Symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease is dependent on spatiotemporal reflux characteristics

Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion is significantly lower in non-erosive reflux disease patients than in healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Saliva secretion is significantly lower in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) than in healthy controls (HC). A previous study on HC showed that saliva secretion was lower in females than in males. Saliva secretion may be lower in female patients with NERD than in male patients. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with NERD.

METHODS

Subjects older than 50 years were included in the present study and consisted of 20 male patients with NERD, 19 male HC, 25 female patients with NERD, and 23 female HC. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured.

RESULTS

In males, no significant differences were observed in the amount of stimulated saliva secretion or salivary pH between NERD patients and HC. However, the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 6.1 [5.9-6.5], HC: 6.4 [6.2-6.6]) was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. In females, the amount of stimulated saliva secretion (NERD: 2.6 [2.0-4.1], HC: 5.8 [3.7-7.5]), salivary pH (NERD: 7.0 [6.8-7.2], HC: 7.2 [7.0-7.2]), and the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 5.8 [5.4-6.2], HC: 6.2 [6.0-6.5]) were significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC.

CONCLUSION

Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. This reduction in saliva secretion may contribute to the pathophysiology of NERD in females.

Significantly Lower Saliva Secretion in Females With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Healthy Subjects Than in Males

OBJECTIVE

Saliva secretion in healthy subjects is lower in females than in males. The present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls.

METHODS

This case-control study included 39 (male/female: 16/23) with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 49 (25/24) patients with mild reflux esophagitis, 45 (23/22) with severe reflux esophagitis (A1), and 46 (24/22) healthy controls. Saliva secretion was examined as follows: before endoscopy, patients chewed sugar-free gum for three minutes, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of acid-buffering capacity were evaluated. The relationships between saliva secretion and body mass index, height, and weight were also examined.

RESULTS

The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in females than in males in all four groups (NERD, mild reflux esophagitis, severe reflux esophagitis, and healthy controls). Salivary pH and acid-buffering capacity were similar in all groups. The amount of saliva secreted positively correlated with height and body weight, albeit more strongly with height.

CONCLUSION

A sex difference in saliva secretion exists in GERD patients, similar to healthy controls. Saliva secretion was significantly lower in female GERD patients than in male GERD patients.

Differences in salivary secretion and epidermal growth factor concentrations in mild reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in salivary secretion have been reported among healthy subjects. In the present study, salivary secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) concentrations were investigated in mild reflux esophagitis patients, non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients, and healthy controls by matching the sex ratio.

METHODS

Thirty-three (male:female = 11:22) patients with NERD, 33 (11:22) with mild reflux esophagitis, and 33 (11:22) healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. Salivary secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and salivary pH after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. Salivary EGF concentrations were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, or the acid-buffering capacity between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups. However, the amount of saliva secretion and the acid-buffering capacity in the mild reflux esophagitis group and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and the acid-buffering capacity in the NERD group were significantly lower than those in the healthy control group. No significant differences were noted in salivary EGF concentrations between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups.

CONCLUSION

After matching the sex ratio, the saliva secretion was significantly lower in patients with mild reflux esophagitis and NERD than in healthy controls. However, no significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion or salivary EGF concentrations between both groups.

Quantification of gastroesophageal regurgitation in brachycephalic dogs

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux and regurgitation occurs in brachycephalic dogs, but objective assessment is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Quantify reflux in brachycephalic dogs using an esophageal pH probe and determine the association with scored clinical observations.

ANIMALS

Fifty-one brachycephalic dogs.

METHODS

Case review study. Signs of respiratory and gastrointestinal disease severity were graded based on owner assessment. An esophageal pH probe with 2 pH sensors was placed for 18-24 hours in brachycephalic dogs that presented for upper airway assessment. Proximal and distal reflux were indicated by detection of fluid with a pH ≤4. The median reflux per hour, percentage time pH ≤4, number of refluxes ≥5 minutes and longest reflux event for distal and proximal sensors were recorded. Association of preoperative respiratory and gastrointestinal grade, laryngeal collapse grade, and previous airway surgery with the distal percentage time pH ≤4 was examined using 1-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

A total of 43 of 51 dogs (84%; 95% confidence interval 72-92) displayed abnormal reflux with a median (range) distal percentage time pH ≤4 of 6.4 (2.5-36.1). There was no significant association between the distal percentage time pH ≤4 and respiratory grade, gastrointestinal grade, laryngeal collapse grade, or previous upper airway surgery.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The occurrence of reflux is not associated with owner-assessed preoperative respiratory and gastrointestinal grade, laryngeal collapse grade, and previous airway surgery. Esophageal pH measurement provides an objective assessment tool before and after surgery.

GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: A PRACTICAL APPROACH

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents typical manifestations such as heartburn and/or regurgitation as well as atypical manifestations such as throat symptoms, laryngitis, hoarseness, chronic cough, asthma, and sleep alterations. There are two phenotypes of the disease: erosive GERD, when erosions are identified by upper digestive endoscopy, and non-erosive GERD, when the esophageal mucosa presents a normal endoscopic aspect. Relevant clinical findings are usually absent in the physical examination, but it should be highlighted that obesity is an important aggravating factor of reflux. The treatment is established based on clinical findings and, according to the clinical situation, on complementary exams such as upper digestive endoscopy. In dubious cases where a precise diagnosis is required, the indicated test is esophageal pHmetry or impedance-pHmetry. Clinical treatment is divided into behavioral/dietary measures and pharmacological measures. Most patients benefit from clinical treatment, but surgical treatment may be indicated in the presence of a larger hiatal hernia and complications of the disease.

Saliva secretion is reduced in proton pump inhibitor-responsive non-erosive reflux disease patients

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the relationship between saliva secretion and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). In this study, saliva secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) in patients with NERD were examined.

METHODS

Thirty-one PPI-responsive NERD patients and 31 control subjects were recruited for this case-control study. Saliva secretion testing was performed. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. The salivary EGF concentration was assessed by ELISA.

RESULTS

The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in the NERD group than in the control group, with medians (25th-75th percentile) of 4.0 mL/3 min (2.0-6.0) and 6.0 (3.9-8.0), respectively (p = 0.0131). Salivary pH was significantly lower in the NERD group (7.0 [6.8-7.2]) than in the control group (7.2 [7.0-7.3], p = 0.0100). Salivary pH after acid loading was significantly lower in the NERD group (5.8 [5.4-6.2]) than in the control group (6.3 [6.1-6.5], p = 0.0002). The difference in pH of stimulated saliva after acid loading (1.2 [0.9-1.5], p = 0.0021) was significantly higher in the NERD group than in the control group (0.8 [0.7-1.1]). The salivary EGF concentration was significantly higher in the NERD group (2513.0 pg/mL [1497.5-5005.0] than in the PPI-responsive group (1641.0 [1139.8-2092.0], p = 0.0032).

CONCLUSION

Stimulated saliva secretion was reduced in PPI-responsive NERD patients.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in adults and children. The global prevalence of GERD is high and increasing. Non-erosive reflux disease is the most common phenotype of GERD. Heartburn and regurgitation are considered classic symptoms but GERD may present with various atypical and extra-oesophageal manifestations. The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial and different mechanisms may result in GERD symptoms, including gastric composition and motility, anti-reflux barrier, refluxate characteristics, clearance mechanisms, mucosal integrity and symptom perception. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of GERD is commonly established on the basis of response to anti-reflux treatment; however, a more accurate diagnosis requires testing that includes upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and reflux monitoring. New techniques and new reflux testing parameters help to better phenotype the condition. In children, the diagnosis of GERD is primarily based on history and physical examination and treatment vary with age. Treatment in adults includes a combination of lifestyle modifications with pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical intervention. In refractory GERD, optimization of proton-pump inhibitor treatment should be attempted before a series of diagnostic tests to assess the patient's phenotype.

