Mechanism of blockade by flunarizine of bovine adrenal catecholamine release

Lewis X-Containing Neoglycoproteins Mimic the Intrinsic Ability of Zona Pellucida Glycoprotein ZP3 to Induce the Acrosome Reaction in Capacitated Mouse Sperm1

The binding of zona pellucida (ZP) glycoprotein ZP3 to mouse sperm surface receptors is mediated by protein-carbohydrate interactions. Subsequently, ZP3 induces sperm to undergo the acrosome reaction, an obligatory step in fertilization. We have previously identified Lewis X (Le(x); Gal beta 4[Fuc alpha 3]GlcNAc) as a potent inhibitor of in vitro sperm-ZP binding (Johnston et al. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:1888-1895). This glycan is recognized by approximately 70% of the ZP3 binding sites on capacitated, acrosome-intact mouse sperm, whereas Lewis A (Le(a); Gal beta 3[Fuc alpha 4]GlcNAc) is recognized by most of the remaining sites (Kerr et al. Biol Reprod 2004; 71:770-777). Herein, we test the hypothesis that Le(x)- and Le(a)-containing glycans, when clustered on a neoglycoprotein, bind ZP3 receptors on sperm and induce sperm to undergo the acrosome reaction via the same signaling pathways as ZP3. Results show that a Le(x)-containing neoglycoprotein induced the acrosome reaction in a dose-dependent and capacitation-dependent manner. A Le(a)-containing neoglycoprotein also induced sperm to undergo the acrosome reaction but was less potent than Le(x)-containing neoglycoproteins. In contrast, neoglycoproteins containing beta4-lactosamine (Gal beta 4GlcNAc), Lewis B (Fuc alpha 2Gal beta 3[Fuc alpha 4]GlcNAc), and sialyl-Le(x) glycans were inactive, as were four other neoglycoproteins with different nonfucosylated glycans. Consistent with these results, unconjugated Le(x)- and Le(a)-capped glycans were dose-dependent inhibitors, which at saturation, reduced the ZP-induced acrosome reaction by about 60% and 30%, respectively. Experiments utilizing pharmacological inhibitors suggest that induction of the acrosome reaction by solubilized ZP and Le(x)- and Le(a)-containing neoglycoproteins require the same calcium-dependent pathway. However, only the ZP-induced acrosome reaction requires a functional G(i) protein. Thus, Le(x)-containing neoglycoproteins bind to a major class of ZP3 receptors on capacitated sperm. A Le(a)-containing neoglycoprotein binds a second ZP3 receptor but is a less-potent inducer of the acrosome reaction.

'Wide-spectrum Ca2+ channel antagonists': lipophilicity, inhibition, and recovery of secretion in chromaffin cells

Repetitive application of short depolarizing K+ pulses (70 mM K+, 2 mM Ca2+ Krebs-HEPES solution, for 10 s every 5 min) produced reproducible catecholamine secretory responses from superfused bovine chromaffin cells. At 10 microM for 15 min, the piperazine derivatives dotarizine, flunarizine and lidoflazine inhibited secretion by around 90%; cinnarizine halved the secretory response. Recovery of secretion after 30-min washout with Krebs-HEPES solution amounted to 75% in the case of dotarizine, 8% for flunarizine, 46% for lidoflazine and 21% for cinnarizine. The benzothiazol derivatives (10 microM) (+)-S-lubeluzole and R91154 (the (-)-R-enantiomer of lubeluzole) blocked the response by 75%; sabeluzole inhibited secretion by only 34% and R56865 (N-[1-(4-(4-fluorophenoxy)butyl]-4-piperidinyl-N-methyl-2-benzo-thiaz olamine) by 61%. Recoveries were around 70% in the case of these four benzothiazol derivatives. The diphenylbutyl-piperazine derivatives fluspirilene and penfluridol inhibited secretion by over 80%; no recovery was produced after 30-min washout. The inhibition of secretion was time dependent, as the recovery of the response was. Blockade of secretion by dotarizine and flunarizine occurred even in the absence of intermittent K+ stimulations of the cells. No obvious correlation was seen between the octanol/water partition coefficients of the ten compounds tested (that ranged between 6 and 4.61), the rate and extent of blockade of secretion, and the recovery of the secretory response upon washout. Rather than non-specific actions on ion channels (and secretion) due to their high lipophilicity, we believe that blockade of various Ca2+ channels relates to their binding properties to specific channel micro and macrodomains, as the case might be for 'narrow' (omega-conotoxin GVIA) and 'wide-spectrum' (omega-conotoxin MVIIC) peptide toxins.

