Delta-opioid receptor agonists inhibit neuromuscular transmission in human colon

Visceral analgesic effect of eluxadoline (Viberzi): A central action

Painful bladder syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome affect 10%-15% of the global population. Current treatment options for these syndromes are ineffective in severe disease progression and are fraught with adverse effects. Prolonged use of conventional opioids causes constipation, respiratory depression, tolerance, and addiction. Bifunctional opioid ligands with mixed agonist/antagonist profiles at 2 types of opioid receptors (ORs) possess therapeutic advantages. Eluxadoline (ELX, Viberzi), a drug for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, has an agonistic effect on μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and an antagonistic effect on δ-opioid receptor (DOR). ELX alleviates pain and normalizes peristalsis by activating MOR without causing constipation, a DOR antagonistic effect. However, its mechanism of analgesic action is not known. We investigated the analgesic mechanism of ELX in colon and bladder pain by recording the visceromotor responses (VMRs) to painful distension of the organ and identified the site of action of the drug in pain signaling pathways. ELX inhibited VMRs via the activation of spinal MOR. The peripherally restricted MOR antagonist naloxone-methiodide (meth-NLX) did not reverse the VMR inhibition by ELX, whereas centrally acting NLX reversed it. ELX did not inhibit the excitation of mechanosensitive afferent fibers in lumbar 6 (L6) and sacral 1 (S1) dorsal root innervating the bladder or colon. In contrast, ELX inhibited excitation of bladder distension-responsive L6 and S1 spinal neurons. The inhibition was reversed by NLX, but not by meth-NLX. Electrophysiology results reinforce behavioral experiments suggesting that ELX produces analgesia by attenuating responses of spinal neurons, but not visceral sensory afferents. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The bifunctional opioid ligand eluxadoline is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome to normalize bowel movement and to relieve abdominal pain. This study documents for the first time to our knowledge that unlike its peripheral action to normalize diarrhea, the drug alleviates colon and bladder pain centrally by modulating responses of lumbo-sacral (L6-S1) spinal neurons.

Therapeutic potential of allosteric modulators for the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders

Gastrointestinal motility is tightly regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS). Disruption of coordinated enteric nervous system activity can result in dysmotility. Pharmacological treatment options for dysmotility include targeting of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed by neurons of the enteric nervous system. Current GPCR-targeting drugs for motility disorders bind to the highly conserved endogenous ligand-binding site and promote indiscriminate activation or inhibition of the target receptor throughout the body. This can be associated with significant side-effect liability and a loss of physiological tone. Allosteric modulators of GPCRs bind to a distinct site from the endogenous ligand, which is typically less conserved across multiple receptor subtypes and can modulate endogenous ligand signalling. Allosteric modulation of GPCRs that are important for enteric nervous system function may provide effective relief from motility disorders while limiting side-effects. This review will focus on how allosteric modulators of GPCRs may influence gastrointestinal motility, using 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), acetylcholine (ACh) and opioid receptors as examples. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: hot topics from the Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists 2021 Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.14/issuetoc.

The effects of loperamide on excitatory and inhibitory neuromuscular function in the human colon

BACKGROUND

In most animal species, opioids alter colonic motility via the inhibition of excitatory enteric motor neurons. The mechanisms by which opioids alter human colonic motility are unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the effects of loperamide on neuromuscular function in the human colon.

METHODS

Tissue specimens of human colon from 10 patients undergoing an anterior resection were divided into three inter-taenial circular muscle strips. Separate organ baths were used to assess: (1) excitatory transmission (selective blockade of inhibitory transmission: L-NOARG/MRS2179); (2) inhibitory transmission (selective blockade of excitatory transmission: hyoscine hydrobromide); and (3) a control bath (no drug additions). Neuromuscular function was assessed using force transducer recordings and electrical field stimulation (EFS; 20 V, 10 Hz, 0.5 ms, 10 s) prior to and following loperamide and naloxone.

KEY RESULTS

In human preparations with L-NOARG/MRS2179, loperamide had no significant effects on isometric contractions. In preparations with hyoscine hydrobromide, loperamide reduced isometric relaxation during EFS (median difference + 0.60 g post-loperamide, Z = -2.35, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Loperamide had no effect on excitatory neuromuscular function in human colonic circular muscle. These findings suggest that loperamide alters colonic function by acting primarily on inhibitory motor neurons, premotor enteric neurons, or via alternative non-opioid receptor pathways.