Factors of Reflux Episodes With Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic Wave in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background/Aims

It is known that post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index represents the chemical clearance of the esophagus. However, few studies have explored why some reflux episodes could induce PSPW while others in the same patient could not. The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of reflux episodes which could elicit PSPW.

Methods

In this study, 269 reflux episodes were detected, of which 90 with a PSPW and 179 without a PSPW. Comparisons were made between the characteristics of reflux episodes with a PSPW and without a PSPW. The characteristics were including nadir pH, pH drop, proximal extent (cm, sec), ascending velocity (cm/sec), volume clearance time, acid clearance time, percentage acidic (%), 15 to 60-minute acid burden (seconds), and 15- to 60-minute volume burden (seconds). The characteristics between the 2 groups were compared through performing Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results

Reflux episodes followed by a PSPW were significantly associated with a higher proximal extent than those without a PSPW. After the reflux episodes, higher volume clearance time and larger volume burden were more likely to trigger a PSPW. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in nadir pH, pH drop, ascending velocity, acid clearance time, percentage acidic, or acid burden.

Conclusions

The role of acid seems to be less important in a reflux episode inducing a PSPW. Proximal reflux episodes are more likely to induce a PSPW. The depression of volume clearance may also be an important factor in eliciting a PSPW.

Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD

The Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) provided a rationale for acid suppression medication without investigation, thus enhancing the management of the substantial symptom burden in these patients. Increased proton-pump inhibitor use has also highlighted their limitations, with one third of "typical" symptoms known to be refractory. Most refractory symptoms are ascribed to reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH). RH may be caused by impaired esophageal mucosal barrier function and sensitization of peripheral esophageal receptors. Central sensitization may also contribute to the perception of non-pathologic reflux in RH, and the perception of physiological stimuli in FH. Importantly, mechanisms underlying GERD, RH, and FH are (in theory) not mutually exclusive, further complicating patient management. Methods used to distinguish GERD from RH and FH are impractical for use in epidemiological studies and pragmatic care and may have limited diagnostic accuracy. This is impeding accurate prevalence estimates and risk factor determination and the identification of new therapies. Direct assessment of mucosal barrier function by measuring impedance is a promising candidate for improved diagnosis. Ultimately though the concept of GERD as a composite, symptom-based entity needs re-evaluation, so that new understandings of upper GI symptoms can direct more precise management.

Alcohol accumulation promotes esophagitis via pyroptosis activation

Gastroesophageal reflux impairs the mucosal barrier in the distal esophagus, allowing chronic exposure of the squamous epithelium to multitudinous stimulations and inducing chronic inflammation. Esophagitis is a response to inflammation of the esophageal squamous mucosa. Our study clarified that alcohol accumulation could aggravate the progress of esophagitis by inducing pyroptosis; however, Ac-YVAD-CMK, an inhibitor of caspase-1, could effectively suppress the expression of IL-1β and IL-18 both in vivo and in vitro, reducing the inflammatory response, which is promised to be an agent to inhibit the progression of esophagitis. Additionally, caspase-1-derived pyroptosis is involved in esophageal cancer.

Determinants of reflux-induced chronic cough

OBJECTIVE

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is considered to be an important contributing factor in chronic unexplained cough. It remains unclear why some reflux episodes in the same patient causes cough while others do not. To understand more about the mechanism by which reflux induces cough, we aimed to identify factors which are important in triggering cough.

DESIGN

In this multicentre study, 49 patients with reflux-associated chronic cough were analysed using 24-hour pH-impedance-pressure monitoring. The characteristics of reflux episodes that were followed by cough were compared with reflux episodes not associated with cough.

RESULTS

The majority (72.4%) of the reflux episodes were acidic (pH<4). Compared with reflux episodes that were not followed by cough, reflux episodes that were followed by a cough burst were associated with a higher proximal extent (p=0.0001), a higher volume clearance time (p=0.002) and a higher acid burden in the preceding 15 min window (p=0.019) and higher reflux burden in the preceding 30 min window (p=0.044). No significant difference was found between the two groups when looking at the nadir pH, the pH drop, the acid clearance time or the percentage of reflux episodes which were acidic.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a larger volume of refluxate and oesophageal exposure to reflux for a longer period of time seems to play an important role in inducing cough, while the acidity of the refluxate seems to be less relevant. This helps explain the observation that most patients with chronic cough tend not to benefit from acid inhibitory treatment.

Determinants of the Association between Non-Cardiac Chest Pain and Reflux

OBJECTIVES

Gastroesophageal reflux is considered to be the most common gastrointestinal cause of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). It remains unclear why some reflux episodes in the same patient cause chest pain while others do not. To understand more about the mechanisms by which reflux elicits chest pain, we aimed to identify factors which are important in triggering chest pain.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, 120 patients with NCCP were analyzed using 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. In the patients with a positive association between reflux and chest pain, the characteristics of the reflux episodes which were followed by a chest pain episode were compared with chest pain-free reflux episodes.

RESULTS

Using 24-h pH-impedance monitoring, 40% of the NCCP patients were identified as having reflux as a possible cause of their chest pain. Reflux episodes that were associated with chest pain had a higher proximal extent (P=0.007), a higher volume clearance time (P=0.030), a higher 15-minute acid burden (P=0.041), were more often acidic (P=0.011), had a lower nadir pH (P=0.044), and had a longer acid duration time (P=0.027) than reflux episodes which were not followed by chest pain. Patients who experienced typical reflux symptoms were more likely to have reflux as the cause of their chest pain (52 vs. 31.4%, P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a larger volume of acid refluxate for a longer period of time appears to be an important determinant of perceiving a reflux episode as chest pain. 24-h pH-impedance monitoring is an important tool in identifying gastroesophageal reflux as a potential cause of symptoms in patients with NCCP.

Reflex cardiorespiratory events from esophageal origin are heightened by preterm birth

The involvement of gastroesophageal refluxes in cardiorespiratory events of preterm infants remains controversial. While a few studies in full-term newborn animals have shown that stimulation of esophageal receptors leads to cardiorespiratory reflexes, the latter remain largely unknown, especially after premature birth. The present study aimed to 1) characterize the cardiorespiratory reflexes originating from esophageal receptors in newborn lambs and 2) test the hypotheses that preterm birth enhances reflex cardiorespiratory inhibition and that C-fibers are involved in these reflexes. Eight full-term lambs and 10 lambs born 14 days prematurely were studied. Following surgical instrumentation, a 6-h polysomnography was performed without sedation to record electrocardiogram, respiratory movements, arterial pressure, laryngeal constrictor muscle activity, state of alertness, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation. Five esophageal stimulations of the upper and/or lower esophagus, including rapid balloon inflation and/or HCl injection, were performed in random order. A second recording was performed in full-term lambs 24 h later, after C-fiber blockade by capsaicin. Results confirmed that esophageal stimulations induced inhibitory cardiorespiratory reflexes combined with protective mechanisms, including laryngeal closure, swallowing, coughing, increased arterial pressure, and arousal. Preterm birth heightened cardiorespiratory inhibition. The strongest cardiorespiratory inhibition was observed following simultaneous stimulation of the lower and upper esophagus. Finally, cardiorespiratory inhibition was decreased after C-fiber blockade. In conclusion, esophageal stimulation induces inhibitory cardiorespiratory reflexes, which are partly mediated by C-fibers and more pronounced in preterm lambs. Clinical relevance of these findings requires further studies, especially in conditions associated with increased cardiorespiratory events, e.g., neonatal infection.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Preterm birth heightens the cardiorespiratory events triggered by esophageal stimulation. The most extensive cardiorespiratory events are induced by simultaneous stimulation of the proximal and distal esophagus.

