Pharmacologic effects of beta-blocking agents used in the management of glaucoma

Cardiovascular considerations in using topical, oral, and intravenous drugs for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: focus on beta-adrenergic blockade

Glaucoma and ocular hypertension are highly prevalent conditions in individuals over the age of 40 and are commonly seen together in patients with cardiovascular disease. Many of the antiglaucoma medications, when systemically absorbed, affect the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems of patients and can cause cardiovascular toxicity. Such adverse effects are frequently associated with the long-term use of potentially toxic agents in elderly people, who are most prone to chronic eye disease. Moreover, patients may not associate their symptoms with the topical eye medications, and consequently may not report adverse drug effects. Drug-drug interactions can also occur when patients are taking medications for both cardiovascular disease and glaucoma. This review focuses on beta-adrenergic blockers as topical antiglaucoma medications and other topical antiglaucoma drugs. The systemic toxicity of these agents is reviewed, along with the possible drug interactions. Brief mention is also made of other antiglaucoma medications used alone and in combination with topical beta-blockers.

Pharmacodynamics of beta-blocker modulation of aqueous humor production

A conscious rabbit model with microdialysis sampling of endogenous aqueous humor ascorbate was developed in order to assess the pharmacodynamics of beta-blocker modulation of aqueous humor production. CMA/20 microdialysis probes were implanted in the anterior chamber of each eye of rabbits (n = 6). After a 2 week recovery period, an i.v. bolus of 14C-ascorbate (20 microCi) was administered. Blood samples and aqueous humor microdialysis probe effluent were collected and analysed for endogenous and 14C-ascorbate to estimate the basal rate of ascorbate blood to aqueous humor secretion (Ro). After a 1 hr washout, each rabbit received a series of three doses of 3H-propranolol (750-3000 microg, 16.5 microCi mg(-1)) every 60 min into the lower cul-de-sac of each eye. Probe effluent was analysed for endogenous ascorbate and 3H-propranolol; ascorbate and propranolol in the iris/ciliary body, vitreous and aqueous was determined at the end of the experiment. Nonlinear least-squares regression analysis of the concentration-time profiles for aqueous humor ascorbate was performed to estimate the change in aqueous humor flow. The average basal aqueous humor ascorbate secretion rate was approximately 48/microg hr(-1). Propranolol (1500 microg) produced significant increases in aqueous humor ascorbate, this observation is consistent with a reduction in aqueous humor production (approximately 47%). Analysis of intraocular tissue ascorbate indicated that propranolol inhibited ascorbate secretion at the 3000 microg dose, the highest dose examined in this study; this inhibition was not observed at the 750 microg or 1500 microg doses. Changes in aqueous humor production precipitated by the administration of beta-adrenergic antagonists can be estimated by measuring changes in aqueous humor ascorbate concentrations in the conscious rabbit. Microdialysis sampling of aqueous humor for endogenous ascorbate provides a relevant analytic tool to estimate modulatory effects of anti-glaucoma drugs on aqueous humor production.

Effect of one week of levobunolol HCl 0.5% on the human retinal circulation

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of one week of topical treatment with levobunolol HCl 0.5% on the retinal circulation of normal subjects.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers with no history of ocular disease were included in this study. In a double-masked, randomized, cross-over design, one eye of each subject was treated, for one week, with one drop of either levobunolol or placebo, administered twice daily. Following a washout period of at least three weeks, the same eye received the alternate treatment for one week. Before the beginning of therapy and then two hours after the last drop, vessel diameter (D), maximum erythrocyte velocity (Vmax), and volumetric blood flow rate (Q) were determined in one major retinal vein of the treated eye, using bidirectional laser Doppler velocimetry and monochromatic fundus photography. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed, paired Student's t-test, linear regression, and correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The average percentage change from baseline in intraocular pressure was statistically significant following levobunolol (-15% +/- 13% (+/-1 SD), P < .001), but not following placebo (-3% +/- 11%, P > .05). No significant changes in average D, Vmax, or Q were observed after levobunolol treatment (-1% +/- 4%, 5% +/- 11%, 4% +/- 15%, respectively) or placebo treatment (-1% +/- 4%, -2% +/- 9%, -5% +/- 10%, respectively). The average difference between the changes in Q from baseline after levobunolol and placebo treatments (9% +/- 17%) achieved a significance level of P = 0.06. Furthermore, following levobunolol treatment, Q was 7% +/- 14% higher than following placebo treatment (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the effects of placebo and levobunolol treatments suggests that levobunolol has a variable effect on the retinal circulation with a tendency to show an overall slight increase in flow.

