Substrate selectivity of lysophosphatidylcholine: lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase from rabbit lung

ESI-MS assay of M. tuberculosis cell wall antigen 85 enzymes permits substrate profiling and design of a mechanism-based inhibitor

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen 85 enzymes are vital to the integrity of the highly impermeable cell envelope and are potential therapeutic targets. Kinetic analysis using a label-free assay revealed both mechanistic details and a substrate profile that allowed the design and construction of a selective in vitro mechanism-based inhibitor.

Chemical mechanism of lysophosphatidylcholine: lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase from rabbit lung. pH-dependence of kinetic parameters

Lysophosphatidylcholine: lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase is an enzyme that catalyses two reactions: hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine and transacylation between two molecules of lysophosphatidylcholine to give disaturated phosphatidylcholine. Following the kinetic model previously proposed for this enzyme [Martín, Pérez-Gil, Acebal & Arche (1990) Biochem. J. 266, 47-53], the values of essential pK values in free enzyme and substrate-enzyme complexes have now been determined. The chemical mechanism of catalysis was dependent on the deprotonation of a histidine residue with pK about 5.7. This result was supported by the perturbation of pK values by addition of organic solvent. Very high and exothermic enthalpy of ionization was measured, indicating that a conformational re-arrangement in the enzyme accompanies the ionization of the essential histidine residue. These results, as well as the results from previous studies, enabled the proposal of a chemical mechanism for the enzymic reactions catalysed by lysophosphatidylcholine: lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase from rabbit lung.

Theoretical approach to the steady-state kinetics of a bi-substrate acyl-transfer enzyme reaction that follows a hydrolysable-acyl-enzyme-based mechanism. Application to the study of lysophosphatidylcholine:lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase from rabbit lung

A kinetic model is proposed for catalysis by an enzyme that has several special characteristics: (i) it catalyses an acyl-transfer bi-substrate reaction between two identical molecules of substrate, (ii) the substrate is an amphiphilic molecule that can be present in two physical forms, namely monomers and micelles, and (iii) the reaction progresses through an acyl-enzyme-based mechanism and the covalent intermediate can react also with water to yield a secondary hydrolytic reaction. The theoretical kinetic equations for both reactions were deduced according to steady-state assumptions and the theoretical plots were predicted. The experimental kinetics of lysophosphatidylcholine:lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase from rabbit lung fitted the proposed equations with great accuracy. Also, kinetics of inhibition by products behaved as expected. It was concluded that the competition between two nucleophiles for the covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate, and not a different enzyme action depending on the physical state of the substrate, is responsible for the differences in kinetic pattern for the two activities of the enzyme. This conclusion, together with the fact that the kinetic equation for the transacylation is quadratic, generates a 'hysteretic' pattern that can provide the basis of self-regulatory properties for enzymes to which this model could be applied.

Essential histidine residues in lysolecithin:lysolecithin acetyltransferase from rabbit lung

Both activities of rabbit lung lysolecithin:lysolecithin acyltransferase (EC 3.1.1.5), hydrolysis and transacylation, are inactivated by diethylpyrocarbonate. The reaction follows pseudo-first-order kinetics, and second-order rate constants of 1.17 mM-1min-1 for hydrolysis and 0.56 mM-1 min-1 for transacylation were obtained at pH 6.5 and 37 degrees C. The rate of inactivation is dependent on pH, showing the involvement of a group with a pK of 6.5. The difference spectra showed an increase in absorbance at 242 nm, indicating the modification of histidine residues. The activity lost by diethylpyrocarbonate modification can be partially recovered by hydroxylamine treatment. The statistical analysis of residual fractional activity versus the number of modified histidine residues leads to the conclusion that two histidine residues are essential for the hydrolytic activity, whereas transacylation activity depends on only one essential histidine. The substrate and substrate analogs protected the enzyme against inactivation by diethylpyrocarbonate, suggesting that the essential residues are located at or near the active site of the enzyme.