Initiation of the UvrABC nuclease cleavage reaction. Efficiency of incision is not correlated with UvrA binding affinity

Real-time investigation of the roles of ATP hydrolysis by UvrA and UvrB during DNA damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) stands out among other DNA repair systems for its ability to process a diverse set of unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, NER damage detection is orchestrated by the UvrA and UvrB proteins, which form the UvrA₂-UvrB₂ (UvrAB) damage sensing complex. The highly versatile damage recognition is accomplished in two ATP-dependent steps. In the first step, the UvrAB complex samples the DNA in search of lesion. Subsequently, the presence of DNA damage is verified within the UvrB-DNA complex after UvrA has dissociated. Although the mechanism of bacterial NER damage detection has been extensively investigated, the role of ATP binding and hydrolysis by UvrA and UvrB during this process remains incompletely understood. Here, we report a pre-steady state kinetics Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) study of the real-time interaction between UvrA, UvrB, and damaged DNA during lesion detection. By using UvrA and UvrB mutants harboring site-specific mutations in the ATP binding sites, we show for the first time that the dissociation of UvrA from the UvrAB-DNA complex does not require ATP hydrolysis by UvrB. We find that ATP hydrolysis by UvrA is not essential, but somehow facilitates the formation of UvrB-DNA complex, with ATP hydrolysis at the proximal site of UvrA playing a more critical role. Consistent with previous reports, our results indicated that the ATPase activity of UvrB is essential for the formation of UvrB-DNA complex but is not required for the binding of the UvrAB complex to DNA.

Alkyltransferase-like protein clusters scan DNA rapidly over long distances and recruit NER to alkyl-DNA lesions

Alkylation of guanine bases in DNA is detrimental to cells due to its high mutagenic and cytotoxic potential and is repaired by the alkyltransferase AGT. Additionally, alkyltransferase-like proteins (ATLs), which are structurally similar to AGTs, have been identified in many organisms. While ATLs are per se catalytically inactive, strong evidence has suggested that ATLs target alkyl lesions to the nucleotide excision repair system (NER). Using a combination of single-molecule and ensemble approaches, we show here recruitment of UvrA, the initiating enzyme of prokaryotic NER, to an alkyl lesion by ATL. We further characterize lesion recognition by ATL and directly visualize DNA lesion search by highly motile ATL and ATL-UvrA complexes on DNA at the molecular level. Based on the high similarity of ATLs and the DNA-interacting domain of AGTs, our results provide important insight in the lesion search mechanism, not only by ATL but also by AGT, thus opening opportunities for controlling the action of AGT for therapeutic benefit during chemotherapy.

The ATPase mechanism of UvrA2 reveals the distinct roles of proximal and distal ATPase sites in nucleotide excision repair

The UvrA₂ dimer finds lesions in DNA and initiates nucleotide excision repair. Each UvrA monomer contains two essential ATPase sites: proximal (P) and distal (D). The manner whereby their activities enable UvrA₂ damage sensing and response remains to be clarified. We report three key findings from the first pre-steady state kinetic analysis of each site. Absent DNA, a P_2ATP-D_2ADP species accumulates when the low-affinity proximal sites bind ATP and enable rapid ATP hydrolysis and phosphate release by the high-affinity distal sites, and ADP release limits catalytic turnover. Native DNA stimulates ATP hydrolysis by all four sites, causing UvrA₂ to transition through a different species, P_2ADP-D_2ADP. Lesion-containing DNA changes the mechanism again, suppressing ATP hydrolysis by the proximal sites while distal sites cycle through hydrolysis and ADP release, to populate proximal ATP-bound species, P_2ATP-D_empty and P_2ATP-D_2ATP. Thus, damaged and native DNA trigger distinct ATPase site activities, which could explain why UvrA₂ forms stable complexes with UvrB on damaged DNA compared with weaker, more dynamic complexes on native DNA. Such specific coupling between the DNA substrate and the ATPase mechanism of each site provides new insights into how UvrA₂ utilizes ATP for lesion search, recognition and repair.

