Pilocarpine and other cholinergic drugs in the management of salivary gland dysfunction

Efficacy of combined administration of Baekhogainsam-Tang and low-dose pilocarpine on frequent intractable xerostomia: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intractable xerostomia is defined as the subjective perception of dry mouth and persistent salivary gland hypofunction. Pilocarpine is an approved salivary sialagogue that is frequently prescribed for the treatment of intractable xerostomia; however, it often exhibits more side effects at high-doses and limited effectiveness at low-doses. Baekhogainsam-Tang (BIT) is a common herbal formula used by patients complaining of sore throats and thirst. It seems that BIT can compensate for the insufficient effect of low-dose pilocarpine. However, no clinical trials have studied the efficacy of combined administration of BIT and low-dose pilocarpine for intractable xerostomia. We aim to assess the non-inferior efficacy and fewer side effects of combined administration of BIT and low-dose pilocarpine compared with the administration of high-dose pilocarpine.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multi-center trial will be conducted. A total of 120 patients with Sjogren's syndrome having an unstimulated salivary flow rate (SFR) ≤0.1 mL/min or who have undergone radiotherapy to the head and neck with an unstimulated SFR ≤0.25 mL/min will be recruited competitively. They will be randomly allocated to either the experimental or control groups. The experimental group will receive BIT herbal granules three times and pilocarpine (2.5-mg) four times daily; meanwhile, the control group will receive only 5-mg pilocarpine four times daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is unstimulated SFR after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes are stimulated SFR after 12 weeks of medication, as well as differences and mean percentage changes in unstimulated and stimulated SFR, visual analog scale, salivary scintigraphy, and questionnaires for both oral symptoms and quality of life during the clinical trial. An independent T test or Mann-Whitney U test will be performed to compare values between the two groups. The Paired T test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be performed to compare intragroup continuous values.

CONCLUSION

This trial will be significant evidence on the efficacy and safety of combined use of BIT and low-dose pilocarpine to treat intractable xerostomia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea (ISRCTN, KCT0005982). Registered on 10 February 2021.

Outline of Salivary Gland Pathogenesis of Sjögren's Syndrome and Current Therapeutic Approaches

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the involvement of exocrine glands such as the salivary and lacrimal glands. The minor salivary glands, from which tissue samples may be obtained, are important for the diagnosis, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, and genetic analyses of SS. In the onset of SS, autoantigens derived from the salivary glands are recognized by antigen-presenting dendritic cells, leading to the activation of T and B cells, cytokine production, autoantibody production by plasma cells, the formation of ectopic germinal centers, and the destruction of salivary gland epithelial cells. A recent therapeutic approach with immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignant tumors enhances the anti-tumor activity of cytotoxic effector T cells, but also induces SS-like autoimmune disease as an adverse event. In the treatment of xerostomia, muscarinic agonists and salivary gland duct cleansing procedure, as well as sialendoscopy, are expected to ameliorate symptoms. Clinical trials on biological therapy to attenuate the hyperresponsiveness of B cells in SS patients with systemic organ involvement have progressed. The efficacy of treatment with mesenchymal stem cells and chimeric antigen receptor T cells for SS has also been investigated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the pathogenesis of salivary gland lesions and recent trends in therapeutic approaches for SS.

Pilocarpine-Induced Effects on Salivary Secretion as a Pharmacological Biomarker for Cholinergic Parasympathetic Activation

Pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion could serve as a nontherapeutic target engagement biomarker in a clinical setting to test the activity of an M3 positive allosteric modulator (PAM). The potentiating effect on the reactivity of the M3 receptor to the agonistic effect of pilocarpine would support the mechanism of action of an M3 PAM in a variety of therapeutic areas. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal pilocarpine dose needed for evaluation of this potentiating effect. Therefore, the effects of pilocarpine on salivary secretion rate and its pharmacokinetics were explored at single doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg of pilocarpine or placebo. The study also explored the test-retest variability of the pilocarpine-induced effects on salivary secretion. Pilocarpine caused a reproducible, dose-related increase in overall and maximum salivary secretion rate, in line with pilocarpine exposure. Oral doses of pilocarpine from 2.5 to 10 mg were safe and well tolerated, consistent with the published safety profile. These results support the use of pilocarpine in single-dose pharmacological challenge studies. The recommended dose for evaluating M3 PAM activity would be between 2.5 and 5 mg, showing a small increase in salivary secretion rate with room for further increase due to PAM activation.

Efficacy of Pilocarpine and Bromhexine in Improving Radiotherapy-induced Xerostomia

Background and aims. Xerostomia is one of the most common complications of head and neck radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of pilocarpine and bromhexine in improving radiotherapy-induced xerostomia and its associated symptoms.

Materials and methods. In this single-blind, randomized crossover study, pilocarpine and bromhexine tablets were used by twenty-five patients suffered from xerostomia, with a medical history of head and neck radiotherapy. At step A, the patients were treated with pilocarpine for 2 weeks. In addition, they were asked to take bromhexine for 2 weeks with a one-week washout period. At step B, the inverse process was conducted (first bromhexine, then pilocarpine). Whole resting saliva was collected from patients before and after receiving each medication by precise measurements. Then, efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of xerostomia and its related oral complications was evaluated using questionnaires by Dichotomous format. The results were statistically analyzed using t-student and Fisher’s exact and chi-squared tests. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results. The difference between saliva secretion rates before and after medications was not significant for bromhexine users at two steps of the study (P=0.35); however, it was significant for pilocarpine users (P=0.0001). Users of both drugs showed significant differences in improvement of xerostomia, chewing, swallowing, tasting and mouth burning.

