Should emergency room thoracotomy be reserved for cases of cardiac tamponade?

Thoracic Trauma: Current Approach in Emergency Medicine

Chest trauma is the leading cause of death in people under 40. It is estimated to cause around 140,000 deaths each year. The key aims are to reduce mortality and the impact of associated complications to expedite recovery and to restore patient's conditions. The recognition of lesions through appropriate imaging and early treatment already in the emergency department are fundamental. The majority can be managed in a non-surgical way, but especially after traumatic cardiac arrest, a surgical approach is required. One of the most important surgical procedures is the Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT). The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis about the management of thoracic trauma, the surgical procedures, accepted indications, and technical details adopted during the most important surgical procedures for different thoracic trauma injuries. Literature from 1990 to 2023 was retrieved from multiple databases and reviewed. It is also important to emphasize the medico-legal implications of this type of trauma, both from the point of view of collaboration with the judicial authority and in the prevention of any litigation.

A Rent in the Left Ventricle: A Sea-Saw Between Life and Death

Penetrating injuries to the precordium are life-threatening and require early detection and immediate intervention. We present a case of penetrating cardiac injury who presented with a definitive airway and hemodynamically unstable. During the primary survey, the patient had a cardiac arrest with pulseless ventricular tachycardia. The patient was resuscitated as per advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) and advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guidelines with manual digital compression at the penetrating site leading to a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). After ROSC, he was shifted for emergency explorative median sternotomy. During the sternotomy, we found a clotted rent in the anterior wall of the left ventricle, which was repaired. Aggressive resuscitation and appropriate management strategy in the emergency department (ED) resulted in a successful outcome, and he was discharged after 10 days of hospital stay. Our case highlights the importance of early diagnosing and managing penetrating cardiac trauma.

Emergency Department Resuscitative Thoracotomy: Indications, surgical procedure and outcome. A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDRT) after traumatic Cardio-pulmonary Arrest (CPR) can be used to salvage select critically injured patients. Indications of this surgical procedure are widely debated and changed during last decades. We provide the available literature about EDRT in the effort to provide a comprehensive synthesis about the procedure, likelihood of success and patient's outcome in the different clinical setting, accepted indications and technical details adopted during the procedure for different trauma injuries.

METHODS

Literature from 1975 to 2020 was retrieved from multiple databases and reviewed. Indications, contraindications, total number and outcome of patients submitted to EDRT were primary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total number of 7236 patients received EDRT, but only 7.8% survived. Penetrating trauma and witnessed cardiopulmonary arrest with the presence of vital signs at the trauma center are the most favorable conditions to perform EDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

EDRT should be reserved for acute resuscitation of selected dying trauma patient. Risks of futility, costs, benefits of the surgical procedure should be carefully evaluated before performing the surgical procedure.

Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on the effectiveness of emergency department thoracotomy after blunt trauma

PURPOSE

Debate remains about the threshold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration associated with futile emergency department thoracotomy (EDT). To validate the CPR duration associated with favorable outcomes, we investigated the relationship between CPR duration and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after EDT in blunt trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at three tertiary centers over the last 7 years. We included bluntly injured adults who were pulseless and required EDT at presentation, but excluded those with devastating head injuries. After multivariate logistic regression identified the CRP duration as an independent predictor of ROSC, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the threshold CPR duration. Patient data were divided into short- and long-duration CPR groups based on this threshold, and we developed a propensity score to estimate assignment to the short-duration CPR group. The ROSC rates were compared between groups after matching.

RESULTS

Forty patients were eligible for this study and ROSC was obtained in 12. The CPR duration was independently associated with the achievement of ROSC [odds ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.37, P = 0.04], and the threshold CPR duration was 17 min. Among the 14 patients with a short CPR duration, 13 matched with the patients with a long CPR duration, and a short CPR duration was significantly associated with higher rates of ROSC (odds ratio 8.80; 95% CI 1.35-57.43, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A CPR duration < 17 min is independently associated with higher ROSC rates in patients suffering blunt trauma.

