Pattern regulation in tergite of Drosophila: a model

The roles of hedgehog and engrailed in patterning adult abdominal segments of Drosophila

We present evidence that hedgehog (hh) protein secreted by posterior compartment cells plays a key role in patterning the posterior portion of the anterior compartment in adult abdominal segments. Loss of function of hh in the hh(ts2) mutant causes the loss of posterior tergite characteristics in the anterior compartment, whereas ectopic expression driven by hs-hh or the gain-of-function allele hh(Mir) causes transformation of anterior structures toward the posterior. FLP-out hh-expressing clones in the anterior compartment induce surrounding wild-type cells to produce posterior tergite structures, establishing that hh functions nonautonomously. The effects of pulses of ectopic expression driven by hs-hh indicate that bristle type and pigmentation are patterned by hh at widely different times in pupal development. We also present evidence that the primary polarization of abdominal segments is symmetric. This symmetry is strikingly revealed by ectopic expression of engrailed (en). As expected, this transforms anterior compartment cells to posterior compartment identity. In addition, however, ectopic en expression causes an autonomous reversal of polarity in the anterior portion of the anterior compartment, but not the posterior portion. By determining the position of polarity reversal within en-expressing clones, we were able to define a cryptic line of symmetry that lies within the pigment band of the normal tergite. This line appears to be retained in hh(ts2) mutants raised at the restrictive temperature, suggesting it is not established by hh signaling. We argue that the primary role of hh in controlling polarity is to cause anterior compartment cells to reverse their interpretation of an underlying symmetric polarization. Consistent with this, we find that strong ectopic expression of hh causes mirror-symmetric double posterior patterning, whereas hh loss of function can cause mirror-symmetric double anterior patterning.

Pattern regulation in the ventral histoblasts of the housefly: induction of sternal pattern abnormalities by mechanical wounding of larval epidermal cells

In higher Diptera, two nests of diploid cells called the ventral histoblasts, located one on either side of each abdominal segment among the polytene larval epidermal cells, give rise to the sternite and its surrounding pleura. During metamorphosis of the insect, these two groups of cells migrate and meet with each other in the midventral region of the developing adult. The cuticular pattern elements and pigmentation in the fifth sternite of the male housefly, when compared to those of other segments as well as the tergites of both sexes, are quite distinct. The above-mentioned features, coupled with the smaller number and predictable occurrence of one of the pattern elements in this sternite, viz, the primary forceps, help one to determine the developmental potential of the histoblast nest and the regulation of its potential which occur at the time of fusion of the two contralateral nests of this segment. A simple operation of slitting the larval epidermal cells (LEC) in a hemisegment in the vicinity of the histoblast nest or extirpation or rotation of a small rectangular piece of LEC between the ventral nest and the midventral line produced pattern abnormalities including mirror image duplication in the hemisternite. An analysis of these pattern abnormalities in the different segments and, in particular, in the fifth segment provides a dynamic picture of the formation of the median sternite. Further, these abnormalities indicate the significance of the presence of the intervening pleural cells between the confronting hemisternites under experimental conditions. Thus, each of the fifth ventral nests has the developmental potential to form more than half of the final sternite pattern. Possible mechanisms for the formation of the normal median sternite during metamorphosis and for the formation of duplicated hemisternites and their fusion products under experimental conditions are discussed in light of current models of pattern regulation.