Conclusion. Pilocarpine is probably more effective in improving xerostomia and its associated problems compared with bromhexine, although the use of the latter was also shown to ease some of the consequences of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.

Central mechanisms involved in pilocarpine-induced pressor response

Pilocarpine (cholinergic muscarinic agonist) injected peripherally may act centrally to produce pressor responses; in the present study, using c-fos immunoreactive expression, we investigated the forebrain and brainstem areas activated by pressor doses of intravenous (i.v.) pilocarpine. In addition, the importance of vasopressin secretion and/or sympathetic activation and the effects of lesions in the anteroventral third ventricle (AV3V) region in awake rats were also investigated. In male Holtzman rats, pilocarpine (0.04 to 4μmol/kg b.w.) i.v. induced transitory hypotension followed by long lasting hypertension. Sympathetic blockade with prazosin (1mg/kg b.w.) i.v. or AV3V lesions (1 day) almost abolished the pressor response to i.v. pilocarpine (2μmol/kg b.w.), whereas the vasopressin antagonist (10μg/kg b.w.) i.v. reduced the response to pilocarpine. Pilocarpine (2 and 4μmol/kg b.w.) i.v. increased the number of c-fos immunoreactive cells in the subfornical organ, paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus, organ vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, median preoptic nucleus, nucleus of the solitary tract and caudal and rostral ventrolateral medulla. These data suggest that i.v. pilocarpine activates specific forebrain and brainstem mechanisms increasing sympathetic activity and vasopressin secretion to induce pressor response.

Formulation and stability of pilocarpine oral solution

The stability of four formulations of pilocarpine oral solution containing glycerol, hydroxybenzoate preservatives and lemon spirit was studied on storage for 90 days at 4, 25 and 38C using a stability-indicating high performance liquid chromatography assay. The solutions were prepared from pilocarpine hydrochloride powder (0.2 and 3mg/ml) in citrate buffer pH 5.5, or from eyedrops (3mg/ml) in citrate buffer pH 5.5 or phosphate buffer pH 7.5. Significant decomposition of pilocarpine occurred in the pH 7.5 formulation at all three temperatures. The data were adequately described by a first order model. Degradation in the pH 5.5 formulations was not significant over 90 days at 4C or 60 days at 25C. Decomposition at 38C was significant and adequately described by a zero order model. The lower 95 per cent confidence limits for 10 per cent decomposition were 36 days for the eye-drop formulation and 27 and 32 days for the 0.2 and 3mg/ml powder formulations respectively. Pilocarpine oral solution prepared from powder or eye-drops in pH 5.5 buffer is chemically stable for 60 or 90 days at 25C or 4C, respectively, and provides a stable dosage form.

The effects of antidepressants and pilocarpine on rat parotid glands: an immunohistochemical study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of antidepressants and pilocarpine on the quantity of myoepithelial cells and on the proliferation index of the epithelial cells of rat parotid glands.

INTRODUCTION

Hyposalivation, xerostomia, and alterations in saliva composition are important clinical side effects related to the use of antidepressants.

METHODS

Ninety male Wistar rats were allocated to nine groups. The control groups received saline for 30 (group C30) or 60 days (group C60) or pilocarpine for 60 days (group Pilo). The experimental groups were administered fluoxetine (group F30) or venlafaxine for 30 days (group V30); fluoxetine (group FS60) or venlafaxine (group VS60) with saline for 60 days; or fluoxetine (group FP60) or venlafaxine (group VP60) with pilocarpine for 60 days. Parotid gland specimens were processed, and the immunohistochemical expression of calponin and proliferating cell nuclear anti-antigen on the myoepithelial and parenchymal cells, respectively, was evaluated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey HSD and Games-Howell tests were applied to detect differences among groups (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Compared with the controls, chronic exposure to antidepressants was associated with an increase in the number of positively stained cells for calponin. In addition, venlafaxine administration for 30 days was associated with an increase in the number of positively stained cells for proliferating cell nuclear anti-antigen. Fluoxetine and pilocarpine (group FP60) induced a significant decrease in the number of positively stained cells for calponin compared with all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of positively stained cells for calponin increased after chronic administration of antidepressants. The proliferation index of the epithelial cells of rat parotid glands was not altered by the use of antidepressants for 60 days.

Central muscarinic receptor subtypes involved in pilocarpine-induced salivation, hypertension and water intake

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent evidence has suggested that pilocarpine (ACh receptor agonist) injected peripherally may act centrally producing salivation and hypertension. In this study, we investigated the effects of specific M(1) (pirenzepine), M(2)/M(4) (methoctramine), M(1)/M(3) (4-DAMP) and M(4) (tropicamide) muscarinic receptor subtype antagonists injected into the lateral cerebral ventricle (LV) on salivation, water intake and pressor responses to peripheral pilocarpine.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male Holtzman rats with stainless steel cannulae implanted in the LV were used. Salivation was measured in rats anaesthetized with ketamine (100 mg per kg body weight) and arterial pressure was recorded in unanaesthetized rats.

KEY RESULTS

Salivation induced by i.p. pilocarpine (4 micromol per kg body weight) was reduced only by 4-DAMP (25-250 nmol) injected into the LV, not by pirenzepine, methoctramine or tropicamide at the dose of 500 nmol. Pirenzepine (0.1 and 1 nmol) and 4-DAMP (5 and 10 nmol) injected into the LV reduced i.p. pilocarpine-induced water intake, whereas metoctramine (50 nmol) produced nonspecific effects on ingestive behaviours. Injection of pirenzepine (100 nmol) or 4-DAMP (25 and 50 nmol) into the LV reduced i.v. pilocarpine-induced pressor responses. Tropicamide (500 nmol) injected into the LV had no effect on pilocarpine-induced salivation, pressor responses or water intake.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results suggest that central M(3) receptors are involved in peripheral pilocarpine-induced salivation and M(1) receptors in water intake and pressor responses. The involvement of M(3) receptors in water intake and pressor responses is not clear because 4-DAMP blocks both M(1) and M(3) receptors.