Thoracotomy in the emergency department for resuscitation of the mortally injured

PURPOSE

Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy is an intervention of last resort for the acutely dying victim of trauma. In light of improvements in pre-hospital emergency systems, improved operative strategies for survival such as damage control and improvements in critical care medicine, the most extreme of resuscitation efforts should be re-evaluated for the potential survivor, with success properly defined as the return of vital signs which allow transport of the patient to the operating room.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients at a suburban level I trauma center who underwent emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy as an adjunct to the resuscitation efforts normally delivered in the trauma receiving area over a 22 year period was performed. Survival of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy was defined as restoration of vital signs and transport out of the trauma resuscitation area to the operating room.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were identified, of whom 27 survived the emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy and were transported to the operating room. Review of pre-hospital and initial hospital data between these potential long term survivors and those who died in the emergency department failed to demonstrate trends which were predictive of survival of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy. The only subgroup which failed to respond to emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy was patients without signs of life at the scene who arrived to the treatment facility without signs of life.

CONCLUSION

The patient population of the "potential survivor" has been expanded due to advances in critical care practices, technology, and surgical technique and every opportunity for survival should be provided at the outset. Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy is warranted for any patient with thoracic or subdiaphragmatic trauma who presents in extremis with a history of signs of life at the scene or organized cardiac activity upon arrival. Patients who have no evidence of signs of life at the scene and have no organized cardiac activity upon arrival should be pronounced.

Resuscitative thoracotomy

Resuscitative thoracotomy is often performed on trauma patients with thoracoabdominal penetrating or blunt injuries arriving in cardiac arrest. The goal of this procedure is to immediately restore cardiac output and to control major hemorrhage within the thorax and abdominal cavity. Only surgeons with experience in the management of cardiac and thoracic injuries should perform this procedure.

Comparative Effectiveness of Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy versus Closed Chest Compressions among Patients with Critical Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although emergency resuscitative thoracotomy is performed as a salvage maneuver for critical blunt trauma patients, evidence supporting superior effectiveness of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy compared to conventional closed-chest compressions remains insufficient. The objective of this study was to investigate whether emergency resuscitative thoracotomy at the emergency department or in the operating room was associated with favourable outcomes after blunt trauma and to compare its effectiveness with that of closed-chest compressions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective nationwide cohort study. Data were obtained from the Japan Trauma Data Bank for the period between 2004 and 2012. The primary and secondary outcomes were patient survival rates 24 h and 28 d after emergency department arrival. Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable generalized mixed-effects regression analysis. We adjusted for the effects of different hospitals by introducing random intercepts in regression analysis to account for the differential quality of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy at hospitals where patients in cardiac arrest were treated. Sensitivity analyses were performed using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

In total, 1,377 consecutive, critical blunt trauma patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department or operating room were included in the study. Of these patients, 484 (35.1%) underwent emergency resuscitative thoracotomy and 893 (64.9%) received closed-chest compressions. Compared to closed-chest compressions, emergency resuscitative thoracotomy was associated with lower survival rate 24 h after emergency department arrival (4.5% vs. 17.5%, respectively, P < 0.001) and 28 d after arrival (1.2% vs. 6.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariable generalized mixed-effects regression analysis with and without a propensity score-matched dataset revealed that the odds ratio for an unfavorable survival rate after 24 h was lower for emergency resuscitative thoracotomy than for closed-chest compressions (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy was independently associated with decreased odds of a favorable survival rate compared to closed-chest compressions.

The role for surgery in pre-hospital care

Pre-hospital care requires a broad skillset. One of the most challenging aspects of pre-hospital care is performing surgical procedures. The indications and evidence for performing pre-hospital surgical airway, thoracostomy, thoracotomy, caesarean section and amputation are discussed. Where evidence for the procedure is lacking from pre-hospital care, evidence from in-hospital experience is sought.

To be blunt: are we wasting our time? Emergency department thoracotomy following blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The role of emergency department (ED) thoracotomy after blunt trauma is controversial. The objective of this review is to determine whether patients treated with an ED thoracotomy after blunt trauma survive and whether survivors have a good neurologic outcome.

