Increased serum apolipoprotein(a) in patients with chronic renal failure treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The Role of Peritoneal Dialysis in Different Phases of Kidney Transplantation

The utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been increasing in the past decade owing to various government initiatives and recognition of benefits such as better preservation of residual renal function, quality of life, and lower cost. The Advancing American Kidney Health initiative aims to increase the utilization of home therapies such as PD and kidney transplantation to treat end stage kidney disease (ESKD). A natural consequence of this development is that more patients will receive PD, and many will eventually undergo kidney transplantation. Therefore, it is important to understand the effect of pretransplant PD on posttransplant outcomes such as delayed graft function (DGF), rejection, thrombosis, graft, and patient survival. Furthermore, some of these patients may develop DGF, which raises the question of the utility of PD during DGF and its risks. Although transplant is the best renal replacement therapy option, it is not everlasting, and many transplant recipients must go on dialysis after allograft failure. Can PD be a good option for these patients? This is another critical question. Furthermore, a significant proportion of nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients develop ESKD. Is PD feasible in this group? In this review, we try to address all of these questions in the light of available evidence.

Lipid Parameters Including Lipoprotein (A) in Patients Undergoing CAPD and Hemodialysis

Objective

Oyslipidemia possibly contributes to the vascular complications commonly afflicting uremic patients. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular dis ease. The aim of our study was to compare lipidparameters, including Lp(a), between hemodialysis (HO) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPO) patients.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting

University Medical Center.

Participants

Forty CAPO and 40 HO patients carefully matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, and duration of dialysis were studied. A group of 40 healthy individuals matched for age, sex, BMI, and smoking habits was used as control.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Serum lipid parameters and atherogenic risk ratios were the main outcome measures.

Results

Both groups of dialysis patients had increased serum triglycerides and decreased levels of Apo AI and HOL cholesterol compared to controls. Moreover, the risk ratios total cholesterol/HOL cholesterol and LOL cholesterol/HOL cholesterol were significantly higher, and the ratio ApoA1/ApoB was significantly lower in both groups of patients in comparison to the normal subjects. Both groups of dialysis patients exhibited decreased ratios of LOL cholesterol/ApoB and HOL cholesterol/ApoAI, suggesting the presence of compositional lipoprotein changes. CAPO patients had a more atherogenic lipid profile compared to HO patients, since they exhibited higher levels of total and LOL cholesterol, of ApoB as well as of the ratios total cholesterol/HOL cholesterol and LOL cholesterol/ HOL cholesterol, and lower levels of the ratio ApoA1/ApoB compared to HO patients. Both groups of dialysis patients had increased serum Lp(a) levels. Even though CAPO patients had higher serum Lp(a) levels than HO patients, the differences between these two groups were only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.056 by Mann-Whitney U-test). Uremic dyslipidemia was positively correlated with serum albumin levels in both groups of patients.

Conclusion

CAPO patients exhibit a more atherogenic lipid profile than that of HO patients. The marked disturbances in Lp(a) levels may further increase the vascular risk in both groups of patients.

Lipoprotein (a) Levels in Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Most researchers have found increases of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] in uremic patients, as well as in those undergo ng hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The mechanisms for this increase remain unclear. We studied 71 patients undergoing CAPD, 48 me n and 23 women. According to the time spent on CAPD, the patients were divided into three groups: group 0: 29 patients at the starting off point of dialysis treatment; group I: 22 patients with an average stay of 15.2 months; group II: 20 patients with an average stay of 69.3 months on CAPD. We have only observed significant increases of Lp(a) levels in those patients initiating the dialysis, but no significant differences are found in the other groups undergoing CAPD for longer periods when compared to the control group. We found no significant relation between Lp(a) levels and peritoneal protein loss, and not with absorption of glucose from the dialysate either. We have found a positive and significant correlation between Lp(a) levels and urinary protein loss (r = 0.41; p < 0.001). It is possible that an element associated with proteinuria might have an effect on the metabolism of Lp(a) in CAPD patients.