Investigation of bacterial nucleotide excision repair using single-molecule techniques

Despite three decades of biochemical and structural analysis of the prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair (NER) system, many intriguing questions remain with regard to how the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins detect, verify and remove a wide range of DNA lesions. Single-molecule techniques have begun to allow more detailed understanding of the kinetics and action mechanism of this complex process. This article reviews how atomic force microscopy and fluorescence microscopy have captured new glimpses of how these proteins work together to mediate NER.

Efficient processing of TFO-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks by the UvrABC nuclease

Photoreactive psoralens can form interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) in double-stranded DNA. In eubacteria, the endonuclease UvrABC plays a key role in processing psoralen ICLs. Psoralen-modified triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) can be used to direct ICLs to specific genomic sites. Previous studies of pyrimidine-rich methoxypsoralen–modified TFOs indicated that the TFO inhibits cleavage by UvrABC. Because different chemistries may alter the processing of TFO-directed ICLs, we investigated the effect of another type of triplex formed by purine-rich TFOs on the processing of 4′-(hydroxymethyl)-4,5′,8-trimethylpsoralen (HMT) ICLs by the UvrABC nuclease. Using an HMT-modified TFO to direct ICLs to a specific site, we found that UvrABC made incisions on the purine-rich strand of the duplex ∼3 bases from the 3′-side and ∼9 bases from the 5′-side of the ICL, within the TFO-binding region. In contrast to previous reports, the UvrABC nuclease cleaved the TFO-directed psoralen ICL with a greater efficiency than that of the psoralen ICL alone. Furthermore, the TFO was dissociated from its duplex binding site by UvrA and UvrB. As mutagenesis by TFO-directed ICLs requires nucleotide excision repair, the efficient processing of these lesions supports the use of triplex technology to direct DNA damage for genome modification.

Cooperative damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB: identification of UvrA residues that mediate DNA binding

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is responsible for the recognition and removal of numerous structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In prokaryotes, the proteins UvrA, UvrB and UvrC orchestrate the recognition and excision of aberrant lesions from DNA. Despite the progress we have made in understanding the NER pathway, it remains unclear how the UvrA dimer interacts with DNA to facilitate DNA damage recognition. The purpose of this study was to define amino acid residues in UvrA that provide binding energy to DNA. Based on conservation among approximately 300 UvrA sequences and 3D-modeling, two positively charged residues, Lys680 and Arg691, were predicted to be important for DNA binding. Mutagenesis and biochemical analysis of Bacillus caldontenax UvrA variant proteins containing site directed mutations at these residues demonstrate that Lys680 and Arg691 make a significant contribution toward the DNA binding affinity of UvrA. Replacing these side chains with alanine or negatively charged residues decreased UvrA binding 3-37-fold. Survival studies indicated that these mutant proteins complemented a WP2 uvrA(-) strain of bacteria 10-100% of WT UvrA levels. Further analysis by DNase I footprinting of the double UvrA mutant revealed that the UvrA DNA binding defects caused a slower rate of transfer of DNA to UvrB. Consequently, the mutants initiated the oligonucleotide incision assay nearly as well as WT UvrA thus explaining the observed mild phenotype in the survival assay. Based on our findings we propose a model of how UvrA binds to DNA.

Intrastrand DNA cross-links as tools for studying DNA replication and repair: two-, three-, and four-carbon tethers between the N(2) positions of adjacent guanines

A general protocol for preparation of oligonucleotides containing intrastrand cross-links between the exocyclic amino groups of adjacent deoxyguanosines has been developed. A series of 2, 3, and 4 methylene cross-links was incorporated site-specifically into an 11-mer (5'-GGCAGGTGGTG-3', cross-linked positions are underlined) via a reaction between oligonucleotide containing 2-fluoro-O(6)-trimethylsilylethyl deoxyinosines and the appropriate diamine (ethylenediamine, 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,4-diaminobutane). These cross-linked-oligonucleotides were studied for their ability to bend DNA by the method of Koo and Crothers [Koo, H. S., and Crothers, D. M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 1763-1767] in which the mobility of ligated oligomers in nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels is evaluated. It was found that all cross-links induced bending (2-carbon cross-link, 30.0 +/- 4.0 deg/turn; 3-carbon cross-link, 11.7 +/- 1.6 deg/turn; 4-carbon cross-link, 7.4 +/- 1.0 deg/turn). Despite the differing extent of helical distortion exhibited by the cross-links, all appeared to be equally blocking to replication by the Escherichia coli polymerases, pol I, pol II, and pol III. In contrast, when incision of the cross-links by the E. coli UvrABC nucleotide incision complex was studied, the extent of incision of the cross-link was found to correlate closely with the degree of bending measured in the gel mobility assay, i.e., the efficiency of incision was 2-carbon >> 3-carbon > 4-carbon.