Functional relationship between subfornical organ cholinergic stimulation and nitrergic activation influencing cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis

We have studied the effects of L-NG-nitro arginine methyl esther (L-NAME), L-arginine (LAR), inhibitor and a donating nitric oxide agent on the alterations of salivary flow, water intake, arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) induced by the injection pilocarpine into the subfornical organ (SFO). Rats (Holtzman 250-300 g) were anesthetized with 2, 2, 2-tribromoethanol (20 mg/100 kg b. wt.) and a stainless steel cannula were implanted into their SFO. The volume of injection was 0.2 microl. The amount of saliva secretion was studied over a 5-min period. Pilocarpine (40 microg), L-NAME (40 microg) and LAR (30 microg) were used in all experiments for the injection into the SFO. Pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 microg) injected into SFO elicited a concentration-dependent increase in salivary secretion. L-NAME injected prior to pilocarpine into the SFO increased salivary secretion and water intake due to the effect of pilocarpine. LAR injected prior to pilocarpine into the SFO attenuated the salivary secretion and water intake. Pilocarpine, injected into the SFO increased the MAP and decreased heart rate (HR). L-NAME injected prior to pilocarpine into the SFO potentiated the pressor effect of pilocarpine with a decrease in HR. LAR injected into the SFO prior to pilocarpine attenuated the increase in MAP with no changes in HR. The present study suggests that the SFO nitrergic cells interfere in the cholinergic pathways implicated in the control of salivary secretion, fluid and cardiovascular homeostasis.

Damage of the medial preoptic area impairs peripheral pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion

The existence of neural connections between the medial preoptic area (MPOA) and the salivary glands and the increase in salivation by thermal or electrical stimulation of the MPOA have suggested an important role of MPOA in the control of salivary gland function. Although direct cholinergic activation of the salivary glands induces salivation, recent studies have suggested that salivation produced by i.p. pilocarpine may also depend on the activation of central mechanisms. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the effects of bilateral electrolytic lesions of the MPOA on the salivation induced by i.p. pilocarpine. Adult male Holtzman rats (n = 11-12/group) with bilateral sham or electrolytic lesions of the MPOA were used. One, five, and fifteen days after the brain surgery, under ketamine anesthesia, the salivation was induced by i.p. pilocarpine (1 mg/kg of body weight), and saliva was collected using pre-weighed small cotton balls inserted into the animal's mouth. Pilocarpine-induced salivation was reduced 1 and 5 days after MPOA lesion (341 +/- 41 and 310 +/- 35 mg/7 min, respectively, vs. sham lesions: 428 +/- 32 and 495 +/- 36 mg/7 min, respectively), but it was fully recovered at the 15th day post-lesion (561 +/- 49 vs. sham lesion: 618 +/- 27 mg/7 min). Lesions of the MPOA did not affect baseline non-stimulated salivary secretion. The results confirm the importance of MPOA in the control of salivation and suggest that its integrity is necessary for the full sialogogue effect of pilocarpine. However, alternative mechanisms probably involving other central nuclei can replace MPOA function in chronically lesioned rats allowing the complete recovery of the effects of pilocarpine.

Mutans streptococci in xerostomic cancer patients after pilocarpine therapy: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Opiod- and/or radiation-induced xerostomia in cancer patients is frequently associated with elevated levels of cariogenic mutans streptococci (MS).

STUDY DESIGN

In a single-center, single blind 8-week clinical trial at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, and from an initial sample of 32 patients, we evaluated MS counts in 28 cancer patients receiving chronic analgesic treatment for cancer pain. All patients received escalating doses of pilocarpine (Salagen) tablets, either 2.5 mg to 5 mg or 5 mg to 7.5 mg qid for 6 weeks, followed by placebo qid for a 2-week washout period. Whole resting saliva flow rates (g/5 min) and MS counts were evaluated at pretreatment, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks. MS samples were obtained by 5-mL saline rinse (15 sec) at each visit prior to sialometry.

RESULTS

In 19 patients (59%), MS counts exceeded 10(5) CFU/mL. At the end of the 6-week trial, 96% of patients showed a positive response to pilocarpine following a 30-minute postdosing evaluation (P=.001). MS counts were lower in 17 patients, higher in 6 patients, and nondetectable before and after pilocarpine in 5 patients (P=.03).

CONCLUSION

The reduced MS counts associated with improved saliva flow rates following pilocarpine therapy in this short-term pilot study are encouraging, but further investigation in a larger group of patients over a longer study period is indicated.

Central muscarinic receptors signal pilocarpine-induced salivation

Although cholinergic agonists such as pilocarpine injected peripherally can act directly on salivary glands to induce salivation, it is possible that their action in the brain may contribute to salivation. To investigate if the action in the brain is important to salivation, we injected pilocarpine intraperitoneally after blockade of central cholinergic receptors with atropine methyl bromide (atropine-mb). In male Holtzman rats with stainless steel cannulas implanted into the lateral ventricle and anesthetized with ketamine, atropine-mb (8 and 16 nmol) intracerebroventricularly reduced the salivation induced by pilocarpine (4 micro mol/kg) intraperitoneally (133 + 42 and 108 + 22 mg/7 min, respectively, vs. saline, 463 + 26 mg/7 min), but did not modify peripheral cardiovascular responses to intravenous acetylcholine. Similar doses of atropine-mb intraperitoneally also reduced pilocarpine-induced salivation. Therefore, systemically injected pilocarpine also enters the brain and acts on central muscarinic receptors, activating autonomic efferent fibers to induce salivation.

