Technical aspects of the use of the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail

Are piriformis reconstruction implants ideal for prophylactic femoral neck fixation?

OBJECTIVES

Prophylactic femoral neck fixation may be performed in the setting of geriatric diaphyseal femur fracture, pathologic or impending atypical femur fractures. Fixation constructs often utilize cephalomedullary implants with one or two proximal interlocking screws into the femoral head/neck. Variations in proximal femoral anatomy and implant design can interfere with the placement of two screws in the femoral head and neck. Our objective was to assess the strength of piriformis entry reconstruction implants with one versus two proximal interlock screws for prophylactic femoral neck fixation.

METHODS

Thirty fourth generation synthetic femur models were separated into 5 groups. The control group was an intact femur, and the second group was an intact femur with an entry hole in the piriformis fossa. The remaining groups had an intramedullary nail placed with either 0, 1, or 2 screws placed into the femoral head and neck. Each femur was mechanically loaded along the mechanical axis through the femoral head. Load to failure and failure displacement were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean load to failure was 5583 ± 543 N in the intact femur. Constructs with 2 screws had a significantly higher mean load to failure (3223 ± 474 N) compared to one screw constructs (2368 ± 280 N). All of the experimental groups remained significantly lower than the intact femur model (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that piriformis entry reconstruction implants have a significantly lower load to failure compared to an intact femur irrespective of screw construct. Further studies are needed to investigate this potential iatrogenic weakening.

Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates

OBJECTIVE:

To study the outcome of subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with proximal lateral femur locking plate.

METHOD:

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical results of 48 cases of femoral subtrochanteric fractures treated with proximal lateral femur locking plates from January 2008 to May 2010. The progress of fracture healing, as well as the occurrence of complications, was recorded. The function of the hip joint was evaluated by the Harris social index and the Parker and Palmer mobility score one year after the operation.

RESULT:

45 patients were followed up until fracture union or a revision surgery. Among the 45 patients, 43 patients obtained fracture union without further intervention. Thirty-eight fractures healed with no loss of position at 1-year follow-up. There were no cases of hip screw cutting through the femoral head. The mean score of the Harris social index was 86.5±9.8 (73~95). The mean Parker and Palmer mobility score was 7.4±2.1 (3~9).

CONCLUSION:

The proximal lateral femur locking plate is the kind of stable and effective internal fixation for treating subtrochanteric hip fractures which has the advantage of stable fixation especially for the lateral femoral wall fracture. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Cephalomedullary nailing for proximal femoral fractures

From May 1999 to April 2002, we treated 14 patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures and seven patients with ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft using a second-generation cephalomedullary interlocked nail. Patients mean age was 36 (20-60) years, and 19 fractures were caused by high-energy trauma. Four patients had associated injuries. The average follow-up was 23 (16-30) months. Per-operatively, we had problems in locating the entry portal in four patients, and one nail was driven through the inter-condylar notch. All fractures except two united. One patient had non-union of the femoral neck and one of both neck and shaft. One patient united with shortening of more than 1.5 cm and varus angulation at the fracture site. Two patients had loosening and backing out of the proximal screw. The second-generation cephalomedullary nail is a suitable treatment option for proximal femoral fractures, but it requires a high degree of accuracy and technical expertise.

The treatment of difficult proximal femoral fractures with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail

The outcome of 30 proximal femoral fractures and pathological lesions in 29 patients treated with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail are reported. Four patients had fractures involving both the femoral neck and shaft (segmental). Fifteen patients had extensive comminuted fractures of the proximal femur and ten patients underwent nailing because of pathological fractures (one bilateral). In nineteen operations there were technical difficulties, nail insertion and proximal interlocking being the commonest. In the elderly there was a high post-operative complication rate. Three nails needed to be revised for failure of fixation. On review, all patients under sixty years of age regained full mobility and returned to their pre-fracture level of activities. Patients with per-trochanteric fractures over the age of sixty had less favourable results. No cancer patient returned to their prefracture mobility level. The Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail proved to be useful in the treatment of segmented and, in a lesser degree, pathological fractures. However, the surgical technique is demanding and there is a high incidence of post-operative complications in the patients over the age of sixty.

Comparison of reconstruction nails for high subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation

Subtrochanteric osteotomies were created in 18 matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric femora. The femora were stabilized with a Synthes, Zimmer, or Richards second generation femoral reconstruction nail with retrograde blade or screws. The femoral pairs were randomly assigned to groups based on nails used: Synthes versus Zimmer, Synthes versus Richards, and Zimmer versus Richards. The reconstructions were cyclically loaded in bending for 2000 cycles and then loaded to failure. The mean stiffness of the Synthes, Zimmer, and Richards reconstructions was 17%, 40%, and 40% of the intact femora, respectively. The Richards construct was the strongest, and predominately failed by fracture at the distal interlocking screw hole. The Zimmer construct failed by bending of the nail at the osteotomy site and fracture of the proximal femoral shaft. The Synthes construct was the most flexible and least strong and failed by bending of the spiral, retrograde blade with concomitant fracture of the femoral neck. This study indicates that fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures with a Synthes spiral blade or Richards or Zimmer reconstruction nails provides stable fixation for postoperative loading conditions. However, the Richards and Zimmer nails were able to withstand higher loads than was the Synthes nail before failure.

Use of the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail in femoral shaft fractures

Of 242 patients with injuries treated by locked intramedullary nailing of the femur, 52 (22 percent) were considered suitable for insertion of the reconstruction nail. The Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail was found to be useful in a greater variety of fractures than those for which it was originally designed. In addition to ipsilateral neck and shaft fractures, the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail proved successful in high-energy comminuted subtrochanteric fractures, elderly subtrochanteric fractures and pathological lesions. In two cases, problems were encountered due to the relative straightness of the nail, but in the remaining patients there were no technical problems. In the 43 elderly patients and those with pathological lesions, seven complications occurred: a number which compares favourably with published reports for extramedullary devices. There were no cases of implant failure and in all patients the device supported the fracture to union or death.