Intra-bolus pressure and esophagogastric gradient, assessed with high-resolution manometry, are associated with acid exposure and proximal migration of refluxate

Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient (TSPG) seems to play a relevant role in eliciting refluxes during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). Intra-bolus pressure (IBP) is considered to be correlated to esophageal wall tone. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between IBP, TSPG during TLESRs and the dynamic properties of refluxate in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Sixteen non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 10 erosive disease (ERD) patients and 12 healthy volunteers (HVs), underwent 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring and combined high-resolution manometry-impedance before and 60 minutes. After a meal, ERD patients presented a significantly lower mean IBP (4.7 ± 1.6 mmHg) respect to NERD patients (8.9 ± 2.8 mmHg) and HVs (9.2 ± 3.2 mmHg). NERD patients with physiological abnormal acid exposure time showed a mean IBP (10.4 ± 3.1 mmHg) significantly higher than that in NERD with pathological abnormal acid exposure time (5.1 ± 1.5 mmHg). The TSPG value was significantly higher during TLESRs accompanied by reflux than during TLESRs not associated with reflux, both in patients and in HVs. A significant direct correlation was found between IBP, TSPG and proximal spread of refluxes in patients and in HVs. Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients display different degrees of esophageal distension. An increased compliance of the distal esophagus may accommodate larger volumes of refluxate and likely facilitates the injuries development. Higher TSPG values appear to facilitate the occurrence of refluxes during TLESRs. In patients with NERD, higher TSPG and IBP values favor proximal spread of refluxate and hence may play a relevant role in symptom generation.

Lower pH values of weakly acidic refluxes as determinants of heartburn perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with normal esophageal acid exposure

Multichannel impedance pH monitoring has shown that weakly acidic refluxes are able to generate heartburn. However, data on the role of different pH values, ranging between 4 and 7, in the generation of them are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether different pH values of weakly acidic refluxes play a differential role in provoking reflux symptoms in endoscopy-negative patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure time and positive symptom index and symptom association probability for weakly acidic refluxes. One hundred and forty-three consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonresponders to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), were allowed a washout from PPIs before undergoing: upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and multichannel impedance pH monitoring. In patients with both symptom index and symptom association probability positive for weakly acidic reflux, each weakly acidic reflux was evaluated considering exact pH value, extension, physical characteristics, and correlation with heartburn. Forty-five patients with normal acid exposure time and positive symptom association probability for weakly acidic reflux were identified. The number of refluxes not heartburn related was higher than those heartburn related. In all distal and proximal liquid refluxes, as well as in distal mixed refluxes, the mean pH value of reflux events associated with heartburn was significantly lower than that not associated. This condition was not confirmed for proximal mixed refluxes. Overall, a low pH of weakly acidic reflux represents a determinant factor in provoking heartburn. This observation contributes to better understand the pathophysiology of symptoms generated by weakly acidic refluxes, paving the way toward the search for different therapeutic approaches to this peculiar condition of esophageal hypersensitivity.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: new understanding in a new era

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has increased in the last decades and it is now one of the most common chronic diseases. Throughout time our insight in the pathophysiology of GERD has been characterized by remarkable back and forth swings, often prompted by new investigational techniques. Even today, the pathophysiology of GERD is not fully understood but it is now recognized to be a multifactorial disease. Among the factors that have been shown to be involved in the provocation or increase of reflux, are sliding hiatus hernia, low lower esophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, the acid pocket, obesity, increased distensibility of the esophagogastric junction, prolonged esophageal clearance, and delayed gastric emptying. Moreover, multiple mechanisms influence the perception of GERD symptoms, such as the acidity of the refluxate, its proximal extent, the presence of gas in the refluxate, duodenogastroesophageal reflux, longitudinal muscle contraction, mucosal integrity, and peripheral and central sensitization. Understanding the pathophysiology of GERD is important for future targets for therapy as proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD symptoms remain a common problem.

PURPOSE

In this review we provide an overview of the mechanisms leading to reflux and the factors influencing perception, in the light of historical developments. It is clear that further research remains necessary despite the recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of GERD.

Mechanisms of acid reflux and how refluxed Acid extends proximally in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The mechanisms that cause acid reflux in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), including those that determine how acid extends proximally, are not yet clear.

METHODS

Concurrent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed for 3 h after a meal in 13 patients with NERD, 12 with mild reflux esophagitis (RE), and 13 healthy subjects (HS).

RESULTS

Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR) was the major mechanism of acid reflux in all three groups. LES pressure did not differ between the groups. At 2 cm above the LES, there were no differences between the three groups in the number of TLESR-related acid reflux episodes, rate of TLESRs and rate of acid reflux during TLESR. However, at 7 cm above the LES, the rate of acid reflux during TLESRs was significantly higher in patients with NERD (mean ± SEM 42.3 ± 4.8) than in those with mild RE (28.0 ± 3.8) and HS (10.8 ± 2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

TLESRs are the sole motor events underlying acid reflux episodes in patients with NERD. Acid extends proximally more readily in patients with NERD than in HS and those with mild RE.

Distinct afferent innervation patterns within the human proximal and distal esophageal mucosa

Little is known about the mucosal phenotype of the proximal human esophagus. There is evidence to suggest that the proximal esophagus is more sensitive to chemical and mechanical stimulation compared with the distal. This may have physiological relevance (e.g., in prevention of aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate), but also pathological relevance (e.g., in reflux perception or dysphagia). Reasons for this increased sensitivity are unclear but may include impairment in mucosal barrier integrity or changes in sensory innervation. We assessed mucosal barrier integrity and afferent nerve distribution in the proximal and distal esophagus of healthy human volunteers. In 10 healthy volunteers baseline proximal and distal esophageal impedance was measured in vivo. Esophageal mucosal biopsies from the distal and proximal esophagus were taken, and baseline transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured in Ussing chambers. Biopsies were examined immunohistochemically for presence and location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerve fibers. In a further four healthy volunteers we investigated for colocalization of CGRP and protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunoreactivity in nerve fibers. Baseline impedance was higher in the proximal than in the distal esophagus [2,936 Ω (SD578) vs. 2,229 Ω (SD821); P = 0.03], however, baseline TER was not significantly different between them. Mucosal CGRP-immunoreactive nerves were found in the epithelium of both proximal and distal esophagus, but were located more superficially in the proximal mucosa compared with the distal [11.5 (SD7) vs. 21.7 (SD5) cell layers from lumen, P = 0.002] 19% of proximal, and 10% of distal mucosal PGP-immunoreactive fibers colocalized with CGRP. PGP-immunoreactive fibers were also significantly closer to the luminal surface in the proximal compared with the distal esophagus (P < 0.001). We conclude that mucosal barrier integrity is similar in proximal and distal esophagus, but proximal mucosal afferent nerves are in a more superficial location. The enhanced sensitivity to reflux-evoked symptoms of the proximal esophagus most likely has an anatomical basis.

Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of proximal GERD

INTRODUCTION

Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, using EndoStim(®) LES stimulation system (EndoStim BV, the Hague, Netherlands), enhances LES pressure, decrease distal esophageal acid exposure, improves symptoms, and eliminates the need in many patients for daily GERD medications.

AIM

To evaluate, in a post hoc analysis, the effect of LES stimulation on proximal esophageal acid exposure in a subgroup of patients with abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure.

METHODS

Nineteen patients (median age 54 years; IQR 47-64; men-10) with GERD partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPI), hiatal hernia ≤ 3 cm, esophagitis ≤ LA grade C underwent laparoscopic implantation of the LES stimulator. LES stimulation at 20 Hz, 215 μs, 5-8 m Amp sessions was delivered in 6-12, 30 min sessions each day. Esophageal pH at baseline and after 12-months of LES stimulation was measured 5 and 23 cm above the manometric upper border of LES.

