The clinical assessment of olfaction: differential diagnoses including Kallman's syndrome

Olfactory Dysfunction in Children: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Olfactory disorders are well-studied in the adult population, however, there is a paucity of literature characterizing olfactory dysfunction in pediatric patients. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify known causes of olfactory loss in pediatric populations, clarify the extent of use and validity of smell tests, and summarize current therapies for olfactory loss.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Databases were systematically searched in September 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract screen, followed by review of full-texts for inclusion based on preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included study type, age/age-range of participants, gender, radiological evidence of olfactory dysfunction, types and results of smell tests used, etiology of olfactory loss, and therapies employed for olfactory loss.

RESULTS

A total of 103 articles (n = 1654) were eligible for final data extraction. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was used most frequently for smell testing (21% of studies). In total, 45 causes of olfactory dysfunction have been elucidated by this study: 22 congenital and 23 acquired. Few therapies were described, and all were specific to the etiology of olfactory loss.

CONCLUSION

Olfactory dysfunction has a wide range of etiologies in the pediatric population, and clinicians should have a diagnostic algorithm for how to identify a cause should they encounter it in practice. If no etiology can be identified, education around safety should be provided to both the patient and their caregivers.

Olfactory loss is a predisposing factor for depression, while olfactory enrichment is an effective treatment for depression

The loss of olfactory stimulation correlates well with at least 68 widely differing neurological disorders, including depression, and we raise the possibility that this relationship may be causal. That is, it seems possible that olfactory loss makes the brain vulnerable to expressing the symptoms of these neurological disorders, while daily olfactory enrichment may decrease the risk of expressing these symptoms. This situation resembles the cognitive reserve that is thought to protect people with Alzheimer’s neuropathology from expressing the functional deficit in memory through the cumulative effect of intellectual stimulation. These relationships also resemble the functional response of animal models of human neurological disorders to environmental enrichment, wherein the animals continue to have the induced neuropathology, but do not express the symptoms as they do in a standard environment with restricted sensorimotor stimulation.

Measurement of chemosensory function

Although hundreds of thousands of patients seek medical help annually for disorders of taste and smell, relatively few medical practitioners quantitatively test their patients' chemosensory function, taking their complaints at face value. This is clearly not the approach paid to patients complaining of visual, hearing, or balance problems. Accurate chemosensory testing is essential to establish the nature, degree, and veracity of a patient's complaint, as well as to aid in counseling and in monitoring the effectiveness of treatment strategies and decisions. In many cases, patients perseverate on chemosensory loss that objective assessment demonstrates has resolved. In other cases, patients are malingering. Olfactory testing is critical for not only establishing the validity and degree of the chemosensory dysfunction, but for helping patients place their dysfunction into perspective relative to the function of their peer group. It is well established, for example, that olfactory dysfunction is the rule, rather than the exception, in members of the older population. Moreover, it is now apparent that such dysfunction can be an early sign of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Importantly, older anosmics are three times more likely to die over the course of an ensuring five-year period than their normosmic peers, a situation that may be averted in some cases by appropriate nutritional and safety counseling. This review provides the clinician, as well as the academic and industrial researcher, with an overview of the available means for accurately assessing smell and taste function, including up-to-date information and normative data for advances in this field.

Estimating frequency of Kallmann syndrome among hypogonadic and among anosmic patients

The frequency of Kallmann syndrome (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and anosmia, HHA) was estimated in patients presenting with hypogonadism and patients with anosmia. Of 791 hypogonadal males 19 had HHA. The frequency of HHA was about 1:25 (n = 8/189) in outpatients questioned about their sense of smell, about 1:50 (n = 11/579) in patients whose blood samples were sent to us for chromosome analysis, and about 1:30 (n = 19/605) in males with hypogonadism and 46,XY chromosomes. The relation of patients with HHA to those with Klinefelter syndrome was 1:10 (n = 19/186). From 24 patients presenting with anosmia we found 1 hitherto undiagnosed case of HHA. The mean age at diagnosis was 24.8 and 24.9 years in our cases and cases from literature, respectively. These data provide evidence that Kallmann syndrome is not infrequent and that most patients remain undiagnosed until the third decade of life. Earlier diagnosis is emphasized by questioning each hypogonadal patient about his sense of smell because therapeutic success seems to be age dependent.