Two forms of UvrC protein with different double-stranded DNA binding affinities

Using phosphocellulose followed by single-stranded DNA-cellulose chromatography for purification of UvrC proteins from overproducing cells, we found that UvrC elutes at two peaks: 0.4 m KCl (UvrCI) and 0.6 m KCl (UvrCII). Both forms of UvrC have a major peptide band (>95%) of the same molecular weight and identical N-terminal amino acid sequences, which are consistent with the initiation codon being at the unusual GTG site. Both forms of UvrC are active in incising UV-irradiated, supercoiled phiX-174 replicative form I DNA in the presence of UvrA and UvrB proteins; however, the specific activity of UvrCII is one-fourth that of UvrCI. The molecular weight of UvrCII is four times that of UvrCI on the basis of results of size exclusion chromatography and glutaraldehyde cross-linking reactions, indicating that UvrCII is a tetramer of UvrCI. Functionally, these two forms of UvrC proteins can be distinguished under reaction conditions in which the protein/nucleotide molar ratio is >0.06 by using UV-irradiated, (32)P-labeled DNA fragments as substrates; under these conditions UvrCII is inactive in incision, but UvrCI remains active. The activity of UvrCII in incising UV-irradiated, (32)P- labeled DNA fragments can be restored by adding unirradiated competitive DNA, and the increased level of incision corresponds to a decreased level of UvrCII binding to the substrate DNA. The sites of incision at the 5' and 3' sides of a UV-induced pyrimidine dimer are the same for UvrCI and UvrCII. Nitrocellulose filter binding and gel retardation assays show that UvrCII binds to both UV-irradiated and unirradiated double-stranded DNA with the same affinity (K(a), 9 x 10(8)/m) and in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas UvrCI does not. These two forms of UvrC were also produced by the endogenous uvrC operon. We propose that UvrCII-DNA binding may interfere with Uvr(A)(2)B-DNA damage complex formation. However, because of its low copy number and low binding affinity to DNA, UvrCII may not interfere with Uvr(A)(2)B-DNA damage complex formation in vivo, but instead through double-stranded DNA binding UvrCII may become concentrated at genomic areas and therefore may facilitate nucleotide excision repair.

Differential incision of bulky carcinogen-DNA adducts by the UvrABC nuclease: comparison of incision rates and the interactions of Uvr subunits with lesions of different structures