Positive allosteric modulation of endogenous delta opioid receptor signaling in the enteric nervous system is a potential treatment for gastrointestinal motility disorders

Allosteric modulators (AMs) are molecules that can fine-tune signaling by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although they are a promising therapeutic approach for treating a range of disorders, allosteric modulation of GPCRs in the context of the enteric nervous system (ENS) and digestive dysfunction remains largely unexplored. This study examined allosteric modulation of the delta opioid receptor (DOR) in the ENS and assessed the suitability of DOR AMs for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms using mouse models. The effects of the positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of DOR, BMS-986187, on neurogenic contractions of the mouse colon and on DOR internalization in enteric neurons were quantified. The ability of BMS-986187 to influence colonic motility was assessed both in vitro and in vivo. BMS-986187 displayed DOR-selective PAM-agonist activity and orthosteric agonist probe dependence in the mouse colon. BMS-986187 augmented the inhibitory effects of DOR agonists on neurogenic contractions and enhanced reflex-evoked DOR internalization in myenteric neurons. BMS-986187 significantly increased DOR endocytosis in myenteric neurons in response to the weakly internalizing agonist ARM390. BMS-986187 reduced the generation of complex motor patterns in the isolated intact colon. BMS-986187 reduced fecal output and diarrhea onset in the novel environment stress and castor oil models of IBS symptoms, respectively. DOR PAMs enhance DOR-mediated signaling in the ENS and have potential benefit for the treatment of dysmotility. This study provides proof of concept to support the use of GPCR AMs for the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study assesses the use of positive allosteric modulation as a pharmacological approach to enhance opioid receptor signaling in the enteric nervous system. We demonstrate that selective modulation of endogenous delta opioid receptor signaling can suppress colonic motility without causing constipation. We propose that allosteric modulation of opioid receptor signaling may be a therapeutic strategy to normalize gastrointestinal motility in conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome.

Inflammation-associated changes in DOR expression and function in the mouse colon

Endogenous opioids activate opioid receptors (ORs) in the enteric nervous system to control intestinal motility and secretion. The μ-OR mediates the deleterious side effects of opioid analgesics, including constipation, respiratory depression, and addiction. Although the δ-OR (DOR) is a promising target for analgesia, the function and regulation of DOR in the colon are poorly understood. This study provides evidence that endogenous opioids activate DOR in myenteric neurons that may regulate colonic motility. The DOR agonists DADLE, deltorphin II, and SNC80 inhibited electrically evoked contractions and induced neurogenic contractions in the mouse colon. Electrical, chemical, and mechanical stimulation of the colon evoked the release of endogenous opioids, which stimulated endocytosis of DOR in the soma and proximal neurites of myenteric neurons of transgenic mice expressing DOR fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein. In contrast, DOR was not internalized in nerve fibers within the circular muscle. Administration of dextran sulfate sodium induced acute colitis, which was accompanied by DOR endocytosis and an increased density of DOR-positive nerve fibers within the circular muscle. The potency with which SNC80 inhibited neurogenic contractions was significantly enhanced in the inflamed colon. This study demonstrates that DOR-expressing neurons in the mouse colon can be activated by exogenous and endogenous opioids. Activated DOR traffics to endosomes and inhibits neurogenic motility of the colon. DOR signaling is enhanced during intestinal inflammation. This study demonstrates functional expression of DOR by myenteric neurons and supports the therapeutic targeting of DOR in the enteric nervous system. NEW & NOTEWORTHY DOR is activated during physiologically relevant reflex stimulation. Agonist-evoked DOR endocytosis is spatially and temporally regulated. A significant proportion of DOR is internalized in myenteric neurons during inflammation. The relative proportion of all myenteric neurons that expressed DOR and the overlap with the nNOS-positive population are increased in inflammation. DOR-specific innervation of the circular muscle is increased in inflammation, and this is consistent with enhanced responsiveness to the DOR agonist SNC80.