Preemptively and non-preemptively transplanted patients show a comparable hypercoagulable state prior to kidney transplantation compared to living kidney donors

To prevent renal graft thrombosis in kidney transplantation, centres use different perioperative anticoagulant strategies, based on various risk factors. In our centre, patients transplanted preemptively are considered at increased risk of renal graft thrombosis compared to patients who are dialysis-dependent at time of transplantation. Therefore these patients are given a single dose of 5000 IU unfractionated heparin intraoperatively before clamping of the vessels. We questioned whether there is a difference in haemostatic state between preemptively and non-preemptively transplanted patients and whether the distinction in intraoperative heparin administration used in our center is justified. For this analysis, citrate samples of patients participating in the VAPOR-1 trial were used and several haemostatic and fibrinolytic parameters were measured in 29 preemptively and 28 non-preemptively transplanted patients and compared to 37 living kidney donors. Sample points were: induction anaesthesia (T1), 5 minutes after reperfusion (T2) and 2 hours postoperative (T3). At T1, recipient groups showed comparable elevated levels of platelet factor 4 (PF4, indicating platelet activation), prothrombin fragment F1+2 and D-dimer (indicating coagulation activation) and Von Willebrand Factor (indicating endothelial activation) compared to the donors. The Clot Lysis Time (CLT, a measure of fibrinolytic potential) was prolonged in both recipient groups compared to the donors. At T3, F1+2, PF4 and CLT were higher in non-preemptively transplanted recipients compared to preemptively transplanted recipients. Compared to donors, non-preemptive recipients showed a prolonged CLT, but comparable levels of PF4 and D-dimer. In conclusion pre-transplantation, preemptively and non-preemptively transplanted patients show a comparable enhanced haemostatic state. A distinction in intraoperative heparin administration between preemptive and non-preemptive transplantation does not seem justified.

Elevated Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Hypoalbuminemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Plasma lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is strongly and independently associated with atherosclerosis, and levels are elevated in hemodialysis (HD) patients and in some studies of those on peritoneal dialysis (PD). We hypothesized that protein losses and hypoalbuminemia could stimulate hepatic Lp(a) synthesis, and this effect would be accentuated in PD patients with malnutrition. The PD subjects (n=24) had higher plasma Lp(a) levels than those (n=10) on HD (median 34.4 vs 21.0 mg/dl, p<0.05), and values exceed normal in 62.5% vs 20% of the subjects (p<0.03), respectively. The serum albumin levels inversely correlated with concentrations of Lp(a) and apolipoprotein B, as well as the apolipoprotein B/AI ratio. In conclusion, plasma Lp(a) concentrations are frequently elevated in PD as well as HD patients. Measuring Lp(a) levels is useful in identifying patients at increased atherogenic risk, which may not be reflected in routine lipid profiles. The negative correlation between plasma Lp(a) and albumin levels suggests that the latter may be linked pathophysiologically to hepatic Lp(a) production. The association of hypoalbuminemia with higher Lp(a) values is of particular concern because malnutrition frequently occurs in PD patients.