The UvrABC nuclease system from Escherichia coli removes DNA damages induced by a wide range of chemical carcinogens with variable efficiencies. The interactions with UvrABC proteins of the following three lesions site-specifically positioned in DNA, and of known conformations, were investigated: (i) adducts derived from the binding of the (-)-(7S,8R,9R,10S) enantiomer of 7,8-dihydroxy-9, 10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene [(-)-anti-BPDE] by cis-covalent addition to N(2)-2'-deoxyguanosine [(-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG], (ii) an adduct derived from the binding of the (+)-(1R,2S,3S,4R) enantiomer of 1,2-dihydroxy-3,4-epoxy-1,2,3, 4-tetrahydro-5-methylchrysene [(+)-anti-5-MeCDE] by trans addition to N(2)-2'-deoxyguanosine [(+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG], and (iii) a C8-2'-deoxyguanosine adduct (C8-AP-dG) formed by reductively activated 1-nitropyrene (1-NP). The influence of these three different adducts on UvrA binding affinities, formation of UvrB-DNA complexes by quantitative gel mobility shift analyses, and the rates of UvrABC incision were investigated. The binding affinities of UvrA varied among the three adducts. UvrA bound to the DNA adduct (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG with the highest affinity (K(d) = 17 +/- 2 nM) and to the DNA containing C8-AP-dG with the least affinity (K(d) = 28 +/- 1 nM). The extent of complex formation with UvrB was also the lowest with the C8-AP-dG adduct. 5' Incisions occurred at the eighth phosphate from the modified guanine. The major 3' incision site corresponded to the fifth phosphodiester bond for all three adducts. However, additional 3' incisions were observed at the fourth and sixth phosphates in the case of the C8-AP-dG adduct, whereas in the case of the (-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG and (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG lesions additional 3' cleavage occurred at the sixth and seventh phosphodiester bonds. Both the initial rate and the extent of 5' and 3' incisions revealed that C8-AP-dG was repaired less efficiently in comparison to the (-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG and (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG containing DNA adducts. Our study showed that UvrA recognizes conformational changes induced by structurally different lesions and that in certain cases the binding affinities of UvrA and UvrB can be correlated with the incision rates. The size of the bubble formed around the damaged site with mismatched bases also appears to influence the incision rates. A particularly noteworthy finding in this study is that UvrABC repair of a substrate with no base opposite C8-AP-dG was quite inefficient as compared to the same adduct with a C opposite it. These findings are discussed in terms of the available NMR solution structures.

Interaction of UvrA and UvrB proteins with a fluorescent single-stranded DNA. Implication for slow conformational change upon interaction of UvrB with DNA

UvrA and UvrB proteins play key roles in the damage recognition step in the nucleotide excision repair. However, the molecular mechanism of damage recognition by these proteins is still not well understood. In this work we analyzed the interaction between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) labeled with a fluorophore tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrA (ttUvrA) and UvrB (ttUvrB) proteins. TMR-labeled ssDNA (TMR-ssDNA) as well as UV-irradiated ssDNA stimulated ATPase activity of ttUvrB more strongly than did normal ssDNA, indicating that this fluorescent ssDNA was recognized as damaged ssDNA. The addition of ttUvrA or ttUvrB enhanced the fluorescence intensity of TMR-ssDNA, and the intensity was much greater in the presence of ATP. Fluorescence titration indicated that ttUvrA has higher specificity for TMR-ssDNA than for normal ssDNA in the absence of ATP. The ttUvrB showed no specificity for TMR-ssDNA, but it took over 200 min for the fluorescence intensity of the ttUvrB-TMR-ssDNA complex to reach saturation in the presence of ATP. This time-dependent change could be separated into two phases. The first phase was rapid, whereas the second phase was slow and dependent on ATP hydrolysis. Time dependence of ATPase activity and fluorescence polarization suggested that changes other than the binding reaction occurred during the second phase. These results strongly suggest that ttUvrB binds ssDNA quickly and that a conformational change in ttUrvB-ssDNA complex occurs slowly. We also found that DNA containing a fluorophore as a lesion is useful for directly investigating the damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB.

Hydrophobic forces dominate the thermodynamic characteristics of UvrA-DNA damage interactions

The Escherichia coli DNA repair proteins UvrA, UvrB and UvrC work together to recognize and incise DNA damage during the process of nucleotide excision repair (NER). To gain an understanding of the damage recognition properties of UvrA, we have used fluorescence spectroscopy to study the thermodynamics of its interaction with a defined DNA substrate containing a benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) adduct. Oligonucleotides containing a single site-specifically modified N2-guanine (+)-trans-, (-)-trans-, (+)-cis-, or (-)-cis-BPDE adducts were ligated into 50-base-pair DNA fragments. All four stereoisomers of DNA-BPDE adducts show an excitation maximum at 350 nm and an emission maximum around 380 to 385 nm. Binding of UvrA to the BPDE-DNA adducts results in a five to sevenfold fluorescence enhancement. Titration of the BPDE-adducted DNA with UvrA was used to generate binding isotherms. The equilibrium dissociation constants for UvrA binding to (+)-trans-, (-)-trans-, (+)-cis-, and (-)-cis- BPDE adduct were: 7.4+/-1.9, 15. 8+/-5.4, 11.3+/-2.7 and 22.4+/-2.0 nM, respectively. There was a large negative change in heat capacity DeltaCpo,obs, (-3.3 kcal mol-1 K-1) accompanied by a relatively unchanged DeltaGoobs with temperature. Furthermore, varying the concentration of KCl showed that the number of ions released upon formation of UvrA-DNA complex is about 3.4, a relatively small value compared to the contact size of UvrA with the substrate. These data suggest that hydrophobic interactions are an important driving force for UvrA binding to BPDE-damaged DNA.