Nitric oxide of the supraoptic nucleus influences the salivary secretion, sodium renal excretion, urinary volume and arterial blood pressure induced by pilocarpine

Male Holtzman rats weighting 200-250 g were anesthetized with zoletil 50 mg/Kg (tiletamine chloridrate 125.0 mg and zolazepan chloridrate 125.0 mg) into quadriceps muscle and stainless steel cannulas were implanted into their supraoptic nucleus (SON). We investigated the effects of the injection into the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of FK 409, a nitric oxide donor, and NW-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (NOS), on the salivary secretion, arterial blood pressure, sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine, which was injected into SON. The drugs were injected in 0.5 microl volume over 30-60 s. Controls was injected with a similar volume of 0.15 M NaCl. FK 409 and L-NAME were injected at doses of 20 microg/0.5 microl and 40 microg/0.5 microl respectively. The amount of saliva secretion was studied over a five-minute period after injection of pilocarpine into SON. Injection of pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 microg/microl) into SON produced a dose-dependent increase in salivary secretion. L-NAME was injected into SON prior to the injection of pilocarpine into SON, producing an increase in salivary secretion due to the effect of pilocarpine. FK 409 injected into SON attenuating the increase in salivary secretion induced by pilocarpine. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase after injections of pilocarpine into the SON. L-NAME injected into the SON prior to injection of pilocarpine into SON increased the MAP. FK 409 injected into the SON prior to pilocarpine attenuated the effect of pilocarpine on MAP. Pilocarpine (0.5 micromol/0.5 microl) injected into the SON induced an increase in sodium and urinary excretion. L-NAME injected prior to pilocarpine into the SON increased the urinary sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine. FK 409 injected prior to pilocarpine into the SON decreased the sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine. All these roles of pilocarpine depend on the release of nitric oxide into the SON. In summary the present results show: a) SON is involved in pilocarpine-induced salivation; b) that mechanism involves increase in MAP, sodium excretion and urinary volume.

An update of the etiology and management of xerostomia

Salivary gland disease gives rise to salivary gland enlargement, pain, and prolonged xerostomia (dry mouth). Xerostomia is the most common long-standing problem for the majority of affected patients. There are many causes of dry mouth, with long-standing xerostomia being a particular problem in Sjögren's syndrome and after radiation to the head and neck region. Xerostomia is usually managed with saliva substitutes, but a large number of potential systemic therapies of long-standing xerostomia now exist. Some-particularly immunosuppressants-are of fundamental interest for the potential reduction of gland damage in Sjögren's syndrome but as yet are of limited clinical usefulness. Others, particularly pilocarpine and cevimeline, are, or have the potential to be, clinically useful in stimulating salivation by virtue of their action on cholinergic receptors.

Central moxonidine on salivary gland blood flow and cardiovascular responses to pilocarpine

Peripheral treatment with the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine induces intense salivation that is inhibited by central injections of the alpha2-adrenergic/imidazoline receptor agonist moxonidine. Salivary gland blood flow controlled by sympathetic and parasympathetic systems may affect salivation. We investigated the changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and in the vascular resistance in the submandibular/sublingual gland (SSG) artery, superior mesenteric (SM) artery and low abdominal aorta (hindlimb) in rats treated with intraperitoneal (i.p.) pilocarpine alone or combined with intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) moxonidine. Male Holtzman rats with stainless steel cannula implanted into lateral ventricle (LV) and anesthetized with urethane were used. Pilocarpine (4 micromol/kg of body weight) i.p. reduced SSG vascular resistance (-50+/-13% vs. vehicle: 5+/-3%). Pilocarpine i.p. also increased mesenteric vascular resistance (15+/-5% vs. vehicle: 2+/-3%) and MAP (16+/-3 mmHg, vs. vehicle: 2+/-3 mmHg). Moxonidine (20 nmol) i.c.v. increased SSG vascular resistance (88+/-12% vs. vehicle: 7+/-4%). When injected 15 min following i.c.v. moxonidine, pilocarpine i.p. produced no change on SSG vascular resistance. Pilocarpine-induced pressor responses and increase in mesenteric vascular resistance were not modified by i.c.v. moxonidine. The treatments produced no change in heart rate (HR) and hindlimb vascular resistance. The results show that (1) i.p. pilocarpine increases mesenteric vascular resistance and MAP and reduces salivary gland vascular resistance and (2) central moxonidine increases salivary gland vascular resistance and impairs pilocarpine-induced salivary gland vasodilatation. Therefore, the increase in salivary gland vascular resistance may play a role in the anti-salivatory response to central moxonidine.

Role of nitric oxide of the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) in the alterations of salivary flow, arterial pressure and heart rate induced by injection of pilocarpine into the MnPO and intraperitoneally

We investigated the effect of L-NAME, a nitric oxide (NO) inhibitor and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an NO-donating agent, on pilocarpine-induced alterations in salivary flow, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in rats. Male Holtzman rats (250-300 g) were implanted with a stainless steel cannula directly into the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO). Pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 g) injected into the MnPO induced an increase in salivary secretion (P<0.01). Pilocarpine (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 mg/kg) ip also increased salivary secretion (P<0.01). Injection of L-NAME (40 g) into the MnPO prior to pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 g) injected into the MnPO or ip (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 mg/kg) increased salivary secretion (P<0.01). SNP (30 g) injected into the MnPO or ip prior to pilocarpine attenuated salivary secretion (P<0.01). Pilocarpine (40 g) injection into the MnPO increased MAP and decreased HR (P<0.01). Pilocarpine (4 mg/kg body weight) ip produced a decrease in MAP and an increase in HR (P<0.01). Injection of L-NAME (40 g) into the MnPO prior to pilocarpine potentiated the increase in MAP and reduced HR (P<0.01). SNP (30 g) injected into the MnPO prior to pilocarpine attenuated (100%) the effect of pilocarpine on MAP, with no effect on HR. Administration of L-NAME (40 g) into the MnPO potentiated the effect of pilocarpine injected ip. SNP (30 g) injected into the MnPO attenuated the effect of ip pilocarpine on MAP and HR. The present study suggests that in the rat MnPO 1) NO is important for the effects of pilocarpine on salivary flow, and 2) pilocarpine interferes with blood pressure and HR (side effects of pilocarpine), that is attenuated by NO.

Central alpha(2) adrenergic receptors and cholinergic-induced salivation in rats

Salivation induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of pilocarpine (cholinergic agonist) is reduced by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of moxonidine (alpha(2) adrenergic and imidazoline receptor agonist). In the present study, we investigated the involvement of central alpha(2) adrenergic receptors in the inhibitory effect of i.c.v. moxonidine on i.p. pilocarpine-induced salivation. Male Holtzman rats with stainless steel cannula implanted into the lateral ventricle (LV) were used. Saliva was collected using pre-weighted small cotton balls inserted into the animal's mouth under ketamine (100 mg x kg(-1)) anesthesia. Salivation was induced by i.p. injection of pilocarpine (4 micromol x kg(-1)). Pilocarpine-induced salivation was reduced by i.c.v. injection of moxonidine (10 nmol) and enhanced by i.c.v. injections of either RX 821002 (160 nmol) or yohimbine (320 nmol). The inhibitory effect of i.c.v. moxonidine on pilocarpine-induced salivation was abolished by prior i.c.v. injections of the alpha(2) adrenergic receptor antagonists, RX 821002 (160 nmol) or yohimbine (160 and 320 nmol). The alpha(1) adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin (320 nmol) injected i.c.v. did not change the effect of moxonidine on pilocarpine-induced salivation. The results suggest that moxonidine acts on central alpha(2) adrenergic receptors to inhibit pilocarpine-induced salivation, and that this salivation is tonically inhibited by central alpha(2) adrenergic receptors.

A pilot study to test the efficacy of oral administration of interferon-alpha lozenges to patients with Sjögren's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Complications from Sjögren's syndrome-induced xerostomia may cause a significant disruption in daily routines such as speech and eating habits. In addition, the reduction in salivary output may lead to increased incidence of caries, oral ulcers, sialadenitis, periodontal problems, and Candida infections. Interferon-alpha has been suggested as an effective drug therapy to increase salivary output.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to test the efficacy of interferon-alpha lozenges in relieving the symptoms of dry mouth and dry eyes when administered orally to patients with Sjögren's syndrome in double-blind placebo-controlled and open-label trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Twelve patients with a diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome were provided an Institutional Review Board-approved, written informed-consent form. During the double-blind placebo-controlled study they were randomized to receive 150 IU of interferon-alpha (8 patients) or placebo (4 patients) for 24 weeks with 6-week reevaluations. Five patients who received interferon-alpha in the double-blind placebo-controlled trial were treated in an open-label study for another 24 weeks. Whole saliva was measured during each visit, and symptoms were assessed by questionnaires and visual analog scales. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect significant changes for each variable.

RESULTS

The results indicated that, by the end of 24 weeks, patients who received interferon-alpha had a statistically significant improvement in unstimulated salivary flow rate (P < .05), and statistically significant changes were observed in the median ocular dryness visual analog scale (P < .05) and oral dryness visual analog scale (P < .05). No significant changes were observed among the placebo patients. By the end of 48 weeks, medicated patients had better results than they had at the end of the double-blind placebo-controlled study and showed improvements in whole stimulated salivary flow rate, conditions of throat, and swallowing dry food.

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of 150 IU interferon-alpha 3 times a day for the patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome improved saliva production, relieved symptoms of xerostomia and xerophthalmia, and was well tolerated by the patients.

Lesions of the lateral hypothalamus impair pilocarpine-induced salivation in rats

In the present study we investigated the effects of electrolytic lesions of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) in the salivation induced by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine. Rats with sham or LH lesions and stainless steel cannulas implanted into the lateral ventricle (LV) were used. In rats anesthetized with urethane (1.25mg/kg of body weight) saliva was collected using pre-weighed cotton balls inserted in the animal mouth during a period of 7 min following i.c.v. or i.p. injection of pilocarpine. Injection of pilocarpine (1mg/kg of body weight) i.p. in sham-operated rats (6h, 2, 7, and 15 days after the surgery) induced salivation (497+/-24, 452+/-26, 476+/-30, and 560+/-75 mg/7 min, respectively). The effects of i.p. pilocarpine was reduced 6h, 2 and 7 days after LH lesions (162+/-37, 190+/-32, and 229+/-27 mg/7 min, respectively), not 15 days after LH lesions (416+/-89 mg/7 min). Injection of pilocarpine (120 micro g/micro l) i.c.v., in sham-operated rats (6h, 2, 7, and 15 days after the surgery) also produced salivation (473+/-20, 382+/-16, 396+/-14, and 427+/-47 mg/7 min, respectively). The salivation induced by i.c.v. pilocarpine was also reduced 6h, 2 and 7 days after LH lesions (243+/-19, 278+/-24, and 295+/-27 mg/7 min, respectively), not 15 days after LH lesions (385+/-48 mg/7 min). The present results show the participation of the LH in the salivation induced by central or peripheral injection of pilocarpine in rats, reinforcing the involvement of central mechanisms on pilocarpine-induced salivation.