Dialysis modality and the risk of allograft thrombosis in adult renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal vascular thrombosis (RVT) is a rare but catastrophic complication of renal transplantation. Although a plethora of risk factors has been identified, a large proportion of cases of RVT is unexplained. Uremic coagulopathy and dialysis modality may predispose to RVT. We investigated the impact of the pretransplant dialysis modality on the risk of RVT in adult renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Renal transplant recipients (age 18 years or more) who were enrolled in the national registry between 1990 and 1996 (N = 84,513) were evaluated for RVT occurring within 30 days of transplantation. Each case was matched with two controls from the same transplant center and with the year of transplantation. The association between RVT and 18 factors was studied with multivariate conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Forty-nine percent of all cases of RVT (365 out of 743) occurred in repeat transplant recipients with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 5.72 compared with first transplants (P < 0.001). There were a significantly higher odds of RVT in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-compared with hemodialysis (HD)-treated patients (OR = 1.87, P = 0.001). Change in dialysis modality was an independent predictor of RVT: switching from HD to PD (OR = 3.59, P < 0.001) and from PD to HD (OR = 1.62, P = 0.047). Compared with primary transplant recipients on HD (OR = 1.00), the highest odds of RVT were in repeat transplant recipients treated with PD (OR = 12.95, P < 0.001) and HD (OR = 4.50, P < 0.001). Other independent predictors of RVT were preemptive transplantation, relatively young and old donor age, diabetes mellitus and systemic lupus erythematosus as causes of end-stage renal disease, recipient gender, and lower panel reactive antibody levels (PRAs).

CONCLUSIONS

The strongest risk factors for RVT were retransplantation and prior PD treatment. Prevention of RVT with perioperative anticoagulation should be studied in patients who have a constellation of the identified risk factors.

Cardiac disease in chronic uremia: clinical outcome and risk factors

Cardiac disease is common and is the major killer in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Cardiac failure is a highly malignant condition in ESRD patients. Cardiac failure mediates most of the adverse prognostic impact of ischemic heart disease. Left ventricular (LV) abnormalities are already present at initiation of dialysis therapy in approximately 80% of patients. These abnormalities (ie, systolic dysfunction in approximately 15%, LV dilatation with preserved systolic function in 30%, concentric LV hypertrophy [LVH] in 40%) independently predict ischemic heart disease and cardiac failure, and are the largest baseline predictor of mortality after 2 years on dialysis therapy. The associations between classical risk factors (eg, hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypertension) and cardiac outcomes in ESRD are inconsistent. "Uremic" risk factors represent a nascent, but potentially important field. In our prospective 10-year study of 433 patients starting renal replacement therapy, we identified the following as major independent risk factors for cardiac disease: (1) hypertension (concentric LVH, LV dilatation, ischemic heart disease, cardiac failure, inverse relationship with mortality); (2) anemia (LV dilatation, cardiac failure, death); and (3) hypoalbuminemia (ischemic heart disease, cardiac failure, death). Transplantation dramatically improved LV abnormalities, suggesting that a uremic environment is cardiotoxic. Multiple risk factors act in concert to produce cardiac disease in ESRD; many of these are avoidable, suggesting that the enormous burden of disease can be reduced considerably.

Decrease in lipoprotein(a) after renal transplantation is related to the glucocorticoid dose

Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes were determined in 46 patients with end-stage renal disease both before as well as 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after renal transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporin A, prednisone and azathioprine. Before transplantation median Lp(a) levels did not differ between the patients and a healthy control group. A highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) in Lp(a) levels was observed in both male and female patients 1 week after transplantation. This marked reduction in Lp(a) occurred at a time when patients were receiving the highest doses of corticosteroids. As steroid doses were gradually tapered, Lp(a) concentrations subsequently increased, although at 6 months levels were still significantly reduced (P < 0.01) in women. No significant correlation was observed between Lp(a) and whole-blood cyclosporin levels, nor was there any correlation with the azathioprine dose. The reduction in Lp(a) concentrations was seen for all apo(a) phenotypes observed in the study.

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Lipoprotein(a) levels in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: methodologic issues and clinical implications