Involvement of molecular chaperonins in nucleotide excision repair. Dnak leads to increased thermal stability of UvrA, catalytic UvrB loading, enhanced repair, and increased UV resistance

UvrA is one of the key Escherichia coli proteins involved in removing DNA damage during the process of nucleotide excision repair. The relatively low concentrations (nanomolar) of the protein in the normal cells raise the potential questions about its stability in vivo under both normal and stress conditions. In vitro, UvrA at low concentrations is shown to be stabilized to heat inactivation by E. coli molecular chaperones DnaK or the combination of DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. These chaperone proteins allow sub-nanomolar concentrations of UvrA to load UvrB through >10 cycles of incision. Guanidine hydrochloride-denatured UvrA was reactivated by DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE to as much as 50% of the native protein activity. Co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that DnaK bound denatured UvrA in the absence of ATP. UV survival studies of a DnaK-deficient strain indicated an 80-fold increased sensitivity to 100 J/m2 of ultraviolet light (254 nm) as compared with an isogenic wild-type strain. Global repair analysis indicated a reduction in the extent of pyrimidine dimer and 6-4 photoproduct removal in the DnaK-deficient cells. These results suggest that molecular chaperonins participate in nucleotide excision repair by maintaining repair proteins in their properly folded state.

Introduction of a tryptophan reporter group into the ATP binding motif of the Escherichia coli UvrB protein for the study of nucleotide binding and conformational dynamics

The DNA-dependent ATPase activity of UvrB is required to support preincision steps in nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. This activity is, however, cryptic. Elicited in nucleotide excision repair by association with the UvrA protein, it may also be unmasked by a specific proteolysis eliminating the C-terminal domain of UvrB (generating UvrB*). We introduced fluorescent reporter groups (tryptophan replacing Phe47 or Asn51) into the ATP binding motif of UvrB, without significant alteration of behavior, to study both nucleotide binding and those conformational changes expected to be essential to function. The inserted tryptophans occupy moderately hydrophobic, although potentially heterogeneous, environments as evidenced by fluorescence emission and time-resolved decay characteristics, yet are accessible to the diffusible quencher acrylamide. Activation, via specific proteolysis, is accompanied by conformational change at the ATP binding site, with multiple changes in emission spectra and a greater shielding of the tryptophans from diffusible quencher. Titration of tryptophan fluorescence with ATP has revealed that, although catalytically incompetent, UvrB can bind ATP and bind with an affinity equal to that of the active UvrB* form (Kd of approximately 1 mM). The ATP binding site of UvrB is therefore functional and accessible, suggesting that conformational change either brings amino acid residues into proper alignment for catalysis and/or enables response to effector DNA.

Formation of DNA repair intermediates and incision by the ATP-dependent UvrB-UvrC endonuclease

