Hemodialysis and enzymatic cleavage of methotrexate in man

Extracorporeal Treatment for Methotrexate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

Methotrexate is used in the treatment of many malignancies, rheumatological diseases, and inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicity from use is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Rescue treatments include intravenous hydration, folinic acid, and, in some centers, glucarpidase. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) methods to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments in the management of methotrexate toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations (either "strong" or "weak/conditional") were graded according to the GRADE approach. A formal voting process using a modified Delphi method assessed the level of agreement between panelists on the final recommendations. A total of 92 articles met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic data were available on 90 patients (89 with impaired kidney function). Methotrexate was considered to be moderately dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis. Data were available for clinical analysis on 109 patients (high-dose methotrexate [>0.5 g/m²]: 91 patients; low-dose [≤0.5 g/m²]: 18). Overall mortality in these publications was 19.5% and 26.7% in those with high-dose and low-dose methotrexate-related toxicity, respectively. Although one observational study reported lower mortality in patients treated with glucarpidase compared with those treated with hemodialysis, there were important limitations in the study. For patients with severe methotrexate toxicity receiving standard care, the EXTRIP workgroup: (1) suggested against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is not administered; (2) recommended against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is administered; and (3) recommended against extracorporeal treatments instead of administering glucarpidase. The quality of evidence for these recommendations was very low. Rationales for these recommendations included: (1) extracorporeal treatments mainly remove drugs in the intravascular compartment, whereas methotrexate rapidly distributes into cells; (2) extracorporeal treatments remove folinic acid; (3) in rare cases where fast removal of methotrexate is required, glucarpidase will outperform any extracorporeal treatment; and (4) extracorporeal treatments do not appear to reduce the incidence and magnitude of methotrexate toxicity.

Half-dose glucarpidase as efficient rescue for toxic methotrexate levels in patients with acute kidney injury

Purpose

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-associated acute kidney injury with delayed MTX clearance has been linked to an excess in MTX-induced toxicities. Glucarpidase is a recombinant enzyme that rapidly hydrolyzes MTX into non-toxic metabolites. The recommended dose of glucarpidase is 50 U/kg, which has never been formally established in a dose finding study in humans. Few case reports, mostly in children, suggest that lower doses of glucarpidase might be equally effective in lowering MTX levels.

Methods

Seven patients with toxic MTX plasma concentrations following HDMTX therapy were treated with half-dose glucarpidase (mean 25 U/kg, range 17–32 U/kg). MTX levels were measured immunologically as well as by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Toxicities were assessed according to National Cancer Institute—Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.

Results

All patients experienced HDMTX-associated kidney injury (median increase in creatinine levels within 48 h after HDMTX initiation compared to baseline of 251%, range 80–455%) and showed toxic MTX plasma concentrations (range 3.1–182.4 µmol/L) before glucarpidase injection. The drug was administered 42–70 h after HDMTX initiation. Within one day after glucarpidase injection, MTX plasma concentrations decreased by ≥ 97.7% translating into levels of 0.02–2.03 µmol/L. MTX rebound was detected in plasma 42–73 h after glucarpidase initiation, but concentrations remained consistent at < 10 µmol/L.

Conclusion

Half-dose glucarpidase seems to be effective in lowering MTX levels to concentrations manageable with continued intensified folinic acid rescue.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04361-8.

Status of Hemodialysis of Drugs in 2002

Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining chronic therapy for individuals with end stage renal disease (ESRD). It is also frequently used for days to weeks for patients with acute renal failure who are awaiting the recovery of their kidneys from the acute toxic or traumatic event. Both populations of patients often require complex pharmacotherapeutic regimens, and it is not uncommon for them to be receiving 10 or more concomitant medications. Optimization of care for these patients is dependent on the selection of the most appropriate drug as well as dosage regimen design, which accounts for the influence of hemodialysis therapy on drug disposition. During the last 10 to 15 years there have been several significant changes in the prescribed dose of dialysis and the composition and size of dialyzers available for use. Furthermore, reuse of dialyzers, which was rare in the early 1980s, is now common; it is employed with over 70% of patients with ESRD. The new synthetic dialyzers, which are now used for over 60% of ESRD patients in the United States, are uniformly associated with dramatic improvements in drug removal; dialysis clearance increases of 3 to 10 fold were common for the few drugs evaluated. The influence of these changes in hemodialysis therapy on drug disposition are discussed in a quantitative fashion, and a conceptual framework for drug therapy regimen decision making is presented. For the majority of the drugs reviewed, however, there were no data in the literature regarding dialyzability with currently available dialyzers. The generation of dialyzability data for old and new pharmacotherapeutic agents with state of the art dialysis procedures is clearly needed.