RESULTS

Total, upright and supine values of median (IQR) proximal esophageal pH at baseline were 0.4 (0.1-1.4), 0.6 (0.2-2.3), and 0 (0.0-0.2) %, respectively, and at 12 months on LES-EST were 0 (0-0) % (p = 0.001 total and upright; p = 0.043 supine comparisons). 24-hour distal esophageal acid exposure improved from 10.2 (7.6-11.7) to 3.4 (1.6-7.0) % (p = 0.001). Seven (37%) patients had abnormal (>1.1%) 24-hour proximal acid exposure at baseline; all normalized at 12 months (p = 0.008). In these 7 patients, total, upright, and supine median proximal acid exposure values at baseline were 1.7 (1.3-4.1), 2.9 (1.9-3.7), and 0.3 (0-4.9) %, respectively, and after 12 months of LES-EST were 0 (0-0.0), 0 (0-0.1), and 0 (0-0) % (p = 0.018 total and upright; p = 0.043 supine comparisons). Distal esophageal pH for this group improved from 9.3 (7.8-17.2) at baseline to 3.2 (1.1-3.7) % at 12-months (p = 0.043). There were no GI side effects such as dysphagia, gas-bloat or diarrhea or device or procedure related serious adverse events with LES-EST. There was also a significant improvement in their GERD-HRQL scores.

CONCLUSION

LES-EST is associated with normalization of proximal esophageal pH in patients with GERD and may be useful in treating those with proximal GERD. The LES-EST is safe without typical side effects associated with traditional antireflux surgery.

Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?

BACKGROUND

A short-course of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is often used to confirm gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, some patients with PPI responsive heartburn do not seem to have evidence of GERD on impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH). The aim of the study was to evaluate patients with reflux symptoms and a negative endoscopy, who well respond to PPIs with MII-pH.

METHODS

We enrolled 312 patients with GERD symptoms and negative endoscopy: 144 reported well-controlled symptoms after 8-week PPIs and 155 were non-responders. Symptom relief was evaluated with GERD Impact Scale and visual analog scale score. All patients underwent MII-pH off-therapy. Thirteen patients were excluded from analysis. Patients were grouped as follows: non-erosive reflux disease (NERD; increased acid exposure time, AET); hypersensitive esophagus (HE; normal AET, positive symptom association, SI/SAP); MII-pH-/PPI+ (normal AET, negative SI/SAP) in the responder group; MII-pH-/PPI- in non-responders.

KEY RESULTS

MII-pH in PPI responders (symptom relief during PPI therapy > 75%) showed: 79/144 NERD (54.9%); 37/144 HE (25.7%); 28/144 MII-pH-/PPI+ (19.4%). MII-pH-/PPI+ patients reported the same symptom relief when compared with NERD and HE. In non-responder (symptom relief during PPI therapy < 50%) group, 27/155 patients were NERD (17.4%); 53/155 were HE (34.2%); 75/155 were MII-pH-/PPI- (48.4%). NERD diagnosis was significantly higher in responder group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In a substantial subgroup of patients responding to PPI with typical reflux symptoms, the diagnosis of GERD cannot be confirmed with pH-impedance monitoring. Proton pump inhibitor response and presence of typical symptoms are thus not reliable predictors of the diagnosis and antireflux surgery should always be preceded by reflux monitoring.

Generation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms During Esophageal Acid Infusion With Concomitant Esophageal pH Monitoring in Healthy Adults

Background/Aims

The sensitivity of the upper and lower esophageal mucosa to acid is considered to differ. We investigated the relationship between pH changes in different sites of the esophagus and generation of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms during an acid infusion test.

Methods

An acid infusion catheter was placed at 5 or 15 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in 18 healthy volunteers, while a 2-channel pH sensor catheter was also placed in each with the sensors set at 5 and 15 cm above the LES. Solutions containing water and hydrochloric acid at different concentrations were infused through the infusion catheter.

Results

Acid infusion in the upper esophagus caused a pH drop in both upper and lower esophageal sites, whereas that in the lower esophagus resulted in a significant pH drop only in the lower without a corresponding pH decline in the upper esophagus. Stronger heartburn, chest pain, and chest oppression symptoms were noted when acid was infused in the upper as compared to the lower esophagus, while increased intra-esophageal acidity strengthened each symptom. Regurgitations caused by upper and lower esophageal acid infusions were similar, and not worsened by a larger drop in intra-esophageal pH. Chest pain was caused only by lowered intra-esophageal pH, while heartburn, chest oppression, and regurgitation were induced by a less acidic solution.

Conclusions

Higher intra-esophageal acidity caused stronger heartburn, chest pain, and chest oppression symptoms. However, regurgitation was not significantly influenced by intra-esophageal acidity. The upper esophagus showed higher acid sensitivity than the lower esophagus.

A standardized method for measuring intercellular spaces in esophageal biopsies in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (the intercellular space ratio)

OBJECTIVE

Dilated intercellular space (DIS) in esophageal biopsies is regarded as a possible early sign of mucosal injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study presents a standardized approach of intercellular space measurement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Distal and proximal esophageal biopsies were taken from 19 patients with suspected GERD, and examined with TEM. A grid containing 150 line-crossing points was applied upon each photomicrograph. The number of points falling on the intercellular space was divided by the total number of points of the grid, thereby creating a ratio called the intercellular space ratio (ISR). The ISR method was validated with regard to intra- and interobserver agreement, and was compared to a widely used method for measuring intercellular space diameter developed by Tobey et al. (Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, Orlando RC. Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux-damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1996;111(5):1200-1205). The ISR was also compared to other markers for GERD. Results. Pearson's correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreement were 0.91 (p < 0.001) and 0.82 (p < 0.001), respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the ISR and the intercellular space diameter according to Tobey et al., measured in the same micrographs, was 0.32 (p < 0.001). The proximal ISR correlated significantly with the distal ISR (Spearman's rho = 0.57, p = 0.010), and with heartburn symptom score (Spearman's rho = 0.50, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The ISR showed a high intraobserver and interobserver agreement. It also displayed good external validity when compared to other markers for gastroesophageal reflux. A rather poor correlation was however found between the ISR and the intercellular space diameter measured as described by Tobey et al.

Effect of transoral incisionless fundoplication on reflux mechanisms

OBJECTIVES

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is a new endoscopic treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mechanisms underlying the anti-reflux effect of this new procedure have not been studied. We therefore conducted this explorative study to evaluate the effect of TIF on reflux mechanisms, focusing on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility.

METHODS

GERD patients (N = 15; 11 males, mean age 41 years, range 23-66), dissatisfied with medical treatment were studied before and 6 months after TIF. We performed 90-min postprandial combined high-resolution manometry and impedance-pH monitoring and an ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. EGJ distensibility was evaluated using an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe before and directly after the procedure.

RESULTS

TIF reduced the number of postprandial TLESRs (16.8 ± 1.5 vs. 9.2 ± 1.3; p < 0.01) and the number of postprandial TLESRs associated with reflux (11.1 ± 1.6 vs. 5.6 ± 0.6; p < 0.01), but the proportion of TLESRs associated with reflux was unaltered (67.6 ± 6.9 vs. 69.9 ± 6.3 %). TIF also led to a decrease in the number and proximal extent of reflux episodes and an improvement of acid exposure in the upright position; conversely, TIF had no effect on the number of gas reflux episodes. EGJ distensibility was reduced after the procedure (2.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2 mm(2)/mmHg; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TIF reduced the number of postprandial TLESRs, the number of TLESRs associated with reflux and EGJ distensibility. This resulted in a reduction of the number and proximal extent of reflux episodes and improvement of acid exposure in the upright position. The anti-reflux effect of TIF showed to be selective for liquid-containing reflux only, thereby preserving the ability of venting gastric air.

