The effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on serum high density lipoprotein subfractions

Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is now well established as a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of gastrointestinal lesions aggravated by gastric acid secretion. Therapeutic trials involving several thousands of patients with peptic ulcer disease confirm that ranitidine 300mg daily administered orally in single or divided doses is at least as effective as cimetidine 800 to 1000mg daily in increasing the rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers. Similar dosages of ranitidine have been shown to relieve the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis and heal or prevent gastrointestinal damage caused by ulcerogenic drugs. Ranitidine 150mg orally at night maintains ulcer healing in the long term. Ranitidine has also demonstrated good results in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonitis when given prior to surgery and to pregnant women at full term. It may also have a place in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in the prevention of stress ulcers in the intensive care setting, although these areas require further investigation. Ranitidine has been used safely in obstetric patients during labour, in children, the elderly, and in patients with renal impairment when given in appropriate dosages. The drug is very well tolerated and is only infrequently associated with serious adverse reactions or clinically significant drug interactions. Even at high dosages, ranitidine appears devoid of antiandrogenic effects. Ranitidine is clearly comparable or superior to most other antiulcer agents in the treatment and prevention of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders associated with gastric acid secretion. With its favourable efficacy and tolerability profiles, ranitidine must be considered a first-line agent when suppression of gastric acid secretion is indicated.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists and high-density lipoproteins

Epidemiologic evidence has shown that elevated levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). These observations have prompted the evaluation of various factors thought to affect HDL and its subspecies, HDL2 and HDL3. Numerous behavioral and physiologic factors have been shown to elevate HDL levels. These are currently being researched as potential tools in preventing CHD. Several pharmacologic agents are known to alter HDL levels. Studies show that patients with peptic ulcer disease treated with the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine show significant elevations in their HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 profiles. In contrast, ranitidine has no effect, or may even decrease HDL levels. These divergent effects may be related to differences in pharmacologic activity unrelated to H2-receptor blockade. It should be noted that many of the variables affecting HDL levels were not controlled in these studies, and definite conclusions should not be extrapolated to the general population at risk for CHD. Currently, well-controlled trials to study the effect of cimetidine on HDL levels are in progress.

Mode of action of lipid-lowering drugs

Following the recent demonstration that both cholestyramine and nicotinic acid decrease mortality from coronary heart disease, there is a new enthusiasm for hypolipidaemic therapy. The agents in current use are, however, insufficiently active or are accompanied by unacceptable side effects. An understanding of the mode of action is necessary, both to optimize treatment guidelines (e.g. regarding combination therapy or use in specific subsets of patients) and to develop new agents with preferred actions on rate-limiting steps. A reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration remains the principal desired action, although an elevation in HDL may also be beneficial. The main categories of commercially available agent comprise the anion exchange resins (inhibitors of bile acid absorption); cholesterol absorption inhibitors; fibrates (probably acting by enhancing lipoprotein lipase); and probucol (affecting LDL clearance). The most interesting of the new agents in clinical trials are the beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, but other types of agent are at an earlier stage of evaluation, e.g. acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors and peptide cofactors. It is not yet certain whether all the approaches to cholesterol lowering have equal validity, although an effect on biological endpoints is obtained for a variety of agents. Future evaluation will be aided by the implementation of noninvasive methods to quantify atherosclerosis and by the use of simple, 'dry-chemistry', cholesterol assays to screen populations.

Adverse reactions and interactions with H2-receptor antagonists

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have been used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases for more than a decade and during this period have become one of the most commonly prescribed groups of drugs in the world. The deserved popularity of the H2-receptor antagonists reflects, in part, their therapeutic efficacy, which has revolutionised the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. An equally, or more, important reason for the widespread use of H2-receptor antagonists is their remarkably low toxicity. We have attempted, in this review, to present a detailed account of the minor and more serious adverse reactions, while emphasising the low incidence of the former and the rarity of the latter. The toxicology of the H2-receptor antagonists is discussed under two main headings: adverse effects; and drug interactions. The latter category is potentially the more significant, since the frequent use of therapy with multiple drugs may give rise to drug interactions, some of which are serious and may even be lethal. These drug interactions occur especially in the gastrointestinal tract, the liver and the kidneys. Thus, the absorption of other drugs may be altered because the H2-receptor antagonists inhibit gastric secretion--an effect illustrated by ketoconazole, the absorption of which is reduced when given in combination with cimetidine. Very important drug interactions are caused by inhibition of the hepatic microsomal enzyme cytochrome P450 by some of the H2-receptor antagonists. This effect appears to be related to the chemical structure of the individual H2-receptor antagonists and is not attributable to histamine H2-receptor blockade. For example, cimetidine is a powerful inhibitor of cytochrome P450, while the interaction of ranitidine with this system is weaker. Consequently, cimetidine reduces the metabolism of many drugs which are normally degraded by phase I reactions, leading to potentially toxic plasma concentrations of therapeutic agents such as some oral anticoagulants, beta-blockers, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines and xanthines. Some of the H2-receptor antagonists are actively secreted by the renal tubules and may thus compete with other drugs for cationic tubular transport mechanisms, resulting in reduced urinary excretion and hence potentially toxic plasma concentrations. This type of drug interaction has been reported after administration of both cimetidine and ranitidine with procainamide or quinidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)