Influence of certain calcium-channel blockers on some aspects of lorazepam-dependence in mice

The effect of acute and chronic treatments of the calcium-channel blockers, isradipine, diltiazem and flunarizine in protecting against lorazepam dependence has been demonstrated in mice. Dependence was induced by twice-daily administration of lorazepam (1 mg kg-1) for 10 days, doubling the dose during the next 10 days. Withdrawal symptoms and changes in the noradrenaline, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine content of different regions of the brain were observed after either 24-h withdrawal or flumazenil administration. Isradipine inhibited lorazepam withdrawal symptoms, the effect being accompanied in the 24-h withdrawal group by significant decreases in the noradrenaline and dopamine content of the thalamus and hypothalamus and in the noradrenaline content of the mid-brain. In the flumazenil-treated group isradipine produced significant decreases in mid-brain noradrenaline and dopamine levels and in the dopamine content of the thalamus and hypothalamus. Diltiazem did not, on the other hand, afford significant protection against lorazepam withdrawal symptoms and did not induce any significant change in the neurotransmitters studied. Flunarizine significantly inhibited lorazepam withdrawal symptoms, an effect accompanied by significant reduction in noradrenaline and dopamine levels in the thalamus and hypothalamus. Dopamine was also significantly reduced in the cerebral cortex. Similar effects were produced in the flumazenil-treated group, and the noradrenaline content was reduced in the medulla, pons and cerebellum. It was concluded that isradipine and flunarizine might be of value in ameliorating lorazepam withdrawal symptoms.

Dotarizine versus flunarizine as calcium antagonists in chromaffin cells

1. Dotarizine is a novel piperazine derivative structurally related to flunarizine that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for its antimigraine and antivertigo effects. This clinical profile may be related to its Ca2+ antagonist properties. Therefore, the actions of both compounds as calcium antagonists were compared in bovine chromaffin cells. 2. Dotarizine and flunarizine blocked 45Ca2+ uptake into K+ depolarized chromaffin cells (70 mM K+/0.5 mM Ca2+ for 60 s) in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50s of 4.8 and 6.7 microM, respectively. 3. Dotarizine and flunarizine also inhibited the whole-cell Ca2+ and Ba2+ currents (ICa, IBa) in voltage-clamped chromaffin cells, induced by depolarizing test pulses to 0 mV, during 50 ms, from a holding potential of -80 mV. Blockade exhibited IC50s of 4 microM for dotarizine and 2.2 microM for flunarizine. Dotarizine increased the rate of inactivation of ICa and IBa; inhibition of whole-cell currents was use-dependent. 4. Transient increases of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]i, produced by K+ stimulation (70 mM K+ for 5 s) of single fura-2-loaded chromaffin cells, were also inhibited by dotarizine and flunarizine with IC50s of 1.2 and 0.6 microM, respectively. Upon washout of dotarizine, the [Ca2+]i increases recovered fully after 5-10 min. In contrast, the responses remained largely inhibited 10 min after washing out flunarizine. 5. Catecholamine release induced by K+ stimulation (10-s pulses of 70 mM) was inhibited by dotarizine with an IC50 of 2.6 microM and by flunarizine with an IC50 of 1.2 microM. The blocking effects of both compounds developed slowly, and was fully established after 20-30 min of superfusion. While blockade by dotarizine quickly reversed upon its washout, that of flunarizine lasted even 25 min after washing out.6. Catecholamine release from electroporated chromaffin cells triggered by 10 micro M Ca2+ was not affected by 10 micro M dotarizine or flunarizine.7. Overall, the results suggest that dotarizine behaves as a Ca2+ antagonist in bovine chromaffin cells. It exhibits a potency similar to flunarizine in blocking Ca2+ entry, Ca2+ channels, Cai2+ signals and secretion. The dotarizine effects are readily reversible suggesting that in contrast to flunarizine, it does not accumulate in cells. Dotarizine is devoid of intracellular effects on the secretory machinery. All its blocking effects on Ca2+ entry, [Ca2+]i rise and secretion are probably due to blockade of various Ca2+channel subtypes in chromaffin cells. This blockade is use-dependent and seems to be due to the increase by dotarizine of the rate of Ca2+ channel inactivation.