METHODS

A structured search was performed with MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were ED thoracotomy or out-of-hospital thoracotomy, cardiac arrest or periarrest, and blunt trauma. Outcomes assessed were mortality and neurologic result. The articles were appraised with the system designed by the Institute of Health Economics of Canada. A fixed-effects model was used to meta-analyze the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were included in the review. All were case series. Of 1,369 patients who underwent an ED thoracotomy, 21 (1.5%) survived with a good neurologic outcome. All 21 patients had vital signs present on scene or in the ED and a maximum duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of 11 to 15 minutes. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. If there were either vital signs or signs of life present in the ED, the probability of a poor outcome was 99.2% (95% confidence interval 96.4% to 99.7%).

CONCLUSION

There may be a role for ED thoracotomy after blunt trauma, but only in a limited group of patients. Good outcomes have been achieved for patients who had vital signs on admission and for patients who received an ED thoracotomy within 15 minutes of cardiac arrest. The proposed guideline should be used to determine which patients should be considered for an ED thoracotomy, according to level 4 evidence.

Critical cardiovascular skills and procedures in the emergency department

The management of cardiovascular emergencies is a fundamental component of the practice of an emergency practitioner. Delays in the evaluations and management can lead to significant morbidity or mortality. It is of vital importance to be familiar with procedures such as pericardiocentesis, cardioversion, defibrillation, temporary pacing, and options for the management of tachyarrhythmias. This article discusses the most common cardiovascular procedures encountered in an emergency setting, including the indications, contraindications, equipment, technique, and complications for each procedure.

Outcomes following military traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest: A prospective observational study

AIM

To determine the characteristics of military traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest (TCRA), and to identify factors associated with successful resuscitation.

METHODS

Data was collected prospectively for adult casualties suffering TCRA presenting to a military field hospital in Helmand Province, Afghanistan between 29 November 2009 and 13 June 2010.

RESULTS

Data was available for 52 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age (range) was 25 (18-36) years. The principal mechanism of injury was improvised explosive device (IED) explosion, the lower limbs were the most common sites of injury and exsanguination was the most common cause of arrest. Fourteen (27%) patients exhibited ROSC and four (8%) survived to discharge. All survivors achieved a good neurological recovery by Glasgow Outcome Scale. Three survivors had arrested due to exsanguination and one had arrested due to pericardial tamponade. All survivors had arrested after commencing transport to hospital and the longest duration of arrest associated with survival was 24 min. All survivors demonstrated PEA rhythms on ECG during arrest. When performed, 6/24 patients had ultrasound evidence of cardiac activity during arrest; all six with cardiac activity subsequently exhibited ROSC and two survived to hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Overall rates of survival from military TCRA were similar to published civilian data, despite military TCRA victims presenting with high Injury Severity Scores and exsanguination due to blast and fragmentation injuries. Factors associated with successful resuscitation included arrest beginning after transport to hospital, the presence of electrical activity on ECG, and the presence of cardiac movement on ultrasound examination.

Emergency thoracotomy--the indications, contraindications and evidence

Emergency thoracotomy is a dramatic and controversial intervention which may be life saving after major torso trauma. Success rates are variable and differ widely according to mechanism of injury. This article outlines the current indications and contraindications to emergency thoracotomy and examines the evidence to support it accumulated over 40 years.

Changes in the patterns, presentation and management of penetrating chest trauma patients at a level II trauma centre in southern Pakistan over the last two decades

Penetrating chest trauma can be used as an indicator of violence in the country. We aimed to look at the changes in its incidence and management at a major trauma centre in the country. We also wanted to look at any effect of prehospital time on surgical intervention and outcome of the victim. In this retrospective descriptive study, we observed the presentation and management of 191 penetrating chest injury patients at a level II trauma hospital in Pakistan in the last 20 years. The study sample was divided into two groups: Group 1, 1988-1998 and Group 2, 1999-2009. No significant change in incidence of trauma was observed between the two groups. The delay in the time between event and arrival showed an increase in the number of surgical procedures performed. Also the number of thoracotomies performed went up significantly in the second decade from 5.7 to 16.5% with a P<0.05. Six (3.1%) mortality cases were observed in 20 years. It was seen that the greater the prehospital time, the greater the chances of surgery. Also seen was the increase in mortality as critical cases could make it to the hospital alive in recent times due to improved transportation services.