Inhibition of pilocarpine-induced salivation in rats by central noradrenaline

Peripheral treatment with cholinergic or adrenergic agonists results in salivation and the possibility of synergy between cholinergic and adrenergic efferent mechanisms in the control of salivation has been proposed. Central injections of the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine also induce salivation, while the effects of central injections of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) are not known. Here (a) the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of noradrenaline on the salivation induced by i.c.v. or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of pilocarpine and (b) the receptors involved in the effects of central noradrenaline on pilocarpine-induced salivation were investigated. Male Holtzman rats with a stainless-steel guide cannula implanted into the lateral ventricle were used. Rats were anaesthetized with tribromoethanol (200mg/kg body weight) and saliva was collected on small, preweighed cotton balls inserted into the animal's mouth. Noradrenaline (40, 80 and 160 nmol/1 microl) injected i.c.v. reduced the salivary secretion induced by pilocarpine (0.5 micro mol/1 microl) injected i.c.v.. Noradrenaline (80 and 160 nmol/1 microl) injected i.c.v. also reduced the salivation induced by pilocarpine (4 micromol/kg) injected i.p. Previous treatment with the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonists RX 821002 (40, 80 and 160 nmol/1 microl) or yohimbine (160 and 320 nmol/1 microl) abolished the inhibitory effect produced by i.c.v. injection of noradrenaline on pilocarpine-induced salivation in rats. Prazosin (alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist) injected icv did not change the effect of noradrenaline on pilocarpine-induced salivation. Prior icv injection of only RX 821002 (80 or 160 nmol/1 microl) or yohimbine (320 nmol/1 microl) increased pilocarpine-induced salivation. The results show that (1) contrary to its peripheral effects, noradrenaline acting centrally inhibits cholinergic-induced salivation in rats; (2) central mechanisms involving alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors inhibit pilocarpine-induced salivation.

Role of nitric oxide and beta-adrenoceptors of the central nervous system on the salivary flow induced by pilocarpine injection into the lateral ventricle

Our studies have focused on the effect of L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and L-arginine, the substrate of NOS, on salivary secretion induced by the administration of pilocarpine into the lateral cerebral ventricle (LV) of rats. The present study has also investigated the role of the beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonist injected into LV on the salivary secretion elicited by the injection of pilocarpine into LV. Male Holtzman rats with a stainless-steel cannula implanted into the LV were used. The amount of salivary secretion was studied over a 7-min period after injection of pilocarpine, isoproterenol, propranolol, salbutamol, salmeterol, L-NAME and L-arginine. The injection of pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 microg/microl) into LV produced a dose-dependent increase in salivary secretion. The injection of L-NAME (40 microg/microl) into LV alone produced an increase in salivary secretion. The injection of L-NAME into LV previous to the injection of pilocarpine produced an increase in salivary secretion. L-Arginine (30 microg/microl) injected alone into LV produced no change in salivary secretion. L-Arginine injected into LV attenuated pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion. The isoproterenol (40 nmol/microl) injected into LV increased the salivary secretion. When injected previous to pilocarpine at a dose of 20 and 40 microg/microl, isoproterenol produced an additive effect on pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion. The 40-nmol/microl dose of propranolol injected alone or previous to pilocarpine into LV attenuated the pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion. The injection of salbutamol (40 nmol/microl), a specific beta-2 agonist, injected alone into LV produced no change in salivary secretion and when injected previous to pilocarpine produced an increase in salivary secretion. The 40-nmol/microl dose of salmeterol, a long-acting beta-2 agonist, injected into LV alone or previous to pilocarpine produced no change in salivary secretion. The results have shown that central injections of L-NAME and L-arginine interfere with the salivary secretion, which implies that might participate in pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion. The interaction between cholinergic and beta-adrenergic receptors of the central nervous system (CNS) for the control of salivary secretion can also be postulated.

Novel evidence that nitric oxide of the medial septal area influences the salivary secretion induced by pilocarpine

Our studies have focused on the effect of injection of L-NAME and sodium nitroprussiate (SNP) on the salivary secretion, arterial blood pressure, sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine which was injected into the medial septal area (MSA). Rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.25 g/kg b. wt.) and a stainless steel cannula was implanted into their MSA. The amount of saliva secretion was studied over a five-minute period after injection of pilocarpine into MSA. Injection of pilocarpine (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 microg/microl) into MSA produced a dose-dependent increase in salivary secretion. L-NG-nitro arginine methyl-esther (L-NAME) (40 microg/microl), a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, was injected into MSA prior to the injection of pilocarpine into MSA, producing an increase in salivary secretion due to the effect of pilocarpine. Sodium nitroprussiate (SNP) (30 microg/microl) was injected into MSA prior to the injection of pilocarpine into MSA attenuating the increase in salivary secretion induced by pilocarpine. Medial arterial pressure (MAP) increase after injections of pilocarpine into the MSA. L-NAME injected into the MSA prior to injection of pilocarpine into MSA increased the MAP. SNP injected into the MSA prior to pilocarpine attenuated the effect of pilocarpine on MAP. Pilocarpine (40 ug/ul) injected into the MAS induced an increase in sodium and urinary excretion. L-NAME injected prior to pilocarpine into the MSA increased the urinary sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine. SNP injected prior to pilocarpine into the MSA decreased the sodium excretion and urinary volume induced by pilocarpine. All these roles of pilocarpine depend on the release of nitric oxide into the MSA. We may also conclude that the MSA is involved with the cholinergic excitatory mechanism that induce salivary secretion, increase in MAP and increase in sodium excretion and urinary volume.