How reflux causes symptoms: reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms arise due to reflux of gastric content into the oesophagus. However, the relation between magnitude and onset of reflux and symptom generation in GERD patients is far from simple; gastroesophageal reflux occurs several times a day in everyone and the majority of reflux episodes remains asymptomatic. This review aims to address the question how reflux causes symptoms, focussing on factors leading to enhanced reflux perception. We will highlight esophageal sensitivity variance between subtypes of GERD, which is influenced by peripheral sensitization of primary afferents, central sensitization of spinal dorsal horn neurons, impaired mucosal barrier function and genetic factors. We will also discuss the contribution of specific refluxate characteristics to reflux perception, including acidity, and the role of bile, pepsin and gas and proximal extent. Further understanding of reflux perception might improve GERD treatment, especially in current partial responders to therapy.

PPI therapy is equally effective in well-defined non-erosive reflux disease and in reflux esophagitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

  Symptomatic response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is often reported as lower than in patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD). However, the definition of NERD differs across clinical trials. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the rate of symptom relief in response to PPI in NERD patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1966-2010), Cochrane Comprehensive Trial Register (1997-2010) and EMBASE (1985-2010) databases were searched and manual searches from studies' references were performed. Randomized clinical trials were selected that included patients with heartburn, and analyzed the effect of short-term PPI treatment. The primary outcome of selected studies was defined as complete or partial heartburn relief. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality of selected articles. Random effects models and meta-regression were used to combine and analyze results.

KEY RESULTS

The pooled estimate of complete relief of heartburn after 4 weeks of PPI therapy in patients with ERD was 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74) (32 studies), vs 0.50 (0.43-0.57) (eight studies) in empirically treated patients, 0.49 (0.44-0.55) (12 studies) in patients defined as non-erosive by negative endoscopy, and 0.73 (0.69-0.77) (two studies) in patients defined as non-erosive by both negative endoscopy and a positive pH-test.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In well-defined NERD patients, the estimated complete symptom response rate after PPI therapy is comparable to the response rate in patients with ERD. The previously reported low response rate in studies with patients classified as NERD is likely the result of inclusion of patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms that do not have reflux disease.

Duodenal lipid-induced symptom generation in gastroesophageal reflux disease: role of apolipoprotein A-IV and cholecystokinin

BACKGROUND

  Duodenal lipid intensifies the perception of esophageal acid perfusion. Recently, we showed that genes implicated in lipid absorption were upregulated in the duodenum of fasting gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. This suggests that chylomicron production and secretion may be enhanced and, consequently, the release of apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV), a chylomicron-derived signaling protein. ApoA-IV may stimulate release of cholecystokinin (CCK), an activator of vagal afferents. This study evaluated putative involvement of abnormal apoA-IV and CCK responses to lipid in GERD.

METHODS

  Ten GERD patients and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent duodenal perfusion with Intralipid 20%, 2 kcal min(-1) , for 60 min. Symptoms were scored, blood samples collected every 15 min during lipid perfusion and 15 min after discontinuation when duodenal biopsies were taken. Plasma and mucosal concentrations of apoA-IV and CCK and transcript levels of 21 genes implicated in lipid absorption, differentially expressed under fasting conditions, were quantified.

KEY RESULTS

  Heartburn (P = 0.003), abdominal discomfort (P = 0.037) and nausea (P = 0.008) only increased significantly during lipid infusion in GERD patients. Following lipid infusion mean mucosal apoA-IV concentration was lower in GERD patients compared with HV (P = 0.023), whereas plasma concentration tended to be elevated (P = 0.068). Mean mucosal CCK concentration was also lower in GERD patients (P = 0.009). Two genes, HIBADH and JTB, were upregulated in GERD patients (P = 0.008 and P = 0.038, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

  Our results suggest excessive duodenal lipid-induced release of apoA-IV and CCK in GERD. We postulate that the resulting heightened activation of duodenal vagal afferents may underlie central sensitization, thereby increasing the perception of reflux events.

Comparison of central and intraesophageal factors between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients and those with GERD-related noncardiac chest pain

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of symptoms. Some patients present with typical symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation and others with atypical symptoms such as chest pain. The mechanism responsible for the varying clinical presentation of GERD is still not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate differences in central and local intraesophageal factors between patients with typical GERD symptoms and those with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Patients presenting with typical and atypical symptoms suspicious of GERD underwent upper endoscopy and 24-hour pH monitoring with four sensors, each positioned at a different esophageal level. All patients completed GERD symptom, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Symptom Stress Rating questionnaires. From January 2006 to December 2009, 50 patients were recruited, 29 with typical symptoms, and 21 with NCCP. Patients with proven GERD and NCCP had higher proximal extension of acid during reflux episodes than patients with typical symptoms. They were found to be older, had a shorter history of symptom onset, worse anxiety scores, and more endoscopic findings compatible with gastritis. Proximal extension of acid during the reflux episodes in patients with GERD presenting with NCCP may play a role in symptom generation.

A double-blind sham-controlled study of the effect of radiofrequency energy on symptoms and distensibility of the gastro-esophageal junction in GERD

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have reported symptom relief in gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients treated with radiofrequency delivery (Stretta procedure) at the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ), but the mechanism underlying this improvement is unclear. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that Stretta alters GEJ resistance.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized cross-over study of Stretta and sham treatment. Consecutive GERD patients were included in the study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Patients underwent two upper gastrointestinal endoscopies with 3 months interval, during which active or sham Stretta treatment was performed in a randomized double-blind manner. Symptom assessment, endoscopy, manometry, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and a distensibility test of the GEJ were done before the start of the study and after 3 months.

RESULTS

Barostat distensibility test of the GEJ before and after administration of sildenafil was the main outcome measure. In all, 22 GERD patients (17 females, mean age 47±12 years) participated in the study; 11 in each group. Initial sham treatment did not affect any of the parameters studied. Three months after initial Stretta procedure, no changes were observed in esophageal acid exposure and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. In contrast, symptom score was significantly improved and GEJ compliance was significantly decreased. Administration of sildenafil, an esophageal smooth muscle relaxant, normalized GEJ compliance again to pre-Stretta level, arguing against GEJ fibrosis as the underlying mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

The limitation of this study was reflux evaluation did not include impedance monitoring. In this sham-controlled study, Stretta improved GERD symptoms and decreased GEJ compliance. Decreased GEJ compliance, which reflects altered LES neuromuscular function, may contribute to symptomatic benefit by decreasing refluxate volume.

Mechanisms of reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review

Patients with reflux symptoms often do not have excessive esophageal acid exposure, and patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux often do not have reflux symptoms. Understanding why different types of reflux induce symptoms in different patients is vital for addressing therapeutic gaps in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we review studies providing insight into how gastroesophageal reflux is perceived, with a focus on comparing reflux characteristics and esophageal sensitivity among subgroups of patients with GERD. The available studies indicate that patients with nonerosive reflux disease have fewer acid reflux episodes and thus less esophageal acid exposure than patients with reflux esophagitis but perceive less intense stimuli because of greater esophageal sensitivity. Reflux characteristics other than acidity, such as the presence of bile, pepsin, liquid, or gas in reflux, and the proximal extent or volume of reflux, may also contribute to symptom perception. Factors contributing to greater esophageal sensitivity may include impaired mucosal barrier function, peripherally mediated esophageal sensitivity (enhanced esophageal receptor signaling), and centrally mediated esophageal sensitivity (physiological stressors, sensitization of spinal sensory neurons). Further insight into mechanisms of reflux perception may require a shift toward studies aimed at understanding predisposing cellular, molecular, and genetic factors.