Dosing of antirheumatic drugs in renal disease and dialysis

Many patients with rheumatic diseases have their management complicated by renal problems. Renal failure modifies the metabolism of many drugs, especially by retention. Questions often arise about the effects of renal failure on the handling of drugs commonly used in rheumatology. For which drugs must we be especially concerned about increased toxicity? Patients on chronic dialysis may also need a variety of drugs for rheumatic disease. How are our drugs dialyzed, and which of these can be safety used and how best to use them?Decisions about dosing of rheumatic drugs are often required for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency or on long-term dialysis, although many drugs have not been formally studied in these settings. Patients with renal insufficiency are excluded from most drug trials. Data for some of these drugs have to be extrapolated based on the information available about the pharmacokinetics of the drug.This review addresses dosing of commonly used drugs in rheumatology in patients with chronic renal insufficiency or failure. It is compiled from a MEDLINE search of papers dealing with renal handling of antirheumatic drugs and suggestions for dose adjustments for these drugs. Drugs reviewed include commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS), drugs used for treatment of gout, commonly used nonsteroidal antnflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and the newer COX-2 inhibitors.

Have advances in extracorporeal removal techniques changed the indications for their use in poisonings?

During the past 25 years, numerous changes have taken place in the use of hemodialysis as a therapeutic modality. Advances in technologies and a progression in our collective understanding of the pharmacokinetics of certain xenobiotics have resulted in alterations in the indications, effectiveness, and safety of hemodialysis. However, these changes have not necessarily been reflected in the current published data regarding treatment of intoxications. Reported clearance rates often reflect what was achievable in the 1970s and 1980s, and more recent reports are frequently lacking. Our goal in this review is to summarize the changes in hemodialysis and in other extracorporeal removal technologies and highlight the effects of these changes on the current indications for hemodialysis of the poisoned patient. Changes in dialysis performance that are reviewed in this article include the use of high-efficiency and high-flux dialysis membranes, improved hemodynamic stability because of ultrafiltration control, and the use of bicarbonate as a source of base. We review the indications for hemodialysis for removal of specific toxins, including vancomycin, methotrexate, carbamazepine, and valproic acid.

Drugs and pharmaceuticals: management of intoxication and antidotes

The treatment of patients poisoned with drugs and pharmaceuticals can be quite challenging. Diverse exposure circumstances, varied clinical presentations, unique patient-specific factors, and inconsistent diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure support, coupled with relatively few definitive antidotes, may complicate evaluation and management. The historical approach to poisoned patients (patient arousal, toxin elimination, and toxin identification) has given way to rigorous attention to the fundamental aspects of basic life support--airway management, oxygenation and ventilation, circulatory competence, thermoregulation, and substrate availability. Selected patients may benefit from methods to alter toxin pharmacokinetics to minimize systemic, target organ, or tissue compartment exposure (either by decreasing absorption or increasing elimination). These may include syrup of ipecac, orogastric lavage, activated single- or multi-dose charcoal, whole bowel irrigation, endoscopy and surgery, urinary alkalinization, saline diuresis, or extracorporeal methods (hemodialysis, charcoal hemoperfusion, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, and exchange transfusion). Pharmaceutical adjuncts and antidotes may be useful in toxicant-induced hyperthermias. In the context of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anticholinergic, anticonvulsant, antihyperglycemic, antimicrobial, antineoplastic, cardiovascular, opioid, or sedative-hypnotic agents overdose, N-acetylcysteine, physostigmine, L-carnitine, dextrose, octreotide, pyridoxine, dexrazoxane, leucovorin, glucarpidase, atropine, calcium, digoxin-specific antibody fragments, glucagon, high-dose insulin euglycemia therapy, lipid emulsion, magnesium, sodium bicarbonate, naloxone, and flumazenil are specifically reviewed. In summary, patients generally benefit from aggressive support of vital functions, careful history and physical examination, specific laboratory analyses, a thoughtful consideration of the risks and benefits of decontamination and enhanced elimination, and the use of specific antidotes where warranted. Data supporting antidotes effectiveness vary considerably. Clinicians are encouraged to utilize consultation with regional poison centers or those with toxicology training to assist with diagnosis, management, and administration of antidotes, particularly in unfamiliar cases.