The Escherichia coli UvrB and UvrC proteins play key roles in DNA damage processing and incisions during nucleotide excision repair. To study the DNA structural requirements and protein-DNA intermediates formed during these processes, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-damaged and structure-specific 50-base pair substrates were constructed. DNA fragments containing a preexisting 3' incision were rapidly and efficiently incised 5' to the adduct. Gel mobility shift assays indicated that this substrate supported UvrA dissociation from the UvrB-DNA complex, which led to efficient incision. Experiments with a DNA fragment containing an internal noncomplementary 11-base region surrounding the benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide adduct indicated that UvrABC nuclease does not require fully duplexed DNA for binding and incision. In the absence of UvrA, UvrB (UvrC) bound to an 11-base noncomplementary region containing a 3' nick (Y substrate), forming a stable protein-DNA complex (Kd approximately 5-10 nM). Formation of this complex was absolutely dependent upon UvrC. Addition to this complex of ATP, but not adenosine 5'-(beta,gamma-iminotriphosphate) or adenosine 5'-(beta, gamma-methylene)triphosphate, caused incision three or four nucleotides 5' to the double strand-single strand junction. The ATPase activity of native UvrB is activated upon interaction with UvrC and enhanced further by the addition of Y substrate. Incision of this Y structure occurs even without DNA damage. Thus the UvrBC complex is a structure-specific, ATP-dependent endonuclease.

UvrAB activity at a damaged DNA site: is unpaired DNA present?

To study the activity of the Escherichia coli UvrA and UvrB nucleotide excision repair proteins during the formation of the pre-incision complex at a damaged DNA site, we used substrates with modifications around a single 2-(acetylamino)fluorene (AAF) lesion. Based on the release of AAF-containing oligonucleotides from a single-stranded DNA circle, we conclude that during interaction with our substrates UvrAB introduces changes in DNA which are localized at the lesion and are limited to 1-3 bp. Since these changes might include a denaturation of DNA at the lesion site and, consequently, a bubble structure might be present in a pre-incision complex, we studied incision activity of UvrABC excinuclease on substrates with 1-4 unpaired bases next to an AAF adduct. Opening more than one base on either or both sides of the lesion caused a significant decrease in the incision activity of UvrABC, but did not change the position of the incision sites. We conclude that the UvrAB action leading to a pre-incision complex does not include the formation of a bubble intermediate generated by extensive denaturation of base pairs.

The topodynamics of incision of UV-irradiated covalently closed DNA by the Escherichia coli Uvr(A)BC endonuclease

The Escherichia coli Uvr(A)BC endonuclease (Uvr(A)BC) initiates nucleotide excision repair of a large variety of DNA damages. The damage recognition and incision steps by the Uvr(A)BC is a complex process utilizing an ATP-dependent DNA helix-tracking activity associated with the UvrA2B1 complex. The latter activity leads to the generation of highly positively supercoiled DNA in the presence of E. coli topoisomerase I in vitro. Such highly positively supercoiled DNA, containing ultraviolet irradiation-induced photoproducts (uvDNA), is resistant to the incision by Uvr(A)BC, whereas the negatively supercoiled and relaxed forms of the uvDNA are effectively incised. The E. coli gyrase can contribute to the above reaction by abolishing the accumulation of highly positively supercoiled uvDNA thereby restoring Uvr(A)BC-catalyzed incision. Eukaryotic (calf thymus) topoisomerase I is able to substitute for gyrase in restoring this Uvr(A)BC-mediated incision reaction. The inability of Uvr(A)BC to incise highly positively supercoiled uvDNA results from the failure of the formation of UvrAB-dependent obligatory intermediates associated with the DNA conformational change. In contrast to Uvr(A)BC, the Micrococcus luteus UV endonuclease efficiently incises uvDNA regardless of its topological state. The in vitro topodynamic system proposed in this study may provide a simple model for studying a topological aspect of nucleotide excision repair and its interaction with other DNA topology-related processes in E. coli.

The binding of UvrAB proteins to bubble and loop regions in duplex DNA

Based on the binding of the UvrAB complex to a promoter region in transcription open complexes (Ahn, B., and Grossman, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21453-21461) and the requirement of a single-stranded region for UvrAB helicase activity, we examined the binding of UvrAB proteins to synthetic bubble or loop regions in duplex DNA and the role of these regions in translocation of the UvrAB complex as well as incision of DNA damage. We found that the UvrAB complex was able to bind to bubble and loop regions with an affinity similar to that for damaged DNA in the absence of RNAP. The preferential recognition and incision of damaged sites by the UvrAB complex was observed downstream of the bubble or loop region in the strand complementary to the strand along which the UvrAB complex translocates. These results imply that the bubble region generated in duplex DNA by RNAP serves as a preferred entry site for the translocation of the UvrAB complex, and that preferential binding and unidirectional translocation of the UvrAB complex predetermine where incision is to occur.