Effect of pilocarpine mouthwash on salivary flow

Pilocarpine is a cholinergic agonist that increases salivary flow and has been used to treat xerostomia. Oral intake is the most frequent route of administration. Adverse effects are dose-dependent and include sudoresis, facial blushing and increased urinary frequency. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of topical pilocarpine solutions as mouthwashes on salivary flow and their adverse effects on healthy subjects. Forty volunteers received 10 ml 0.5, 1 and 2% pilocarpine solutions or 0.9% saline in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled manner. Salivation was measured before and 45, 60 and 75 min after mouth rinsing for 1 min with 10 ml of saline or pilocarpine solutions. Vital signs were measured and ocular, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular symptoms, anxiety and flushing were estimated using visual analog scales. There was a dose-dependent increase in salivation. Salivation measured after 1 and 2% pilocarpine (1.4 +/- 0.36 and 2.22 +/- 0.42 g, respectively) was significantly (P<0.001) higher than before (0.70 +/- 0.15 and 0.64 +/- 0.1 g), with a plateau between 45 and 75 min. Cardiovascular, visual, gastrointestinal and behavioral symptoms and signs were not changed by topical pilocarpine. Mouth rinsing with pilocarpine solutions at concentrations of 1 to 2% induced a significant objective and subjective dose-dependent increase in salivary flow, similar to the results reported by others studying the effect of oral 5 mg pilocarpine. The present study revealed the efficacy of pilocarpine mouthwash solutions in increasing salivary flow in healthy volunteers, with no adverse effects. Additional studies on patients with xerostomia are needed.

Preservation of the rat parotid gland function after radiation by prophylactic pilocarpine treatment: radiation dose dependency and compensatory mechanisms

PURPOSE

To study the ability of a prophylactic pilocarpine administration to preserve the rat parotid gland function after unilateral irradiation with graded doses of X-rays.

METHODS

The right parotid gland of male albino Wistar rats was irradiated with single doses of X-rays (10-30 Gy, at 1.5 Gy min(-1)). Pilocarpine (4 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally, 1 hour prior to irradiation. Saliva samples of both left and right parotid gland were collected by means of miniaturized Lashley cups 4 days before and 3, 7, 10, and 30 days after irradiation. The parotid salivary flow rate (microl/min) was used as a parameter for the assessment of parotid gland function.

RESULTS

Our data confirm that a single prophylactic treatment of pilocarpine can attenuate radiation-induced loss of gland function. Surprisingly, the effect of pilocarpine was not restricted to the irradiated gland only. Pilocarpine also enhanced the flow rate in the contralateral, nonirradiated gland. The latter effect was found for all doses above 10 Gy and became apparent around 7 days after the radiation treatment. The effectiveness of pilocarpine to attenuate function loss in the irradiated gland decreased with increasing dose and was lost after single doses of 30 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide direct evidence that increasing the compensatory potential of the nondamaged gland, at least in part, underlies the "radioprotective effect" of pilocarpine in case of unilateral radiation. The ability of pilocarpine to ameliorate the early radiation-induced impairment of the parotid gland function in the irradiated gland may therefore be dependent on the remaining number of functional cells, and thus on the volume of the gland that lies within the radiation portal.

A pilot study of the disposition of pilocarpine in plasma, saliva and urine after a single oral dose

Concentrations of pilocarpine in plasma, saliva and urine from three healthy male volunteers were measured using a fluorescence derivatisation method, following administration of a single 10 mg oral dose. Pharmacokinetic parameter values were estimated from concentration-time profiles. Linear correlations between plasma and saliva pilocarpine concentrations (r2=0.945, n=10, p<0.001; r2=0.954, n=12, p<0.001) and plasma concentrations and salivation rate (r2=0. 863, n=12, p<0.001; r2=0.862, n=15, p<0.001) were established. Pilocarpine and an unidentified metabolite, respectively 20.3% and 34.7% of the oral dose, were excreted into urine.

Sympathetic mediation of salivation induced by intracerebroventricular pilocarpine in rats

Central cholinergic activation by pilocarpine induces salivation dependent on the integrity of forebrain areas. The present work investigates the autonomic mediation of this salivation. Pilocarpine (500 nmol/rat) was injected into the lateral ventricle (LV) of tribromoethanol-anesthetized adult male rats. Preweighed cotton balls were inserted into the oral cavity and weighed again 7 min later. Alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists (3-50 micromol/kg) prazosin (alpha1), yohimbine (alpha2) or propranolol (beta) injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) produced, 80%, 20% and 0% inhibition respectively of the LV pilocarpine-induced salivation. Intracerebroventricular injections (160 nmol) of the antagonists did not alter the effects of pilocarpine injected into the LV. Bilateral section of chorda tympani nerve or bilateral sympathetic cervical ganglionectomy produced 0% and 40% inhibition of pilocarpine-induced salivation, respectively. Ganglionectomy did not alter salivation induced by i.p. injection of pilocarpine (4 micromol/kg). The results indicate that there is a large sympathetic contribution to the salivation induced by central cholinergic activation.

[Prevention and therapy of acute radiation-related morbidity of the skin and mucosa. II, Recommendations of the literature]

BACKGROUND

In a German multicenter questionnaire, answered by 89 departments, we had examined the strategies to prevent or to treat the acute morbidity of the skin and mucosa associated to radiation therapy. In this work, the recommendations from the literature are compared to the results of the questionnaire.

METHODS

An extensive research on common data information systems (Medline, Cancerlit, DIMDI and others) was performed. The criteria included the organ related morbidity and therapeutic strategies for its reduction. The obtained data were compared to the results from the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study data found by the research often demonstrate small patient numbers and little convincing results. However, as in the questionnaire, the joint principle seems to be the reduction of acute inflammatory tissue reaction by evasion of bacterial and mycotic overgrowth and reduction of exo- and endogenous toxins.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies with more convincing results are required.

