Interactions of pure beta gamma-subunits of G-proteins with purified beta 1-adrenoceptor

Ternary WD40 Repeat-Containing Protein Complexes: Evolution, Composition and Roles in Plant Immunity

Plants, like mammals, rely on their innate immune system to perceive and discriminate among the majority of their microbial pathogens. Unlike mammals, plants respond to this molecular dialog by unleashing a complex chemical arsenal of defense metabolites to resist or evade pathogen infection. In basal or non-host resistance, plants utilize signal transduction pathways to detect "non-self," "damaged-self," and "altered-self"- associated molecular patterns and translate these "danger" signals into largely inducible chemical defenses. The WD40 repeat (WDR)-containing proteins Gβ and TTG1 are constituents of two independent ternary protein complexes functioning at opposite ends of a plant immune signaling pathway. They are also encoded by single-copy genes that are ubiquitous in higher plants, implying the limited diversity and functional conservation of their respective complexes. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about the evolutionary history of these WDR-containing ternary complexes, their repertoire and combinatorial interactions, and their downstream effectors and pathways in plant defense.

Understanding the ligand-receptor-G protein ternary complex for GPCR drug discovery

Understanding the ternary complex between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), cognate G proteins, and their ligands is an important landmark for drug discovery. Yet, little is known about the specific interactions between GPCRs and G proteins. For a better perspective on the ternary complex dynamics, we adapted a beta(2)-adrenergic receptor(beta(2)AR)-tetGs(alpha) reconstitution system and found evidence that for efficient coupling of the beta(2)AR to Gs does not require specific interactions between the betagamma-subunits and the beta(2)AR. Our results demonstrate that specific interactions between betagamma and the beta(2)AR are not required for G protein activation but likely serve to anchor Gs(alpha) to the plasma membrane. Our results also suggests that the advantages of analysis of G protein activation by using beta(2)AR receptor-tetGs(alpha) system in vitro at the close proximity of the receptor may constitute a simple screening system that avoids false positives and potentially adapted to screen drugs for other GPCRs.

The G-protein betagamma complex

The vast majority of signalling pathways in mammalian cells are mediated by heterotrimeric (alpha betagamma) G proteins. Reviewed here is regulation of signal transduction by the betagamma complex at different protein interfaces: subunit-subunit, receptor-G protein and G protein-effector. The role of diverse beta and gamma subunit types in achieving specificity in signalling and potentially unidentified functions for these subunits also are discussed.

Role of subunit diversity in signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins

The heterotrimeric G proteins are extensively involved in the regulation of cells by extracellular signals. The receptors that control them are often the targets of drugs. There are many isoforms of each of the three subunits that make up these proteins. Thus far, genes for at least sixteen alpha subunits, five beta subunits, and eleven gamma subunits have been identified. In addition, some of these proteins have splice variants or are differentially modified. Based upon what is already known, there are well over a thousand possible G protein heterotrimer combinations. The role of subunit diversity in heterotrimer formation and its effect on signaling by G proteins are still not well understood. However, many current lines of research are leading toward an understanding of these roles. The functional significance of subunit heterogeneity is related to the mechanisms used by G proteins to transmit and integrate the many signals coming into cells through this system. Described here are the basic mechanisms by which G proteins integrate cellular responses, the possible role of subunit heterogeneity in these mechanisms, and the evidence for and against their physiological significance. Recent studies suggest the likely possibility that subunit heterogeneity plays an important role in signaling by G proteins. This role has the potential to extend substantially the flexibility of G proteins in mediating cellular responses to extracellular signals. However, the details of this are yet to be worked out, and they are the subject of many different avenues of research.

Distinct biochemical properties of the native members of the G12 G-protein subfamily. Characterization of G alpha 12 purified from rat brain

G12 and G13 are insufficiently characterized pertussis toxin-insensitive G-proteins. Here, we describe the isolation of G alpha 12 from rat brain membranes. G alpha 12 was purified to apparent homogeneity by three steps of conventional chromatography, followed by two cycles of subunit-exchange chromatography on immobilized G subunits. Purified G alpha 12 bound guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate slowly and substoichiometrically. For isolation of functionally active G alpha 12, it was mandatory to use sucrose monolaurate as a detergent. Comparative studies of both rat-brain-derived members of the G12 subfamily revealed differences in the affinity of G alpha 12 and G alpha 13 for G beta gamma. G alpha 12 required a higher Mg2+ concentration for AlF4- -induced dissociation from immobilized G beta gamma than did G alpha 13. In addition, the G12 subfamily members differed in their sedimentation velocities, as determined by sucrose-density-gradient centrifugation. Analysis of sedimentation coefficients revealed a higher tendency of G12 to form supramolecular structures in comparison to G13 and other G-proteins. These G13 structures were stabilized by sucrose monolaurate, which in turn may explain the necessity for this detergent for purification of functionally active G alpha 12. Despite these distinct biochemical characteristics of G12 and G13, both purified G-proteins coupled to a recombinant thromboxane A2 (TXA2) receptor reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. These data indicate, (1) significant differences in the biochemical properties of native members of the G12 subfamily, and (2) their specific coupling to TXA2 receptors.