Insights into the Role of Opioid Receptors in the GI Tract: Experimental Evidence and Therapeutic Relevance

Opioid drugs are prescribed extensively for pain treatment but when used chronically they induce constipation that can progress to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Opioid drugs interact with three classes of opioid receptors: mu opioid receptors (MORs), delta opioid receptors (DOR), and kappa opioid receptors (KORs), but opioid drugs mostly target the MORs. Upon stimulation, opioid receptors couple to inhibitory Gi/Go proteins that activate or inhibit downstream effector proteins. MOR and DOR couple to inhibition of adenylate cyclase and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and to activation of K+ channels resulting in reduced neuronal activity and neurotransmitter release. KORs couple to inhibition of Ca2+ channels and neurotransmitter release. In the gastrointestinal tract, opioid receptors are localized to enteric neurons, interstitial cells of Cajal, and immune cells. In humans, MOR, DOR, and KOR link to inhibition of acetylcholine release from enteric interneurons and motor neurons and purine/nitric oxide release from inhibitory motor neurons causing inhibition of propulsive motility patterns. MOR and DOR activation also results in inhibition of submucosal secretomotor neurons reducing active Cl- secretion and passive water movement into the colonic lumen. Together, these effects on motility and secretion account for the constipation caused by opioid receptor agonists. Tolerance develops to the analgesic effects of opioid receptor agonists but not to the constipating actions. This may be due to differences in trafficking and downstream signaling in enteric nerves in the colon compared to the small intestine and in neuronal pain pathways. Further studies of differential opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance in subsets of enteric neurons may identify new drug or other treatment strategies of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

Opioidergic effects on enteric and sensory nerves in the lower GI tract: basic mechanisms and clinical implications

Opioids are one of the most prescribed drug classes for treating acute pain. However, chronic use is often associated with tolerance as well as debilitating side effects, including nausea and dependence, which are mediated by the central nervous system, as well as constipation emerging from effects on the enteric nervous system. These gastrointestinal (GI) side effects limit the usefulness of opioids in treating pain in many patients. Understanding the mechanism(s) of action of opioids on the nervous system that shows clinical benefit as well as those that have unwanted effects is critical for the improvement of opioid drugs. The opioidergic system comprises three classical receptors (μ, δ, κ) and a nonclassical receptor (nociceptin), and each of these receptors is expressed to varying extents by the enteric and intestinal extrinsic sensory afferent nerves. The purpose of this review is to discuss the role that the opioidergic system has on enteric and extrinsic afferent nerves in the lower GI tract in health and diseases of the lower GI tract, particularly inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, and the implications of opioid treatment on clinical outcomes. Consideration is also given to emerging developments in our understanding of the immune system as a novel source of endogenous opioids and the mechanisms underlying opioid tolerance, including the potential influence of opioid receptor splice variants and heteromeric complexes.

Pharmacological traits of delta opioid receptors: pitfalls or opportunities?

RATIONALE

Delta opioid receptors (DORs) have been considered as a potential target to relieve pain as well as treat depression and anxiety disorders and are known to modulate other physiological responses, including ethanol and food consumption. A small number of DOR-selective drugs are in clinical trials, but no DOR-selective drugs have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration and some candidates have failed in phase II clinical trials, highlighting current difficulties producing effective delta opioid-based therapies. Recent studies have provided new insights into the pharmacology of the DOR, which is often complex and at times paradoxical.

OBJECTIVE

This review will discuss the existing literature focusing on four aspects: (1) Two DOR subtypes have been postulated based on differences in pharmacological effects of existing DOR-selective ligands. (2) DORs are expressed ubiquitously throughout the body and central nervous system and are, thus, positioned to play a role in a multitude of diseases. (3) DOR expression is often dynamic, with many reports of increased expression during exposure to chronic stimuli, such as stress, inflammation, neuropathy, morphine, or changes in endogenous opioid tone. (4) A large structural variety in DOR ligands implies potential different mechanisms of activating the receptor.

CONCLUSION

The reviewed features of DOR pharmacology illustrate the potential benefit of designing tailored or biased DOR ligands.

Opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction

Use of opioid analgesics is associated with a number of side effects, especially opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. The extensive use of these compounds and the significant negative impact of the resulting gastrointestinal dysfunction on patients' quality of life make it an important clinical issue. In recent years our understanding of the mechanisms of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction has advanced greatly. This article reviews the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of specific gastrointestinal adverse effects of opioids. The role of endogenous opioid peptides in certain gastrointestinal diseases is also discussed. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction should lead to the development of newer opioid analgesics and improved regimens resulting in reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects.

Propulsive activity induced by sequential electrical stimulation in the descending colon of the pig

This work was performed to study electrically induced contractions in the descending colon of pigs. Contractions were monitored using impedance planimetry and manometry. The luminal pressure, cross-sectional area (CSA), latency and velocity of CSA decrease were compared when using 3 ms, 9, 12, 15 or 30 mA pulses at 10 Hz for 10 s, and 15 mA, 0.03, 0.3 or 3 ms pulses at 10 Hz for 10 s. Stimulation was performed prior and after the application of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and atropine. In the untreated colon, contraction was always of an 'off' type. A current increase from 9 to 30 mA increased the pressure. An increase of pulse duration from 0.03 to 3 ms shortened the latency, accelerated contraction and increased pressure. By sequential stimulation, contractions were coordinated to propel semi-fluid and solid luminal contents. L-NAME increased the magnitude of CSA decrease. Atropine induced inhibitory effects on contractions elicited by 3 ms pulses and abolished contractions induced by 0.03 and 0.3 ms pulses.

IN CONCLUSION

(i) electrical stimulation evokes'off' colon contractions, which can be coordinated to result in propulsion; (ii) the best combination for current and pulse duration to induce propulsive contractions is 15 mA and 3 ms; (iii) nitrergic and cholinergic pathways mediate responses to electrical stimulation.

Lessons from the porcine enteric nervous system

The porcine intestinal tract possesses functional and pathological similarities to the human digestive tract and the organization of the porcine enteric nervous system, like that of the human, appears to be more complex than that of commonly investigated guinea-pig intestine. Intrinsic primary afferent neurones appear to differ in the intestines of large and small animals in terms of their chemical coding, distribution over enteric neural networks, electrophysiological behaviour and synaptic properties. Opioid receptors on afferent and motor neurones in the porcine small intestine are predominately of the delta type, whereas those in guinea-pig ileum are mu. Moreover, delta-opioid receptors associated with the myenteric and submucosal plexuses of porcine ileum that, respectively, modulate neurogenic smooth muscle contractions and mucosal ion transport appear to differ in their pharmacological characteristics. These profound interspecies and interregional differences underscore the complexity of the enteric nervous system, and the development of new drugs designed to treat human neurogastrointestinal disorders should be based on the results of investigations in homologous animal models, such as the pig.

Abdominal surgery induces μ opioid receptor endocytosis in enteric neurons of the guinea-pig ileum

Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy were used to investigate mu opioid receptor (muOR) internalization in enteric neurons of the guinea-pig ileum following abdominal surgery. The following surgical procedures were performed under halothane or isofluorane anesthesia: a) midline abdominal skin incision, b) laparotomy or c) laparotomy with intestinal manipulation. Gastrointestinal transit was evaluated by using a non-absorbable marker and measuring fecal pellet output. In neurons from normal and control (anesthesia alone) animals, muOR was predominantly at the cell surface. muOR endocytosis following skin incision was not significantly different from controls (21.2+/-3.5% vs. 13.7+/-2.1%, mean+/-S.E.M.), whereas it was significantly increased by laparotomy (46.5+/-6.1%; P<0.01 vs. controls) or laparotomy plus intestinal manipulation (40.5+/-6.1%; P<0.01 vs. controls) 30 min following surgery compared with controls. muOR endocytosis remained elevated at 4 h (38.6+/-1.2%; P<0.01 vs. controls), whereas it was similar to controls at 6 and 12 h (17.5+/-5.8% and 11.2+/-3.0%). muOR endocytosis occurred in cholinergic and nitrergic neurons. Gastrointestinal transit was significantly delayed by laparotomy or laparotomy plus intestinal manipulation (12.8+/-1.2 and 13.8+/-0.6 h vs. 7.0+/-0.5 in controls; P<0.01), but was not significantly changed by skin incision (8.2+/-0.6 h). The findings of the present study support the concept that the noxious stimulation caused by abdominal surgery induces release of endogenous opioids thus resulting in muOR endocytosis in neurochemically distinct enteric neurons. muOR internalization can serve as indirect evidence of opioid release and as a means to visualize neuronal pathways activated by opioids.