A comparison of artificial saliva and pilocarpine in the management of xerostomia in patients with advanced cancer

This was a crossover study comparing a mucin-based artificial saliva (Saliva Orthana) and pilocarpine hydrochloride (Salagen) in the management of xerostomia in patients with advanced cancer. The pilocarpine was found to be more effective than the artificial saliva in terms of mean change in visual analogue scale scores for xerostomia (P = 0.003). Furthermore, more patients reported that it had helped their xerostomia, and more patients wanted to continue with it after the study. However, the pilocarpine was found to be associated with more side-effects than the artificial saliva (P < 0.001). These side-effects were usually reported as being mild. Of the patients who used both treatments, 50% preferred the artificial saliva, and 50% preferred the pilocarpine. The commonest reason for preferring the artificial saliva was the fact that it was a spray, rather than a tablet.

Pilocarpine, a salivary gland radioprotectant, does not inhibit cytotoxic effect of gamma-radiation on squamous cell carcinoma in vitro

PURPOSE

Pilocarpine, a salivary stimulant, has been shown to protect salivary glands from gamma-radiation-induced damage during the radiotherapy of head and neck tumors. This study was performed to determine whether pilocarpine affects the survival of squamous carcinoma cells, line SCC-25, following gamma-radiation treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The survival of squamous carcinoma tumor cells, line SCC-25, following the exposure of cells to pilocarpine at concentration of 0-100 ng/ml given for 0-1 h prior to radiation at dose of 0-20 Gy was determined by an in vitro colony-formation assay.

RESULTS

The survival fractions of SCC-25 cells were identical for the control and pilocarpine-treated samples at all tested conditions. Calculated Do and Dq values did not depend on the presence of pilocarpine and were not affected by the time of incubation prior to irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Pilocarpine, at clinically relevant concentrations, given to the SCC-25 cells 1 h prior to or at the time of irradiation did not affect survival of SCC-25 cells in vitro. Pilocarpine does not sensitize or protect these tumor cells from the effects of y-radiation, suggesting that this agent should not compromise the tumoricidal effects of radiotherapy.

Oral pilocarpine HCl stimulates labial (minor) salivary gland flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome

Pilocarpine HCl has been shown to stimulate parotid and submandibular gland salivary flow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this cholinergic-muscarinic drug also stimulates labial (minor) salivary gland (LSG) flow and to relate that with whole unstimulated salivary (WUS) flow rates. Subjects diagnosed with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS-1; n = 9) or secondary Sjögren's syndrome (SS-2; n = 9) were enrolled in this study after meeting stringent enrollment criteria. An age-gender matched control group was also enrolled. The labial saliva was collected in a standardized manner on Periopaper for 5 min and the volume was analysed by the Periotron. Whole unstimulated salivary samples were collected for 5 min by the method of Mandel and Wotman (1976). Each subject was dosed with pilocarpine HCl (5 mg; tablets; p.o.). After 60 min the LSG flow as well as the WUS flow was determined again as previously. The results indicated a significant (> 180%) increase in both labial salivary gland flow as well as whole salivary flow in the SS-1 and SS-2 subjects (mean +/- s.e.m.): [SS-1: WUS = 0.1080 +/- 0.03 vs 0.2242 +/- 0.03 ml per 5 min; LSG = 93.1 +/- 22.2 vs 167.8 +/- 15.9 microliters/5 min; P < 0.001; SS-2: WUS = 0.1384 +/- 0.02 vs 0.2775 +/- 0.09 ml per 5 min; LSG = 97.7 +/- 20.2 vs 182.8 +/- 17.9 microliters per 5 min; P < 0.001]. These results indicate a significant increase in labial salivary gland flow as well as whole salivary flow as stimulated by pilocarpine HCl in Sjögren's syndrome patients.

Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for pilocarpine in biological fluids using fluorescence derivatisation

A sensitive assay for pilocarpine in biological fluids has been developed involving HPLC of a fluorescent derivative of 4-bromomethyl-7-methoxycoumarin. Pilosine as internal standard was added before the derivatisation step. The fluorescent derivatives were well resolved and separated from excess reagent and endogenous compounds on a cyanopropyl silica column. The detection limit of pilocarpine in biological fluids was 1.0 ng/ml and the assay was linear up to a concentration of 150 ng/ml. The assay was applied to a preliminary study of pilocarpine disposition in man after a single oral dose. This is the first report of pilocarpine excretion into saliva.

A comparison of artificial saliva and pilocarpine in radiation-induced xerostomia

Twenty patients with radiation-induced xerostomia were entered into a prospective randomized crossover study comparing a mucin-based artificial saliva (Saliva Orthana) and a mouthwash containing pilocarpine (5 mg three times a day). Overall the patients found that the pilocarpine mouthwash was more effective than the artificial saliva in relieving their symptoms (p = 0.04), and 47 per cent of the patients wanted to continue with this treatment after the study had finished.

A clinical trial of bethanechol in patients with xerostomia after radiation therapy. A pilot study

The effects of bethanechol in the treatment of dry mouth were assessed in patients with xerostomia after radiation therapy to the head and neck. Bethanechol possesses muscarinic and nicotinic-cholinergic activity that likely accounts for its mode of action. Bethanechol (25 mg, three times daily) was not associated with significant side effects. Statistically significant increases in whole resting saliva (p = 0.003) and whole stimulated saliva (p = 0.001) were seen. In patients with pretreatment stimulated saliva volumes greater than resting saliva volumes, a positive response to subsequent use of the sialagogue was seen.