S-prenylated cysteine analogues inhibit receptor-mediated G protein activation in native human granulocyte and reconstituted bovine retinal rod outer segment membranes

We have previously shown that the S-prenylated cysteine analogue N-acetyl-S-trans,trans-farnesyl-L-cysteine (L-AFC) inhibits basal and formyl peptide receptor-stimulated binding of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP[S]) to and hydrolysis of GTP by membranes of HL-60 granulocytes and have presented evidence suggesting that this inhibition was not caused by reduced protein carboxyl methylation [Scheer, A., & Gierschik, P. (1993) FEBS Lett. 319, 110-114]. We now report a detailed analysis of the structural properties of S-prenylated cysteine analogues required for this inhibition and demonstrate that S-prenylcysteines also suppress basal and receptor-stimulated GTP[S] binding to human peripheral neutrophil and HL-60 granulocyte membranes when stimulated by formyl peptide and complement C5a, respectively. S-Prenylcysteines did not affect pertussis toxin-mediated [32P]ADP-ribosylation of Gi proteins. The inhibitory effect of L-AFC was reversible and was not mimicked by farnesylic acid. L-AFC also interfered with GTP[S] binding to retinal transducin when stimulated by light-activated rhodopsin in a reconstituted system. This inhibitory effect was fully reversed upon increasing the concentration of either the G protein beta gamma dimer or the activated receptor. On the basis of these results, we suggest that S-prenylated cysteine analogues like L-AFC inhibit receptor-mediated G protein activation by specifically and reversibly interfering with the interaction of activated receptors with G proteins, most likely with their beta gamma dimers, rather than by inhibiting alpha.beta gamma heterotrimer formation.

Specific enhancement of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase activity by defined G-protein beta and gamma subunits

The beta and gamma subunits of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) have recently been shown to play an active role in signal transduction. Among other effects they enable translocation of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (beta ARK) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane and thus permit phosphorylation and ultimately desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors and other G-protein-coupled receptors. To investigate the specificity of this effect, we have purified various combinations of recombinant beta and gamma subunits expressed in Sf9 cells and measured their effects on beta ARK-catalyzed phosphorylation of beta 2-adrenergic receptors and of rhodopsin. The combinations tested were beta 1 gamma 2, beta 1 gamma 3, beta 2 gamma 2, beta 2 gamma 3, and transducin beta gamma (beta 1 gamma 1). There were clear differences in enhancement of rhodopsin phosphorylation, with an order of efficacy beta 2 gamma 2 > beta 1 gamma 2 >> beta 2 gamma 3 approximately beta 1 gamma 3 approximately beta 1 gamma 1. The first two combinations had larger effects than a mixed beta gamma preparation from bovine brain. In enhancing phosphorylation of beta 2-adrenergic receptors, beta 1 gamma 2 was more efficient and potent than all other combinations. These data suggest a twofold specificity of beta gamma complexes in enhancing beta ARK-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation: the gamma subunits may be important in interacting with beta ARK, with gamma 2 being more potent than gamma 3, whereas the beta subunits may determine coupling to the receptors, with beta 2 being more effective than beta 1 for rhodopsin and beta 1 being more effective than beta 2 for beta 2-adrenergic receptors.

Subunit interactions of GTP-binding proteins

Fluorescence energy transfer [cf. Förster, T. (1948) Ann. Phys. 6, 55-75] was tested for its suitability to study quantitative interactions of subunits of G0 with each other and these subunits or trimeric G0 with the beta 1-adrenoceptor in detergent micelles or after reconstitution into lipid vesicles [according to Feder, D., Im, M.-J., Klein, H. W., Hekman, M., Holzhöfer, A, Dees, C., Levitzki, A., Helmreich, E. J. M. & Pfeuffer, T. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 1509-1514]. For this purpose, alpha 0- and beta gamma-subunits and trimeric G0 purified from bovine brain, the beta gamma-subunits from bovine rod outer segment membranes and the beta 1-adrenoceptor from the turkey erythrocyte were all labelled with either tetramethylrhodamine maleimide or fluorescein isothiocyanate under conditions which leave the labelled proteins functionally intact. In the case of alpha 0- and beta gamma-interactions, specific high-affinity binding interactions (Kd approximately 10 nM) and nonspecific low-affinity binding interactions (Kd approximately 1 microM) could be readily distinguished by comparing fluorescence energy transfer before and after dissociation with 10 microM guanosine 5'-O-[gamma-thio]triphosphate and 10 mM MgCl2 where only low-affinity binding interactions remained. Interactions between alpha 0- and beta gamma-subunits from bovine brain or from bovine retinal transducin did not differ much. The beta gamma-subunits from bovine brain were found to bind with high transfer efficiency and comparable affinities to the hormone-activated and the nonactivated beta 1-receptor reconstituted in lipid vesicles: Kd = 100 +/- 20 and 120 +/- 20 nM, respectively; however, beta gamma-subunits from transducin appeared to bind more weakly to the beta 1-adrenoceptor than beta gamma-subunits from bovine brain. Separated purified homologous alpha 0- and beta gamma-subunits from bovine brain interfered mutually with each other in binding to the beta 1-adrenoceptor presumably because they had a greater affinity for each other than for the receptor. These findings attest to the suitability of fluorescence energy transfer for studying protein-protein interactions of G-proteins and G-protein-linked receptors. Moreover, they supported the previous finding [Kurstjens, N. P., Fröhlich, M., Dees, C., Cantrill, R. C., Hekman, M. & Helmreich, E. J. M. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 197, 167-176] that beta gamma-subunits can bind to the nonactivated beta 1-adrenoceptor.