The Escherichia coli DNA repair protein UvrA can re-associate with the UvrB: aflatoxin B1-DNA complex in vitro

The UvrA and UvrB proteins form part of the UvrABc endonuclease, which is responsible for nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Using a mobility shift gel assay we have studied the binding of UvrA dimer, UvrB monomer and UvA(2)B trimer complexes with 40, 50 and 136 bp (32)P-end-labelled DNA fragments adducted with aflatoxin B(1). UvrA was shown to re-associate with adduct specific UvrB: DNA complexes, a phenomenon which could be reversed by the addition of 500 mM potassium chloride or anti-UvrA anti-sera. Re-association was shown to be UvrA concentration dependent. Re-association of UvrA(2)B to the UvrB:DNA complex was not seen. We have also shown that the UvrB:DNA complex, in the case of aflatoxin B(1), is extremely stable with a half-life excess of 400 min and that fragment termini are not a specific substrate for UvrA binding.

Site-specific DNA substrates for human excision repair: comparison between deoxyribose and base adducts

BACKGROUND

The genetic integrity of living organisms is maintained by a complex network of DNA repair pathways. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a versatile process that excises bulky base modifications from DNA. To study the substrate range of this system, we constructed bulky deoxyribose adducts that do not affect the chemistry of the corresponding bases. These novel adducts were incorporated into double-stranded DNA in a site-specific manner and the repair of the modified sites was investigated.

RESULTS

Using restriction enzymes as a probe for DNA modification, we confirmed that the resulting substrates contained the bulky deoxyribose adducts at the expected position. DNA containing these unique adducts did not stimulate DNA repair synthesis when mixed with an NER-competent human cell extract. Inefficient repair of deoxyribose adducts was confirmed by monitoring the release of single-stranded oligonucleotides during the excision reaction that precedes DNA repair synthesis. As a control, the same human cell extract was able to process a base adduct of comparable size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that modification of DNA bases rather than disruption of the sugar-phosphate backbone is an important determinant for damage recognition by the human NER system. Specific positions in DNA may thus be modified without eliciting NER responses. This observation suggests new strategies for anticancer drug design to generate DNA modifications that are refractory to repair processes.

"Close-fitting sleeves"--recognition of structural defects in duplex DNA

The first step in the ubiquitous cellular process of nucleotide excision-repair must involve the recognition of a lesion or structural distortion in DNA. This is followed by incision in the strand perceived as damaged; and then coordinated steps of local degradation and re-synthesis occur to replace the defective DNA segment with a new stretch of nucleotides, making use of the intact complementary strand as template. The repair patch is ultimately ligated at its 3' end to the contiguous preexisting DNA strand to restore the integrity of the normal DNA structure. Crucial to this repair scheme is the fact that the genome consists of double-stranded DNA, so that when one strand is damaged the information for its repair can, in principle, be recovered from the other strand. We will review a bit of the early speculation about the nature of the damage recognition step and then discuss the complexity of that event as we currently understand it. An important conceptual contribution to this field resulted from my collaboration with Robert Haynes in which we suggested that "the recognition step in the repair mechanism could be formally equivalent to threading the DNA through a close-fitting 'sleeve' which gauges the closeness-of-fit to the Watson-Crick structure" (Hanawalt and Haynes, 1965).

Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli UvrABC nuclease: clues to the damage recognition problem

During the process of E. coli nucleotide excision repair, DNA damage recognition and processing are achieved by the action of the uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC gene products. The availability of highly purified proteins has lead to a detailed molecular description of E. coli nucleotide excision repair that serves as a model for similar processes in eukaryotes. An interesting aspect of this repair system is the protein complex's ability to work on a vast array of DNA lesions that differ widely in their chemical composition and molecular architecture. Here we propose a model for damage recognition in which the UvrB protein serves as the component that confers enhanced specificity to a preincision complex. We hypothesize that one major determinant for the formation of a stable preincision complex appears to be the disruption of base stacking interactions by DNA lesions.