Effect of charcoal hemoperfusion for removal of plasma methotrexate in a patient with acute renal failure

Strategies effective for accelerating methotrexate removal in delayed methotrexate excretion have not been universally accepted. The authors report a case of a 12-year-old girl with osteosarcoma who developed acute renal failure immediately after the first administration of high-dose methotrexate. Plasma methotrexate was effectively removed with repeated charcoal hemoperfusion in addition to plasma exchange and leucovorin rescue. Charcoal hemoperfusion was most effective for reducing plasma methotrexate with approximately 50% of methotrexate being reduced during each of the procedures. No rebound increase in MTX levels was observed. The patient received further therapy with other cancer drugs and has been well for 3.5 years.

High-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-induced renal dysfunction can be life threatening, because it delays methotrexate (MTX) excretion, thereby exacerbating the other toxicities of MTX. HDMTX-induced nephrotoxicity has been managed with high-dose leucovorin, dialysis-based methods of MTX removal, thymidine, and with the recombinant enzyme, carboxypeptidase-G2 (CPDG2), which cleaves MTX to inactive metabolites. The objectives of the current study were to estimate the current incidence of HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction in patients with osteosarcoma and to compare the efficacy and recovery of renal function for dialysis-based methods of MTX removal with treatment using CPDG2.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed for osteosarcoma trials, use of dialysis-based methods for MTX removal, and reports of MTX-induced nephrotoxicity, including information regarding recovery of renal function. Clinical trial databases of select osteosarcoma studies were reviewed. The efficacy of CPDG2 and renal recovery after CPDG2 rescue was obtained from the database of a compassionate-release trial.

RESULTS

Approximately 1.8% of patients with osteosarcoma (68 of 3887 patients) who received HDMTX developed nephrotoxicity Grade >/= 2. The mortality rate among those patients was 4.4% (3 of 68 patients). Dialysis-based methods of MTX removal were used frequently but had limited effectiveness in removing MTX compared with the rapid reductions > 98% in plasma MTX concentrations achieved with CPDG2. CPDG2 did not appear to increase the time to recovery of renal function compared with supportive treatment that included dialysis-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS

HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction continues to occur in approximately 1.8% of patients with osteosarcoma who are treated on clinical protocols with optimal supportive care. For patients with delayed MTX excretion and high plasma MTX concentrations, CPDG2 should be considered over hemodialysis to lower plasma MTX concentrations rapidly and efficiently.

Malignancy and renal disease

A variety of renal diseases and electrolyte disorders may be associated with various malignancies or with treatment of malignancy with chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation. This article reviews renal disease in cancer patients, which constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality.

High-dose leucovorin as sole therapy for methotrexate toxicity

PURPOSE

Hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, thymidine, and carboxypeptidase have been recommended together with high-dose (HD) leucovorin (LV) to treat patients at risk for methotrexate (MTX) toxicity. To elucidate the efficacy of high LV rescue as the sole salvage modality for severe MTX intoxication, we studied 13 patients who were treated in this fashion at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To identify patients at high risk for severe MTX toxicity, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with MTX levels greater than 100 micromol/L at 24 hours and greater than 10 micromol/L at 48 hours after HD MTX.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were identified. The median MTX concentration was 164 micromol/L at 24 hours (range, 102 to 940 micromol/L), 16.3 micromol/L at 48 hours (range, 10.5 to 190 micromol/L), and 6.2 micromol/L at 72 hours (range, 1.35 to 39 micromol/L). MTX levels remained greater than 0.1 micromol/L for an average of 11 +/- 3 days (mean +/- SD) (range, 7 to 17 days). In addition to supportive treatment with hydration and sodium bicarbonate administration, all patients were treated solely with HD LV, which was started within the first 24 hours in nine patients, 48 hours in three patients, and 72 hours in one patient in doses that varied from 0.24 to 8 g/d. Significant neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1,000/ microL) occurred in eight patients and lasted for 1 to 5 days. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/microL) occurred in seven patients and lasted for 5 to 10 days. Other toxic manifestations included mucositis of varying degrees, diarrhea, and neutropenic fever, but all patients recovered.