The prehospital management of chest injuries: a consensus statement. Faculty of Pre-hospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

This paper provides a guideline for the management of prehospital chest injuries after a consensus meeting held by the Faculty of Prehospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, in January 2005. An overview of the prehospital assessment, diagnosis and interventions for life threatening chest injury are discussed, with the application of skills depending on the training, experience and competence of the individual practitioner.

Thoracic trauma: when and how to intervene

Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients younger than 40 years of age. Thoracic injuries are common and often can be managed by tube thoracostomy. In many patients, however, the thoracic injuries must be repaired surgically in one of three time periods: immediate, urgent, or delayed thoracotomy. In this article, we describe the general approach to effectively managing thoracic trauma patients. We review common injuries and scenarios that may be encountered by the surgeon and discuss the considerations and variables that enter into the decision-making process for operative intervention.

Emergency thoracotomy in thoracic trauma-a review

Thoracic trauma is one of the leading causes of death in all age groups and accounts for 25-50% of all traumatic injuries. While the majority of patients with thoracic trauma can be managed conservatively, a small but significant number requires emergency thoracotomy as part of their initial resuscitation. The procedure has been advocated for evacuation of pericardial tamponade, direct control of intrathoracic haemorrhage, control of massive air-embolism, open cardiac massage and cross-clamping of the descending aorta. Emergency thoracotomy can be defined as thoracotomy "occurring either immediately at the site of injury, or in the emergency department or operating room as an integral part of the initial resuscitation process". Following emergency thoracotomy, the overall survival rates for penetrating thoracic trauma are around 9-12% but have been reported to be as high as 38%. The survival rate for blunt trauma is approximately 1-2%. The decision to perform emergency thoracotomy involves careful evaluation of the scientific, ethical, social and economic issues. This article aims to provide a review of the current literature and to outline the pathophysiological features, technical manoeuvres and selective indications for emergency thoracotomy as a component of the initial resuscitation of trauma victims with thoracic injury.

Penetrating trauma in children

Penetrating injuries account for 10% to 20% of all pediatric trauma admissions at most centers. Gunshot wounds are responsible for the overwhelming majority of penetrating traumatic injuries and have a significantly higher mortality rate than do blunt injury mechanisms. The management of penetrating injuries can be quite challenging and often requires rapid assessment and intervention. Specific management principles are guided by the anatomic location of injury, the determination of trajectory, and the suspected organs injured. Management approaches have been adopted in large part from the more robust adult experience. However, application of these strategies to similar life-threatening injuries in the pediatric population appears appropriate.

Emergency room thoracotomy for penetrating chest injury: effect of an institutional protocol

BACKGROUND

Emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) can be life saving in patients with penetrating chest injury. A protocol was established at our institution stating that ERT be performed for cases of cardiac tamponade secondary to penetrating chest trauma on patients with vital signs/mentation in the field or on arrival to the emergency room. To validate our protocol, we reevaluated patients undergoing ERT at our institution.

METHODS

In our retrospective review, there were 49 patients undergoing ERT over a 6-year period.

RESULTS

Survival in patients with vital signs was approximately 50%. Survival in those without was 0%. Compared with the preprotocol data, the number of ERTs declined from 32.2 cases per year to 8.1 cases per year. Overall survival increased from 4% to 20%. Neurologic outcome remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the data validate our protocol, and the establishment of a guideline has enabled us to maximize patient survival and minimize exposure risks to our staff.

Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years

BACKGROUND

Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) has become standard therapy for patients who acutely arrest after injury. Patient selection is vitally important to achieve optimal outcomes without wasting valuable resources. The aim of this study was to determine the main factors that most influence survival after EDT.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four studies that included 4,620 cases from institutions that reported EDT for both blunt and penetrating trauma during the past 25 years were reviewed. The primary outcomes analyzed were in-hospital survival rates.