Comparison of the ocular beta-blockers

OBJECTIVE

To compare the similarities and differences among the ocular beta-blockers. Important considerations when comparing these agents are the differences in systemic adverse effects, local tolerability, and cost.

DATA SOURCE

Information was retrieved from a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature and bibliographic reviews of review articles. Index terms included beta-blockers, glaucoma, timolol, levobunolol, betaxolol, metipranolol, and carteolol.

STUDY SELECTION

Emphasis was placed on eyedrop studies, as well as properly designed and executed clinical trials that assessed dosage, dosing interval, therapeutic response, adverse effects, and cost.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from several studies were evaluated according to the study design, therapeutic response, and adverse effects.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Timolol maleate, levobunolol, metipranolol, and carteolol have similar effectiveness in lowering intraocular pressure; however, levobunolol and timolol gel forming solution may have an advantage of once-daily dosing. Studies have not been published comparing the clinical efficacy of timolol hemihydrate with that of other ocular beta-blockers. Metipranolol is cost effective in treating primary open-angle glaucoma; however, it has been associated with more ocular burning, stinging, and granulomatous anterior uveitis than other agents. The intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of carteolol has not yet displayed a definite advantage over the other agents in terms of optic disk perfusion and systemic adverse effects. The control of intraocular pressure with betaxolol has not always been as good as with timolol; however, betaxolol has some advantages over timolol and the other topical beta-blockers in terms of systemic adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering cost, efficacy, and safety, timolol maleate is the recommended formulary agent because the other agents cannot consistently show an outstanding advantage.

Topical ophthalmic beta-adrenergic blockade for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Since the late 1970s, topical beta-adrenergic blockers have been the drugs of choice in treating ocular hypertension and associated glaucoma. The currently available drugs are timolol, betaxolol, levobunolol, metipranolol, and carteolol. All reduce intraocular pressure by decreasing the production of aqueous humor. Although these drugs are applied locally in the eye, they may enter the general circulation and reach concentrations high enough to cause systemic effects, including alterations in heart rate and rhythm, bronchoconstriction, dyslipidemia, and central nervous system abnormalities. Interactions with other drugs may also occur. Ocular beta- blockers differ in beta 1-selectivity (betaxolol is beta 1-selective, whereas the other drugs are nonselective) and in intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) or partial agonist properties (only carteolol possesses ISA). These differences give betaxolol and carteolol potential advantages in minimizing certain side effects. The advantage of betaxolol vis-à-vis systemic side effects is more clearly established than that of carteolol. Further systematic study is needed to determine what advantages, if any, are conferred by the presence of ISA.

Ocular carteolol. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Carteolol is a relatively potent nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with partial agonist activity. It is used topically to reduce elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Twice-daily ocular administration of carteolol 1 or 2% lowers IOP by approximately 32% on average in patients with these conditions, an efficacy equivalent to that of timolol 0.25 or 0.5%. Carteolol eyedrops lack local anaesthetic activity, appear to cause less local irritation than timolol, and produce less pronounced decreases in heart rate or dyspnoea, possibly due to partial agonist activity. The latter activity may also improve retinal perfusion. Thus, although additional comparative trials are needed to accurately assess the precise place of carteolol in therapy, this drug offers a useful alternative to timolol in the management of conditions associated with a raised IOP, and may have advantages in older patients with regard to its tolerability profile, although careful monitoring is still wise.