CONCLUSION

In the range of MTX levels observed, HD LV can be used as a sole therapy for MTX toxicity without the need for extracorporeal removal and with tolerable morbidity.

Successful rescue in a patient with high dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity and acute renal failure

We describe the case of a 35-year old male who developed acute renal failure following high dose methotrexate therapy for Burkitt's non Hodgkin lymphoma. Serum methotrexate levels reached 37 micromol/l, and remained higher than 1 micromol/l for more than a week. Folinic acid rescue was intensified to 200-400 mg intravenously every 4 hours. As methotrexate binds markedly to proteins, plasma exchange was initially chosen, 4 sessions being performed from day 2 to day 4. The methotrexate pharmacokinetic profile was not significantly modified during plasma exchange, and serum drug level was 3 micromol/l. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration was therefore performed from day 5 to day 10. This procedure also seemed ineffective, with evidence of low ultrafiltrate clearance. No extrarenal toxicity was observed in our patient. Thus, conventional extrarenal procedures appear to have a limited role in the setting of overexposure to methotrexate. The use of very high doses of folinic acid in our case probably played a major role in the eventual favorable outcome.

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in rheumatic disease. Practical issues in treatment and design

Methotrexate (MTX) is among the most effective drugs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and has been proven valuable in the treatment of multiple other disorders of immune regulation. MTX has been administered at a wide range of doses and dose intervals, in conjunction with multiple other drugs, and in patients with a broad range of concomitant disorders. To design a safe and effective MTX treatment plan for an individual patient, the provider must have knowledge of the pharmacology and drug interactions of this effective but potentially dangerous medication. The first section of the article reviews MTX structure, pharmacology pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of action in rheumatic disease. The second section examines factors that can be used to increase MTX efficacy and decrease toxicity.

Effective clearance of methotrexate using high-flux hemodialysis membranes

We report the first series demonstrating effective clearance of methotrexate using acute intermittent hemodialysis with a high-flux dialyzer. The study was performed on six patients, two females and four males aged 13 to 72 years. All were patients at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patients were dialyzed for 4 to 6 hours daily using a Fresenius F-80 membrane (Fresenius Inc, Walnut Creek, CA). Following the initiation of dialysis, there was a reduction in arterial and venous serum concentration of methotrexate with time. Mean plasma clearance of methotrexate during dialysis in these six patients was 92.1 +/- 10.3 mL/min. One patient who was nearly functionally anephric was studied in detail. In this patient, following a high dose of methotrexate (7.2 g/m2), approximately 63% of this dose was cleared with 6 hours of hemodialysis. With subsequent dialysis performed daily for 6 hours, the drug was cleared completely in 5.6 +/- 0.3 days (n = 7 separate methotrexate treatments). A reduction in plasma methotrexate concentration from 1,733 +/- 40 micromol/L 1 hour postinfusion to less than 0.3 micromol/L in 5 to 6 days was observed for these seven separate treatments. We conclude that significant clearance of methotrexate can be achieved with high-flux dialyzers, making methotrexate therapy a viable treatment option in patients with responsive malignancies despite the presence of renal failure.

Carboxypeptidase-G2 rescue in a patient with high dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

High dose methotrexate (HDMTX) induced renal failure is a medical emergency, as methotrexate (MTX) is primarily eliminated by renal excretion. High doses of leucovorin (LV) do not necessarily prevent toxicity in the presence of sustained elevated plasma MTX concentrations. The bacterial enzyme carboxypeptidase-G2 (CPDG2) hydrolyzes MTX into inactive metabolites and has been demonstrated to lower plasma MTX concentrations to nontoxic levels rapidly in the nonhuman primate after HDMTX infusion. Therefore, CPDG2 was evaluated as a rescue agent in a patient with acute renal dysfunction secondary to HDMTX:

METHODS

A 16 year old patient with osteosarcoma experienced acute renal dysfunction after HDMTX administration, which resulted in markedly elevated and sustained plasma MTX concentrations. She received three doses of CPDG2 on the fifth day after HDMTX: Plasma MTX concentrations were determined before and after CPDG2 administration.