Analysis of stimulation-G protein subunit coupling by using active insulin-like growth factor II receptor peptide

The peptide Arg2410-Lys2423 (peptide 14) of the human insulin-like growth factor II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor directly activates Gi-2, a GTP-binding protein (G protein), and is responsible for Gi-2 activating function of the receptor. To characterize the basic mechanism of couplings between receptor stimulation and subunits of G proteins, we constructed a system consisting of peptide 14 and alpha and beta gamma subunits of Gi-2 in aqueous solution. Peptide 14 significantly increased the rate of guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate binding to isolated Gi-2 alpha from 0.50 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SE; n = 3) to 0.75 +/- 0.02 mol per mol of Gi-2 alpha per 3 min (n = 3) at 100 microM. In this system, G beta gamma does dependently potentiated the peptide 14 action on Gi-2 alpha; and G beta gamma-induced potentiation reached saturation at a concentration comparable to that of Gi-2 alpha. An antibody specific for the C-terminal decapeptide of Gi-2 alpha reduce peptide 14-stimulated GDP release from Gi-2 to the basal level. This simplified system indicates that (i) the receptor sequence directly interacts with isolated Gi-2 alpha at its C-terminal region and (ii) G beta gamma potentiates the stimulation-G alpha coupling in a stoichiometrical manner for G alpha.

Structural heterogeneity of membrane receptors and GTP-binding proteins and its functional consequences for signal transduction

Recent information obtained, mainly by recombinant cDNA technology, on structural heterogeneity of hormone and transmitter receptors, of GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) and, especially, of G-protein-linked receptors is reviewed and the implications of structural heterogeneity for diversity of hormone and transmitter actions is discussed. For the future, three-dimensional structural analysis of membrane proteins participating in signal transmission and transduction pathways is needed in order to understand the molecular basis of allosteric regulatory mechanisms governing the interactions between these proteins including hysteretic properties and cell-cybernetic aspects.

Binding of alpha- and beta gamma-subunits of Go to beta 1-adrenoceptor in sealed unilamellar lipid vesicles

First, we describe a preparation of sealed unilamellar lipid vesicles. When this preparation was subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation, two rather uniform fractions emerged, one consisting of lighter lipid-rich vesicles with average diameters ranging over 150-200 nm (fraction I), the other consisting of heavier vesicles with average diameters ranging over 30-70 nm (fraction II). When the lipid mixture containing dimyristoylglycerophosphocholine, cholesterol, dipalmitoylglycerophosphoserine and dipalmitoylglycerophosphoethanolamine at molar ratios of 54:35:10:1 was reconstituted with alpha- and beta gamma-subunits of Go-proteins purified to homogeneity from bovine brain, the lipid-rich lighter vesicle fraction I took up these subunits nearly exclusively. Whereas, when a beta 1-adrenoceptor preparation purified from turkey erythrocyte membranes was reconstituted, it was found nearly completely in the smaller heavier vesicle fraction II where it was incorporated inside-out. On co-reconstitution of either alpha o or beta gamma alone with beta 1-adrenoceptors, some of these subunits appear together with beta 1-adrenoceptors in the small vesicle fraction II, but much more alpha o was bound to the receptor in the presence of beta gamma-subunits. The observations reported are novel and surprising in several respects: firstly, they suggest that beta gamma-subunits can bind to the non-activated beta 1-receptor where they may serve as an anchor for alpha-subunits. Secondly, the binding of alpha o- and beta gamma-subunits to the beta 1-adrenoceptors enhances the basal GTPase activity of alpha o. Thirdly, since the binding domains of the beta 1-adrenoceptor for G-proteins were facing outwards in our sealed vesicle preparations, it follows that interactions of G-proteins with the beta-receptor can occur at the aqueous membrane interface as was postulated originally by M. Chabre [Trends Biochem. Sci. 12, 213-215 (1987)] for the transducin-rhodopsin interactions. Finally, the binding of Go-subunits from bovine brain to a beta 1-adrenoceptor from turkey erythrocytes was not expected, since these polypeptides are not likely to be physiological partners.