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for vascular disease and a potential link between coagulation, lipoproteins, and the development of atherosclerosis. Its role in the vascular complications of patients with chronic renal disease is unclear. We review methodologic issues involved in measuring Lp(a), particularly as they relate to studies of patients with chronic renal disease. The accurate measurement of Lp(a) is difficult because all the commercially available assays are sensitive to apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, Lp(a) behaves like an acute phase reactant, and levels vary markedly among ethnic groups. The results of 12 studies that included data on median Lp(a) levels in controls and patients receiving renal replacement therapy were analyzed. Although there was variation among studies, most found elevated levels of Lp(a) in patients receiving hemodialysis (range of medians, 9.0 to 38.4 mg/dL) compared with controls (range of medians, 4.7 to 19.7 mg/dL). With the exception of one study, Lp(a) levels also were elevated in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis compared with controls and patients receiving hemodialysis. In one study, an elevated Lp(a) level in patients receiving hemodialysis correlated with subsequent development of vascular events. A separate study associated the occurrence of vascular access occlusion with Lp(a) level. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) levels decreased in all four studies, which included data before and after transplantation. Although variability in results were seen, Lp(a) levels appear to be elevated in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Renal transplantation at least partially reverses this effect. The variability in results is probably related to methodologic difficulties in measuring Lp(a) and failure to segregate ethnic groups in study design and analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotype-associated decrease in lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations after renal transplantation

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations are an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. In the general population, Lp(a) levels are primarily determined by allelic variation at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus. Apo(a) isoforms of various sizes are associated with different Lp(a) concentrations. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), which are not explained by the size variation at the apo(a) gene locus. To further investigate the origin of the elevated Lp(a) plasma concentrations, we examined Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) phenotypes in 154 ESRD patients undergoing renal transplantation. In a prospective longitudinal study we observed a rapid normalization of Lp(a) levels from an average concentration of 25.9 +/- 28.7 mg/dL before to 17.9 +/- 25.5 mg/dL 3 weeks after renal transplantation (P < .0001). Only patients with high-molecular-weight phenotypes had a significant decrease in Lp(a) plasma concentrations. This study demonstrates the nongenetic origin of elevated Lp(a) concentrations in ESRD patients, which is obviously caused by the disease. It further confirms a phenotype-associated elevation of Lp(a) concentrations in ESRD.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict the risk for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease

Several studies have demonstrated that atherosclerotic complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations are an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), which are not explained by size variation at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Lp(a) concentrations and/or apo(a) phenotypes are predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis in the extracranial carotid arteries in ESRD patients. Of 167 patients, 108 showed atherosclerotic plaques (65%). Univariate analysis showed that the plaque-affected group was significantly older and had a higher frequency of angina pectoris, previous myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident. Furthermore, this group included significantly more patients with low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms (26.9% versus 8.5%, P < .005) and had significantly higher mean Lp(a) plasma concentrations (29.3 +/- 31.0 versus 19.7 +/- 25.7 mg/dL, P < .05). Lp(a) plasma concentration increased significantly with the number of affected arterial sites, from 19.7 mg/dL in patients without plaques to 40.1 mg/dL in patients with seven or eight affected sites. In patients with low-molecular-weight phenotypes, significantly more arterial sites were affected (3.62 versus 2.08, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, angina pectoris, and the apo(a) phenotype were the only significant predictors of the degree of atherosclerosis. We conclude that, besides age, the apo(a) phenotype is the best predictor of carotid atherosclerosis in ESRD patients and may be used for assessment of general atherosclerosis risk in this patient group.

Lipid parameters including Lp(a) in hemodialysis patients

Chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients have a high incidence and prevalence of atherosclerotic disease which may be related to numerous atherosclerotic risk factors. Among them dyslipidemia plays a significant role. Elevated Lp(a) levels, which are strongly associated with atherosclerosis, have been reported recently in uremic patients. The aim of our study was the determination of the levels of lipid parameters including Lp(a) in 151 CHD patients (76 male) aged 57 (12-81) years, who were on hemodialysis for a mean of 44.3 (range 1 to 189) months. Eighty-four normal individuals age and sex matched were used as controls. The median serum Lp(a) concentration in hemodialysis patients was 13 mg/dL compared with 6.5 mg/dL in healthy controls, p < 0.001 by distribution-free Mann-Whitney test. The prevalence of subjects with Lp(a) levels above 25 mg/dL was significantly higher in CHD patients compared to normal subjects (30% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Even if CHD patients were matched for fasting lipid levels, they showed Lp(a) levels significantly higher than controls. No significant correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and either the age of the patients or the duration of hemodialysis. The etiology of primary renal disease did not influence the Lp(a) levels.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and serum lipoprotein(a) levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients with/without diabetes mellitus

