluated by pelvic examination, colposcopy and vaginal and cervical cultures.

RESULTS

About 13% of women (4/30) reported symptoms of irritation, and minor product-related colposcopic findings were seen in about one third (11/30). Although average colony counts for enterococcus, Escherichia coli and anaerobic gram-negative rods increased during product use, no clinical diagnoses of infection were made. Most users reported at least one problem using Lea's Shield.

CONCLUSION

Lea's Shield, when used for 8 weeks during intercourse, is associated with evidence of genital irritation in a minority of users and with changes in vaginal microflora that do not appear to correlate with clinical infections.

Evaluation of a contraceptive device with MR imaging

The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the positioning and to confirm the volume concept of the Lea's Shield diaphragm utilizing MR imaging. We evaluated the device in two women, one nulliparous and one multiparous. We were able to comprehensively evaluate the device in both patients and answer all questions regarding anatomical positioning and aspects pertaining to the morphology of the device relevant to its function. MRI may be effectively utilized to evaluate contraceptive devices and their relationship to adjacent anatomical structures. This may enhance the gynecologist's clinical assessment of its correct positioning and efficacy.

Lea's Shield: a phase I postcoital study of a new contraceptive barrier device

Lea's Shield is a new vaginal barrier contraceptive that may offer advantages over existing methods. It is made of silicone which is resistant to petroleum-based lubricants, does not absorb odors, and does not cause allergic reactions in users with latex sensitivity. It has an anterior loop for ease of insertion and removal and a one-way flutter valve. Its novel design has sufficient volume to fill the posterior fornix, which helps keep it in place and prevent sperm from entering the cervical os. This study evaluated with a standard postcoital test (PCT) the ability of the Lea's Shield used with spermicide or non-spermicidal lubricant to prevent sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus. Ten sterilized women underwent four PCT cycles: one cycle in which no contraceptive barrier was used (a baseline cycle) and 3 cycles in which one of the following was used: Lea's Shield with spermicide, or with non-spermicidal lubricant, or the contraceptive diaphragm used with spermicide. All volunteers demonstrated more than 5 progressively motile sperm per high power field in the cervical mucus after intercourse in the baseline cycle. No motile sperm were found in the cervical mucus in any cycle in which Lea's Shield or the diaphragm was used with spermicide. No motile sperm were found in cervical mucus in 9 of 10 cycles in which Lea's Shield was used without spermicide. Only two progressively motile sperm were present in the cervical mucus of one volunteer who used the shield with non-spermicidal lubricant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)