Role of the Drosophila genome in Sigma virus multiplication. II. Host spectrum variants among the haP mutants

The genetic architecture of resistance to virus infection in Drosophila

Variation in susceptibility to infection has a substantial genetic component in natural populations, and it has been argued that selection by pathogens may result in it having a simpler genetic architecture than many other quantitative traits. This is important as models of host-pathogen co-evolution typically assume resistance is controlled by a small number of genes. Using the Drosophila melanogaster multiparent advanced intercross, we investigated the genetic architecture of resistance to two naturally occurring viruses, the sigma virus and DCV (Drosophila C virus). We found extensive genetic variation in resistance to both viruses. For DCV resistance, this variation is largely caused by two major-effect loci. Sigma virus resistance involves more genes - we mapped five loci, and together these explained less than half the genetic variance. Nonetheless, several of these had a large effect on resistance. Models of co-evolution typically assume strong epistatic interactions between polymorphisms controlling resistance, but we were only able to detect one locus that altered the effect of the main effect loci we had mapped. Most of the loci we mapped were probably at an intermediate frequency in natural populations. Overall, our results are consistent with major-effect genes commonly affecting susceptibility to infectious diseases, with DCV resistance being a near-Mendelian trait.

Successive increases in the resistance of Drosophila to viral infection through a transposon insertion followed by a Duplication

To understand the molecular basis of how hosts evolve resistance to their parasites, we have investigated the genes that cause variation in the susceptibility of Drosophila melanogaster to viral infection. Using a host-specific pathogen of D. melanogaster called the sigma virus (Rhabdoviridae), we mapped a major-effect polymorphism to a region containing two paralogous genes called CHKov1 and CHKov2. In a panel of inbred fly lines, we found that a transposable element insertion in the protein coding sequence of CHKov1 is associated with increased resistance to infection. Previous research has shown that this insertion results in a truncated messenger RNA that encodes a far shorter protein than the susceptible allele. This resistant allele has rapidly increased in frequency under directional selection and is now the commonest form of the gene in natural populations. Using genetic mapping and site-specific recombination, we identified a third genotype with considerably greater resistance that is currently rare in the wild. In these flies there have been two duplications, resulting in three copies of both the truncated allele of CHKov1 and CHKov2 (one of which is also truncated). Remarkably, the truncated allele of CHKov1 has previously been found to confer resistance to organophosphate insecticides. As estimates of the age of this allele predate the use of insecticides, it is likely that this allele initially functioned as a defence against viruses and fortuitously "pre-adapted" flies to insecticides. These results demonstrate that strong selection by parasites for increased host resistance can result in major genetic changes and rapid shifts in allele frequencies; and, contrary to the prevailing view that resistance to pathogens can be a costly trait to evolve, the pleiotropic effects of these changes can have unexpected benefits.

The age and evolution of an antiviral resistance mutation in Drosophila melanogaster

What selective processes underlie the evolution of parasites and their hosts? Arms-race models propose that new host-resistance mutations or parasite counter-adaptations arise and sweep to fixation. Frequency-dependent models propose that selection favours pathogens adapted to the most common host genotypes, conferring an advantage to rare host genotypes. Distinguishing between these models is empirically difficult. The maintenance of disease-resistance polymorphisms has been studied in detail in plants, but less so in animals, and rarely in natural populations. We have made a detailed study of genetic variation in host resistance in a natural animal population, Drosophila melanogaster, and its natural pathogen, the sigma virus. We confirm previous findings that a single (albeit complex) mutation in the gene ref(2)P confers resistance against sigma and show that this mutation has increased in frequency under positive selection. Previous studies suggested that ref(2)P polymorphism reflects the progress of a very recent selective sweep, and that in Europe during the 1980s, this was followed by a sweep of a sigma virus strain able to infect flies carrying this mutation. We find that the ref(2)P resistance mutation is considerably older than the recent spread of this viral strain and suggest that—possibly because it is recessive—the initial spread of the resistance mutation was very slow.

Localization of domains within the Drosophila Ref(2)P protein involved in the intracellular control of sigma rhabdovirus multiplication

The ref(2)P gene of Drosophila melanogaster interferes with sigma rhabdovirus multiplication. This gene is highly variable, and the different alleles are considered permissive or restrictive according to their effects on virus replication. In all cases, the mechanisms involve intracellular interactions between the sigma virus and Ref(2)P proteins. We showed that the N-terminal domain of the Ref(2)P protein was required for its activity in vivo. The protein was inactive in the null p(od)2 mutant when its first 82 amino acids were deleted. The p delta n gene was constructed so that the first 91 amino acids coded for by the restrictive alleles could be expressed in vivo. It was active in a transformed line. This sequence was sufficient to impart a restrictive phenotype to an adult D. melanogaster fly after it was injected with the virus. However, the truncated protein expressed by p delta n did not have an effect on the hereditary transmission of the sigma virus to the offspring of the infected flies, even though it contained the restriction site. The native Ref(2)P protein has been previously shown to have conformation-dependent epitopes common with some of those of the viral N protein. We demonstrated the following. (i) These epitopes were found in a domain of the Ref(2)P protein distinct from the site involved in restriction. (ii) They were modified in the N protein of the haP7 sigma virus mutant selected as being adapted to the restrictive alleles of the ref(2)P gene; only one mutation in the N gene, leading to an amino acid substitution, distinguished the haP7 mutant from the original virus. (iii) The virus strains partially or totally adapted to the effects of the full restrictive protein expressed by pp were always found to multiply to a lesser extent in the presence of the protein expressed by p delta n. These data suggest that two distinct domains of the Ref(2)P protein are involved in the control of sigma virus multiplication.

Genetic resistance to viral infection: the molecular cloning of a Drosophila gene that restricts infection by the rhabdovirus sigma

The ref(2)P gene of Drosophila melanogaster has two common alleles, ref(2)Po which permits the infection of flies by the rhabdovirus sigma (sigma), and ref(2)Pp which is restrictive for sigma infection. This gene has been cloned by P element tagging and shown to code for two RNAs in adult flies. These RNAs are expressed in both males and females, but only the larger is expressed in ovaries. Both transcripts are shorter, by about 50 nucleotides, in flies carrying the ref(2)Pp allele than in those carrying ref(2)Po. The dominance relationships of these two alleles, and the fact that ref(2)Pnull alleles are permissive to sigma infection, suggest that the ref(2)Po product is antimorphic to that of the ref(2)Pp allele.

Vesicular stomatitis virus in Drosophila melanogaster cells: regulation of viral transcription and replication

Vesicular stomatitis virus RNA synthesis was investigated during the establishment of persistent infection in Drosophila melanogaster cells. The transcription rate declined as early as 5 h after infection and was strongly inhibited after 7 h, leading to a decrease in viral mRNA levels and in viral protein synthesis rates. Full-length plus-strand antigenomes and minus-strand genomes were detected after a 3-h lag time and accumulated until 15 h after infection. Short encapsidated plus-strand molecules were also generated corresponding to the 5' end of viral defective antigenomes. Assembly and release of virions were not restricted, but their infectivity was extremely reduced. In persistently infected cells, an equilibrium was reached where the level of intracellular genomes maintained was constant and maximal even after the rate of all viral syntheses had decreased. These results are discussed with regard to the establishment of persistent infection.

The late functions of Drosophila sigma virus

Several criteria can be used to characterize the temperature-sensitive mutants of sigma virus: the lability of infectious centers initiated by the efficient viral particles following the inoculation; the localization of the temperature-sensitive period; the hereditary transmission of infection in a maternal Drosophila line at high temperature; the evolution of the CO2 sensitivity symptom and of the viral titer per fly for hereditarily infected flies kept at a permissive temperature and shifted to a restrictive one. Experimental data concerning the last two criteria are shown and discussed here. From all the criteria, three classes of ts mutants can be defined: the first class (prototype ts4) are the mutants blocked in hereditary transmission at high temperature. These mutants are affected during the whole viral cycle but the viral maturation is not directly affected. The second class (ts9, haP27) are the mutants directly affected in viral maturation. For these latter, the hereditary transmission in a maternal line is efficient at high temperature, and only a late temperature sensitive period is observed. The third class (prototype haP7) are the mutants for which only an early temperature-sensitive period is observed. In fact, for these mutants, the viral information is strongly heat-sensitive at the beginning of viral cycle. This defect is rapidly corrected, and the hereditary transmission, late viral functions and viral maturation are as efficient as those of wild type virus, at high temperature. Using temperature-sensitive mutants similar to the wild type virus at permissive temperature, a formal description of the viral cycle at 20 degrees C in the standard flies can be obtained. The long period necessary to perform an entire viral cycle (about 60 hours) is a result of the restrictive action on late viral functions at 20 degrees C of the Oe allele of the ref(3)O host gene present in the standard flies.