RESULTS

EDT had an overall survival rate of 7.4%. Normal neurologic outcomes were noted in 92.4% of surviving patients. Factors reported as influencing outcomes were the mechanism of injury (MOI), location of major injury (LOMI), and signs of life (SOL). Survival rates for MOI were 8.8% for penetrating injuries and 1.4% for blunt injuries. When penetrating injuries were further separated, the survival rates were 16.8% for stab wounds and 4.3% for gunshot wounds. For the LOMI, survival rates were 10.7% for thoracic injuries, 4.5% for abdominal injuries, and 0.7% for multiple injuries. If the LOMI was the heart, the survival rate was the highest at 19.4%. The third factor influencing outcomes was SOL. If SOL were present on arrival at the hospital, survival rate was 11.5% in contrast to 2.6% if none were present. SOL present during transport resulted in a survival rate of 8.9%. Absence of SOL in the field yielded a survival rate of 1.2%. There was no clear single independent preoperative factor that could uniformly predict death.

CONCLUSIONS

The best survival results are seen in patients who undergo EDT for thoracic stab injuries and who arrive with SOL in the emergency department. All three factors-MOI, LOMI, and SOL-should be taken into account when deciding whether to perform EDT. Uniform reporting guidelines are needed to further elucidate the role of EDT taking into account the combination of MOI, LOMI, and SOL.

Emergency Room Thoracotomy: A Single Surgeon's Thirteen-Year Experience

Our objectives were to elucidate the postoperative complications in patients who have had emergency room thoracotomy (ERT), to define anatomic and physiologic parameters that are compatible with survival and to document the evolution of management of these patients. A single surgeon's experience over a 13-year period was reviewed. All patients where he was the primary or supervising surgeon for the ERT were included. Data were analyzed for mechanism (penetrating/blunt), hospital where performed, survival to intensive care unit, survival to discharge, and postoperative complications. Among survivors, data were analyzed for the anatomic injuries and the patients' physiologic condition in the field and on arrival. There were a total of 102 patients; penetrating injury 94 (92 percent); blunt, 8 (8 percent). Ten patients (10 percent) reached the intensive care unit alive. Three of the ten (30 percent) died at 2 hours, 12 hours, and 7 days postoperatively. Seven patients survived to hospital discharge. All seven had penetrating chest injuries and were not in cardiac arrest when first examined by paramedics. Four of the seven survivors (57 percent) had major complications. Survival for the early period was 1.6 percent (1/62) and for the later period 15 percent (6/40); P < 0.05. During the study period, changes in patient management included 1) for penetrating torso injury, withholding ERT when survival was extremely unlikely; 2) increased use of blood- and fluid-warming measures; 3) elimination of aortic cross-clamping, instead judiciously using manual compression; 4) making the main purpose of ERT the relief of cardiac tamponade; and 5) immediately controlling any cardiac injury with a simple running suture on a large needle. We conclude the following: 1) The postoperative course after ERT carried significant mortality and morbidity. 2) Compatibility with survival required both the absence of cardiac arrest when initially evaluated in the field and the presence of penetrating chest injury. 3) Significant changes occurred in patient management during this 13-year period. Survival was higher in the latter part of this period.

Critical analysis of two decades of experience with postinjury emergency department thoracotomy in a regional trauma center

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous studies, no clear consensus exists for the optimal use of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT). As such, we have continued to critically review our experience with EDT during the last 23 years to clarify indications for EDT and evaluate its cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 950 EDTs performed at our regional Level I trauma center during the last 23 years. Cost-benefit ratios were calculated using standardized models.

RESULTS

In 23 years, 950 patients underwent postinjury thoracotomy. We were able to obtain the complete medical records for 868 patients (91%). Overall survival was 4.4%, with 3.9% surviving functionally intact. All survivors of blunt trauma had either palpable pulse or recorded blood pressure in the field. Blunt trauma functional survival when field vital signs were present was 2.5%. Of note, 26.5% of our functional survivors sustained penetrating injuries and had no pulse or blood pressure in the field. Stab wounds to the chest and gunshot wounds to the abdomen were the two mechanisms of injury most likely to be survived. The benefit-charge ratio was strongly in favor of performing EDT at 5.6:1; it was 1.8:1 if adjusted for the cost of maintaining all neurologically injured survivors throughout their lifetime.

CONCLUSION

EDT is efficacious and cost-effective for select patient populations. We suggest a key clinical pathway for the use of EDT that would reduce the number of procedures by at least 32% without changing the number of neurologically intact survivors.