Measurement of acid exposure of proximal esophagus: a better tool for diagnosing non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity of 24-h pH monitoring is poor in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). In NERD patients, the proximal extent of acid reflux is one of the main determinants of reflux perception. The present study was aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of acid exposure time (AET), at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter, with those at 10 cm and at 3 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter as well as the reproducibility of these parameters.

METHODS

A total of 93 consecutive NERD patients, with typical symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor treatment, and 40 controls underwent esophageal manometry and multi-channel 24-h pH-test; 13 patients underwent the same study on two occasions. Symptom association probability (SAP) values were evaluated at each esophageal level.

KEY RESULTS

The ROC curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.79 at distal (SE=0.039), 0.87 (SE=0.032) at proximal (P=0.029 vs distal), and 0.85 (SE=0.033) at very proximal esophagus (P =0.148). AET showed a reproducibility of 61% (Kappa 0.22) at distal esophagus, 77% (Kappa 0.45) at proximal and 53% (Kappa 0.05) at very proximal esophagus. The percentage of patients with a positive SAP was not significantly different when assessed at the distal compared with the proximal esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In NERD patients, the diagnostic yield of the pH test is significantly improved by the assessment of AET at the proximal esophagus. As this variable seems to be less affected by the day to day variability, it could be considered a reliable and useful diagnostic tool in NERD patients.

Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus and spread of gastro-esophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Factors that determine the spread of gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) along the length of the esophagus are not known. We investigated if cardiovascular (CV) compressions on the esophagus may determine the spread of refluxate into the proximal esophagus.

METHODS

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and multi-channel intra-luminal impedance recording (MIIR) were performed simultaneously in 10 normal subjects in the recumbent and upright positions. Pulsatile pressure increases on the esophagus (marker of CV compression) were identified on the HRM. Spread of refluxate into the esophagus was determined by the MIIR.

KEY RESULTS

Cardiovascular compression zones were observed in the esophagus in 9 out of 10 subjects in recumbent position. Forty percent of GER episodes were limited to the distal esophagus in the recumbent position and CV compression pressure was greater than distal esophageal pressure at the time of GER in all such cases. On the other hand, distal esophageal pressure was greater than CV compression pressure when the refluxate extended into the proximal esophagus. In the upright position, CV compression was less frequent than recumbent position and only 12% of GER episodes were limited to the distal esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus is frequently observed in normal healthy subject and restricts the spread of refluxate into the proximal esophagus.

Medical treatment of GORD. Emerging therapeutic targets and concepts

Approximately 20-30% of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms report inadequate symptom relief while on PPI therapy. Persisting acid or non-acid reflux can be demonstrated in 40-50% of them suggesting that there is room for anti-reflux therapy in these patients. New anti-reflux compounds aim at decreasing the occurrence of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) which represent the main mechanism of all types of reflux. The most promising classes of compounds are GABA(B) agonists and mGluR5 antagonists which have been shown to reduce both reflux episodes and symptoms and are currently under evaluation in phase II and III clinical trials. Compounds that target TLOSR activity represent a promising new therapeutic option for patients who suffer from GORD symptoms. These drugs will probably be developed as add-on therapy in combination with PPIs provided the tolerability and safety issues are resolved.

The refluxate: The impact of its magnitude, composition and distribution

The pathogenesis of gastrointestinal reflux disease is multifactoral. Integral to the disease process is the refluxate itself. The characteristics and composition of the refluxate are dependent on several physiological variables. The refluxate may contain varying concentrations of acid, pepsin, gas, or contents of duodenal reflux (such as bile acid and pancreatic enzymes). Characteristics such as volume and proximal extent of the refluxate, and the chemical content of this refluxate can strongly influence the risk of symptom perception. Strong acid (pH<4) and duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux are also implicated in the development of mucosal damage in the form of oesophagitis, Barrett's metaplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The manifestation of disease, however, is not entirely reliant on the refluxate, which must be considered in the context of the genetic, environmental and psychological susceptibility of the individual.

Characteristics of gastro-esophageal reflux episodes in Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis and healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux is considered a major culprit in the pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Still, there is controversy on the role of weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in BE. To compare characteristics of reflux episodes patients with BE, erosive esophagitis (EE), and healthy volunteers (HV).

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with BE (75 short-segment BE, 25 long-segment BE), 50 with EE and 48 HV underwent multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH off-therapy. We quantified esophageal acid exposure, characteristics, and proximal extension of reflux episodes.

KEY RESULTS

Total and acid reflux episodes gradually increased from HV [28 (17.5-43) and 18 (8-31)] to EE [73.5 (54-96) and 52 (39-68)], short-segment BE (SSBE) [83 (73.2-131) and 65 (43.3-95)] and long-segment BE (LSBE) [105 (102-187) and 77 (75-107)]. Weakly acidic reflux episodes were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in LSBE [36 (27.5-50.5)] and SSBE [34 (18.5-41)] compared to EE [21.5 (15-37)] and HV [19 (14-25)]. No differences in terms of proportion of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux were found [HV (49%-49%-2%) vs EE (68%-32%-1%) vs SSBE (65%-34%-1%) vs LSBE (69%-30%-1%); P = ns]. In LSBE, a higher percentage of reflux episodes (P < 0.05) reached the proximal esophagus (59%) compared with SSBE (43%).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

 Barrett esophagus patients have more severe reflux as shown by the number of acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes, re-reflux episodes and proximal migration. Given that PPI change only the pH of the refluxate, the role of weakly acidic reflux in Barrett's patients on acid suppressive therapy warrants further investigation.

Differences in clinical characteristics between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in Korea

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. GERD can be divided into two groups, erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with erosive esophagitis to those with NERD. All participating patients underwent an upper endoscopy during a voluntary health check-up. The NERD group consisted of 500 subjects with classic GERD symptoms in the absence of esophageal mucosal injury during upper endoscopy. The erosive esophagitis group consisted of 292 subjects with superficial esophageal erosions with or without typical symptoms of GERD. Among GERD patients, male gender, high body mass index, high obesity degree, high waist-to-hip ratio, high triglycerides, alcohol intake, smoking and the presence of a hiatal hernia were positively related to the development of erosive esophagitis compared to NERD. In multivariated analysis, male gender, waist-to-hip ratio and the presence of a hiatal hernia were the significant risk factors of erosive esophagitis. We suggest that erosive esophagitis was more closely related to abdominal obesity.

Quantitative assessment and characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of esophageal hypersensitivity in functional heartburn (FH) with negative pH test, negative symptom index, and the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) failure has not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with FH, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis and further characterize the pathophysiologic mechanism of FH.

METHODS

A total of 21 FH patients (with esophageal acid exposure <3.1% and a symptom index<50% and nonresponse to a therapeutic trial with proton pump inhibitors, 25 Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients (with esophageal acid exposure>4%), 23 erosive esophagitis (EE) patients (LA grade B to D), and 18 healthy controls were recruited in the study. Mechanosensitivity including the initial perception threshold (IPT) and pain threshold (PT) was evaluated by using a Barostat with a double-random staircase distension protocol. Chemosensitivity was graded along a visual analog scale after perfusion of saline and 0.1 N HCl.

RESULTS

The baseline IPTs and PTs were all lower in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than in the controls (all P<0.01). In addition, the baseline PT in FH patients was significantly lower than those in NERD (P=0.015) and EE patients (P<0.001). After acid perfusion, the mean symptom intensity scores were significantly greater in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than those in the controls (all P<0.001). The postacid perfusion IPTs in patients with FH, NERD, and EE were all significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values (all P<0.01). The PTs in FH (P=0.026) and EE patients (P<0.001) were significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values. Moreover, the postacid perfusion PT was significantly lower in FH patients than in NERD patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FH patients are more sensitive to mechanical or chemical stimuli than NERD patients. Sensitization of esophageal acid-sensitive chemoreceptors may exert a significant influence on the pressure-sensitive mechanoreceptors, and there is the cooperative interaction in the process of esophageal visceral hyperalgesia.