RESULTS

The plasma MTX concentrations decreased from 60 to 1.2 microM within 15 minutes after the first dose of CPDG2. No rebound increase in plasma MTX concentrations or adverse reactions to the enzyme were observed. The patient developed only mild mucositis. Serum creatinine at the time of CPDG2 administration was 5 mg/dl and returned to normal within 7 weeks of enzyme administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboxypeptidase-G2 rapidly, markedly, and persistently lowered plasma MTX concentrations to a level that could be rescued safely with LV. Based on the experience with this patient and on preclinical studies in nonhuman primates, CPDG2 appears to be more effective than hemodialysis or hemoperfusion, and may prove beneficial for patients at risk for life-threatening toxicity secondary to delayed excretion of MTX.

Modulation of cytotoxicity of cytostatic drugs by hemodialysis in vitro and in vivo

For most cytotoxic substances there are no established guidelines on how to deal with overdosage. Little is known about the dialysability of cytostatic drugs. To obtain further information, human plasma was incubated with cytostatic drugs and dialysed in vitro, using 'minimodules' with capillaries identical to those in clinical use. Cytotoxicity before and after dialysis was measured in a biological test system using permanent human lymphoblast cultures (LS2). The 20 cytostatic drugs studied were categorized as follows: (1) Dialysability in vitro. Good: methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU/5-FUdR), cytarabine (ARAC), actinomycin D (DACT), mitomycin C (MMC), 4-OH-cyclophosphamide (4-OH-CPM), ifosfamide (IFO), melphalan (L-PAM), dacarbazine (DTIC), cisplatin (DDP). Intermediate: Adriamycin (ADM), 4'-epi-doxorubicin (4'-EA), carmustine (BCNU). Ineffective: daunorubicin (DNR), vincristine (VCR), vinblastine (VBL), vindesine (VDS), etoposide (VP-16), teniposide (VM-26), mitoxantrone (MITOX). These in vitro results cannot be transferred automatically into the in vivo situation because of specific drug distribution and metabolic rates. Considering pharmacokinetic data from the literature, the following recommendations can be made for practical clinical purposes. (2) Detoxification by hemodialysis in vivo. Possibly effective: MTX, 5-FU, MMC, CPM, IFO, L-PAM, BCNU, DTIC. Ineffective: ADM, 4'-EA, DNR, MITOX, DACT, VP-16, VM-26, VCR, VBL, VDS, ARAC, DDP.

Removal of methotrexate, leucovorin, and their metabolites by combined hemodialysis and hemoperfusion

This article documents the case of a patient with severe renal failure immediately after having been given high-dose methotrexate; the patient was effectively treated with repeated hemodialysis, charcoal hemoperfusion, leucovorin, and thymidine. The methotrexate plasma concentration was reduced from 390 mumol/L to 7 mumol/L as a result of 24.5 hours of hemodialysis along with 39.5 hours of hemoperfusion. Although a rebound in the plasma methotrexate concentration occurred the first three times that hemodialysis and/or hemoperfusion was stopped, reinstitution of the procedure was always effective in further lowering methotrexate concentrations. The patient was subsequently managed with leucovorin and thymidine rescue. Simultaneous measurements before and after the hemodialysis-hemoperfusion apparatus and before and after the hemoperfusion device alone revealed a percent decrease in the concentration of d-leucovorin of 36% and 79%; 1-leucovorin, 82% and 75%; 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, 52% and 64%; methotrexate, 73% and 37%; and 7-hydroxymethotrexate, 21% and 24%, respectively. Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were completely prevented, and serum creatinine normalized within 24 days.

Will hemoperfusion be useful for cancer chemotherapeutic drug removal?

One of the major problems in clinical cancer chemotherapy is the inability to safely administer full therapeutic doses of specific drugs in the face of dysfunction of an organ system controlling that drug's metabolism and excretion. Should efficient drug removal from blood be possible following full therapeutic doses and after tumor exposure, then theoretically, even in the presence of organ dysfunction, anticancer drug toxicity may be reduced or avoided. Preliminary experiments in our laboratory have shown that adriamycin may be efficiently removed by activated charcoal from aqueous and protein solutions and blood in vivo, and that daunorubicin is removed in vitro to the same extent. However, although methotrexate is removed efficiently in vitro and extracted 50% in vivo by charcoal hemoperfusion, its overall pharmacokinetics do not appear to be altered in comparison with the alteration in pharmacokinetics of adriamycin achieved with charcoal hemoperfusion. Computer modeling has suggested that efficient adriamycin removal is achievable, and that clinical studies are warranted. For methotrexate removal, however, previous clinical studies and our own data suggest that charcoal hemoperfusion has little utility unless a highly specific sorbent for methotrexate removal can be developed.