We studied the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a function of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in 152 patients (123 males, 29 females) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) with or without diabetes mellitus (DM), in 101 patients with diabetes mellitus without hemodialysis (58 males, 43 females), and in 421 normal controls (333 males, 88 females). Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in patients than in controls (26.2 +/- 18.3 mg/dl in HD with DM, 26.4 +/- 22.0 mg/dl in HD without DM, 27.1 +/- 27.3 mg/dl in DM without HD, and 14.9 +/- 13.7 mg/dl in controls, respectively). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high resolution technique using SDS-agarose/gradient (3 to 6%) PAGE. In normal controls, the molecular weights of apo(a) isoforms were inversely correlated with plasma Lp(a) levels, and the same tendency was found in patients who were undergoing hemodialysis and/or who had diabetes mellitus. We assumed the differences in apo(a) phenotypes detectable with our method reflected consecutive differences in molecular weights of apo(a). The results of an analysis of covariance and a least square means comparison indicated that the regression lines between serum Lp(a) levels [log Lp(a)] and apo(a) phenotypes in patient groups were significantly (P < 0.01) elevated for every apo(a) phenotype, as compared to the regression line of the control group. Even after the low molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes (A1-A8) were omitted, the same tendency was observed. However, no differences were observed between the patient groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lipoprotein metabolism and renal failure

Lipoprotein metabolism is altered in the majority of patients with renal insufficiency and renal-failure, but may not necessarily lead to hyperlipidemia. The dyslipoproteinemia of renal disease has characteristic abnormalities of the apolipoprotein (apo) profile and lipoprotein composition. It develops during the asymptomatic stages of renal insufficiency and becomes more pronounced as renal failure advances. The qualitative characteristics of renal dyslipoproteinemia are not modified substantially by dialysis treatment. Patients with chronic renal disease may therefore be exposed to dyslipoproteinemia for long periods of time. The characteristic plasma lipid abnormality is a moderate hypertriglyceridemia. The alterations of lipoprotein metabolism affect both the apoB-containing very low-density and intermediate-density, and low-density lipoproteins and the apoA-containing high-density lipoproteins. The main underlying abnormality of lipoprotein transport is a decreased catabolism of the apoB-containing lipoproteins caused by decreased activity of lipolytic enzymes and altered lipoprotein composition. There is an increase of intact or partially metabolized, triglyceride-rich, apoB-containing lipoproteins with a disproportionate elevation of apoC-III and, to a lesser extent, apoE, resulting in a marked increase of the intermediate-density lipoproteins and an enrichment of triglycerides, apoC-III, and apoE in the low-density lipoproteins. In high-density lipoproteins there are decreases in the concentrations of cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and A-II, and the high-density lipoprotein-2 to high-density lipoprotein-3 ratio. These abnormalities result in a characteristic decrease of the apoA-I to apoC-III ratio and anti-atherogenic index apoA-I/apoB. The pathophysiologic links between the renal insufficiency and the abnormalities of lipoprotein transport are still poorly defined. Changes in the action of insulin on lipolytic enzymes, possibly mediated via increased levels of parathyroid hormone, have been suggested to play a contributory role. The clinical consequences of a defective lipoprotein transport may be related to the atherogenic character of lipoprotein abnormalities. Renal dyslipoproteinemia may contribute to the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease and progression of glomerular and tubular lesions with subsequent deterioration of renal function. Dietary and/or pharmacologic intervention may ameliorate the uremic dyslipoproteinemia, but the long-term clinical effects of such treatment have yet to be established.