Traumatic pericardial tamponade: relearning old lessons

Traumatic pericardial tamponade is a serious and rapidly fatal injury. As penetrating chest wounds are becoming more common, early diagnosis of tamponade is important so that life saving treatment can be started. The classical features of tamponade may be modified by hypovolaemia and the presence of associated injuries; acute tamponade may also be precipitated by rapid administration of large volumes of fluid. Pericardiocentesis, while sometimes life saving, is dangerous and of limited value. Echocardiography is limited by availability and operator dependence. A high degree of clinical suspicion in patients with chest injuries, together with close monitoring and reevaluation, particularly during volume replacement, is essential. Four cases are described which presented to the accident and emergency department of Glasgow Royal Infirmary, in three of which there was a significant delay in the diagnosis.

Survival following pre-hospital arrest with on-scene thoracotomy for a stabbed heart

A 34-year-old man was stabbed in the heart with the loss of all signs of life at the site of the incident. A resuscitative thoracotomy was performed at the roadside rather than transport a lifeless patient to hospital. Thoracotomy revealed asystole, pericardial tamponade and a right ventricular stab wound. Following further roadside resuscitation and subsequent air transport, and 30 min after loss of signs of life the patient was defibrillated in hospital and regained sinus rhythm. He recovered and was discharged at 25 days with normal neurology and mentation. Pre-hospital thoracotomy on a patient who had lost signs of life following a penetrating chest wound is an alternative to a "scoop and run' policy.

Review of emergency thoracotomy for chest injuries in patients attending a UK Accident and Emergency department

Over a two and a half year period, 25 patients presenting to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary underwent emergency thoracotomy for suspected severe chest injuries. Eighteen (72 per cent) were performed in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department and seven (28 per cent) in a fully equipped operating theatre after resuscitation. There were 23 men and 2 women. Twenty-three (92 per cent) had been stabbed, one (4 per cent) had been shot and one (4 per cent) had sustained a blunt injury in a road traffic accident. Eight (32 per cent) patients survived. All survivors had been stabbed and seven were well enough to undergo thoracotomy in theatre. Only one (5.6 per cent) of the patients operated upon in the A&E department survived to discharge, although three (16.8 per cent) survived the initial procedure. Three of four patients survived, in whom the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade was initially missed. Thirteen (76.5 per cent) of the 17 who did not survive had no vital signs on admission. Outcomes may be improved if appropriately trained hospital staff are immediately available and prehospital delays are minimized so that patients arrive sooner with signs of life still present. Ambulance paramedic interventions have little to offer these patients and may worsen the prognosis if they result in delayed transport to hospital. The emphasis placed on diagnosis and treatment of cardiac tamponade in Advanced Trauma Life Support programmes is appropriate and all staff involved in these cases should undergo this type of training.

Surgical management of major thoracic injuries

Major thoracic injuries are uncommon in the United Kingdom and wide experience of their management by centres in this country has not been reported. Between 1985 and 1990, 23 patients have undergone urgent thoracotomy at Birmingham Accident Hospital for suspected intrathoracic injury. The majority of these injuries were caused by penetrating trauma (13 patients). The commonest indications for thoracotomy were suspected intrathoracic haemorrhage in 13 patients and suspected cardiac tamponade in four patients. In three of the four patients with suspected cardiac tamponade, the diagnosis was correct, the tamponade successfully relieved together with repair of the lesion, and all three patients survived. Of the 13 patients with intrathoracic haemorrhage, 10 survived after control of haemorrhage and repair of the lesion but three died: one from uncontrollable haemorrhage from a right middle lobe vessel laceration, one from associated multiple injuries and one from post-operative complications. The TRISS methodology was applied to audit our results. Two patients who died after a penetrating injury had a greater than 50 per cent probability of death by the TRISS method. Two patients who died after a blunt injury had a less than 50 per cent probability of death by the TRISS method although one of these patients died from postoperative complications. This series illustrates the point that prompt recognition of a suspected intrathoracic injury and appropriate urgent surgical intervention to relieve cardiac tamponade and control intrathoracic haemorrhage in these patients can produce a successful outcome. In addition it it is essential that all units audit their own results in order to highlight areas where improvements in trauma care can be made.