Modulation by GABA(B) and delta opioid receptors of neurally induced responses in isolated guinea-pig taenia coli and human colonic circular muscle

The GABA-ergic and opioid modulation of neurally induced muscle responses was studied in isolated guinea-pig taenia coli and human colonic circular muscle, using identical field stimulation parameters (rectangular pulses of 0.5 ms duration, 9 V x cm(-1) intensity, trains of 3 pulses at 0.5 Hz, repeated every 1/3/5 min). The stimulation-induced contractions were inhibited in both preparations by GABA and baclofen; the IC50 values in human colonic circular muscle were approximately 100 and 31.0 microM, respectively. In guinea-pig taenia coli, the inhibition by 10(-4) M GABA was dose-dependently reversed by 10(-4)-10(-3) M of GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP 35348; antagonism by phaclofen was less effective in the same concentration range. In human colonic circular muscle, inhibition by 3 x 10(-5) M baclofen was fully reversed by 10(-3) M CGP 35348. With the exception of caecum, the delta 2 opioid receptor agonist deltorphin II was a potent inhibitor in human colonic circular muscle. 10(-8) M Deltorphin caused a 74.4 +/- 9.6% (n = 4) inhibition which was reversed by 10(-6) M of delta receptor selective peptide antagonist BOC-Tyr-Pro-Gly-Phe-Leu-Thr(OtBu). Deltorphin II was ineffective in guinea-pig taenia coli even at 10(-6) M; the same concentration caused an 84.3 +/- 7.9 (n = 4) inhibition in human preparations. It is concluded that: 1) GABA-ergic modulatory mechanisms are present both in human colonic circular muscle and guinea-pig taenia coli; 2) the GABA receptors involved are of type B; and 3) delta opioid receptor-mediated modulation functions only in human colonic circular muscle in regions other than the caecum.

Effect of wood creosote and loperamide on propulsive motility of mouse colon and small intestine

To elucidate a mechanism of the antidiarrheal activity of wood creosote, its effect on the propulsive motility of mouse colon and small intestine was studied using a charcoal meal test and a colonic bead expulsion test. The effect was compared with that of loperamide. At an ordinary therapeutic dose, wood creosote inhibited the propulsive motility of colon, but not of small intestine. On the other hand, loperamide inhibited the propulsive motility of small intestine, but not of colon. The results indicate that at least a part of the antidiarrheal activity of wood creosote and loperamide is attributable to their antikinetic effect predominantly on colon of the former and predominantly on small intestine of the latter.

mu-Opioid receptor-knockout mice: the role of mu-opioid receptor in gastrointestinal transit

The role of mu-opioid receptor in gastrointestinal transit was investigated using mu-opioid receptor knockout mice (MOR-KO). Our result establishes unequivocally that inhibition of GI transit by morphine is a mu-opioid receptor mediated function. In addition, we show that neither delta nor kappa receptor agonist given supraspinally or peripherally are able to inhibit GI transit in MOR-KO animals. It was interesting to observe that basal GI motility was lower in MOR-KO (-/-) compared to heterozygous (+/-) and wild type (+/+) animals.

Insights into opioid action in the intestinal tract

Opioids have been used for centuries as antidiarrhoeal drugs. In recent years, their mechanism and sites of action in exerting their antidiarrhoeal effect have been studied intensely. Attempts have been made to propose their general mode of action. Whilst there are numerous similarities in their general effects on motility, fluid secretion, and neuroeffector transmission, the differences between species, in some cases, can be remarkable. We highlight and contrast the similarities and differences in the commonly examined species and compare them to humans. Insights into mechanisms of opioid antidiarrhoeal action now also provide some new perspectives of opioid action in the intestine.

Endogenous opiates: 1994

This article is the 17th installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes papers published during 1994 involving the behavioral, nonanalgesic, effects of the endogenous opiate peptides. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.