The prokinetic effect of mosapride citrate combined with omeprazole therapy improves clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients are less sensitive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment than patients with erosive reflux disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with prokinetics in addition to omeprazole therapy would improve clinical symptoms, gastric emptying and esophageal peristalsis in PPI-resistant NERD patients with or without delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

Subjects were 64 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of PPl-resistant NERD (n = 44) and 20 healthy volunteers. PPI-resistant NERD patients underwent mosapride citrate (15 mg/day) and omeprazole (20 mg/day) co-therapy for 12 weeks. We evaluated the clinical symptoms as well as gastric emptying and esophageal manometry before and after combined therapy. We measured both acylated- and des-acylated plasma ghrelin levels by the ELISA method. The primary endopoint was to investigate whether co-administration of mosapride citrate and omeprazole would improve clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

RESULTS

T (max) value in PPI-resistant NERD patients was significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. Combination therapy with the prokinetic agent mosapride citrate and omeprazole significantly improved reflux symptoms and T (max) value in T (max) > 65 min NERD patients. Co-therapy also significantly reduced des-acylated-ghrelin levels in NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of mosapride citrate in addition to omeprazole improved gastro-esophageal reflux and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

Review article: sleep-related gastro-oesophageal reflux as a distinct clinical entity

BACKGROUND

Many patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have frequent nighttime heartburn as well as sleep-related gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR). Sleep-related GOR has been shown to play an important role in the development of oesophagitis and other complications of GOR.

AIM

To present a conceptual argument that nighttime heartburn and associated sleep-related GOR should be recognized as a distinct clinical entity deserving special attention with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.

METHODS

The data presented come from surveys of GERD patients as well as from physiological studies to include studies monitoring oesophageal pH and spontaneous reflux events during polysomnographically (PSG) monitored sleep.

RESULTS

Evidence is presented to show that nighttime heartburn is prevalent and its occurrence separates patients from those who have heartburn most exclusively in the daytime. The evidence presented also supports the notion that nighttime heartburn sufferers have a more complicated disease and they have a greater risk of developing oesophagitis and other respiratory complications. The data also show that responses to acid mucosal contact are quite different during sleep compared to responses measured during the waking state.

CONCLUSIONS

Nighttime heartburn and GOR represent a distinct clinical entity which deserves specific attention in the diagnosis and optimal treatment of GERD.

Role of the gastric refluxate in gastroesophageal reflux disease: acid, weak acid and bile

The role of acid, weak/nonacid, and bile in the genesis of esophageal mucosal damage and reflux symptoms is complex. Acid combined with pepsin and unconjugated bile acids are critical to the development of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. Acid alone may be the principal factor in determining the severity of esophagitis. Weak acid or nonacid reflux does not cause esophageal damage or damage to adjacent organs, such as the larynx or lungs. The primary cause of heartburn and regurgitation is acid reflux, but a minority of symptoms (5%-15%) can be triggered by weak acid or bile reflux. The role is changed among patients on proton pump inhibitors with persistent symptoms, where the majority of symptoms are now due to weak acid or bile reflux. The proximal extent of the reflux, regardless of its acidity, seems to be the key to reflux symptoms.

Comparison of the different characteristics of sensed reflux events among different heartburn groups

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Presently, there are no studies comparing sensed acid reflux event (SARE) characteristics among different heartburn groups. Our aim was to compare the different esophageal acid reflux characteristics of an SARE among the different heartburn groups.

METHODS

Patients with heartburn underwent endoscopy and pH testing and were stratified into 3 groups: erosive esophagitis (EE), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), and functional heartburn (FH). Patients underwent esophageal pH testing using a 4-sensor pH probe, with the most distal pH sensor positioned 1 cm> lower esophageal sphincter (LES).

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had EE, 15 NERD, and 13 FH (M/F: 20/2, 12/3, 5/8, mean age: 51.5+/-3.7, 50.1+/-4.2, 50.3+/-3.8, respectively). The percentage of SAREs at 1 cm>LES that had reached 16 cm>LES was significantly higher in the FH group compared with NERD and EE (P<0.05). EE demonstrated the lowest nadir during an SARE and NERD the most acid reflux events before an SARE (up to 4 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FH demonstrated the most SAREs that reached the proximal esophagus. EE patients demonstrated the lowest nadir pH during an SARE and NERD patients the most acid reflux events before an SARE, as compared with the other heartburn groups.

Comparison of the degree of duodenogastroesophageal reflux and acid reflux between patients who failed to respond and those who were successfully treated with a proton pump inhibitor once daily

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the degree of esophageal acid exposure and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) during treatment between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients who responded fully to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) once a day and those who failed to respond.

METHODS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients who continued to report symptoms 3 times a week for 3 months while on PPI once a day were assigned to the PPI failure group. GERD patients who were asymptomatic on PPI once a day for 3 months were assigned to the PPI success group. All patients underwent upper endoscopy to assess esophageal mucosal injury. Subsequently, all patients underwent simultaneous 24-h esophageal Bilitec 2000 and pH testing while on treatment. Patients recorded GERD-related symptoms during the test.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the PPI failure group and 23 patients were enrolled in the PPI success group. Endoscopy was normal in 63% of PPI failure patients and 76% of PPI success patients. Abnormal DGER was documented in 82% of PPI success patients vs. 67% of PPI failure patients (P=NS). All pH testing and Bilitec parameters in the PPI failure group were similar to those in the PPI success group (P=NS). Of the 34 GERD symptoms recorded by the PPI failure group, 64% were associated with acid reflux and 41% were associated with DGER (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in the degree of DGER and acid exposure during treatment between patients who failed to respond and those who achieved complete symptom resolution on PPI once daily. GERD symptoms in the PPI failure group are more commonly associated with acid reflux than with DGER.

Proximal oesophagus: the added value in understanding GORD symptoms

Over the past decade, the approach to the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms has changed, and growing evidence now supports the concept that visceral hyper-sensitivity to intra-oesophageal stimuli plays a major role. Among the recent advances, one of the more consistent findings is that the contact of the refluxate, either acidic or weakly acidic, with the proximal oesophageal mucosa, is a main determinant of GORD symptoms, particularly in the large majority of patients affected by non-erosive reflux disease. The data reported in the current issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility by Bredenoord et al., showing only a small proportion of proximal reflux in patients with Barrett's oesophagus, who are less sensitive to gastro-oesophageal reflux, further support the consistency of this finding in the pathogenesis of symptoms. In the light of these results, we shall look forward, in the management of patients, to approaches aimed at restoring the antireflux barrier, hopefully decreasing the amount of reflux and, in turn, its proximal extent.

Relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern and severity of mucosal damage

The aim of the study is to compare the characteristics of reflux episodes in controls and in patients with various degrees of oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus. Ambulatory 24-h impedance-pH tracings were analysed from healthy volunteers, patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), patients with grade A oesophagitis, grade B oesophagitis, grade C or D oesophagitis and patients with a short segment (<2 cm) of Barrett's metaplasia. The number of acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes increased from 25.9 +/- 3.9 to 17.9 +/- 1.5 in the controls, 39.9 +/- 6.3 to 33.4 +/- 5.7 in the patients with NERD, 46.6 +/- 6.2 to 40.4 +/- 9.2 in grade A, 68.2 +/- 9.2 to 49.2 +/- 12.3 in grade B, 79.8 +/- 15.6 to 47.4 +/- 4.6 in grade C/D and 75.1 +/- 7.9 to 37.3 +/- 8.5 in the patients with Barrett. The proportion of reflux episodes that is acidic or alkaline was similar all groups. Comparison with normal values revealed that none of the controls, 40% of the patients with NERD, 50% of the patients with grade A, 80% of the patients with grade B and all patients with grade C/D or Barrett's oesophagus had an abnormally high total number of reflux episodes. In the patients with severe oesophagitis a significantly higher percentage of reflux episodes reached the proximal oesophagus (43.8%) compared to the patients with Barrett's oesophagus (19.2%). With increasing degrees of oesophagitis, patients have more reflux episodes but a large overlap between the groups exists making comparison with normal values of limited relevance. In patients with Barrett's oesophagus fewer reflux episodes reach the proximal oesophagus which might explain their low sensitivity to reflux.

In GERD patients, mucosal repair associated genes are upregulated in non-inflamed oesophageal epithelium

Previous studies addressing the effects of acid reflux and PPI therapy on gene expression in oesophageal epithelium concentrated on inflamed tissue. We aimed to determine changes in gene expression in non-inflamed oesophageal epithelium of GERD patients. Therefore, we included 20 GERD patients with pathological total 24-hr acid exposure of 6-12% and SAP > or = 95%. Ten patients discontinued PPI treatment (PPI-), 10 took pantoprazole 40 mg bid (PPI+). Ten age/sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Biopsies were taken from non-inflamed mucosa 6 cm and 16 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ). Gene expression profiling of biopsies from 6 cm was performed on Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix). Genes exhibiting a fold change >1.4 (t-test P-value < 1(E)- 4) were considered differentially expressed. Results were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. In PPI- patients, 92 microarray probesets were deregulated. The majority of the corresponding genes were associated with cell-cell contacts, cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular motility, suggesting facilitation of a migratory phenotype. Genes encoding proteins with anti-apoptotic or anti-proliferative functions or stress-protective functions were also deregulated. No probesets were deregulated in PPI+ patients. QPCR analysis of 20 selected genes confirmed most of the deregulations in PPI- patients, and showed several deregulated genes in PPI+ patients as well. In the biopsies taken at 16 cm QPCR revealed no deregulations of the selected genes. We conclude that upon acid exposure, oesophageal epithelial cells activate a process globally known as epithelial restitution: up-regulation of anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant and migration associated genes. Possibly this process helps maintaining barrier function.

Regional oesophageal sensitivity to acid and weakly acidic reflux in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

The mechanisms underlying symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) remain to be elucidated. Non-erosive reflux disease patients appear to be more sensitive to intraluminal stimula than erosive patients, the proximal oesophagus being the most sensitive. In order to assess regional oesophageal changes in reflux acidity and sensitivity to reflux, according either to the acidity or the composition of the refluxate, combined multiple pH and multiple pH-impedance (pH-MII) was performed in 16 NERD patients. According to multiple pH-metry, 29% and 12% of reflux events reached the middle and proximal oesophagus respectively, and 35% and 19% according to conventional pH-MII (P < 0.05). The per-individual analysis confirmed the difference between the two techniques. According to combined distal and proximal pH-MII, approximately 30% of distal acid reflux became weakly acidic at the proximal oesophagus. In all patients, the frequency of symptomatic refluxes, both acid and weakly acidic, was significantly higher at the proximal, compared with distal oesophagus (25 +/- 8%vs 11 +/- 2% for acid reflux and 27 +/- 8%vs 8 +/- 2% for weakly acidic reflux; P < 0.05). Compared with multiple pH-metry, pH-MII shows a higher sensitivity in the detection of proximal reflux. As approximately 30% of acid reflux becomes weakly acidic along the oesophageal body, to better characterize proximal reflux, in clinical practice, combined proximal pH-impedance monitoring should be used. In NERD patients, the proximal oesophagus seems to be more sensitive to both acid and weakly acidic reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with the C825T polymorphism in the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3)

OBJECTIVES

Visceral hypersensitivity is involved in the etiology of reflux symptoms. Familial clustering and twin studies demonstrated a genetic predisposition to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the response to acid, neurotransmitters and humoral factors modulating esophageal sensory function. Thus, polymorphisms in G-proteins are putative genetic factors contributing to GERD manifestation. A functional polymorphism in the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3) is associated with functional dyspepsia (FD), in which visceral hypersensitivity is implicated in symptom generation. We evaluated the association of the GNB3 C825T polymorphism with GERD and GERD subgroups classified according to esophageal acid exposure time, symptom-reflux correlation, or coexistence of FD and/or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms.

METHODS

In total, 363 GERD patients, defined as having esophageal pH < 4 > or = 6% of time and/or symptom index (SI) > or = 50% or symptom association probability (SAP) > or = 95%, participated. In addition, 373 healthy controls free of gastrointestinal symptoms were studied. Genotyping was performed by molecular beacon assay.

RESULTS

The CT genotype was more prevalent in GERD patients relative to healthy controls (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98). GERD patients sensitive to physiological amounts of reflux displayed a higher OR (1.59), as did GERD patients with a positive symptom association score (1.50). The strongest association was detected in patients without concomitant FD and/or IBS symptoms (OR=1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

GERD is associated with GNB3 C825T. The results for GERD subgroups support the hypothesis that enhanced perception of reflux events, as a consequence of the increased signal transduction upon GPCR activation associated with the 825T allele, underlies this association.

Mechanisms of heartburn

Heartburn is a typical symptom of GERD. The spectrum of diseases associated with GERD includes reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). Although acid reflux is the classic cause of heartburn in patients with erosive esophagitis, the relationship between acid and heartburn is far from clear, especially in patients with NERD. Strong evidence exists that weakly acidic reflux and/or non-acid-related events have a significant role in the generation of heartburn. In addition to the role of nonacidic refluxate components, activation of mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors, and a possible role for central and peripheral sensitization, has been described. Although patients with erosive esophagitis respond well to acid-suppressive therapy, the same does not hold true for those with NERD. NERD represents a major clinical problem, and its management remains a challenge. Discussion of NERD focuses on the mechanisms that cause chest pain in this subgroup of patients. Improved understanding of the pathogenesis underlying heartburn in patients with GERD, in particular those with NERD, will shape our understanding of this condition. Such understanding will serve as a platform for further research and allow additional therapies to be developed for this increasingly encountered clinical condition.

Esophageal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) and nonerosive reflux disease

Esophageal mucosal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) are frequently observed in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and patients with esophagitis. The specificity of DIS is questionable, as it is present in up to 30% of asymptomatic healthy subjects and in patients with other esophageal disorders. DIS occurs in parallel with a drop in potential difference, diminished transepithelial resistance, and increased esophageal mucosal permeability. These alterations arise with exposure to acid and pepsin during gastroesophageal reflux, but the exact pathway of damage to the intercellular junctions remains unclear and seems to be multifactorial. Other noxious contents of the refluxate, such as bile acids, are harmful and DIS can also be induced by acute psychological stress. DIS can be assessed quantitatively with electron microscopy (EM), but it is also recognizable with light microscopy (LM). DIS can disappear after treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI); however, this is not the case in all NERD patients. A recent study showed that patients with NERD who are refractory to PPI might still have DIS; and animal experiments showed that persistence of DIS might be due to esophageal mucosal exposure to bile acids and/or psychological stress. In conclusion, DIS is a frequent but nonspecific histological feature of NERD. It can be caused by acid reflux, but bile acids in the refluxate and/or psychological stress can modulate the development or persistence of DIS. Although a causal relationship between DIS and heartburn has been proposed, it still needs to be proven and the underlying mechanisms investigated before considering DIS as a target for treatment of NERD.