Evaluation of dopaminergic tone in hyperprolactinemia. III. Thyroid-stimulating hormone response to metoclopramide in differential diagnosis and postoperative follow-up of prolactinoma patients

Reappraising the Role of Trans-Sphenoidal Surgery in Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Tumors

Simple Summary

Prolactinomas constitute a subgroup of pituitary adenomas for which there are several treatment options. Dopamine agonists (DA), since their introduction, have shown a strong efficacy both in the control of hyperprolactinemia and of the significant volumetric reduction of prolactinomas, leading, in some cases, to a definitive cure. Trans-sphenoidal surgery (TSS) has been traditionally confined to a failure of medical therapy, pituitary apoplexy with neurological worsening, and prolactinomas with wide cystic components. Moreover, the recent technical innovations introduced in TSS and increasing experience of surgeons have allowed to achieve better results, such as complete tumor resection with lower complication rates. On these grounds, the authors reviewed the extensive institutional Prolactinomas case series over the last 25 years to analyze the role of TSS in the management of Prolactinomas, particularly in terms of the cure rate.

Abstract

Background: Prolactinomas represent a unique challenge for endocrinologists and neurosurgeons. Considering recent innovations in surgical practice, the authors aimed to investigate the best management for prolactinomas. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional and monocentric study was designed. Consecutive patients affected by prolactinomas were enrolled if treated with a first-line treatment with a dopamine agonist (DA) or trans-sphenoidal surgery (TSS). Patients carried giant prolactinomas, and those with a follow-up <12 months were excluded. Results: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The first treatment was DA for 140 patients and TS for 119 cases. One hundred and forty-six of 249 patients (58.6%) needed a second therapy. The mean follow-up was 102.2 months (12–438 months). Surgery highly impacted on the cure rate—in particular, in females (p = 0.0021) and in microprolactinomas (p = 0.0020). Considering the multivariate analysis, the female gender and surgical treatment in the course of the clinical history were the only independent positive predictors of a cure at the end of 5 years follow-up (p = 0.0016, p = 0.0005). The evaluation of serum prolactin (24 hours after TSS) revealed that 86.4% of patients with postoperative prolactin (PRL) ≤10 ng/mL were cured at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: According to our experience, surgery allows a high cure rate of prolactinomas, particularly in females with microadenoma, with a good safety profile. TSS for prolactinomas should be considered as a concrete option, during the multidisciplinary evaluation, in centers of reference for pituitary diseases.

Macroprolactinemia: new insights in hyperprolactinemia

Hypersecretion of prolactin by lactotroph cells of the anterior pituitary may lead to hyperprolactinemia in physiological, pathological and idiopathic conditions. Most patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia may have radiologically undetected microprolactinomas, but some may present other causes of hyperprolactinemia described as macroprolactinemia. This condition corresponds to the predominance of higher molecular mass prolactin forms (big-big prolactin, MW > 150 kDa), that have been postulated to represent prolactin monomer complexed with anti-prolactin immunoglobulins or autoantibodies. The prevalence of macroprolactinemia in hyperprolactinemic populations between 15–46% has been reported. In the pathophysiology of macroprolactinemia it seems that pituitary prolactin has antigenicity, leading to the production of anti-prolactin autoantibodies, and these antibodies reduce prolactin bioactivity and delay prolactin clearance. Antibody-bound prolactin is big enough to be confined to vascular spaces, and therefore macroprolactinemia develops due to the delayed clearance of prolactin rather than increased production. Although the clinical symptoms are less frequent in macroprolactinemic patients, they could not be diff erentiated from true hyperprolactinemic patients, on the basis of clinical features alone. Although gel filtration chromatography (GFC) is known to be the gold standard for detecting macroprolactin, the polyethylene glycol precipitation (PEG) method has off ered a simple, cheap, and highly suitable alternative. In conclusion, macroprolactinemia can be considered a benign condition with low incidence of clinical symptoms and therefore hormonal and imaging investigations as well as medical or surgical treatment and prolonged follow-up are not necessary.

Development of anti-PRL (prolactin) autoantibodies by homologous PRL in rats: a model for macroprolactinemia

Macroprolactinemia is hyperprolactinemia in humans mainly due to anti-PRL (prolactin) autoantibodies and is a pitfall for the differential diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia. Despite its high prevalence, the pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we examined whether anti-PRL autoantibodies develop via immunization with homologous rat pituitary PRL in rats to elucidate what mechanisms are involved and whether they cause hyperprolactinemia with low PRL bioactivity, as seen in human macroprolactinemia. Anti-PRL antibodies were developed in 19 of 20 rats immunized with homologous rat pituitary PRL and 29 of 30 rats with heterogeneous bovine or porcine pituitary PRL but did not develop in 25 control rats. In rats with anti-PRL antibodies, the basal serum PRL levels were elevated, and a provocative test for PRL secretion using dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (metoclopramide) showed a normal rising response with a slower clearance of PRL because of the accumulation of macroprolactin in blood. Antibodies developed by porcine or rat pituitary PRL reduced the bioactivity of rat serum PRL, and gonadal functions in these rats were normal despite hyperprolactinemia. Anti-PRL antibodies were stable and persisted for at least 5 wk after the final injection of PRL. These findings suggest that pituitary PRL, even if homologous, has antigenicity, leading to the development of anti-PRL autoantibodies. We successfully produced an animal model of human macroprolactinemia, with which we can explain the mechanisms of its clinical characteristics, i.e. asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia.