Defining the borders of the chicken proto-fps gene, a precursor of Fujinami sarcoma virus

Evidence that retroviral transduction is mediated by DNA not by RNA

Retroviral transduction of cellular nucleic acid sequences requires illegitimate RNA or DNA recombination. To test a model that postulates transduction via efficient illegitimate recombination during reverse transcription of viral and cellular RNAs, we have measured the ability of Harvey sarcoma viruses (HaSVs) with artificial 3' termini to recover a retroviral 3' terminus from helper Moloney virus (MoV) by illegitimate and homologous recombination. For this purpose, mouse NIH 3T3 cells were transformed with Harvey proviruses and then superinfected with MoV. The proviruses lacked the 3' long terminal repeat and an untranscribed region of the 5' long terminal repeat to prevent virus regeneration from input provirus. Only 0-11 focus-forming units of HaSV were generated upon MoV superinfection of 3 x 10(6) cells transformed by Harvey proviruses with MoV-unrelated termini. This low frequency is consistent with illegitimate DNA recombination via random Moloney provirus integration 3' of the transforming viral ras gene in the 10(6)-kilobase mouse genome. When portions of murine viral envelope (env) genes were attached 3' of ras, 10(2)-10(5) focus-forming units of HaSV were generated, depending on the extent of homology with env of MoV. These recombinants all contained HaSV-specific sequences 5' and MoV-specific sequences 3' of the common env homology. They were probably generated by recombination during reverse transcription rather than by recombination among either input or secondary proviruses, since (i) the yield of recombinants was reduced by a factor of 10 when the env sequence was flanked by splice signals and (ii) HaSV RNAs without retroviral 3' termini would be inadequate templates for provirus synthesis. We conclude that there is no efficient illegitimate recombination in retroviruses. In view of known precedents of illegitimate DNA recombination, the structure of known viral onc genes, and our evidence for illegitimate DNA recombination via provirus integration, we favor the DNA model of transduction over the RNA model.

Avian sarcoma viruses

Twelve independent isolates of avian sarcoma viruses (ASVs) can be divided into four groups according to the transforming genes harbored in the viral genomes. The first group is represented by viruses containing the transforming sequence, src, inserted in the viral genome as an independent gene; the other three groups of viruses contain transforming genes fps, yes or ros fused to various length of the truncated structural gene gag. These transforming sequences have been obtained by avian retroviruses from chicken cellular DNA by recombination. The src-containing viruses code for an independent polypeptide, p60src; and the representative fps, yes and ros-containing ASVs code for P140/130gag-fps, P90gag-yes and P68gag-ros fusion polypeptides respectively. All of these transforming proteins are associated with the tyrosine-specific protein kinase activity capable of autophosphorylation and phosphorylating certain foreign substrates. p60src and P68gag-ros are integral cellular membrane proteins and P140/130gag-fps and P90gag-yes are only loosely associated with the plasma membrane. Cells transformed by ASVs contain many newly phosphorylated proteins and in most cases have an elevated level of total phosphotyrosine. However, no definitive correlation between phosphorylation of a particular substrate and transformation has been established except that a marked increase of the tyrosine phosphorylation of a 34,000 to 37,000 dalton protein is observed in most ASV transformed cells. The kinase activity of ASV transforming proteins appears to be essential, but not sufficient for transformation. The N-terminal domain of p60src required for myristylation and membrane binding is also crucial for transformation. By contrast, the gag portion of the FSV P130gag-fps is dispensable for in vitro transformation and removal of it has only an attenuating effect on in vivo tumorigenicity. The products of cellular src, fps and yes proto-oncogenes have been identified and shown to also have tyrosine-specific protein kinase activity. The transforming potential of c-src and c-fps has been studied and shown that certain structural changes are necessary to convert them into transforming genes. Among the cellular proto-oncogenes related to the four ASV transforming genes, c-ros most likely codes for a growth factor receptor-like molecule. It is possible that the oncogene products of ASVs act through certain membrane receptor(s) or enzyme(s), such as protein kinase C, in the process of cell transformation.

Cancer genes generated by rare chromosomal rearrangements rather than activation of oncogenes

The 20 known transforming onc genes of retroviruses are defined by sequences that are transduced from cellular genes, termed proto-oncogenes or cellular oncogenes. Based on these sequences, viral onc genes have been postulated to be transduced cellular cancer genes and proto-onc genes have been postulated to be latent cancer genes that can be activated from within the cell to cause virus-negative tumors. The hypothesis is popular because it promises direct access to cellular cancer genes. However, the existence of latent cancer genes presents a paradox since such genes are clearly undesirable. The hypothesis predicts (i) that viral onc genes and proto-onc genes are isogenic, (ii) that expression of proto-onc genes induces tumors, (iii) that activated proto-onc genes transform diploid cells upon transfection, like viral onc genes, and (iv) that diploid tumors exist that differ from normal cells only in transcriptionally or mutationally activated proto-onc genes. As yet, none of these predictions is confirmed. Moreover, the probability of spontaneous transformation in vivo is at least 10(9) times lower than predicted from the mechanisms thought to activate proto-onc genes. Therefore the hypothesis, that proto-onc genes are latent cellular oncogenes, appears to be an overinterpretation of sequence homology to structural and functional homology with viral onc genes. Here it is proposed that only rare truncations and illegitimate recombinations that alter the germline configuration of cellular genes, generate viral and possibly cellular cancer genes. The clonal chromosome abnormalities that are consistently found in tumor cells are microscopic evidence for rearrangements that may generate cancer genes. The clonality indicates that the tumors are initiated with, and possibly by, these abnormalities as predicted by Boveri in 1914 (Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren, Jena, Fischer).

Cancer genes: rare recombinants instead of activated oncogenes (a review)

The 20 known transforming (onc) genes of retroviruses are defined by sequences that are transduced from cellular genes termed protooncogenes or cellular oncogenes. Based on these sequences, viral onc genes have been postulated to be transduced cellular cancer genes, and proto-onc genes have been postulated to be latent cancer genes that can be activated from within the cell to cause virus-negative tumors. The hypothesis is popular because it promises direct access to cellular cancer genes. However, the existence of latent cancer genes presents a paradox, since such genes are clearly undesirable. The hypothesis predicts that viral onc genes and proto-onc genes are isogenic; that expression of proto-onc genes induces tumors; that activated proto-onc genes transform diploid cells upon transfection, like viral onc genes; and that diploid tumors exist. As yet, none of these predictions is confirmed. Instead: Structural comparisons between viral onc genes, essential retroviral genes, and proto-onc genes show that all viral onc genes are indeed new genes, rather than transduced cellular cancer genes. They are recombinants put together from truncated viral and truncated proto-onc genes. Proto-onc genes are frequently expressed in normal cells. To date, not one activated proto-onc gene has been isolated that transforms diploid cells. Above all, no diploid tumors with activated proto-onc genes have been found. Moreover, the probability of spontaneous transformation in vivo is at least 10(9) times lower than predicted from the mechanisms thought to activate proto-onc genes. Therefore, the hypothesis that proto-onc genes are latent cellular oncogenes appears to be an overinterpretation of sequence homology to structural and functional homology with viral onc genes. Here it is proposed that only rare truncations and illegitimate recombinations that alter the germ-line configuration of cellular genes generate viral and possibly cellular cancer genes. The clonal chromosome abnormalities that are consistently found in tumor cells are microscopic evidence for rearrangements that may generate cancer genes. The clonality indicates that the tumors are initiated with, and possibly by, these abnormalities, as predicted by Boveri in 1914.

Harvey ras genes transform without mutant codons, apparently activated by truncation of a 5' exon (exon -1)

The hypothesis is tested that the ras gene of Harvey sarcoma virus (Ha-SV) and the proto-ras DNAs from certain tumor cells derive transforming function from specific codons in which they differ from normal proto-ras genes. Molecularly cloned Harvey proviral vectors carrying viral ras, normal rat proto-ras, and recombinant ras genes in which the virus-specific ras codons 12 and 59 were replaced by proto-ras equivalents each transformed aneuploid mouse 3T3 cells after latent periods that ranged from 4 to 10 days. Viruses with or without virus-specific ras codons all transformed diploid rat cells in 3-5 days equally well. However, in the absence of virus replication, mutant codons were beneficial for transforming function. Deletion of non-ras regions of Ha-SV did not affect transforming function. We conclude that specific ras codons are not necessary for transforming function. Comparisons of the ras sequences of Ha-SV, BALB SV, and Rasheed SV with sequences of proto-ras genes from rat and man revealed an upstream proto-ras exon, termed exon -1. The 3' end of this exon is present in all three viruses and in a ras pseudogene of the rat. Since ras genes transform without mutation and since exon -1 is truncated in viral ras genes and all transforming proto-ras DNAs of the Harvey and the Kirsten ras family, we propose that ras genes are activated by truncation of exon -1 either via viral transduction or artificially via cloning and transfection. The proposal implies that untruncated proto-ras genes with point mutations may not be cellular cancer genes.